|
On October 13 2015 01:13 The Shining wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 22:50 MoosyDoosy wrote:
If Shining maintained a modicum of sanity and tried to explain the pile of contradictions he made I would understand but all he did was snap. Only reason why he would do that is if he realizes he made a heap of posts that made no sense with each other. This misrepresentation is trash and you're scum. I did explain my "pile of contradictions" multiple times. That's why marv could so easily understand where I was coming from. Instead you just honed in on the "it doesnt make sense, blah blah blah" and completely disregarded the multiple times I said I think FF could be scum and my reasoning for WHY Marv could be a better lynch. And would you look at that, he's no longer a good lynch because he finally started playing. I'd look to see more but it's a good start.
No, I did listen. You think that your read on FF is so good while you admitted that it was weakened by OO's and FF's defense. On top of that, you thought that marv was a better lynch. But you STILL didn't vote for him in that situation. This doesn't make sense whatsoever.
marv I'm going to read the past two games I've been with you in and check your meta. Also, saying that I'm clever and fairly intuitive from the last game is false because I had my reads all wrong. cheers.
|
Taking the leap, I'm wrong on Obvious, what's wrong with a Gum, Shining and Marv mafia scum group?
|
Blazinghand
United States25552 Posts
marvellosity has been warned for the spam on page 42. it's fine to double post, triple post, etc since you can't edit, but let's try to not fill entire pages on our own. A lot of times, you can wait and think for a moment and consolidate posts. to keep the game legible.
|
marv, try to follow me.
If Shining admits that his case on FF is weakened and thinks that marv is a better lynch, why would he not vote for marv?
Also, why would Shining say that marv is a better lynch, but then later try to retract it and say that his points on FF are better?
Also, why would Shining make 5 posts in a row that are super waffly and leave him open to two available wagons?
|
Hmm, I gots' to run for class. No love for the apostrophe! (I'll keep usin' it liberally.Why did said people get such a blushin' over it?)
|
On October 13 2015 02:10 Eversince wrote:
Taking the leap, I'm wrong on Obvious, what's wrong with a Gum, Shining and Marv mafia scum group?
There's no evidence that gum is mafia, only that he is an afk something.
Shining was like one of the last people to start posting and now has 5 pages of filter and on top of it he sounds a lot like me when I feel really committed.
Marv nobody cares about cause lynching him on D1 is dumb when he's one of the top night kills on the forum.
|
I'm in the lynch OO/SL/maybe moosy for his weird initial tone early before he changed after being noticed, and cause his latest argument over really nitpicky stuff felt kinda fake.
FF slightly got townier in my book.
|
On October 13 2015 02:21 Vivax wrote:
I'm in the lynch OO/SL/maybe moosy for his weird initial tone early before he changed after being noticed, and cause his latest argument over really nitpicky stuff felt kinda fake.
FF slightly got townier in my book.
It's not nitpicky at all. It spans over all of Page 3 in his filter.
|
On October 13 2015 02:17 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2015 02:10 Eversince wrote:
Taking the leap, I'm wrong on Obvious, what's wrong with a Gum, Shining and Marv mafia scum group? There's no evidence that gum is mafia, only that he is an afk something. Shining was like one of the last people to start posting and now has 5 pages of filter and on top of it he sounds a lot like me when I feel really committed. Marv nobody cares about cause lynching him on D1 is dumb when he's one of the top night kills on the forum.
"Gum came in paintin' that great canvas. It's got a stutter mark on it, and is quite blank.
Shining got a bloated post count arguing with me. Whilst bein' real unproductive.
Marv is a wasted vote because he's been so unproductive we'll shoot him in the night"
I re-worded that post for ya'. Lay'ta!
|
There was an error in the current vote count. It has been corrected.
Vote Count
- Gumdrop (1):
Onegu, KelsierSC, Sicklucker
- sicklucker (0):
MoosyDoosy
- Vivax (1): Sicklucker,
FecalFeast
- KelsierSC (1): ObviousOne
- ObviousOne (0):
FecalFeast, MoosyDoosy
- MoosyDoosy (3): Stoicism_,
Onegu, The Shining, Onegu
- Fecalfeast (1):
Vivax, The Shining, marvellosity
- Marvellosity (2):
Onegu, -Celestial-, FecalFeast
- The Shining (2): Eversince, MoosyDoosy
Not Voting (2): Gumdrop, Vivax
Currently, MoosyDoosy is set to be lynched. Day ends at Tuesday, Oct 13 1:00am GMT (GMT+00:00) in .
Voting is mandatory! Voting is done here in this thread. PM the hosts if the vote count is not correct.
|
:D It wouldn't be D1 without me as one of the primary lynch wagons.
|
On October 13 2015 02:09 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2015 01:13 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 22:50 MoosyDoosy wrote:
If Shining maintained a modicum of sanity and tried to explain the pile of contradictions he made I would understand but all he did was snap. Only reason why he would do that is if he realizes he made a heap of posts that made no sense with each other. This misrepresentation is trash and you're scum. I did explain my "pile of contradictions" multiple times. That's why marv could so easily understand where I was coming from. Instead you just honed in on the "it doesnt make sense, blah blah blah" and completely disregarded the multiple times I said I think FF could be scum and my reasoning for WHY Marv could be a better lynch. And would you look at that, he's no longer a good lynch because he finally started playing. I'd look to see more but it's a good start. No, I did listen. You think that your read on FF is so good while you admitted that it was weakened by OO's and FF's defense. On top of that, you thought that marv was a better lynch. But you STILL didn't vote for him in that situation. This doesn't make sense whatsoever. marv I'm going to read the past two games I've been with you in and check your meta. Also, saying that I'm clever and fairly intuitive from the last game is false because I had my reads all wrong. cheers.
But yet you think you have scum caught here D1. LMAO
No I said I trust my own gut instinct. I never once said OMG ITS SO GOOD SHEEP ME SHEEP ME SHEEP ME. And Marv already explained what I already explained.
So why don't you go ahead and answer the question. What is the mafia motivation for saying one lynch is better than another but trusting my own gut because Marv could very well come back, which he did, and I don't feel like abandoning my gut instinct?
|
On October 13 2015 02:16 MoosyDoosy wrote:
marv, try to follow me.
If Shining admits that his case on FF is weakened and thinks that marv is a better lynch, why would he not vote for marv?
Because Marv still had time to come back and a meta read is shit. I feel like I've said this at least 5x already.
Also, why would Shining say that marv is a better lynch, but then later try to retract it and say that his points on FF are better?
I've never tried to retract that Marv was a better lynch at the time, just that I feel a scumread for actual things I see is better than trying to rely on a shit metaread.
Also, why would Shining make 5 posts in a row that are super waffly and leave him open to two available wagons?
Because when I'm town, I put ALL my thoughts into the thread. I couldn't give 2 shits what I look like and when I feel or think something, I say it. Deal with it.
|
On October 13 2015 02:33 The Shining wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2015 02:09 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 13 2015 01:13 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 22:50 MoosyDoosy wrote:
If Shining maintained a modicum of sanity and tried to explain the pile of contradictions he made I would understand but all he did was snap. Only reason why he would do that is if he realizes he made a heap of posts that made no sense with each other. This misrepresentation is trash and you're scum. I did explain my "pile of contradictions" multiple times. That's why marv could so easily understand where I was coming from. Instead you just honed in on the "it doesnt make sense, blah blah blah" and completely disregarded the multiple times I said I think FF could be scum and my reasoning for WHY Marv could be a better lynch. And would you look at that, he's no longer a good lynch because he finally started playing. I'd look to see more but it's a good start. No, I did listen. You think that your read on FF is so good while you admitted that it was weakened by OO's and FF's defense. On top of that, you thought that marv was a better lynch. But you STILL didn't vote for him in that situation. This doesn't make sense whatsoever. marv I'm going to read the past two games I've been with you in and check your meta. Also, saying that I'm clever and fairly intuitive from the last game is false because I had my reads all wrong. cheers. But yet you think you have scum caught here D1. LMAO No I said I trust my own gut instinct. I never once said OMG ITS SO GOOD SHEEP ME SHEEP ME SHEEP ME. And Marv already explained what I already explained. So why don't you go ahead and answer the question. What is the mafia motivation for saying one lynch is better than another but trusting my own gut because Marv could very well come back, which he did, and I don't feel like abandoning my gut instinct?
?? You said that the point against marv made him a better lynch and THEN later you said that your points on FF all of a sudden meant it made sense for you to vote for him.
And yes, of course I think I caught scum when you just made a heap of contradictions, had page 3 of your filter be full of waffly posts, saddled yourself between two possible wagons, and raged at me out of nowhere when I was pointing out your contradictions. What ISN'T scummy about that?
|
On October 13 2015 02:26 Eversince wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2015 02:17 Vivax wrote:On October 13 2015 02:10 Eversince wrote:
Taking the leap, I'm wrong on Obvious, what's wrong with a Gum, Shining and Marv mafia scum group? There's no evidence that gum is mafia, only that he is an afk something. Shining was like one of the last people to start posting and now has 5 pages of filter and on top of it he sounds a lot like me when I feel really committed. Marv nobody cares about cause lynching him on D1 is dumb when he's one of the top night kills on the forum. "Gum came in paintin' that great canvas. It's got a stutter mark on it, and is quite blank. Shining got a bloated post count arguing with me. Whilst bein' real unproductive. Marv is a wasted vote because he's been so unproductive we'll shoot him in the night" I re-worded that post for ya'. Lay'ta!
Have you even read your own 9 page filter? You're commenting and rewording other people's posts for the sake of participation but you're literally doing nothing to follow up on your indirect questioning and horrible play.
Either that or you think there must be 6 players on the scum team. 2legit2quit
|
On October 13 2015 02:37 The Shining wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2015 02:16 MoosyDoosy wrote:
marv, try to follow me.
If Shining admits that his case on FF is weakened and thinks that marv is a better lynch, why would he not vote for marv?
Because Marv still had time to come back and a meta read is shit. I feel like I've said this at least 5x already.
Also, why would Shining say that marv is a better lynch, but then later try to retract it and say that his points on FF are better?
I've never tried to retract that Marv was a better lynch at the time, just that I feel a scumread for actual things I see is better than trying to rely on a shit metaread.
Also, why would Shining make 5 posts in a row that are super waffly and leave him open to two available wagons?
Because when I'm town, I put ALL my thoughts into the thread. I couldn't give 2 shits what I look like and when I feel or think something, I say it. Deal with it.
If a meta read is shit, why did you say that it made marv "a better lynch"?
It still doesn't make sense. If you think meta is terrible why did you say that all of a sudden everything on marv was perfect and that you were warming up to lynching him?
|
On October 13 2015 02:10 Eversince wrote:
Taking the leap, I'm wrong on Obvious, what's wrong with a Gum, Shining and Marv mafia scum group?
Because Shining could have secured easy town points by simply bussing marv who was nowhere in sight. Instead he made an incredibly risky play by saying he's staying on FF despite conceding that he felt marv was a more likely scum; even without marv actively playing at the time. If Shining is scum then that play is borderline suicide because marv might die anyway and he's made himself a priority D2 candidate for lynch.
The safest play as scum!Shining there is to just go along with thread sentiment, vote marv whilst simultaneously setting up a few more people he has fake scumfeel on. That way if marv doesn't come back then he hasn't stuck his neck out too far and if marv does come back he still has an out to try and him to get votes off him.
As it stands Shining made a play that made him look bad and now has a bunch of people breathing down his neck now. As well as marv who, on the whole, hasn't come across as all that convincing since coming back.
In short: If Shining is mafia with marv then his play has put heavy suspicion on two mafia players instead of just having it on one. Which is a poor mafia move no matter how you cut it. I don't think any scum ever makes a play like that unless its total desperation by the mafia team. Which is a very weird thing to do D1 with such a fluid situation.
I still think Gumdrop is just gone and won't come back. I don't think that's necessarily a scumtell though. *shrug*
|
On October 13 2015 02:39 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2015 02:37 The Shining wrote:On October 13 2015 02:16 MoosyDoosy wrote:
marv, try to follow me.
If Shining admits that his case on FF is weakened and thinks that marv is a better lynch, why would he not vote for marv?
Because Marv still had time to come back and a meta read is shit. I feel like I've said this at least 5x already.
Also, why would Shining say that marv is a better lynch, but then later try to retract it and say that his points on FF are better?
I've never tried to retract that Marv was a better lynch at the time, just that I feel a scumread for actual things I see is better than trying to rely on a shit metaread.
Also, why would Shining make 5 posts in a row that are super waffly and leave him open to two available wagons?
Because when I'm town, I put ALL my thoughts into the thread. I couldn't give 2 shits what I look like and when I feel or think something, I say it. Deal with it. If a meta read is shit, why did you say that it made marv "a better lynch"? It still doesn't make sense. If you think meta is terrible why did you say that all of a sudden everything on marv was perfect and that you were warming up to lynching him?
BECAUSE HE STILL HADNT COME BACK. THAT RAISES THE PERCENTAGE THAT THE META READ IS CORRECT. BUT META IS UNRELIABLE. WHY IS THIS SO HARD TO GRASP? HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF PRESSURE? JESUS
|
On October 13 2015 02:40 The Shining wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2015 02:39 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 13 2015 02:37 The Shining wrote:On October 13 2015 02:16 MoosyDoosy wrote:
marv, try to follow me.
If Shining admits that his case on FF is weakened and thinks that marv is a better lynch, why would he not vote for marv?
Because Marv still had time to come back and a meta read is shit. I feel like I've said this at least 5x already.
Also, why would Shining say that marv is a better lynch, but then later try to retract it and say that his points on FF are better?
I've never tried to retract that Marv was a better lynch at the time, just that I feel a scumread for actual things I see is better than trying to rely on a shit metaread.
Also, why would Shining make 5 posts in a row that are super waffly and leave him open to two available wagons?
Because when I'm town, I put ALL my thoughts into the thread. I couldn't give 2 shits what I look like and when I feel or think something, I say it. Deal with it. If a meta read is shit, why did you say that it made marv "a better lynch"? It still doesn't make sense. If you think meta is terrible why did you say that all of a sudden everything on marv was perfect and that you were warming up to lynching him? BECAUSE HE STILL HADNT COME BACK. THAT RAISES THE PERCENTAGE THAT THE META READ IS CORRECT. BUT META IS UNRELIABLE. WHY IS THIS SO HARD TO GRASP? HAVE YOU EVER HEARD OF PRESSURE? JESUS
If you think meta is bad why did you describe it as "a better lynch" and said it was such a perfect point?
|
On October 13 2015 02:38 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 13 2015 02:33 The Shining wrote:On October 13 2015 02:09 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 13 2015 01:13 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 22:50 MoosyDoosy wrote:
If Shining maintained a modicum of sanity and tried to explain the pile of contradictions he made I would understand but all he did was snap. Only reason why he would do that is if he realizes he made a heap of posts that made no sense with each other. This misrepresentation is trash and you're scum. I did explain my "pile of contradictions" multiple times. That's why marv could so easily understand where I was coming from. Instead you just honed in on the "it doesnt make sense, blah blah blah" and completely disregarded the multiple times I said I think FF could be scum and my reasoning for WHY Marv could be a better lynch. And would you look at that, he's no longer a good lynch because he finally started playing. I'd look to see more but it's a good start. No, I did listen. You think that your read on FF is so good while you admitted that it was weakened by OO's and FF's defense. On top of that, you thought that marv was a better lynch. But you STILL didn't vote for him in that situation. This doesn't make sense whatsoever. marv I'm going to read the past two games I've been with you in and check your meta. Also, saying that I'm clever and fairly intuitive from the last game is false because I had my reads all wrong. cheers. But yet you think you have scum caught here D1. LMAO No I said I trust my own gut instinct. I never once said OMG ITS SO GOOD SHEEP ME SHEEP ME SHEEP ME. And Marv already explained what I already explained. So why don't you go ahead and answer the question. What is the mafia motivation for saying one lynch is better than another but trusting my own gut because Marv could very well come back, which he did, and I don't feel like abandoning my gut instinct? ?? You said that the point against marv made him a better lynch and THEN later you said that your points on FF all of a sudden meant it made sense for you to vote for him. And yes, of course I think I caught scum when you just made a heap of contradictions, had page 3 of your filter be full of waffly posts, saddled yourself between two possible wagons, and raged at me out of nowhere when I was pointing out your contradictions. What ISN'T scummy about that?
Yes. The fact that Marv is inactive to the point of uselessness as scum in past games makes it a good lynch if he continues to be useless. Yes, I said and still think my points on FF make sense for me to vote him, which is WHY I VOTED HIM FROM THE FUCKING BEGINNING AND DIDNT SWITCH.
And yes, I always rage super hard as scum. It's all into my meta. A1 deduction there, ace. "A heap" of contradictions because I said 3 different things which I believed in and haven't denied or argued about, just that it doesn't make me scum. Your tunnel is so fucking bad that if you're town, you deserve to lose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
