Newbie Student Mafia XVII: Fullmetal Edition - Page 20
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On November 16 2015 08:30 disformation wrote: Fair enough. Since I haven't played with the shining much, I am not that confident I will find amazing things in those old games. But I did try and pressure him in NSM9 a few times because I felt like he wasn't doing much. He was town in this game. So I am already not too sure about the meta read. His filter length in "Battle of the Drams", where he was mafia, is pretty similar to the one in NSM9, too... Well, back to this game: As stated before I have a town lean on geript for driving the game and prodding ppl into explaining stuff. Trfel.. kinda strange reaction to VE's uh... lets call it a poke. Not sure if his knee jerk reaction is maffay or town motivated. FF: null. Only reaction so far is to me having his name in a post. Lurking? ritoky: Getting an investigating/engaging/driving the thread feel, so town lean. The early discussion stuff with Eversince, Farah, The Shining and VE was a bit strange to me, since I read the early posts by Eversince and Farah as jokes to get stuff going (well: mission accomplished). Not sure about VE, but both ppl I have as a town lean, say he is town based on meta, so I'll probably be a lazy cunt and sheep them (for now). yo geript, what do you think of the bolded? like...why was it included? | ||
![]()
Fecalfeast
Canada11355 Posts
| ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On November 16 2015 14:39 Fecalfeast wrote: i'm here but i'm still palying GTA so don't ecpect me to read ![]() | ||
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
On November 16 2015 14:32 ritoky wrote: idk about that shining post you quoted there breshke. you're like "second paragraph is whatever"; the second paragraph is an excuse wrapped in self-aware meta. no bueno. plus i don't think he is nitpicky....i think he doesn't care about his reads, he is just giving them out of his ass. Ehh. I disagree . Like the second paragraph didn't need to be there geript specifically was saying he wasn't pinging him out because of how much he was posting like he specifically said he wasn't. So it isn't self aware meta nor was it an excuse because geript wasn't saying he was scum because he was posting a lot. That's why i still liked that post because i just ignored the second paragraph. You could stretch it and say he was being overly defensive there but i think that would be dumb. What other than the trefel read don't you like from him? I know im getting into this defending someone when i shouldnt be territory but meh why stop now. | ||
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
On November 16 2015 14:37 ritoky wrote: yo geript, what do you think of the bolded? like...why was it included? I'm 99% sure I've coached disinformation. I just can't remember if it was as scum or town. I really want to look at that before I give a full read on him. The bolded doesn't terribly mark me either way other than the question mark. He's made what would seem to be questions out of statements a few times. He kinda bugs me a bit but without going back to see how he thinks it's hard to say if it's scummy or just bad play. Right now. 7/7---VE/Ritoky 6/7-- 5/7-- 4.5/7--Farah 4/7--everyone else 3.5/7--Breshke 3/7--Disinfo 2/7--Trfel 1/7--Moosy I'm seriously like 99% sure moosy is scum. | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On November 16 2015 14:53 Breshke wrote: Ritoky i have work in an hour just thought you would want to know xoxo thanks babe, i just took a shower, thought you would want to know | ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On November 16 2015 14:52 Breshke wrote: Ehh. I disagree . Like the second paragraph didn't need to be there geript specifically was saying he wasn't pinging him out because of how much he was posting like he specifically said he wasn't. So it isn't self aware meta nor was it an excuse because geript wasn't saying he was scum because he was posting a lot. That's why i still liked that post because i just ignored the second paragraph. You could stretch it and say he was being overly defensive there but i think that would be dumb. What other than the trefel read don't you like from him? I know im getting into this defending someone when i shouldnt be territory but meh why stop now. no the 2nd paragraph is a straight up excuse. "hai gais, not playing for next 2 days". there's no teeth to his only other read that is basically all else he has talked about. his point is this: eversince you say farrah is playing 180 of previous game. in previous game farrah was town. why are you TRing someone who is playing opposite of what your meta should tell you? which is an okay enough point for this stage of day 1, but there's no real bite to it. he doesn't even go to the point of calling ever mafia or giving a firm read on it. he says he is "calling suspicious things suspicious" or "gathering information by questioning both people". like what the hell even is that? i feel like if he really believed in that read as much as he has talked about it then there should be some declarative statement about it. i don't remember finding one when i looked. tl;dr talks about 1 thing mostly. all bluster no muster | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On November 16 2015 15:34 geript wrote: It's meta mostly but I'm really sure of it. tonal meta or content meta? | ||
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On November 16 2015 15:34 geript wrote: It's meta mostly but I'm really sure of it. meh, meta is a very weak way of reading me. Especially nowadays where I'm playing most of my games on other sites. I still want an answer to my question though geript. How are you? | ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
I'll explain it more after work tomorrow. | ||
| ||