EPTHF wouldnt do something dumb like associate himself so easily with a partner by lying about that so I have no idea what it means. #greymistgame
Aperture Mafia 4: This Time it's Personal - Page 223
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
VayneAuthority
United States8983 Posts
HF wouldnt do something dumb like associate himself so easily with a partner by lying about that so I have no idea what it means. #greymistgame | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
Sure why not | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On April 02 2015 09:15 batsnacks wrote: I fine with lynching damdred if he's lying but I don't think voting him now is going to help anything. He either is or isn't and we'll find out soon enough. @kitaman That's all the info I have about the soul fragment: negative reputation = can pm, good reputation = can't pm Bats, you didn't answer the question. So let's try again. On April 02 2015 09:08 Half the Sky wrote: Associative reads? If you don't like Damdred, why are you voting for me and not Damdred? | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
My efforts at asking did not prove fruitful. unless you know something I don't we both have the same information. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On April 02 2015 09:28 Half the Sky wrote: Bats, you didn't answer the question. So let's try again. I'm voting you because you're scummy and I felt like voting because no one else was and I don't think kita is ever the lynch today, there's way scummier people (you). | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On April 02 2015 09:32 batsnacks wrote: I'm voting you because you're scummy and I felt like voting because no one else was and I don't think kita is ever the lynch today, there's way scummier people (you). Maybe you should try explaining why she's scum if you want people to vote her. Just sayin'. You haven't mentioned her all game but day starts and suddenly shes your 100% lynch target instead of people like ExO and Sepulchre who you've wanted to lynch all game? | ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
On April 02 2015 09:07 VisceraEyes wrote: Can confirm receipt of mask. I role claim to you and give you free shit and you still not talk to me in PM land  | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On April 02 2015 09:32 batsnacks wrote: I'm voting you because you're scummy and I felt like voting because no one else was and I don't think kita is ever the lynch today, there's way scummier people (you). Redundant. Let's try this one more time. You're voting me because I'm scummy. Of course you should be voting for scummy people. What is making me such? You're voting me because I voted Kita? I voted Kita after you voted me. I hope that's not the reason. You scumread me D1 for being forgettable. I provided a pre-game RL reason for being inactive. I was in PM land all of last cycle. So you're going to need 1) a better reason to scumread me 2) other scumreads because there are multiple scum, and from what I can tell you don't have much in the way of any scumreads. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On April 02 2015 09:37 Keirathi wrote: Maybe you should try explaining why she's scum if you want people to vote her. Just sayin'. You haven't mentioned her all game but day starts and suddenly shes your 100% lynch target instead of people like ExO and Sepulchre who you've wanted to lynch all game? I'm getting to that probably. Right now I just feel like voting. exo's claim is legit enough to not lynch him, I would rather lynch slam than exo because he's the one that used the power or maybe RS for asking for that power to begin with. Those two are way worse than exo. Sepu is scummy and could be mafia but it just seems lame voting for him at this point. I don't have anything big against him. Calling him mafia and voting for him wasn't getting much done either. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On April 02 2015 09:37 Keirathi wrote: Maybe you should try explaining why she's scum if you want people to vote her. Just sayin'. You haven't mentioned her all game but day starts and suddenly shes your 100% lynch target instead of people like ExO and Sepulchre who you've wanted to lynch all game? And besides all that, it is exceptionally weird that you know Damdred is probably telling the truth about the soul fragment usage, and yet you still don't want to lynch kita? | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
| ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On April 02 2015 09:41 Keirathi wrote: And besides all that, it is exceptionally weird that you know Damdred is probably telling the truth about the soul fragment usage, and yet you still don't want to lynch kita? 100% | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
| ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On April 02 2015 09:43 batsnacks wrote: Of course I think damdred is telling the truth he claimed to have the item I sent. Why does that make kita scummy though? You said that "good reputation people can't PM. bad reputation people can". Damdred said he used the item on rsoultin and kita. rsoultin could pm. kita couldn't. Shouldn't that mean (to you at the very least since you know for sure what the item is and how it works) that kita is scum? | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
| ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
| ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
Why aren't you trying to figure it out and just ignoring it? | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On April 02 2015 09:50 Keirathi wrote: At the VERY LEAST, you should know that that means kita has a "bad reputation", whatever that means. Why aren't you trying to figure it out and just ignoring it? How am I supposed to "figure it out?" I posted everything I know in the thread already. I'm not going to vote kita just because he has a "bad reputation." If "bad reputation" = mafia then the power would just say "mafia" and not "bad reputation." | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On April 02 2015 09:53 batsnacks wrote: How am I supposed to "figure it out?" I posted everything I know in the thread already. I'm not going to vote kita just because he has a "bad reputation." If "bad reputation" = mafia then the power would just say "mafia" and not "bad reputation." If you have an item whose only purpose you can understand is to block players from using PMs and whose investigative results mean nothing, why are you even using it? | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On April 02 2015 09:56 kitaman27 wrote: If you have an item whose only purpose you can understand is to block players from using PMs and whose investigative results mean nothing, why are you even using it? I said this earlier but I gave it to ritoky because I thought he would understand, and because I was townreading him. He claimed to have 11 items. I had hoped one of them was "reputation" related. | ||
| ||
