New Smurf Mini Mafia - Page 10

On February 11 2016 09:32 keanuisgod wrote:






I'm not sure if posts like this show a poor lost townie out of his depth, or scum faking being "innocent and naive" to forgo posting actual content.

I'll just be straight with my suspicions here:

Bhaal came to the thread roleplaying in a fun and seemingly confident manner, but as soon as he stopped roleplaying he turned into a mess:



This post is ripe with excuses ("I sometimes can't read into properly when I'm tired") and all the smileys lke ">.<" and ">.>" which serve little purpose other than appear like an innocent playful townie. It also shows an unnatural fear to respond a normal question saita asked him (like saita asked everybody). The reaction is odd and scummy





The response he gave saita about why he pressured me doesn't seem to make much sense with what he actually posted. When I noticed his question, I got the feeling he wanted me to post some content and reads. His response seemed to confirm this, with the "Fair enough Mortal" (making it seem he was satisfied with my response).
But later in his response to saita he says he only asked my for my reads so he could piggybank them since he "can't read properly when he's tired"?
But what about "being the analytical God when it comes to find scum"? Was that a lie that only existed in "role-playing-mode"?

I said previously this scumread was flimsy BECAUSE of the roleplay. Maybe, for some reason, town Bhaal got all confident and funny and stuff and acted like that, but when he stopped roleplaying the situation overwhelmed him or something and this is how he normally plays.

But it still feels weird. He keeps apologizing (here) and just throwing casual "cheery" posts. Yet he has actually to post any actual content at all, even when asked by many people.

Might as well start somewhere, fuck it

#Vote: Bhaal LoM

P.S: I'm not really confident in this read, mainly because I have a gut feeling in my stomach that Bhaal is just clueless town and this is all a misunderstanding, and also I'm a little pussy and I don't want to commit to a 100% scum read this early into the day. But whatever, we have to start somewhere and this is the best lead I've got, after the 3 inactive dudes

On February 11 2016 10:10 keanuisgod wrote:
Yeah, no, I'm keeping my vote here.
You may disagree with my decision of placing a vote based on what I said, but it does not mean it comes from scum

On February 11 2016 10:27 saitamaofonepunch wrote:
If your read is strong enough to vote on, and bhaal has not defended any of those points, why are you leaving yourself a bunch of back doors?

Concerns before a vote are totally ok.

Concerns in the case are just what scum do.

On February 11 2016 10:29 saitamaofonepunch wrote:
In other words, due to your creating outs for yourself, you look like an opportunistic scum that just found the first low hanging fruit of the day.

On February 11 2016 08:37 Bhaal LoM wrote:
I am quite sad that no one is around when I am around

On February 11 2016 10:40 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:
I'm voting with keanu. His case on bhaal isn't bad, and it's certainly not scummy.
I find his confession that he's not certain in the read simply honest.

Bhaal is gone all day, says he has to catch up, then has nothing to say about anything except when prompted by keanu.

He wants someone to interact with him because he is having trouble generating his own content.

On February 11 2016 10:29 saitamaofonepunch wrote:
In other words, due to your creating outs for yourself, you look like an opportunistic scum that just found the first low hanging fruit of the day.

On February 11 2016 10:43 keanuisgod wrote:


What about Warty?

On February 11 2016 10:03 saitamaofonepunch wrote:




Scummiest thing in the thread by far IMO. If you aren't confident in a read, vote elsewhere or don't vote. No one said you have to vote just because I am deciding I like to vote inactives. Which comes from scum more often than from town.

Wooooooo, wifom konga baby

On February 11 2016 10:37 keanuisgod wrote:


I was trying to hold on to these suspicions until Bhaal actually posted something, but with his refusal to do so I couldn't really wait. The "concerns" I post in the case are these concerns that made me wary of posting anything before.

Anyways, call them "backdoors" if you want, but those are my actual concerns regarding Bhaal's alignment, which may disappear or grow stronger depending on what happens from now on. Basically my head tells me Bhaal is scum but my heart tells me he's town.
I feel the suspicions were enough to post them, and I placed a vote to get the ball rolling since votes are what count over here.
No one said I "had to vote", but nobody said I had to "not" vote either.



I don't care how it looks. I care about transparency in motivations and actions, and I won't hide them just because they may feel "scummy". In the end that's what will actually matter when trying to make people trust that I'm town and listen to what I have to say

On February 11 2016 10:44 nnn_thekushmountains wrote:


Do you think scum would be that overt about not being confident in his read. Especially a read like that which has been cased out?
And what prevents town from being unsure of their day 1 read?