|
On August 06 2015 09:01 The Shining wrote:
I hate d1. Hate it hate it hate it. And where the hell is the filter button? I'm gonna take another break from TL and they'll get rid of preview next.
Dafuq man. How do you dive without filters? How do you guys even play without filters?!
Also this is my first all vanilla game so I was thinking of ways mechanically to hunt scum. I've got iGrok at a light town lean for wanting to go at lurkers from the start, which was one of the first things I considered. I'm not sure I agree with his RSo read, but I'm trash at treading her, and most ppl, D1. But as someone mentioned, she's threatened to go full lazy lurk mode and still hasn't. Not D1 Lynch.
I'm going to have to reread since no filters and I'm on mobile(I always play mobile, sry) but I remember being ehh on FF. It's too early for an associative read but his reaction to ruxxar felt a bit forced. "Idk I don't like ruxxar" its too noncommittal. Great, I'm not sure I like him either but I'm going to reread and figure out why I do/don't. He seems too bouncy to read clearly.
This post is a little bit scummy. It is the first post of The Shining. He talks about a lot of different things, as if he didn't know what to put in his first post. Actually let's count the number of different things he's talking about:
1 - whining about D1 and filters
2 - questionning others about filters
3 - reads (Igrok, rsoultin, FF)
4 - needs to reread 'cause no filters
So The Shining felt the need to talk about 4 different subjects in his first post. Not as scummy as I thought though, 'cause the filter thing is all over the place, so the subjects are linked.
|
On August 06 2015 17:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
That doesn't make anyone mafia.
She is not mafia for that.
You said ruxx would be scummy if he claimed to not have read the thread. Now CopCake not reading the thread is not alignment indicative ?
|
BTW I'm curious about that:
On August 06 2015 05:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Anyways i have dumb reasons to think Scott is town.
What in this scott's post is town indicative ?
On August 06 2015 04:59 scott31337 wrote:
CONFTOWN AGAIN yayyy
At least I-10's has a lane or two now.
I'll be back later.
|
Okay actually The Shining must be also mafia. Thanks for that post Rels.
|
On August 06 2015 17:23 Rels wrote:BTW I'm curious about that: Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 05:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Anyways i have dumb reasons to think Scott is town. What in this scott's post is town indicative ? Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 04:59 scott31337 wrote:
CONFTOWN AGAIN yayyy
At least I-10's has a lane or two now.
I'll be back later.
I can't tell.
|
On August 06 2015 17:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 17:23 Rels wrote:BTW I'm curious about that: On August 06 2015 05:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Anyways i have dumb reasons to think Scott is town. What in this scott's post is town indicative ? On August 06 2015 04:59 scott31337 wrote:
CONFTOWN AGAIN yayyy
At least I-10's has a lane or two now.
I'll be back later. I can't tell.
OK then what is your dumb reason ?
|
On August 06 2015 17:22 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 17:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
That doesn't make anyone mafia.
She is not mafia for that. You said ruxx would be scummy if he claimed to not have read the thread. Now CopCake not reading the thread is not alignment indicative ?
Because they are not the same person and ruxxar is doing that intentionally, cake is clearly not.
|
On August 06 2015 17:25 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 17:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 06 2015 17:23 Rels wrote:BTW I'm curious about that: On August 06 2015 05:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Anyways i have dumb reasons to think Scott is town. What in this scott's post is town indicative ? On August 06 2015 04:59 scott31337 wrote:
CONFTOWN AGAIN yayyy
At least I-10's has a lane or two now.
I'll be back later. I can't tell. OK then what is your dumb reason ?
dick move analysis. yes it's related to that post.
but i can't tell you why me read is what it is.
|
On August 06 2015 17:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 17:22 Rels wrote:On August 06 2015 17:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
That doesn't make anyone mafia.
She is not mafia for that. You said ruxx would be scummy if he claimed to not have read the thread. Now CopCake not reading the thread is not alignment indicative ? Because they are not the same person and ruxxar is doing that intentionally, cake is clearly not.
Makes sense. I'm not convinced though. CopCake clearly stated she (?) read the thread from the start . And she missed two posts: one from her and on from ruxxar.
|
On August 06 2015 17:27 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 17:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 06 2015 17:22 Rels wrote:On August 06 2015 17:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
That doesn't make anyone mafia.
She is not mafia for that. You said ruxx would be scummy if he claimed to not have read the thread. Now CopCake not reading the thread is not alignment indicative ? Because they are not the same person and ruxxar is doing that intentionally, cake is clearly not. Makes sense. I'm not convinced though. CopCake clearly stated she (?) read the thread from the start . And she missed two posts: one from her and on from ruxxar.
well there is literally no mafia motivation to say that in case she has read the thread.
so she has genuinely missed that for some reason, which makes it NAI.
|
On August 06 2015 17:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 17:25 Rels wrote:On August 06 2015 17:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 06 2015 17:23 Rels wrote:BTW I'm curious about that: On August 06 2015 05:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Anyways i have dumb reasons to think Scott is town. What in this scott's post is town indicative ? On August 06 2015 04:59 scott31337 wrote:
CONFTOWN AGAIN yayyy
At least I-10's has a lane or two now.
I'll be back later. I can't tell. OK then what is your dumb reason ? dick move analysis. yes it's related to that post. but i can't tell you why me read is what it is.
Bullshit. You posted to the thread you had a dumb reason to townread scott. Now you're saying you can't post it. If that's the case, it's bullshit to post you have a dumb reason in the first place.
I won't forget that rayn, so you better really have a reason and post it at some point.
|
Anyways this is a game called pick your lynch. Here are the alternatives:
ruxxar - for what me, kelsier and FF have said.
Edgar - says he is at impasse but in the next sentence contradicts himself and votes for iGrok.
TheShining - says "I'm going to have to reread since no filters and I'm on mobile(I always play mobile, sry) but I remember being ehh on FF. It's too early for an associative read but his reaction to ruxxar felt a bit forced." In the next post after re-read talks about everything that is not FF or ruxxar.
|
On August 06 2015 16:57 EdgarAllanPoE wrote:
Unfortunately this game will not work for me without filters.
I like FecalFeast's/Raynpelikoneet's points that Ruxxar is looking like a forced kind of silly while self-metaing but then I also like Ruxxar's last post about iGrok pushing rsoul with a bad case and iGrok's posts in general seem very coachingesque so I'm at quite a bit of an impasse.
##vote iGrok
I will not be very active at all. I'm also going to note that I'm a bit wary of Damdred and Kelsier.
This post is super scummy. The vote does not make sense with the reasonning.
PLUS, it is the first post of EAP. And he talks about different things, as if he didn't know what to post in his first post:
1 - whining about filters
2 - reads
3 - vote igrok
4 - will no be active
5 - wary of Damdred and Kelsier
Talking about different subjects in his first post is scum indicative, 'cause it means EAP had difficulties entering the thread.
PLUS he does not explain why Damdred and KSC are weird.
PLUS setting up to not be active in a all vanille setup.
|
|
|
On August 06 2015 17:29 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 17:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 06 2015 17:25 Rels wrote:On August 06 2015 17:24 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 06 2015 17:23 Rels wrote:BTW I'm curious about that: On August 06 2015 05:53 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Anyways i have dumb reasons to think Scott is town. What in this scott's post is town indicative ? On August 06 2015 04:59 scott31337 wrote:
CONFTOWN AGAIN yayyy
At least I-10's has a lane or two now.
I'll be back later. I can't tell. OK then what is your dumb reason ? dick move analysis. yes it's related to that post. but i can't tell you why me read is what it is. Bullshit. You posted to the thread you had a dumb reason to townread scott. Now you're saying you can't post it. If that's the case, it's bullshit to post you have a dumb reason in the first place. I won't forget that rayn, so you better really have a reason and post it at some point.
yeah i do have a reason. My reason is irrelevant atm.
|
On August 06 2015 17:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
TheShining - says "I'm going to have to reread since no filters and I'm on mobile(I always play mobile, sry) but I remember being ehh on FF. It's too early for an associative read but his reaction to ruxxar felt a bit forced." In the next post after re-read talks about everything that is not FF or ruxxar.
Wow didn't remark that. That is super true, he didn't follow up what he said he would in his reread.
|
that's because i am supertown. 
|
On August 06 2015 17:35 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 16:57 EdgarAllanPoE wrote:
Unfortunately this game will not work for me without filters.
I like FecalFeast's/Raynpelikoneet's points that Ruxxar is looking like a forced kind of silly while self-metaing but then I also like Ruxxar's last post about iGrok pushing rsoul with a bad case and iGrok's posts in general seem very coachingesque so I'm at quite a bit of an impasse.
##vote iGrok
I will not be very active at all. I'm also going to note that I'm a bit wary of Damdred and Kelsier. This post is super scummy. The vote does not make sense with the reasonning. PLUS, it is the first post of EAP. And he talks about different things, as if he didn't know what to post in his first post: 1 - whining about filters 2 - reads 3 - vote igrok 4 - will no be active 5 - wary of Damdred and Kelsier Talking about different subjects in his first post is scum indicative, 'cause it means EAP had difficulties entering the thread. PLUS he does not explain why Damdred and KSC are weird. PLUS setting up to not be active in a all vanille setup.
Cool, another member of the Town Circle! Nice write-up, EAP is now lurker target #2.
@Rayne, why do you think Tina is townie?
|
i can't talk about that either yet. 
|
On August 06 2015 17:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 17:27 Rels wrote:On August 06 2015 17:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:On August 06 2015 17:22 Rels wrote:On August 06 2015 17:17 raynpelikoneet wrote:
That doesn't make anyone mafia.
She is not mafia for that. You said ruxx would be scummy if he claimed to not have read the thread. Now CopCake not reading the thread is not alignment indicative ? Because they are not the same person and ruxxar is doing that intentionally, cake is clearly not. Makes sense. I'm not convinced though. CopCake clearly stated she (?) read the thread from the start . And she missed two posts: one from her and on from ruxxar. well there is literally no mafia motivation to say that in case she has read the thread. so she has genuinely missed that for some reason, which makes it NAI.
Yeah. My reasonning is not based on the fact that she missed this post in particular. What I'm saying is she didn't read the thread carefully, which might be scum indicative.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
