| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On November 13 2015 23:39 kitaman27 wrote: You're really starting to become difficult to deal with, which is problematic considering that I want to town read you. Please lets not go through another Aperature  Like I told Rels, ignore post #2801. I'm reading the thread and 2 filters at once. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 13 2015 23:42 sicklucker wrote: Because voting yes day 1 did not line up with your reads... But it does according to this chart made during D1: two townreads + 1 nullread. Can't remember if it was made before the nomination ended or after but it was around that period. So I don't see anything that would make you go "OH RELS VOTING YES WOULD SCREW YOU HERE" in that chart | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
| ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 13 2015 23:46 sicklucker wrote: Like i dont really remember or care what your day one reads were since your probably scum and im never putting you on a team anyway in 1000 years. All i remembered was you scum read me ryan or both at the end and had no excuse to vote yes. It was also kind of expected to pass anyway Yeah so: - you dug (I suppose it's spelled like that ?) out a chart to prove your point - the chart proved the opposite (that I could vote YES if I wanted to) - you posted your theory anyway It doens't make sense. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/497443-resistance-v-section-31?page=51#1018 so rayn was the other saying Kita didn't have concrete reads, need to match up with Personality when I return. Now I'm off. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On November 13 2015 22:27 Half the Sky wrote: These are actually really good posts. (#2714/2715) Why? They aren't even true statements. He says I'm providing scum reads instead of town reads. Well first off, I'm directly stated that I think rayn and Rels are town and you can easily infer that I want myself nominated so there is no way to interpret that otherwise. When shockeyy was around, I directly addressed him three different times (requesting the removal of Vivax, questioning the inclusion of Artanis, and suggesting alternatives to form my prefered team). I've expressed multiple times my read on Rels. Secondly, of course I'm looking for scum reads. How is this possibly a bad thing? You can't have one without the other at this point. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On November 13 2015 16:55 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Wait, I answered all your questions, you apparently didn't have any more yet now I'm basically confirmed scum to you? Explain yourself.
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
| ||
|
JudgeJudy
188 Posts
On November 12 2015 02:43 Rels wrote: Will have to reread Kita in case of failure, but assuming it confirms my townread on him, I think the team have to be one of this: Arta / rayn / Vivax Arta / rayn / Xata Arta / Xata / Vivax Basically, just don't ever pick those four players and we're OK. Rels, I'm trying to follow your read between SL and Xata. On post number #2147, you state that my analysis on SL is good, inferring that you still have a mafia read on him. However, you list rayn and xata as the individuals on your "do not pick" list. Now you seem to be back on the antagonize SL side of things based on your "BUSTED" post. Could you explain your thought process a bit more? | ||
|
Vivax
21788 Posts
GET DUNKED | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On November 14 2015 01:03 JudgeJudy wrote: Rels, I'm trying to follow your read between SL and Xata. On post number #2147, you state that my analysis on SL is good, inferring that you still have a mafia read on him. However, you list rayn and xata as the individuals on your "do not pick" list. Now you seem to be back on the antagonize SL side of things based on your "BUSTED" post. Could you explain your thought process a bit more? Gotta get in my daily mis-post. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On November 14 2015 01:03 Vivax wrote: While thinking to myself that kita is probably 100 % scum for the 100th time, I also realized that SL went super aggressive on me with his shitty push about me voting yes to the team, but he didn't bitch about kita doing the same thing while scumreading my slot, yet they both keep bringing up how they can't be in a team together. GET DUNKED I've responded to you about Rels like you asked and posted about Artanis. What do you have to say about those? Also, based on this post does that confirm that you've read my filter regarding my interaction with SL and still hold the conclusion that we are buddies? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On November 13 2015 16:57 Artanis[Xp] wrote: There really are too many scum players this game. On November 13 2015 19:20 ShoCkeyy wrote: ^ So your nomination term finally comes up, you forget about the deadline, and then when you return you can't even be bothered to post the team you intended to nomination....? | ||
|
Vivax
21788 Posts
On November 13 2015 09:03 kitaman27 wrote: He has the opportunity to align himself against Xata, but posts the filter length analysis that makes Xata look pretty decent. If I remember correctly, this was posted prior to the mission one failure meaning that he was making a player who is up for consideration look decent, while lessening his own chance of inclusion. This doesn't apply if it is Xata + Rels as the spy, but I thought the other stuff outweighed the exception. I snipped out the parts I didn't find as interesting as this one. Your argument revolves just around him aligning himself in a certain way to a player, but you totally ignore the fact he decided to scumread me instead of Xata early in the game and took away his chances of pushing suspicion on him in case of mission fail. So the only thing he could have done was to keep his read consistent and try to clear Xata, your argument here is NAI. You can do better than that, but you aren't town  .Other point: You call himself aligning against Xata an "opportunity". Why? What would be the benefit in that situation? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On November 13 2015 14:59 Coagulation wrote: your just assuming a whole bunch of stupid bullshit for no reason. Im here reading the game and Im perfectly capable of playing /hosting resistance and our making decisions without a fucking coin flip. So do you've got anything for us yet? | ||
|
Vivax
21788 Posts
On November 14 2015 01:06 kitaman27 wrote: I've responded to you about Rels like you asked and posted about Artanis. What do you have to say about those? Also, based on this post does that confirm that you've read my filter regarding my interaction with SL and still hold the conclusion that we are buddies? I didn't read your interaction much yet, but I noticed the lack of interaction between you and him when you voted yes on a team I was on, yet he should have been much more worked up about you instead of me if you were having a beef with each other earlier in the game already. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On November 14 2015 01:17 Vivax wrote: I didn't read your interaction much yet, but I noticed the lack of interaction between you and him when you voted yes on a team I was on, yet he should have been much more worked up about you instead of me if you were having a beef with each other earlier in the game already. Well when do you plan to? It would take probably five minutes to do a control + F for whenever I mention his name and then come back to the thread with a conclusion. Considering that is the scum team that you seem to be set in stone with, then it really should be a priority over anything else. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 14 2015 01:03 JudgeJudy wrote: Rels, I'm trying to follow your read between SL and Xata. On post number #2147, you state that my analysis on SL is good, inferring that you still have a mafia read on him. However, you list rayn and xata as the individuals on your "do not pick" list. Now you seem to be back on the antagonize SL side of things based on your "BUSTED" post. Could you explain your thought process a bit more? Sure, mysterious non-player that post here sometimes. That post is part of the series of post I made with the assumption that SL was town for his NO vote. Here is the first post of that series: On November 12 2015 02:26 Rels wrote: Alright so either the game is won, or the team is infected. Let's go with the infiltrated theory since we won in the other case anyway. I know why SL voted NO, but I think Arta didn't scumread anyone before deadline. I need to check that. Then when I came back to the thread I found a lot of suspicious things from SL. Here are some posts from that time: On November 12 2015 20:44 Rels wrote: Man you posted this exact post in the last game (Newbie XVI) where you were town; in that game, that post made me feel you were scum because you had this exact post in the previous game (Drams) where you were scum. I have the feeling you posted this just to show me "look I'm town, you made that mistake last game where you thought I was scum". Who is everyone ? Only counting Arta HTS and you where I am. I'm catching up though, did anyone else scumread me ? On November 12 2015 20:50 Rels wrote: Yes I can. More than that; I think it's scum indicative IF the consensus if the team will pass whatever someone's vote is AND the vote doen't match up with the read previous to the vote. Now Arta wasn't as clear cut as I thought, but only because he was super non commital. I really don't like how you didn't say much before the vote deadline when the consensus was the team will pass; and now you're like "WHAT GUYS WHY DID YOU ALL VOTE YES". If you were that sure the team would fail, you would have fought BEFORE the vote. On November 12 2015 20:56 Rels wrote: Before the fail mission: "yeah Rels is super right, for example in suggesting I was the fall guy in the first mission: he should be town". After the fail mission: "oh Rels is too right to be town this game, he's not that good". This is not an explanation. Why are you townreading HTS ? For a dumbtell you thought couldn't come from scum right ? Anything else ? On November 12 2015 21:03 Rels wrote: 'cause I thought rayn was town and you were more likely scum than Xata. After the vote your NO vote looked townie, but the way you're acting right now is super scummy. WHAT YOU ARE SAYING MAKES NO SENSE BECAUSE: The only difference waiting would have made would be switch Superbia for Shockey. ATM I thought the team was very likely to be HTS / Arta / you or Xata. So what you are accusing me of doing is not logical. The bolded line resumes my progression to scum!Xata after SL voted NO, then to scum!SL when I found he was being scummy. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games summit1g13150 hungrybox632 WinterStarcraft589 Happy487 singsing131 JuggernautJason23 SteadfastSC20 SortOf4 Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War |
|
PiG Sty Festival
herO vs Rogue
ByuN vs SKillous
Sparkling Tuna Cup
BSL Nation Wars 2
Online Event
AI Arena 2025 Tournament
Replay Cast
The PondCast
Replay Cast
SOOP StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
