|
On May 20 2015 07:37 Damdred wrote: Stop,being bad GB. Vivax did not play like this in assassination he obviously cared and looked towny near eod where as here he didn't.
And again thus shirt point about ze who's on content at the time was in me how was I going to,engage him objectively at that point again?
Why don't you lynch him for inactivity then, instead of Vivax?
|
Zealos.
If he wasn't generating more content that you could work on, why not lynching your scumread for inactivity?
|
You know I'm talking about content, not filter length.
And calling me bad won't help you.
|
Like no, really. For all the reasons Palmar called Vivax Mafia, one was inactivity, which he even assumed was a shitty argument. The second was posts you already know and called Vivax TOWN for it. The third was Vivax throwing suspicions at you but not going after you, which PART of this argument is associative read, especially because Palmar was scumreading you. But if you're town, the association is flawed and this argument should look weak for you, not strong enough to guarantee your vote on Vivax.
|
On May 20 2015 07:45 Damdred wrote: You are being nonsensival, not having a lot of,content I,can work with objectively doesn't make him inactive. That's just idiotic
Alright Damdred, I'm not discussing with you anymore, I'm already convinced you're 400% Mafia and I can make an ironclad case on you based on everything you've already dropped in thread. Fortunately we may have a vigi that can shoot you tonight. I really HOPE it happens.
|
On May 20 2015 07:52 Damdred wrote: Hard claiming blue, I'll leave my final thoughts before end of night if a dumb vig hits me or if mafia takes me out.
Which I hope it does happen IDK that I was scrappy towards ze which I do apologize for I feel bad for the trolling.
This isn't a fun game for me good luck any questions just leave them
I'm also hard claiming blue now.
Easy to do in a closed setup huh?
|
On May 20 2015 08:30 Damdred wrote: The game really isn't that inactive though, some people do need to step up but it is what it is.
Also actively lurking eh stutters
This. So bad...
|
I'm here sciberbia I don't have much to talk about, tho.
|
On May 20 2015 09:33 Damdred wrote: Might as well convince people I'm mafia before I shoot you during the night GB
I will, but I'm lazy right now
|
I'm drunk.
Palmar damded and ovi we the Mafia. Team
|
Do you guys like megadeth?
|
My drunk senses (TM) also says that qwerty stutters and Shockey is an awesome team
|
Sciberbia, ask drunk GB (C)
|
Hry!!!!!!!
Look at the time!!!
5 am!
Best tkme to vigi shoot Damdred
Brb ok kthxbai
|
On May 20 2015 17:15 sciberbia wrote: Ask you what? Do you know whose smurf qwerty is?
Drunk GB = best GB
I have no idea and I don't think it's holyflare
|
Don't worry I'm not the VIGI lol but if I was I would never shoot anyone but damdre
But I'm not blur, which sucks
Deadlibe is 12 hours from now enough tune to babe a case on Damdred
|
Sleeping is fur weeks Tho
|
I'm sober now
Extremely hangover, but sober
Palmar is Mafia.
|
Why would scum shoot palmar...
|
On May 20 2015 03:20 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On May 20 2015 01:32 Palmar wrote:On May 20 2015 00:27 GlowingBear wrote:On May 20 2015 00:13 Palmar wrote: Also at Oats, I'm not sure this makes shocks mafia. Generally people who come up with convoluted and overly complex conspiracy theories are paranoid townes. Palmar, the problem here is that I debunked his whole case on me and when showing that he was wrong, he simply decided to ignore those points. I've caught him straight up lying about my list post, for example. And when I asked him to assume, hypothetically, that I'm town (which simply destroys any association), he gave a scumread out of association. He is simply calling 3 people Mafia and not caring for the rest of the game. He made a group and is trying to get this group lynched, but has NO opinion on other players. I think none of this necessarily makes him mafia. He could be, who knows. But I just don't think that's the case. Explain to me why Shockey is town like I am a child.
My soft claim, for reference.
|
|
|
|