|
On June 13 2015 06:26 geript wrote:
Newer players. Here's a hint. Just because someone isn't posting, doesn't make it malicious. People have real lives and we aren't all artificial intelligences perusing the interwebs and spending time doing random things like playing mafia on the interwebs. Being not around =/= being mafia in an of itself. It's an ok reason to supplement actual reasons for finding someone to be mafia. But in and of itself being not around doesn't make people mafia.
Oh yeah I forgot about that. All the people who were saying that you leaving the thread was scummy are wrong. I think wave was one of them; the other stuff he said was okay though.
|
On June 13 2015 06:28 n00bKing wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2015 01:04 ruXxar wrote:On June 13 2015 01:01 WaveofShadow wrote:
And yes for the record noob has been upgraded from scum tier to 'meh' tier because I'm not sure I believe he as scum would be so ballsy to continue posting the way he has, though my fear of being wrong on newbies prevents me from bringing him higher just yet. That's not what I asked. I asked why you read him as scum in the first place. Continue to think posts from ruXxar sound like they came from a Town player. And not because this one has anything to do with me, but because he is willing to fearlessly grill WaveofShadow for more information, when (based on post count, and the game history in his profile) Wave could be one of the most experienced players in this game. When ruXxar's early boldness drew him a couple of votes, he didn't decide to change gears. He's willing to go toe-to-toe with anyone, to get the answers he wants.
LOL ... Wave one of the most experienced players. He just posts a bunch on other TL areas. I'd actually consider Damdred and maybe batsnacks as being more experienced currently.
|
On June 13 2015 05:58 geript wrote:
lol batsnacks would lynch himself
It wouldn't be the first time...
|
On June 13 2015 06:29 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2015 06:26 geript wrote:
Newer players. Here's a hint. Just because someone isn't posting, doesn't make it malicious. People have real lives and we aren't all artificial intelligences perusing the interwebs and spending time doing random things like playing mafia on the interwebs. Being not around =/= being mafia in an of itself. It's an ok reason to supplement actual reasons for finding someone to be mafia. But in and of itself being not around doesn't make people mafia. Oh yeah I forgot about that. All the people who were saying that you leaving the thread was scummy are wrong. I think wave was one of them; the other stuff he said was okay though.
Never said that, in fact I think I said that it doesn't mean anything.
Also Geript that's rude as shit.
|
Like I might be a little insulted actually. Go look at my post history and show me the 'other areas' I post.
|
On June 13 2015 06:35 WaveofShadow wrote:
Like I might be a little insulted actually. Go look at my post history and show me the 'other areas' I post.
1v1 me in mafia. Let's find out if he's right.
|
Didn't you used to post a bunch in the league area? Like I'm pretty sure that Damdred is ~5 games of you. Like he's had huge Waves of activity while you've been taking a break.
Besides, we both know that despite both of us having a bunch of experience we're both way better as mafia than as town. As town we both tend to meander more than carry.
|
On June 13 2015 03:08 geript wrote:
Oooh Damdred replaced in. That guy's town 100%. ezpz.
Is this just a joke, based on your history with the player? (eg, "damdred never rolls scum") Or are you actually trying to say something here?
|
Nah. Damdred is 100% town. He's gotten pretty easy to read.
|
On June 13 2015 03:28 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2015 03:25 batsnacks wrote:
I don't know what geripts alignment is... Clearly that guy is 3P.
I don't know what 3P means either.
|
Trfel hasn't re-evaluated in a while. If I ask myself if Trfel really cares if ruxxar gets lynched or I think the answer I get is no. I could possibly push him.
|
On June 12 2015 10:44 Oatsmaster wrote:
Anyway Trfel, what makes bats town?
I had a town lean on batsnacks due to the balance between his jokes and serious reads. Since then, batsnacks has been much more serious, and his jokes are few and far between, so this read isn't valid any more.
On June 12 2015 10:51 Oatsmaster wrote:
NAI is a new thing lol.
I kinda like ruxxar.
It was really funny that he answered a question not directed at him asking why people shouldnt answer questions not directed at them.
He doesnt do it intentionally to just create content IMO.
(bold added)
So if he doesn't do it intentionally, then why is it towny?
On June 12 2015 15:03 n00bKing wrote:
It's also worth noting that RuXx purposely furthered the conversation about Town players lying, AFTER he saw that some other players were reacting negatively to what he had said. If a Newbie scum player saw that what he had said was causing some raised eyebrows, he might clam up or change the subject, to get beyond the comment that had raised suspicion, and bury it. Instead, he challenges the people who expressed a contradictory viewpoint, which ensures that no readers who come along later will gloss over what he's said.
You could try to say that he didn't realize it was a controversial statement when he first made it. But even after it was clear to him (based on the posts of other players) that it was a controversial statement, he stuck to it, and called more attention to it. Again, I feel like this is boldness you would seldom see from an inexperienced scum player. This point about ruXxar continuing to press the lying issue is good. I guess I judged ruXxar too early.
##unvote
On June 12 2015 16:35 Rels wrote:
Hello everybody, GL HF!
I'll read the thread now and comment on things. See you soon. I really don't like this post at all. Posting without having read the thread is useless, the only thing it helps with is making it look like you're doing more work that you actually are, and it detracts from scumhunting. But making a useless post after the investigation has already started is pathetic.
On June 13 2015 00:22 Rels wrote:
Alright ruxxar I was unsure how to read you. But with this post I now believe you're a super excited townie. I too believe that we should not let mafia the ability to stay silent. Rels, what about ruXxar's post made you say this?
On June 13 2015 01:10 WaveofShadow wrote:
I can't decide now if I think geript and bats could be scum together for this horribleness. Association cases = bad but I can't help it and I THINK it's probably not the case. One of them at least for sure though.
I have no idea why someone as experienced as WaveofShadow would share a potential association case while in the same post acknowledging that association cases are bad. Please explain.
On June 13 2015 01:44 scott31337 wrote:
Good day. I'm at page 16 - So far not liking N00bking for his wordy fluff - and Rels gets a slight townread (even if it's for calling out my replacement). KS and Oats feel are two townies angry at each other.
Let me catch up with the rest and a through read. Why does calling out the player with only one post, who needs to get replaced, make someone town? Especially because, if you are town, he called out the easiest player to pick on who happens to be confirmed town.
I really don't like batsnacks' response to the pressure on him. Batsnacks doesn't normally react like this, he's fine under pressure. In my first game playing with him, I tunneled him for basically all of Day 1 and Night 1, and he made a post telling people to stop arguing about useless things and read the case I had posted on him.
I need to read some filters, but batsnacks seems very active, concerned about his safety, but not providing actual content.
On June 13 2015 06:42 n00bKing wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2015 03:28 geript wrote:On June 13 2015 03:25 batsnacks wrote:
I don't know what geripts alignment is... Clearly that guy is 3P. I don't know what 3P means either. Third party.
|
On June 13 2015 06:42 n00bKing wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2015 03:28 geript wrote:On June 13 2015 03:25 batsnacks wrote:
I don't know what geripts alignment is... Clearly that guy is 3P. I don't know what 3P means either.
It's a role that isn't in this game, don't worry about it.
|
Nevermind, I won't be pushing Trfel. -_-
|
Wave not making association cases would be far more concerning. Not a fan of trfel
|
On June 13 2015 06:47 geript wrote:
Wave not making association cases would be far more concerning. Not a fan of trfel
Why don't you like Trfel?
|
On June 13 2015 06:37 geript wrote:
Didn't you used to post a bunch in the league area? Like I'm pretty sure that Damdred is ~5 games of you. Like he's had huge Waves of activity while you've been taking a break.
Besides, we both know that despite both of us having a bunch of experience we're both way better as mafia than as town. As town we both tend to meander more than carry.
Yes but saying I'm not experienced is basically a lie.
I can call myself shit but nobody else can
/ego bruised
|
Batsnacks, any thoughts on Rels?
|
On June 13 2015 05:34 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2015 05:30 Sulfurus wrote:You just completely avoided my question. What do you think of Bats? @Wave ruXx makes a good case on him here and I would probably have my vote on him if it weren't for the fact that he played similar to this as town in the last newbie game. Essentially more thought needs to be put in before he gets bandwagoned. Bolded isn't true at all and you should know it isn't true because you were in the last one. I was a shining paragon of all things that are good and town in the last newbie game. And I think it did something to be because I just can't make it work this game.
Newbie X is the only game I've read on the site. So for anyone that hasn't read it, and is wondering which of Sulfurus/batsnacks is accurate here...I would not go so far as to say that batsnacks was the "shining paragon" he mentions, but he definitely did NOT play that game (in which he was Town) the same as he is playing this one. He was more invested in that game, more interested in that game, and especially more useful in that game. And since he was killed well before the game ended, I don't think he could reasonably say that he's apathetic in this one because of some sort of mental fatigue caused by the last one.
I don't see much of anything to indicate that batsnacks and Sulfurus are teammates. But I also don't see much that indicates either of them are Town.
|
On June 13 2015 06:47 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On June 13 2015 06:47 geript wrote:
Wave not making association cases would be far more concerning. Not a fan of trfel Why don't you like Trfel?
Not really something something I can put my finger on. Feels I guess. Maybe my impression of his meta is off from his actual meta since I don't think I've played a game with him for a bit.
@Wubby. It's ok. I still love you. I just found the heuristic used for experience a bit interesting and funny. A bit clever too. Besides, we both know it's like you/me/damdred for most experience I think. I think I have the most games played there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
