|
On April 29 2015 01:55 indignant wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2015 01:40 Stutters695 wrote:
Question: is pgo generally considered an anti-town role? Depends on how it is used I guess? Why? Are you thinking about why HF also claimed a claim restriction?
Yeah, I have a definite anti-town role that can be basically nullified for claiming and it will cost about half my health. If I say literally anything more than that, it happens (even this post might trigger it since it's kinda obvious). Obviously if it gets triggered I'll full claim.
Point being, it's heavily restricted and if I changed the name to PGO instead of my role it would be triggered doing what he's claimed. I'm probably just being paranoid (pun intended), but it makes me a little uneasy.
|
On April 29 2015 02:00 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2015 01:55 Stutters695 wrote:
I'd be down to have Sep and Rso fight it out deathmatch style lol why? just rocking that double-buss theory or something?
Well if that happens, I hope people would knock hp off sep and you'd live. But your play is incredibly active without doing much and I don't like it.
|
On April 29 2015 02:09 indignant wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2015 02:04 Stutters695 wrote:On April 29 2015 01:55 indignant wrote:On April 29 2015 01:40 Stutters695 wrote:
Question: is pgo generally considered an anti-town role? Depends on how it is used I guess? Why? Are you thinking about why HF also claimed a claim restriction? Yeah, I have a definite anti-town role that can be basically nullified for claiming and it will cost about half my health. Sounds very very familiar.
I don't get it.
|
On April 29 2015 02:15 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2015 02:09 Stutters695 wrote:On April 29 2015 02:00 rsoultin wrote:On April 29 2015 01:55 Stutters695 wrote:
I'd be down to have Sep and Rso fight it out deathmatch style lol why? just rocking that double-buss theory or something? Well if that happens, I hope people would knock hp off sep and you'd live. But your play is incredibly active without doing much and I don't like it. -_- you're not making much sense. are you scumreading me or aren't you? i'm really getting tired of people saying i don't do much, but i guess if it's this widespread a feeling about my play maybe i just suck -_-
I think Sep is scum, but if he flips town, I'm very confident you're not town. I'm beginning to think it already. So you being weaker makes you easier to deal with and puts you in a position where you actually have to try. Win-win in my book.
|
No damage/notifications. I didn't use my power last night either as I think it'll be way stronger as the game goes on.
|
On April 29 2015 12:22 rsoultin wrote:
lol >< starting with people's interpretations of the deafening silence so far this phase
i mean i'm not sure it's possible to read into it so much, but you'd think there'd be more resistance to a vivax lynch than this if he were mafia? possibly? does that sound crazy?
not that i really am inclined to townread him for it cause
1. he's definitely not done anything townie today so far
2. could just be being left out to dry
3. ehhhh i always get timing on the euros wrong lol >< and the day just started come to think of it
actually i don't know why i brought this up :/ maybe it just bugs me how quiet everything is
If he was town, he'd try to fight it. If mafia defended him, they would out themselves real easy. Until more happens, it's hard to take a lot out of night actions and this is the result unfortunately.
|
On April 29 2015 15:26 Xatalos wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2015 07:01 Inspector Javert wrote:
No one died are you shitting me? Btw is this the reaction of a townie after nobody died >.>
A scum doesn't post this in the thread usually.
|
On April 29 2015 23:10 rsoultin wrote:i will acknowledge that i don't do much in the way of case-building or mass quotes though  not my style bueno yes, ls, shining is pretty underwhelming...i liked some of what stutters said here and there but i haven't actually gone through his filter so :/ kinda reserving judgment on him for right now. i don't see him being lynched over vivax/sepu at any rate
Just woke up, I'm not getting lynched. Vivax is scum.
Catching up.
|
On April 29 2015 20:31 marvellosity wrote:by the way, someone (maybe me) should go look at relevancies of d1 votes at the moment. like i was just skimming the playerlist because xata asked me that question. And I thought, where is The Shining? What do I even think of him? This vote for example - sandroba was leading 7-4 in the votes. Only 7 minutes to go. It is absolutely logical for a mafiaplayer to vote sandroba in that situation.
Sorry, I just saw this. Yes, I can see that, but what about with Sand's power?
7-4 in favor of Sand, but Sand hadn't made his play yet and it is a pretty safe assumption the other scummers knew his power. So the practical count there is 6-6, do you think Shining puts Sand further in the lead there when a vote on Yamato would have been just as easy to justify for him?
Did you take this into account when you said that? It doesn't seem like the sort of thing you'd miss.
|
On April 30 2015 02:01 Holyflare wrote:
go for the people that look like scum not the ones that could have been sitting in a qt plotting the exact number of votes at the exact time in that cluster fuck of a deadline
Oh I absolutely agree. That just seemed uncharacteristically not thought out of Marv compared to what I'd expect from him. It's not as clear cut as it's the logical thing for mafia to do, which is what the impression I got out of marv's posts on Shining lately.
|
Also, voting Vivax before I forget again. Night voting throws me off.
|
I'm inclined to believe it based off of his earlier post/Koshi flip.
|
On April 30 2015 02:19 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2015 02:10 Stutters695 wrote:On April 30 2015 02:01 Holyflare wrote:
go for the people that look like scum not the ones that could have been sitting in a qt plotting the exact number of votes at the exact time in that cluster fuck of a deadline Oh I absolutely agree. That just seemed uncharacteristically not thought out of Marv compared to what I'd expect from him. It's not as clear cut as it's the logical thing for mafia to do, which is what the impression I got out of marv's posts on Shining lately. It's still pretty clear cut - there's a whole range of possibilities such as sandroba not saying what his powers are/were, sandroba not being around, Shining not being around, the fact that sandroba has to publically use his powers, and what have you. There was little reason to believe, I think, that yamato was going to get a spurt more votes, regardless of sandroba's voting powers. Plus what I said was intrinsically connected to what Shining had said earlier in the day about sandroba and his subsequent rather large explanation just a few minutes from deadline
I might be giving him too much credit, but if he doesn't throw out the second post justifying voting Sandroba he could have easily gotten away with voting Yamato as a lurker.
I'm not convinced on Shining, but that answered what I wanted to know about you. I feel better.
|
On April 30 2015 02:34 indignant wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2015 02:32 Stutters695 wrote:On April 30 2015 02:19 marvellosity wrote:On April 30 2015 02:10 Stutters695 wrote:On April 30 2015 02:01 Holyflare wrote:
go for the people that look like scum not the ones that could have been sitting in a qt plotting the exact number of votes at the exact time in that cluster fuck of a deadline Oh I absolutely agree. That just seemed uncharacteristically not thought out of Marv compared to what I'd expect from him. It's not as clear cut as it's the logical thing for mafia to do, which is what the impression I got out of marv's posts on Shining lately. It's still pretty clear cut - there's a whole range of possibilities such as sandroba not saying what his powers are/were, sandroba not being around, Shining not being around, the fact that sandroba has to publically use his powers, and what have you. There was little reason to believe, I think, that yamato was going to get a spurt more votes, regardless of sandroba's voting powers. Plus what I said was intrinsically connected to what Shining had said earlier in the day about sandroba and his subsequent rather large explanation just a few minutes from deadline I might be giving him too much credit, but if he doesn't throw out the second post justifying voting Sandroba he could have easily gotten away with voting Yamato as a lurker. I'm not convinced on Shining, but that answered what I wanted to know about you. I feel better. I am pretty sure Shining is off the table anyways dude :p
Haha yeah. Phone posting and I'm at work, so I was typing that, got busy then finished it without checking the thread.
Anyway, if we're lynching FF, Vivax has to fight.
|
Well that was uneventful lol.
|
On April 30 2015 02:48 indignant wrote:
Does all of this make bats pretty likely town? The whole botched interrogation + FF pushed for his lynch eod?
The thing with Shining makes me think so but he didn't really push him EoD. If anything, I'd say it makes Damdred look better since he used his Sandroba vote as his justification for switching off. More than likely though, he probably just needed an excuse to get off of Sand and Damdred happen to be the most convenient.
Either way, I'm not putting much into that, especially before he flips.
|
Also, with us at 11 on FF, I know it doesn't really matter, but it bugs me how many people have been avoiding the real wagons, especially now that we know that vote manipulation is a thing in this.
|
On April 30 2015 03:58 indignant wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2015 03:55 Stutters695 wrote:On April 30 2015 02:48 indignant wrote:
Does all of this make bats pretty likely town? The whole botched interrogation + FF pushed for his lynch eod? The thing with Shining makes me think so but he didn't really push him EoD. If anything, I'd say it makes Damdred look better since he used his Sandroba vote as his justification for switching off. More than likely though, he probably just needed an excuse to get off of Sand and Damdred happen to be the most convenient. Either way, I'm not putting much into that, especially before he flips. What are you talking about? FF was on bats and not on damdred. I don't even know what damdred has to do with all of this. The vote justification thing is not very conclusive in my opinion.
I was saying FF was on Bats but he switched to Bats because Damdred voted Sandroba. I just read it again and it looks like I fucked up the order of events since he was on Bats before saying that so disregard that previous post.
|
On April 30 2015 05:04 indignant wrote:
I find that hard to believe FF. This role sucks.
I'm not sold on the role sucking. Before he claimed, he was a vet that if he plays town, must be RBd or hit twice. If he was definitely town that isn't that shabby, would probably soak at least one NK.
|
For what it's worth, the tradeoff to claiming his negative portion, seems to be in line for what happens if I claim the downside to my role.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
