|
On August 06 2015 10:53 iGrok wrote:
Rels and EAP get a pass until they post once, or 24 hours have passed. Until then, they have a pseudo-valid excuse of having not started playing yet.
Scott is the only true lurker at the moment. If Tina starts posting actual content, I'll shift onto him. Right now Tina looks very scummy, for the reasons I stated at the top of this page.
You think Scott is scummy?
|
On August 06 2015 10:31 Fecalfeast wrote:
ruxxar, to me, seems like he's trying really hard to act silly while not forgetting to mention that as scum he is totally serious. Self meta is poop.
this is the best post in the game.
|
On August 06 2015 16:25 ruXxar wrote:
Don't understand Igroks case against rs, it was really bad IMO.
Still think he's most scum so far, but this game is hard.
##vote igrok
Quote the posts from rsoultin that go against iGrok's case please.
|
Igrok just wanting to lynch lurkers instead of looking for mafia motivation is like trying to escape the responsibility of his scum reads by basing it on a towny concept.
When we mislynch people it's easy to go "I pushed xyz he was the least active, it was his own fault!"
Real easy cop out and avoids getting scum read for it.
|
On August 06 2015 16:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 16:25 ruXxar wrote:
Don't understand Igroks case against rs, it was really bad IMO.
Still think he's most scum so far, but this game is hard.
##vote igrok Quote the posts from rsoultin that go against iGrok's case please.
I'll explain later when not on phone.
|
On August 06 2015 16:31 ruXxar wrote:
Igrok just wanting to lynch lurkers instead of looking for mafia motivation is like trying to escape the responsibility of his scum reads by basing it on a towny concept.
When we mislynch people it's easy to go "I pushed xyz he was the least active, it was his own fault!"
Real easy cop out and avoids getting scum read for it.
yeah except that's not at all what he is saying and this has nothing to do with his case on rsoultin.
|
Canada11355 Posts
On August 06 2015 16:31 ruXxar wrote:
Igrok just wanting to lynch lurkers instead of looking for mafia motivation is like trying to escape the responsibility of his scum reads by basing it on a towny concept.
When we mislynch people it's easy to go "I pushed xyz he was the least active, it was his own fault!"
Real easy cop out and avoids getting scum read for it.
What does this have to do with igrok's case on rso?
|
Canada11355 Posts
refresh the page before you post ff
|
|
|
Apparently we have to vote again for some reason, so:
##vote ruxxar
If you have just been in a game where someone who is also in this game said to you "you know you are one of the people i know who is just more coherent and rational as scum than as town, it's really odd there are people like that", then i do not find it impossible at all that this said person goes all "incoherent" at the start of the game. And this is not just like "he is all over the place". It is like "i am intentionally doing this by not reading the thread, not really caring at all about what i post and just posting dumb shit and seem like i am happy". That is literally what ruxxar has done in this game and i do not think he is trying to find mafia. Because he, at the start of the game, claimed he was not doing that.
Townies do not intentionally do that, therefore he is mafia.
|
Igroks "case" in rsoul is not a case.
It's just a summary of her posts.
And he takes the time to highlight the posts where she mentions going afk as if that has significance as to why he's voting for her.
It's the worst "case" in the history if cases
F-
|
Yo rayn. I also don't like how ruxx entered the thread, spamming, not reading chronogically and jumping about subjects. Don't know what to think of it yet. But your case is super bad:
On August 06 2015 07:30 raynpelikoneet wrote:
##vote ruxxar
Here is the thing. He calls out iGrok's post. Okay let's say he thinks it's scummy (which it isn't - it's non-alignment indicative). Then he has random townreads on rsoultin and Damdred (which he should not). Let's still say he somehow manages to have those reads. Then he claims he did not read the thread chronologically (which he should not do if he is town). Okay let's still believe he does that.
Then he has NO FUCKING read on me, on me, who is defending iGrok's (his ONLY scumread) post. No, instead he treats me like a townie with his "hey rayn i wanna help find scum yoyo" post.
dude is mafia.
All this case is based on the premise that ruxx found igrok's idea about lynching lurkers scummy.
That is false. ruxxar thinks igrok's post is too polished to be townie:
On August 06 2015 06:47 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 06:44 KelsierSC wrote:On August 06 2015 06:40 ruXxar wrote:On August 06 2015 06:39 iGrok wrote:On August 06 2015 06:32 ruXxar wrote:On August 06 2015 05:14 iGrok wrote:
On a serious note, I will be pushing to lynch lurkers hard this game. Particularly in mountainous setups, activity is all we have to read you on. You lurk, I'm coming for you. Ugh this post. So much try hard, I get tired just reading it. #1 scum so far. ##Vote iGrok Yeah, I get that you're just doing this because you want to look like you have some activity, but at least this is some activity? I don't think you really believe what you said, so I'll let it slide. i actually believe that you are scummiest so far. npnp, brush it off, you can take it. you still haven't explained why try harding makes you scum , or what was wrong with the post he made? what is wrong with his posts all being serious? it felt like he put too much thought into it and spent too much time writing it. bolding text and polishing it to make it look real nice as if he was like "yo look at me I'm super town and I'm gonna be like super scum hunter 1000%" <--- town actions town cred GG ez game. gave me a scum vibe.
And he also specified he's agreeing with igrok's message:
On August 06 2015 07:03 ruXxar wrote:
k, so to put it out there, i don't disagree with the message that igrok put out.
i also hate lurkers, so don't lurk guys kk?
Now, I still feel that ruxxar is trying too hard to be all over the place.
|
Unfortunately this game will not work for me without filters.
I like FecalFeast's/Raynpelikoneet's points that Ruxxar is looking like a forced kind of silly while self-metaing but then I also like Ruxxar's last post about iGrok pushing rsoul with a bad case and iGrok's posts in general seem very coachingesque so I'm at quite a bit of an impasse.
##vote iGrok
I will not be very active at all. I'm also going to note that I'm a bit wary of Damdred and Kelsier.
|
On August 06 2015 16:46 ruXxar wrote:
Igroks "case" in rsoul is not a case.
It's just a summary of her posts.
And he takes the time to highlight the posts where she mentions going afk as if that has significance as to why he's voting for her.
It's the worst "case" in the history if cases
F-
I am going to clarify you what iGrok says:
I think rsoultin is actively lurking which is scummy. She has now:
1) shat on iGrok
2) shat on rayn
3) posted some other things that do not really say nothing
She is not saying anything of relevance, therefore she is mafia.
|
On August 06 2015 07:41 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 07:38 ruXxar wrote:On August 06 2015 07:32 KelsierSC wrote:
ruxxar did you read the interaction between rayn and yamato, tell me what you think k so i looked at yamato's interaction with rayn, didnt really like the way yamato responded, seemed angry ish. also looked at your first post ksc, kinda liked it actually, slight townread for u! so you didn't actually check that conversation until now? because you asked for yamato's help but yamato had said that he was just being sarcastic and poking grok. you really just didn't read the game =)
That is super good.
|
On August 06 2015 16:57 EdgarAllanPoE wrote:
Unfortunately this game will not work for me without filters.
I like FecalFeast's/Raynpelikoneet's points that Ruxxar is looking like a forced kind of silly while self-metaing but then I also like Ruxxar's last post about iGrok pushing rsoul with a bad case and iGrok's posts in general seem very coachingesque so I'm at quite a bit of an impasse.
##vote iGrok
I will not be very active at all. I'm also going to note that I'm a bit wary of Damdred and Kelsier.
this is also a scumpost.
|
" I'm at quite a bit of an impasse but hey let's still vote for iGrok."
|
Now my question is, which one of yamato, shining, cake, iGrok is the last mafia.
Actually i do not think it's iGrok.
|
CopCake is so NOT reading carefully the thread he missed his own fucking post. This is either super scummy or a dumbtell, so super scummy either way.
CC entered the thread with this:
On August 06 2015 07:34 CopCake wrote:
Hello friends, I believed there was another thread for the game.
ruxxar immediately answered him:
On August 06 2015 07:39 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 07:34 CopCake wrote:
Hello friends, I believed there was another thread for the game. hello coppy!(is it fine if I call you that?) Nice to meet you \o/
17 minutes later he claimed to have read the game but didn't see his own post nor ruxxar's answer:
On August 06 2015 07:51 CopCake wrote:
Oh fuck I believed I had already posted when I went to look which page this game starts.
Sup everyone
Tell me why you are forever towns and I will tell you if I disagree or not.
ruxxar then said he actually did:
On August 06 2015 07:53 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On August 06 2015 07:51 CopCake wrote:
Oh fuck I believed I had already posted when I went to look which page this game starts.
Sup everyone
Tell me why you are forever towns and I will tell you if I disagree or not. ... i tried to say hello q.q *goes into a corner crying* i'm town cuz i'm town! and i'm ruxxar and i'm town. so yeah! go town!
Now CopCake answered every post adressed to him BUT this one by ruxxar. He still doesn't *realize* that he actually posted before:
On August 06 2015 08:32 CopCake wrote:Also my first post was "I didn't know the sign ups and in game thread was the same thread, now i need to surf and look for the page the game starts rip" but when i finished reading i realized it wasn't posted > 
So: Copcake is either not reading the thread carefully OR he's dumbtelling. Both are scum indicative.
Another scummy thing: after entering the thread, he asked questions without giving reads. See spoiler for source.
+ Show Spoiler +On August 06 2015 07:52 CopCake wrote:
Btw what do you guys mean with "fluff" ? On August 06 2015 07:58 CopCake wrote:
How the fuck do I quote? I blocked the plus sign but got me to somewhere else
Hi Ruxxar I have a question for you, when rayn voted you why didn't you reacted? that's my only question for you
And yes Kelsier, I am good!
So instead of focusing on me why don't tell me about yourself and your reads, maybe?
|
That doesn't make anyone mafia.
She is not mafia for that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
