Generic Boring Mini Mafia - Page 8

On May 22 2015 05:08 Damdred wrote:
You know GB, this is just a piece of friendly advice stop making wagers about your playing time in games. Strong arming people like that is not the right way to play especially when you are wrong.

You have a narrative that you think makes me scum when it doesn't, oh well. When I flip town look at zealos and stutters both promising content and vanishing again.

They will probably delurk soon after this post

On May 19 2015 03:58 Damdred wrote:
Game is decently easy though,

I know my alignment
GB is most likely town here
Scib is really towny
Stutters won't be lynched
Oats/Oneg shouldn't probably be lynched today probably.
Vivax is falling but I like him when he is atm
palmar is palmar I think he's still townish

Shining is a plynch hope he gets more active
qwerty hasn't posted at all if we plynch it should be him

Which leaves
Shockers who's posts are just weird at the high end of the mafia spectrum
Obi who I think did scummy things but not sure if I would 100% lynch him probably would vig him if he's still being lazy soon
and ze

On May 22 2015 06:27 Damdred wrote:
Because Palmar put a good case out and he figures game out.

On May 22 2015 09:23 ObiWanShinobi wrote:


Zealos/Stutters/Shockey.

The Vivax case was okay, but the biggest issue with it was that Vivax never even bothered defending himself outside of his EoD reads post that got him lynched. It doesn't concern me at all that Damdred changed his read the way he did because I did the same thing.

I would revisit Damdred if he's still around tomorrow or on lylo or something, but that's it. We need to purge inactives, and if they're town we can't keep them around until lylo because we can't rely on them to make sensible decisions if they're not playing the game.

If they come back and make good posts then we can reassess, but until then this is what needs to be done.

(Plus, shockey is super scummy and we should probably lynch him at some point anyhoezels.)

On May 22 2015 11:12 ShoCkeyy wrote:
So I read most of your responses in terms of lynching me, that's fine. No need to defend myself against that because it would be a waste of my time. I'm here to try and figure out who's the mafia, not defend myself to the teeth as to why I'm not mafia, I already know I'm not mafia. I don't even get why most of you consider my posts scummy but on the other hand let people like Obi pass right under you.



It's not a theory, it's fact, you're scum. Also, I gotta ask, why are most of your posts worthless? and you have at least a few of these:





Your voting completely says another thing. You have yet to respond seriously to any of my posts, you completely ignore them and you sheep other peoples lynches to look good. Then there is Zealos, who I'm still building up my case on him.

On May 22 2015 13:02 Oatsmaster wrote:

"but why not lynching oats" implies that you want to lynch me.

Nobody else in the game even mentioned me being scum so you cant be asking why they think Im scum.

On May 22 2015 13:03 Oatsmaster wrote:
Also can everyone in the game just fucking vote please.
dont post, dont vote, how do we even know who you want to lynch much less if you are scum or not.

I'm extremely lazy to build that case on Damdred, but I'll sum up the points I may be working upon:

1) Not wanting to give a read on me based on early games' lack of information, instantly giving palmar a town read without even revisiting it.

2) The most important: giving a town read on Vivax throghout the whole day1 but ending on voting him in the end. Gave scumreads on obi and Zealos. Never engages Zealos. Never votes for obi. When obi was with aot of votes, Damdred orefer to vote Vivax, a town lean, arguing that Palmar's case was very good, which couldn't be read as that in Damdred's perspectice because: Palmar's main point was Vivax raising suspicions on Damdred but never doing anything with it. This is not purely logical - part of this argument is associative. If Damdred is town he should realise this is not a strong argument. Second point of Palmar's case is about vivax making a lot of random suspicions and reads, something that Damdred TOWNREAD VIVAX FOR. So this point shouldn't be enough to convince Damdred. Last argument on Palmar's case was Vivax inactivity, which EVEN PALMAR SAID WAS A WEAK ARGUMENT. And Damdred uses this to JUSTIFY HIS VOTE ON VIVAX, but only after OBI STATES INACTIVITY IS ALIGNMENT INDICATIVE. He simply parroted obi. If inactivity is a problem for Damdred, WHY NOT LYNCHING ZEALOS, HIS ORIGINAL SCUMREAD, WHO ALSO WENT INACTIVE??? Damdred raises a lot of suspicions on Zealos but NEVER really does anything with it.

3) When I talk about a VIGI shot on Damdred, he instantly claims "blue" (without even saying what his role is). This makes no sense from a blue's perspectice because: (i) I was the first one to raise suspicions on him and it was still early night1. If he has an important role, it's way more important to try to establish your innocence while discussing with people, and not claiming being a power role instantly because he could be killed by Mafia, and (ii) it doesn't make sense to claim he is s blue without giving his role unless he is afraid of being counter claimed. So, saying he is blue is a safe way to stay away from a Vigi shot in a closed setup game.
His blue claim wasn't a townie wanting to establish his innocence to avoid having town wasting a bullet. His blue claim was a survival one, coming from a guy who doesn't want to get shot by vigi but isn't afraid of getting shot by Mafia.

On May 22 2015 15:23 Damdred wrote:


GB hasn't drooped his acum read on me he's still tunneled as no other. So yes it does hold water.

Sure, trfel/oats/zealos. Its a possibility. Stutters is possible shock doesn't have to be scum necessarily