| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
On March 03 2015 14:31 Snickers wrote: please tell me how I have shown I havent been reading the thread Also let me get this straight. These arnt even the worst. Post count = amount of content Asks for meta --> doesnt put meta in case Should i go on? I only have like two posts left lol. But dw I will show you all what you are missing tomorrow. | ||
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
not giving a fuck about a shitty question = refusing to answer If you do lynch me, dont rage lynch trfel, that dude is town as fuck. | ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
On March 03 2015 12:16 prplhz wrote: 26 @rsoultin Can you show me this Alakaslam bored/notbored read thing you have going on? I just checked out these scum games 1 3 7 and these town games 1 51 i and I don't see it. No, my meta read is good on slam rsoultins is bad. Count how many times he has said chupazi, Svengali, or hijole this game(after day post) multiply by (5-day #) then subtract he post count (including pregame) if you are in the negative he is scum. In the positive he is town. | ||
|
OnceKing
United States939 Posts
Alakaslam (3): Onegu, rsoultin, Damdred ritoky (2): Palmar, Alakaslam prplhz (2): IAmRobik, Snickers Palmar (1): Superbia Snickers (1): MysteryMeat1 (0): Not voted (3): ritoky, MysteryMeat1, Oatsmaster As it currently stands, Alakaslam is slated to be deported. The voting thread is located here. Countdown: | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
| ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
how sure are you on prp? | ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
Palmar left an unexplained vote on prphlz which never made it to the voting thread, but says he will policy vote all unexplained votes. Or is the reason that prphlz placed an unexplained vote earlier in the game? I don't understand this game at all. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
Happy birthday Trfel! Well this game is kind of hard to understand. Maybe it will be better tomorrow? Maybe it will be better tonight? I'm starting to like the Alakaslam lynch more but there are tons of people who should die. Oatsmaster is literally not doing anything. I would expect both of them to try more in this town environment. | ||
|
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 04 2015 02:56 Trfel wrote: No one supports me in my push on Snickers, but no one is saying why it is bad. Palmar left an unexplained vote on prphlz which never made it to the voting thread, but says he will policy vote all unexplained votes. Or is the reason that prphlz placed an unexplained vote earlier in the game? I don't understand this game at all. SNICKERS IS A FUCKING POWER ROLE. ARE YOU DONE? | ||
|
MysteryMeat1
United States3292 Posts
| ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
On March 04 2015 03:14 IAmRobik wrote: I'm not done, because I see no reason whatsoever to believe this.SNICKERS IS A FUCKING POWER ROLE. ARE YOU DONE? If it's something he breadcrumbed, I still don't see why that is a good reason to not lynch him. Scum can breadcrumb a role too, it's not a commitment of any strength. On March 04 2015 02:59 rsoultin wrote: I think that Snickers is scum for reasons that are alignment indicative. Not answering a question is not alignment indicative. However, suggesting to lynch someone only because they are banned is. Constantly drawing attention to himself while not scumhunting is alignment indicative. Not answering a question because that is apparently a townie thing to do is alignment indicative.Your push on Snickers just isn't alignment indicative, Truffle. I can go point-by-point if you like but nothing I saw there makes Snickers scum. Refusing to answer a question, for instance. I tunneled on bats for being a contrary boob (and a couple other more valid reasons but lol still wrong) in my first game here. It doesn't make someone scum. Side note, it's not my birthday, I just chose my TL birthday randomly. Thanks for the birthday wishes anyway, though. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22633 Posts
Robik, you're too much of a robik this game. I'm tempted to lynch you for that. How do you feel about this? | ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
I see a player who is providing minimal reads and is acting very scummy. And I'm supposed to ignore this player indefinitely because someone else said so, whose alignment is by no means confirmed. | ||
|
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 04 2015 03:21 Palmar wrote: I wonder if Trfel is actually confused or just pretending to be. Robik, you're too much of a robik this game. I'm tempted to lynch you for that. How do you feel about this? I think that you're looking for a challenge if you're trying to lynch me this game. + Show Spoiler + reason: stats | ||
|
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On March 04 2015 03:26 Trfel wrote: If it's so obvious that everyone knows, then the mafia knows already. Can someone please clue me in or explain why that is a bad idea? I see a player who is providing minimal reads and is acting very scummy. And I'm supposed to ignore this player indefinitely because someone else said so, whose alignment is by no means confirmed. So you want to lynch a power role because mafia knows he's a power role. Please explain that logic | ||
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
| ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
I am not voting Snickers today. Neither is most of the rest of the thread. If he's one of the scum, find the other two. Unless you come up with something mind-bogglingly amazing, your push is not going anywhere. -pats on head- | ||
|
MysteryMeat1
United States3292 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
Wardi Open
Wardi Open
RotterdaM Event
Replay Cast
WardiTV Summer Champion…
RSL Revival
PiGosaur Monday
WardiTV Summer Champion…
The PondCast
WardiTV Summer Champion…
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
