|
On October 12 2015 11:58 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 11:54 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 11:51 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 12 2015 11:48 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 11:34 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 11:25 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 12 2015 11:21 Fecalfeast wrote: Possibly, I'm about 40 mins from closing shop however. Do you have a case or something other than compiling your filter? I'll read when I get home Just a brief summary but I'm writing up something right now. Basically he said everything on marv was perfect and worked out and said marv was a better lynch than FecalFeast. So I asked him how he read FecalFeast and he said scum. This meant that marv had to be more scummy to Shining than FecalFeast, but Shining kept his vote on FecalFeast while basically saying everything on marv was perfect. There's no reason for him to keep his vote on FecalFeast when he said that marv was a better lynch. I actually had my first suspicions because in our last game where he was scum, Shining made an excuse to switch his vote onto the popular wagon. Here, marv is turning out to be the popular wagon. Also, the fact that he's so conscious about his last game with me is strange in and of itself. Here Marv is turning out to be the popular wagon and IM NOT FUCKING VOTING MARV. so how does that argument make any sort of sense? And all I said was its a perfect META case. I've also said meta can be INACCURATE which is why I didn't switch. The fact that I'm conscious of past games is NAI so blow it out your ass, bro. I'm also conscious of my first ever game here which was almost a year ago and Celestial brought it up in this game. I guess I'm scum for that, too, right? Oh and lets not forget! Moosy just said I'm strangely conscious about last game in the same post HE MENTIONS SOMETHING ABOUT LAST GAME REGARDING ME. Guess I'm not the only one conscious of last game, hm? Hmmmmmmmm?? That's not even the main post I'm making against you. That's actually what kind of sparked my suspicion on you which led me to go on a long spiral of questioning you. Nor is it my main counterpoint. But its the only one you decided to respond to. Why is that? It's funny that that is what sparked your suspicion, though, as it means you were aware of it from the beginning of my posting which means you're just as conscious of last game. So please explain to me how that is a scum tell. I'll give you a hint. It isn't. -tilts head- hm?
You posted the me being conscious of last game thing as if I'm scum. When you just admitted you were conscious of something I did last game and that's what sparked your suspicion here.
I'm asking you to explain how being aware of past games is a reason to scum me. Don't worry, I'll wait.
|
The Shining is scum. I started a train of questioning on Shining because I was unsure about how he read marv and FecalFeast and his votes and lack thereof on them.
- The Shining said that the point on marv as a lurker scum was perfect and even went so far as to say that marv was a better lynch over FF. + Show Spoiler +On October 12 2015 10:16 The Shining wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 10:08 -Celestial- wrote:On October 12 2015 09:59 The Shining wrote: It's simple maths. Whoever doesn't fight or isn't angry by D3 is obvscum. Not necessarily true. In my first game I threw an absolute wobbler over Tubesock's Spanish Inquisition, claimed Doctor in an apparent fit of pique and then spent basically the rest of the game sulking; all of which got me out of a lynch and persuaded everyone not to lynch me the day after either. And I survived as Mafia RB. X-D Actually wasn't that the game you endgamed me in? e.e On a game related note, I think I'm starting to warm up to the Marv lynch. He's still not here. And FF still isn't giving me the warm fuzzies but he's made some pretty logical counterarguments to what I've brought against him. So has OO, although I find it weird OO is defending someone who wants to lynch him. But right now, Marv is a better lynch over FF.
- But he still has his vote on FecalFeast for some reason: + Show Spoiler +On October 12 2015 11:06 The Shining wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 11:04 MoosyDoosy wrote:So Shining is voting for marv because he thinks marv is more scummy than FF although he believes that both are scum. And FF is voting for marv because he changed his read on ObviousOne. @FecalFeast, just one last question. On October 12 2015 10:56 Fecalfeast wrote: And to commit to a read I am now calling OO towny What is with this post? On October 12 2015 10:35 Fecalfeast wrote: In his post he said I was scummy with OO and marv. Both people I have said I'm ok with killing. I was saying that seems like a bad strategy. Welp you're getting knocked down a notch on my town list. I’m voting FF, not Marv. Because meta is unreliable but Marv is playing into his scum meta, whereas FF has given me reasons to scum him. The goal behind doing this is to be in line with one of the popular wagons (marvellosity) and setting up an excuse to possibly vote for him.
- Also, a lot of his posts answering my questions are really, really waffly. On one hand he seems to be saying that marv is a better lynch but then he says he FecalFeast is more scummy because of the stuff he has on him. + Show Spoiler +On October 12 2015 11:00 The Shining wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 10:54 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 12 2015 10:53 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 10:45 Fecalfeast wrote:On October 12 2015 10:40 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 10:28 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 12 2015 10:16 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 10:08 -Celestial- wrote:On October 12 2015 09:59 The Shining wrote: It's simple maths. Whoever doesn't fight or isn't angry by D3 is obvscum. Not necessarily true. In my first game I threw an absolute wobbler over Tubesock's Spanish Inquisition, claimed Doctor in an apparent fit of pique and then spent basically the rest of the game sulking; all of which got me out of a lynch and persuaded everyone not to lynch me the day after either. And I survived as Mafia RB. X-D Actually wasn't that the game you endgamed me in? e.e On a game related note, I think I'm starting to warm up to the Marv lynch. He's still not here. And FF still isn't giving me the warm fuzzies but he's made some pretty logical counterarguments to what I've brought against him. So has OO, although I find it weird OO is defending someone who wants to lynch him. But right now, Marv is a better lynch over FF. Can you point out these logical counterarguments? Regardless of whether i agree with them or not, his point regarding getting both of his partners killed if my scumlist is correct is a good one. And his OO vote was something i did overlook when i scummed him, although i did explain how he could just switdh votes. But he did come off of OO pretty easily now that i look at it... Like i said. I still dont have warm fuzzies about him, my vote is still on him but it also makes perfectly good sense to lynch the guy who did nothing and then fucked off when most here know his potential as town. I only havent switched to marv because Fecal did, which means I'm wrong on one of them but I'm still hoping Marv can show up and clear it up. But at least FF is responding to pressure "I know I'm wrong on one" how do you know you're not wrong on both? If marv shows up and bleeds town how does that make me scum? Yeah yeah moose I'm doing the thing Because I'm just too good to be wrong on every single scumread I have. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Realistically I could be wrong on both but I just don't think I am. Him showing up and bleeding town doesn't make you scum, though. The points I've brought against you make you scum. Lelelelele So how do you read FF? null? town? scum? Is it not obvious I still think FF is scum? My vote is still on him and I continue to say he gives me no warm fuzzies. The only reason I think Marv is a better lynch is because it plays so perfectly into his scum meta and therefore gives us a higher chance of a scumflip because I could very well be wrong on FF. I just don't think I am. On October 12 2015 11:24 The Shining wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 11:10 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 12 2015 10:16 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 10:08 -Celestial- wrote:On October 12 2015 09:59 The Shining wrote: It's simple maths. Whoever doesn't fight or isn't angry by D3 is obvscum. Not necessarily true. In my first game I threw an absolute wobbler over Tubesock's Spanish Inquisition, claimed Doctor in an apparent fit of pique and then spent basically the rest of the game sulking; all of which got me out of a lynch and persuaded everyone not to lynch me the day after either. And I survived as Mafia RB. X-D Actually wasn't that the game you endgamed me in? e.e On a game related note, I think I'm starting to warm up to the Marv lynch. He's still not here. And FF still isn't giving me the warm fuzzies but he's made some pretty logical counterarguments to what I've brought against him. So has OO, although I find it weird OO is defending someone who wants to lynch him. But right now, Marv is a better lynch over FF. Then your vote is on FF when you think marv is a better lynch? You're not making sense right now. ##unvote ##vote The Shining Because I don't want to vote with my scumread on another of my scumread when my first scumread has given me reasons to scum him. But w.e do what you must. Gj on not paying attention, you didnt even know who I was voting. And yes Marv is probably the better lynch because he fucked off, whereas FF is playing but I have actual reasons to scum him. I'm following my personal read and gut over some meta bullshit because it can very well be wrong. But FF playing and posting could come from a town perspective but quite frankly idc anymore. Everyone can keep scumming me all they want and eat a big fat...Snickers when I flip. We all know what I actually wanna say but I don't feel like getting warned. These posts are just contradictions all around and are waffly. In one post he’s leaning that marv is more scummy because the case on him is perfect. In the other, he’s leaning that FecalFeast is more scummy because he has points on him. But don’t forget that he already contradicted the supposed “points” that he had on FecalFeast with this statement: + Show Spoiler +On October 12 2015 10:16 The Shining wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 10:08 -Celestial- wrote:On October 12 2015 09:59 The Shining wrote: It's simple maths. Whoever doesn't fight or isn't angry by D3 is obvscum. Not necessarily true. In my first game I threw an absolute wobbler over Tubesock's Spanish Inquisition, claimed Doctor in an apparent fit of pique and then spent basically the rest of the game sulking; all of which got me out of a lynch and persuaded everyone not to lynch me the day after either. And I survived as Mafia RB. X-D Actually wasn't that the game you endgamed me in? e.e On a game related note, I think I'm starting to warm up to the Marv lynch. He's still not here. And FF still isn't giving me the warm fuzzies but he's made some pretty logical counterarguments to what I've brought against him. So has OO, although I find it weird OO is defending someone who wants to lynch him.But right now, Marv is a better lynch over FF.
|
On October 12 2015 11:58 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 11:54 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 11:51 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 12 2015 11:48 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 11:34 The Shining wrote:On October 12 2015 11:25 MoosyDoosy wrote:On October 12 2015 11:21 Fecalfeast wrote: Possibly, I'm about 40 mins from closing shop however. Do you have a case or something other than compiling your filter? I'll read when I get home Just a brief summary but I'm writing up something right now. Basically he said everything on marv was perfect and worked out and said marv was a better lynch than FecalFeast. So I asked him how he read FecalFeast and he said scum. This meant that marv had to be more scummy to Shining than FecalFeast, but Shining kept his vote on FecalFeast while basically saying everything on marv was perfect. There's no reason for him to keep his vote on FecalFeast when he said that marv was a better lynch. I actually had my first suspicions because in our last game where he was scum, Shining made an excuse to switch his vote onto the popular wagon. Here, marv is turning out to be the popular wagon. Also, the fact that he's so conscious about his last game with me is strange in and of itself. Here Marv is turning out to be the popular wagon and IM NOT FUCKING VOTING MARV. so how does that argument make any sort of sense? And all I said was its a perfect META case. I've also said meta can be INACCURATE which is why I didn't switch. The fact that I'm conscious of past games is NAI so blow it out your ass, bro. I'm also conscious of my first ever game here which was almost a year ago and Celestial brought it up in this game. I guess I'm scum for that, too, right? Oh and lets not forget! Moosy just said I'm strangely conscious about last game in the same post HE MENTIONS SOMETHING ABOUT LAST GAME REGARDING ME. Guess I'm not the only one conscious of last game, hm? Hmmmmmmmm?? That's not even the main post I'm making against you. That's actually what kind of sparked my suspicion on you which led me to go on a long spiral of questioning you. Nor is it my main counterpoint. But its the only one you decided to respond to. Why is that? It's funny that that is what sparked your suspicion, though, as it means you were aware of it from the beginning of my posting which means you're just as conscious of last game. So please explain to me how that is a scum tell. I'll give you a hint. It isn't. -tilts head- hm?
And you haven't mentioned anything at all about you lying and saying I'm making up reasons to scum Marv. And you didn't even know who TF I was voting for. You decided to address the conscious of last game thing instead.
|
Shinin' is rofus, just look toward the exchange we had for validation,
|
On October 12 2015 11:58 MoosyDoosy wrote: I think this is pretty simple Shining. I thought she dropped her scum read on you while she left which is why I'm asking her now to make sure.
Nope its pretty simple Moosy. This is the second time this game you've started doing things, and then explain them after the fact to make yourself look good. The first being the vote on OO before explaining your thought process to Onegu. Now you're trying to convince someone who vote me before you and never moved her vote to lynch me
You're clearly not reading the thread and just pushing for a mislynch here.
|
On October 12 2015 12:04 The Shining wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 11:58 MoosyDoosy wrote: I think this is pretty simple Shining. I thought she dropped her scum read on you while she left which is why I'm asking her now to make sure. Nope its pretty simple Moosy. This is the second time this game you've started doing things, and then explain them after the fact to make yourself look good. The first being the vote on OO before explaining your thought process to Onegu. Now you're trying to convince someone who vote me before you and never moved her vote to lynch me You're clearly not reading the thread and just pushing for a mislynch here. Would it be entertaining if I told you I was spamming for the remainder of Page 37 so that I could post my case at the top of Page 38?
|
Case 10/10 best case 2015. Pls lynch the actively lurking Moosy after I flip town pls and thx
|
Well your shit case still doesn't address my counter points so yeah it is quite entertaining.
|
On October 12 2015 12:06 The Shining wrote: Case 10/10 best case 2015. Pls lynch the actively lurking Moosy after I flip town pls and thx Thank you. It was a pretty good catch if I do say so myself.
|
It's alrights' friend. You can still get in touch with your mafia buddies and set a new course of action.
|
Anyway I'm off work and I'm not gonna stay here on the wifi just to argue w you. See ya when I get home, Mooscum.
|
That is a dirty, dirty post.
|
As a tl;dr for people who don't really understand my post:
1. Shining said marv was a better lynch than FF and that the stuff on marv was perfect, but kept his vote on FF. 2. Shining later tried to retract his statement and say he kept on voting for FF because he thought FF was the better lynch but he already expressed otherwise for marv. 3. Shining already said that his posts on FF were weak because of ObviousOne's defense and FF's defense but still wants to vote FF while thinking marv is a better lynch.
|
On October 12 2015 12:07 MoosyDoosy wrote:Show nested quote +On October 12 2015 12:06 The Shining wrote: Case 10/10 best case 2015. Pls lynch the actively lurking Moosy after I flip town pls and thx Thank you. It was a pretty good catch if I do say so myself.
So full of yourself. I can't wait til you eat shyt after my flip. Expect a rayn-like PM data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
Funny you claim you caught me last game but you really didn't. Trfel and Marv did. You left me alone a good majority of the game and even sheeped some of my points. Now you think you're good and can read me off of one game? This doesn't even fit my scum meta lmfao bad bad bad bad.
|
Mhm, thoughts on our exchange Moosy? Omit the irritated luggage I tossed on.(or dun', it happened, it's there and feel free to interpret it how you will)
|
On October 12 2015 12:12 Eversince wrote: Mhm, thoughts on our exchange Moosy? Omit the irritated luggage I tossed on.(or dun', it happened, it's there and feel free to interpret it how you will)
Why would he have thoughts on it? He didn't even read it lmao
|
|
Canada11355 Posts
I mean, don't get me wrong, I like where your case is going moose. Shining's explanation of marv's meta being damning but his weak read on me being based on this game isn't terrible.
I don't like the rage coming from him though. IDK people say getting mad is a towny thing but I disagree
|
Just a random spark in the dark though, do feel free to flesh those out whenevever Shinin'. I'll be round' for a bit.
|
On October 12 2015 12:19 Fecalfeast wrote: I mean, don't get me wrong, I like where your case is going moose. Shining's explanation of marv's meta being damning but his weak read on me being based on this game isn't terrible.
I don't like the rage coming from him though. IDK people say getting mad is a towny thing but I disagree
What give you hiccups?
|
|
|
|