EPTIf there's room.
Edit: I'm fine being a replacement if it's full.
Aperture Mafia 4: This Time it's Personal
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
If there's room. Edit: I'm fine being a replacement if it's full. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
I just don't know exactly what "directly" means. Obviously I can't screenshot a PM, that seems pretty direct. But where's the line? Can I say: "VE said ______"? Can I say "VE said _____ at 10:58 yesterday"? What if 10:58 is a lie? Can I say "VE told me yesterday ______"? I'm getting bad memories of English class you must put it in your own words directions. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On March 26 2015 09:34 GreYMisT wrote: Almost anything less than a screenshot/direct copy pasting is fine. I would say a good rule is you may neither post or represent that you are posting a direct copy of another player's role PM. This is to prevent scenarios in which players prove something by matching up time stamps/reading the way in which someone wrote something. This rule mainly applies to a host regarding certain PMs you recieve in game. In the case of those I would say the best course of action is to simply paraphrase the information. To be more specific to your questions I am ok with all of them (depends on what fills in the blank, but they look ok) except for the second one. I would err away from that. Great, thank you  | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
First, two general tips: 1. Lots of players = lots of confusion. Spam posts should be kept to a minimum as it will be VERY difficult to wade through all the distractions to determine alignment. 2. Role speculation on day 1 is spam. There is no point in trying to guess setup at this point, or talking about how wonderful the flavour text is. It is a distraction from finding mafia/3p. Now, onto day 1 strategy: Adventuring Party I believe our Adventuring Party should follow strict guidelines as to how they act. Everyone should either express their agreement or disagreement with these guidelines as soon as possible so that we can keep track of people's stances before they get voted in. Please let me know if you disagree, and why. Warrior - Our warrior should be someone who agrees to nominate a lynch based on a plurality vote. He/she should agree that it is important to get lots of opinions on the candidate before deciding on who to vote and SHOULD NOT be someone who will just pick their gut target. We need information from the day 1 lynch more than we need to hit mafia/3p. We need to know why people are for/against a certain lynch. A cowboy warrior will not give us that information. Rogue - Our rogue should be someone who agrees NOT to no lynch. There is one circumstance I see a no lynch being acceptable on day 1, and that is only if the warrior goes rogue and chooses a target of their preference without listening to town. The rogue should agree to this as the ONLY circumstance for no lynch. Not based on their own 'gut' feelings. I was trying to think of a way we can focus votes so that we guarantee we don't get a last minute swap of rogue/cleric. I think the only way this is possible is if we can find two candidates who agree to both of the above criteria and try to split our votes evenly to boost those two players. Normally, this is where I'd nominate myself, but I can guarantee I will NOT be online for the first deadline. Discuss! | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
| ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
| ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
I just finished reading the thread and was going back through filters. I'll try to be here for an hour or so then as mentioned before may not be back before deadline. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
That's a very good find. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
The opener is sort of a half having fun vote me for mayor post / half serious discussion. And calling out hapa for being afk seemed premature rather than just waiting to see if he showed up. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On March 29 2015 10:16 justanothertownie wrote: No. the point is that he evidently did show up without delivering anything of worth. Okay let me double check that. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
No, hapa was here for the first 20 minutes then went afk. That hardly counts as showing up given how trolly the first parts of these games can be. Then Kita called him out like 17 hours later or so. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On March 29 2015 10:23 kitaman27 wrote: Aren't I doing exactly what you're calling me out for with this post? But that's not what you said originally... It sounded to me like you thought he was mafia 12 hours before that. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On March 29 2015 10:27 justanothertownie wrote: 17 hours later during which one would expect town Hapa to make an impact. He returned a few times later and still did nothing at all. Couldnt he just be busy? | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On March 29 2015 10:31 kitaman27 wrote: Yeah I found it scummy at that point in comparison to how strong he starts other town games I've seen him and he hasn't exactly changed my mind yet. i'm not convinced he's town either. I'm just also wondering why you would justify lynching a town player. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On March 29 2015 10:34 justanothertownie wrote: Sure but when he just appears to post something irrelevant and leaves again that doesn't really look like it. You have to keep in mind that Hapa is really good at pushing a thread forward/leading a town while he hates playing as scum. Oh. Well if i knew he hated playing as scum then it becomes easier to accept this is the play of someone who just doesn't want to play. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On March 29 2015 10:36 Holyflare wrote: hapa was playing voice mafia all night /stirdatpot What are you implying? | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On March 29 2015 10:25 sicklucker wrote: also this is the scummiest post in the game. Like who would trust a chezittwo Why do you actually think he's scummy? I don't get the bank thing and don't realllllly care at this point. I trust him because he's pointing out things that seem to be helping town find scum rather than mislynches which seems opposite of what scum would be doing. | ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
| ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
| ||
|
Snarfs
Canada1006 Posts
On March 29 2015 12:03 LightningStrike wrote: Snarfs thoughts on me? Honestly not sure. | ||
| ||
