[M][N] I Still Can't Believe it's not Themed Mafia - Page 26

On June 16 2015 09:26 prplhz wrote:

he has 11 page filter and tons of text walls, he kept active and he had a lot of opinions on everything. boxerfred did enough that people should be able to read him town.

On June 16 2015 09:34 NaCl`y wrote:


Since he flipped town and the game is over then you can categorically say that from his own opinion, none of it was bull shit. Or at least, he had reason to believe some of the things he did. I mean this in no disrespect to yourself Justanothertownie but sometimes, even if you think otherwise, you can come off as incredibly brash and argumentative and it is not conducive to helping people feel good and divulging their opinions.

On June 16 2015 09:35 wherebugsgo wrote:


him taunting you should have been an obvious town-tell

how many new scum players do you think actually say some of the things boxer said this game? Some of his posts were walls of text, I can literally count the number of scum that do stuff like that on one hand and none of them play anymore.

On June 16 2015 09:47 wherebugsgo wrote:


I don't know what to say if you actually believe this, you seem to be so tunneled on this that I don't think you're thinking objectively on the matter.

Scum very rarely put in the type of effort and specificity that boxer did this game. His play was fine, and IMO actually very good given his experience. I personally would love to have players like him in games that I play.

For people like you and marv who misread him, the onus is on you to figure out why you read him wrong. He did more than enough to prove himself and I have already shown that to you. If you can't accept that then you should reevaluate the way you think about other players.

On June 16 2015 09:49 wherebugsgo wrote:


I don't understand what you want to hear.

You were wrong. If you want to not be wrong in the future, don't blame your own faults on another player.

On June 16 2015 09:56 wherebugsgo wrote:
Again, that is not true.

The people responsible for a mislynch are the ones who voted. Period.

Yes, players have responsibilities to defend themselves, but some people (like you) will tunnel a lynch so hard it won't matter what anyone says.

On June 16 2015 10:01 prplhz wrote:
it just makes no sense to blame others for your read on them as long as they make an effort in good faith and he did just that. it doesn't make sense to tell people not to do what they did when they did their best as town. by definition they can't be any townier than that, they can't fake being townier than they naturally appear because that in itself is scummy.

On June 16 2015 10:02 prplhz wrote:

pretty sure you misunderstood that then. it's your fault for getting mislynched and it's your fault for mislynching someone. it's always your own fault

On June 16 2015 10:03 wherebugsgo wrote:


Perhaps you should then ask why Palmar gets mislynched so often.

This is not and has never been good advice. People get lynched all the time for all sorts of stupid reasons. In fact, every lynch in this game is a prime example of that.

Yes, sometimes you can put a lot of the blame on the player who got mislynched but more often than not the majority of the voters didn't bother to read the victim properly.

Also I find it funny that you don't even notice the irony in this statement. The attitude behind saying "I do not care if you disagree" is pretty much exactly the reason your read was wrong.

On June 16 2015 10:06 prplhz wrote:

who cares who is the worst player in the game? the point of it isn't to place blame, the point is that you should always look at yourself to get better.

On June 16 2015 10:07 prplhz wrote:

how is not martyring townier than martyring? like, if you look at this game, a townie martyred (boxerfred) and no scum martyred. wouldn't that indicate that martyring is actually a townie thing to do?

On June 16 2015 10:07 wherebugsgo wrote:
also I want to point out that shifting the blame on the person who got mislynched does nothing to further your chances at winning the game.

When someone gets lynched you need to go back and look at who contributed to getting that person lynched, because the person that got lynched NO LONGER HAS AN INFLUENCE ON THE GAME.

When you shift the blame to the person that just died you basically psychologically have just shot yourself in the foot because the people who voted that person now do not share that burden of blame. It may not be conscious but the rage response that occurs afterward is really dangerous because now you are gonna go in wondering why that player played poorly instead of asking the proper questions that'll actually get you further along in finding scum.

On June 16 2015 10:11 prplhz wrote:

you are 100% to blame for placing your vote on a town player who did everything he could to show you he was town.

On June 16 2015 10:18 rsoultin wrote:
awwwww i missed the fireworks

jaaaat what was that about improving my town game?

+ Show Spoiler +