EPTSorry for my absence. I've read the whole thread. PM me. I'll be around all day tomorrow. Going to bed now though.
Aperture Mafia 4: This Time it's Personal - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
Sorry for my absence. I've read the whole thread. PM me. I'll be around all day tomorrow. Going to bed now though. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
| ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
Compare that to here where he is trying a bit too hard to have well formed opinions on people despite the fact that it's still just day 1. Even his opening feels forced. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On March 31 2015 03:15 Koshi wrote: Onegu is town. Lightening strike is town. Obiwan is town. Jat is town. Snarfs is very likely town but he could be faking his pms. Kita is going to be town or he plays better town than most of the townplayers this game. VE is extremely smart this game. I would not be surprised if he was nightkilled. I think he is wrong on snarfs so there is some restriction to call him town (I respect vets their scumplay) but he is a townleader this game. rsoultin I have restrictions about but is probably town. HF claimed 3p? I wouldn't lynch him anyway. The sicklucker read was shit but maybe he has another wincon. Like killing 3p. Who the fuck knows. I don't think he is playing for mafia. VA seems town. I do need to read his Damdred read. He needs to be respected for his reads when he plays, and he is playing. So I will reread Damdred to see if there is something in it. What are you basing your VE read on? I don't think he's being much of a townleader at all. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On March 31 2015 03:29 WaveofShadow wrote: Actually whoa I just realized something that I probably should have realized before when I noticed yamato's early game hasn't fit his usual. Hell he hasn't had one period of good activity yet this game. Most importantly though, I acted (at least in my mind) fairly similarly to this game post-D1 in my last game with him where he staunchly defended me against all odds while I was afk and/or not giving a shit. He hasn't noticed my behaviour or come to close to it where even HF who is claimed 3P and has no vested interest in helping me out besides being my bud was amiable on PMs. It's been a while since I've seen a yamato scum but this could be it. Bold is why I put you in my town reads day 1. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On March 31 2015 03:33 rsoultin wrote: come at me bitches! unprotected cleric ripe for the picking  -bounces around- and if anyone can tell me why they're so certain kita is town i'd loooooove to hear it I'll tell you why I'm town reading kita now. He's the only person who contacted me by PM and followed up when I responded. It doesn't make sense to me for scum to bother. I had a terrible day 1 and could easily be mislynched. Plus, scum are thinking that I'm not a likely person to try and convince others that someone is town just because they PM me. There's really little reason. Plus, he sounded like he null read me. Plus, I liked his case on BH. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On March 31 2015 04:07 Half the Sky wrote: Snarfs I just dived your filter. I have never played with you so I am disregarding meta. You've hardly done jack all this game. I see a few town reads. Do you have any scumreads? Have your thoughts on Damdred changed any based on what you said on him before? Unless I misunderstood he appeared to be your strongest scumread. No, my thoughts on Damdred have not changed. I've been leaning scum on hapa because of his case on Trfel. He seemed like a target people were already leaning scum towards and hapa's contribution was underwhelming but very wordy. VE, leaning mafia. I expected him to push his scum reads to try to determine their reactions/motivations but despite the fact that we've both been active in thread today he's made no effort to engage me. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On March 30 2015 02:39 VisceraEyes wrote: My issue with snarfs is the really "pro-town" intro post with a complete lack of followup with regard to actually finding mafia and deciding on a lynch target as a town. Like, his whole thing was "I want a Warrior who will lynch according to the majority decision" but has opted out of discussing who actually IS mafia or who SHOULD be lynched today, all day. Could these actions not also be described by someone who was away during the weekend but wanted to get town started out on the right foot? | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On March 31 2015 04:37 yamato77 wrote: Snarfs seems okay to me on a quick glance. I tunneled the shit out of him in the Student game to no avail and also read up on his meta. Not really seeming like mafia here. Although, it isn't true that he doesn't know what kind of player Hapa is. He was traitor in TTABE when Hapa was mafia. Yes, it was a while ago but he shouldn't have forgotten. Just a small point though. I don't remember anything from the games I played mafia/traitor. I hate playing mafia because I hate lying. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
| ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
| ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On March 31 2015 06:43 Blazinghand wrote: Crossfire please read my case instead of doing whatever you think is a good use of your time, you never mention keir in your filter http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/481138-aperture-mafia-4-this-time-its-personal?page=147#2929 I like your case, BH. Especially the defense of Exo. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On March 30 2015 07:54 Chezitwo wrote: (VA best lynch) | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
| ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On March 31 2015 09:55 yamato77 wrote: Well if VA didn't kill crossfire, who did? I did not think of that.  | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
For what it's worth, that's probably the only piece of information I got from him. He thought ritoky was town and that we'd wait and see about hapa. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
| ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
| ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
| ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
Is that correct? | ||
| ||
