|
Like you say "GB is scum".
I say "no he is not".
It is literally your responsibility to prove he is mafia, because if you don't do that, then he is probably not mafia.
It's my responsibility to prove three other people are mafia. My responsibility is NOT to prove GlowingBear is not mafia, at least until you have a case on the table.
I am not wasting time on things i don't find important. I think we are lynching scum atm, and that's what is important to me. Noone has presented any other case. I don't care to do that now, before the lynch, because apparently some other people can't give a shit to play the game at all, so i don't jsut care right now. I have better things to do.
If someone cares, enough, to make a case on someone else than coolTLname, feel free to do it. Then i can discuss it and care more.
|
Day 2 Recall List
coolTLname (7): raynpelikoneet, sicklucker, GlowingBear, MoosyDoosy, The Shining, Rels, LightningStrike
Not listing (4): rsoultin, Trfel, coolTLname, Damdred
Tonight, I will be banning coolTLname permanently for providing us with atrocious whiskey.
Day 2 ends in at 22:00 GMT (+00:00).
The spirits recall list is here.
Only votes on this list will be counted.
Please mind the deadline as failure to vote will result in a modkill.
|
On October 03 2015 08:51 Damdred wrote:
No rayn you are being willfully obtuse when a town read is asking you why they are wrong what is your,motivation keeping relevant information from me.
I can present the information on N2 aswell as here and right now i just don't care.
|
|
|
Like i am sorry Damdred, it's not my intention to ignore you or anything like that.
I am just genuinely disinterested in the game right now because of certain people's unwillingness to play, and on top of that those same people throw shit at me. I would like if some other people made cases and put effort to the game aswell otherwise than yelling "tone tone". And i am not talking about all of the people in this game.
|
okay, rayn, talk about reads time try to keep the bm down please
your main issue with cool is he said he had 7 votes on him before scott claimed...is there anything else?
i've read his filter, and apart from him claiming to have completely read the thread but still getting that detail wrong, i'm not really seeing whatever it is y'all are seeing in his play that has you guys thinking he's lock scum
point me to what i'm missing without demanding that i read your filter? you're on the list but i'm multi-tasking and i'd appreciate your cooperation
|
can we stop talking about me. pick ppl who u think are mafia and assume im town , sometimes
|
On October 03 2015 09:14 coolTLname wrote:
can we stop talking about me. pick ppl who u think are mafia and assume im town , sometimes
let me work, dude. i don't exclude anyone
|
On October 03 2015 09:12 rsoultin wrote:
okay, rayn, talk about reads time try to keep the bm down please
your main issue with cool is he said he had 7 votes on him before scott claimed...is there anything else?
i've read his filter, and apart from him claiming to have completely read the thread but still getting that detail wrong, i'm not really seeing whatever it is y'all are seeing in his play that has you guys thinking he's lock scum
point me to what i'm missing without demanding that i read your filter? you're on the list but i'm multi-tasking and i'd appreciate your cooperation
My case is very simple:
On October 02 2015 11:08 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Like, again, for ANYONE who is willing to do so i am telling this;
You can take any argument coolTLname has ever provided against me in this game and i will prove it is either a lie or him not reading the thread. If i can't do that, you can lynch me, hell i will even vote for myself. And do not twist shit if you are gonna argue with me about this.
So, any takers? If not, can we just lynch him?
For someone who praises that people who:
1) lie
2) do not read the thread
are mafia, the accusation i provide here is pretty damning. I am not going to quote basically every single post in filter from the first 72 hours of the game. If you want to ask about some of them / all of them, do that.
Right now i have had zero questions about this (this is including coolTLname himself....).
I hope people do not ask stupid questions if they do, and if they do, i assume - as always - that they have read the thread.
|
whatever im not gonna try to defend myself for another 100 pages of rayn spam. Cya
|
On October 02 2015 03:56 coolTLname wrote:Show nested quote +On October 01 2015 18:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
... furthermore if he read the voting thread, he is jsut blantantly lying.
There was NEVER ever time when coolname/scott/rsoultin were "main lynch targets". this is just a lie, rayn isn't reading thread, im sure u all remember when rsoultin and trfel had 4 votes a piece. Show nested quote +On October 01 2015 18:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Like i know LS is not the most logical guy, but he gets his stuff somewhere, everyone does. What he says doesn't make any sense. The conclusion definitely did not come from reading the voting thread, that is 100% obvious. If he had skimmed the thread he would know that (1) GB is actually one of the main lynch targets, (2) rsoultin is not, (3) coolTLname is being voted BECAUSE scott claimed. Somehow he conveniently misses those KEY things that lead to the situation we were at the time. I can't see this being possible unless you are like the most unfortunate person on the planet when you skim through the thread. i was not voted because scott claimed, he claimed at the last minute after i had already a lot of votes - 7. GB never had more votes than rsoultin, by the way. Show nested quote +On October 01 2015 19:39 raynpelikoneet wrote:mmm like here is why this coolnamedude is scum; 1) says he wants to be lynched over scott -> tries to vote for scott 2) says i am mafia for things that do not make me mafia, calls me a liar -> either just straight out lying or didn't read the thread.. but -> says people who do not read the thread are mafia..  3) calls me/you mafia because we are "cluttering the thread for posting so much" -> says rsoultin is town because she has the biggest filter in the game (yes that is literally his only reason he has managed to ACTUALLY provide). My votes did not even count because i posted them too late, and i've posted much more reasons for why rsoultin is town, the biggest being that she did not vote up Trfel when the votes were tied, stating him as town and just accepting her own lynch. Show nested quote +On October 01 2015 12:47 coolTLname wrote:On October 01 2015 12:42 Trfel wrote:
I could also probably lynch coolTLname for voting at End of Day and then not posting until 39 minutes later. And then saying that he wanted to get lynched after voting for survival. Like i said earlier, i was busy. To be elaborate i had a therapy session with my dad during the last hour of the game. I actually checked during the session and it seemed clear i would be lynched , until scott revealed at the last minute. I didn't really know what the votes or anything that was going on , but scott seemed suspicious enough to me so i tried to mobile vote him. Unfortunately i was lagging and i cant text for shit, which made my votes not even count, because i missed the deadline, btw. I've caught rayn not really knowing what happening in the thread multiple times now.
alright, rayn, let's break this down really quick
1. he says you're lying because trfel and i were lynch targets. in context you clearly meant that there was no time where scott, cool and i were the main wagons at the same time, however you post doesn't actually say that. this looks like a simple misunderstanding
2. this is certainly untrue. it's also easily explained by seeing the votes after the fact with no timestamps, btw
3. he really did never say anything about wanting to be voted down over scott, so yes, you got that wrong and that would appear to be a lie to him
we all make mistakes of memory/misread things from time to time? just because he believed those were lies, that makes his mistakes make him mafia? i'd say both of you are just wrong on that because i think if you read any player's filter in this game they've misread things and we can't all be scum
are there any "lies" he told that weren't in this post here?
|
Every single post where he writes anything about me, as i said.
|
1. he says you're lying because trfel and i were lynch targets. in context you clearly meant that there was no time where scott, cool and i were the main wagons at the same time, however you post doesn't actually say that. this looks like a simple misunderstanding
Don't be an idiot. The conversation i had, where the post is taken, is ALL ABOUT "scott, cool and rsoultin being the main wagons".... -> not reading the thread.
2. this is certainly untrue. it's also easily explained by seeing the votes after the fact with no timestamps, btw
pretty clear shit.
3. he really did never say anything about wanting to be voted down over scott, so yes, you got that wrong and that would appear to be a lie to him
oh but he did.
|
On October 03 2015 09:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +1. he says you're lying because trfel and i were lynch targets. in context you clearly meant that there was no time where scott, cool and i were the main wagons at the same time, however you post doesn't actually say that. this looks like a simple misunderstanding Don't be an idiot. The conversation i had, where the post is taken, is ALL ABOUT "scott, cool and rsoultin being the main wagons".... -> not reading the thread. Show nested quote +2. this is certainly untrue. it's also easily explained by seeing the votes after the fact with no timestamps, btw pretty clear shit. Show nested quote +3. he really did never say anything about wanting to be voted down over scott, so yes, you got that wrong and that would appear to be a lie to him oh but he did.
i just read his filter rayn @.@ from top to bottom
quote it or let it go
|
please don't call me an idiot. when you're not explicit with what you're saying, rayn, it can be misunderstood and it looks like that's what happened. why would he zero in on that as scum knowing what you meant, either? scum's not going to say the sky is red and expect people to believe them lol ><
|
On October 03 2015 09:40 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2015 09:37 raynpelikoneet wrote:1. he says you're lying because trfel and i were lynch targets. in context you clearly meant that there was no time where scott, cool and i were the main wagons at the same time, however you post doesn't actually say that. this looks like a simple misunderstanding Don't be an idiot. The conversation i had, where the post is taken, is ALL ABOUT "scott, cool and rsoultin being the main wagons".... -> not reading the thread. 2. this is certainly untrue. it's also easily explained by seeing the votes after the fact with no timestamps, btw pretty clear shit. 3. he really did never say anything about wanting to be voted down over scott, so yes, you got that wrong and that would appear to be a lie to him oh but he did. i just read his filter rayn @.@ from top to bottom quote it or let it go
He says he wanted to get lynced. That's what he said. Later on he says he didn't want to get lynched over scott (who was the opposing wagon) because he suspected scott. But he never suspected scott. In fact he suspected ME the most, and i was pushing scott's lynch ALL D1. So i find it really hard to believe what he is saying.
|
On October 03 2015 09:41 rsoultin wrote:
please don't call me an idiot. when you're not explicit with what you're saying, rayn, it can be misunderstood and it looks like that's what happened. why would he zero in on that as scum knowing what you meant, either? scum's not going to say the sky is red and expect people to believe them lol ><
Ge read the conversation where the post is taken from.
If you have read the conversation, you have no doubts what i am talking about.
The post is just taken out of context for no reason.
|
On October 03 2015 09:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2015 09:41 rsoultin wrote:
please don't call me an idiot. when you're not explicit with what you're saying, rayn, it can be misunderstood and it looks like that's what happened. why would he zero in on that as scum knowing what you meant, either? scum's not going to say the sky is red and expect people to believe them lol >< Ge read the conversation where the post is taken from. If you have read the conversation, you have no doubts what i am talking about. The post is just taken out of context for no reason.
no i do understand what you were talking about? but i don't see why scum does that, is the point, rayn. even if he is scum, he still probably misunderstood
|
On October 03 2015 09:51 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On October 03 2015 09:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:On October 03 2015 09:41 rsoultin wrote:
please don't call me an idiot. when you're not explicit with what you're saying, rayn, it can be misunderstood and it looks like that's what happened. why would he zero in on that as scum knowing what you meant, either? scum's not going to say the sky is red and expect people to believe them lol >< Ge read the conversation where the post is taken from. If you have read the conversation, you have no doubts what i am talking about. The post is just taken out of context for no reason. no i do understand what you were talking about? but i don't see why scum does that, is the point, rayn. even if he is scum, he still probably misunderstood
Well he himself claims "mafia are people who don't read the thread".
|
Like i can understand a mistake or two.
But when EVERY SINGLE THING HE SAYS is a "mistake", that's too much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
