EPTAka get off your horse and slow it down. Save a horse ride a turtle as they say in America.
Robik is going to be pissed at me. Shit robik dont be too mad plz. I quoted your filter as an example.
Mini Mafia Down Under 2 - Page 14
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
Aka get off your horse and slow it down. Save a horse ride a turtle as they say in America. Robik is going to be pissed at me. Shit robik dont be too mad plz. I quoted your filter as an example. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
Like yea I know damdred and purple and trefel could be scum but that is unlikely. | ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
On March 03 2015 05:03 Snickers wrote: Can you please explain this post?Rsoultin is town | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
So stop being an ass and talk instead of being bm | ||
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
On March 03 2015 04:57 Snickers wrote: Resoltin make a list of every player, reads, and who you would lynch On March 03 2015 05:00 rsoultin wrote: One of the only players playing the game, and I can follow his line of thinking. If I wanted CHUPAZI I'd channel blazinghand and just RNG a lynch. You first, useless. I've been giving reads and thoughts all game. On March 03 2015 12:52 Snickers wrote: Yea but I have to break a minor rule to explain myself. (if you are catching my drift) And I am prty sure town wants to survive too. But why are people wasting posts on this lol. I have said several insights that everyone ignores. On March 03 2015 13:10 Snickers wrote: since you cant tell what is bold or not bold starts two lines down He also does that mafia thing (which ritoky is so keen to point out usually) or just responding to peoples' questions line for line, question after question as if it's a homework assignment. bold ended two lines ups And that is weird to bring up your not getting lynched. Scum answer questions all the time. Rsoultin tells me to take a hike which is the right townie response. I wasnt answer your question cause a.its shit b.towns dont answer every question So you guys can leave me alone now right. And stop pesting me. Calling me bm and shit. I showed you proof. And I answered the question lol after you guys shit a brick over it lol. Step yo game up. | ||
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
| ||
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
| ||
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
| ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
I'm actually leaning town on Palmar. It's hard for me to explain why, but in addition to providing some (extremely interesting) dialogue, he also provided some reasonable reads. At any rate, I don't want to lynch Palmar today. Rsoultin is probably town. I find it a bit suspicious how she dismissed her initial post on Palmar (which to me seemed to be a light scum read), and how she complained multiple times about the thread being nonsense (while I found it much more readable than last game, though since then it has gotten worse). Still, her filter seems townie overall. Prphlz has been rather defensive of his own play, and seems to be focusing more on explaining why he isn't doing much than finding scum. Looks suspicious to me. I agree that Alakaslam's filter is boring, and that that is probably a reasonable way to read him. However, I am a bit concerned that it is too early in the game to read him in this way? Still, he isn't a bad lynch. Then we have Snickers. Most of his posts are useless spam, many of his posts convey motives that are bad for town. The hypocrisy, lack of original reads/reasoning, and he keeps promising reads/insights but not providing them. And he has shown several times that he isn't reading the thread very carefully. I don't like it at all, and currently I feel that Snickers is the best lynch. Of course, the other thing that must be mentioned about Snickers is that Robik says he is a power role. I don't understand this at all. But Snickers looks scummy, and I want to lynch him. Additional explanations will follow. ##vote Snickers Is that enough of an apology? | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
VOTE SLAM WITH ME IF YOU'RE TOWN if not, please carry on and be dumb xP snickers obviously isn't the best lynch today | ||
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
| ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
On March 03 2015 14:19 rsoultin wrote: Why are you so confident that Alakaslam is scum? I still am not sure if he has had enough time to allow us to read him by amount of original direction.TRUFFLE VOTE SLAM WITH ME IF YOU'RE TOWN if not, please carry on and be dumb xP snickers obviously isn't the best lynch today If I recall correctly, you weren't convinced that Alakaslam was scum last game, despite a somewhat similar lack of original direction to what he has shown in this game. Why the scumread this game and not so much last game, while this game is not as far along? I agree that Alakaslam looks rather suspicious, and I wouldn't mind lynching him, but I feel that there is a better lynch out there. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
On March 03 2015 14:24 Trfel wrote: Why are you so confident that Alakaslam is scum? I still am not sure if he has had enough time to allow us to read him by amount of original direction. If I recall correctly, you weren't convinced that Alakaslam was scum last game, despite a somewhat similar lack of original direction to what he has shown in this game. Why the scumread this game and not so much last game, while this game is not as far along? I agree that Alakaslam looks rather suspicious, and I wouldn't mind lynching him, but I feel that there is a better lynch out there. Last game was my first true encounter with a scum Slam. He was scum in my first game on TL, but AFK'd due to IRL reasons after just a few posts... I am 100% positive that he's had enough time to be original and 100% positive that the poisonous way this game started out is precisely the environment he'd feel the need to be original in. This game more mirrors last game than my town games with him. And frankly, most of the other lynches being pushed are people I don't know how to read yet, cause let's face it...some people just read scummy. | ||
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
| ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
On March 03 2015 14:29 rsoultin wrote: It just feels like really dangerous meta to me. I get the impression that Alakaslam's play varies based on available time, is this correct? (sort of like how Palmar plays sometimes, and at other times does absolutely nothing) If my impression is correct, you can understand how I'm not so eager to lynch Alakaslam right now. And a thread of unreadable mess feels like that would make Alakaslam less likely to post and care about it?Last game was my first true encounter with a scum Slam. He was scum in my first game on TL, but AFK'd due to IRL reasons after just a few posts... I am 100% positive that he's had enough time to be original and 100% positive that the poisonous way this game started out is precisely the environment he'd feel the need to be original in. This game more mirrors last game than my town games with him. And frankly, most of the other lynches being pushed are people I don't know how to read yet, cause let's face it...some people just read scummy. In addition, I don't see how I can be convinced that Alakaslam is mafia like you are, it seems to require more knowledge of his meta than I have available. And again, with a player like Alakaslam with such varying play, it feels like the meta would be more unreliable. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
You're also wrong on snickers I'm pretty sure, or at least if you're not there's good reason to reconsider your read. I have more to go off of on Slam than you do on snickers. | ||
|
Snickers
United States1575 Posts
| ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
well okay snickles probably town. i guess i could go for a slam lynch. it is true that this environment is pretty shitty and maybe i would have expected more HIJOLE and CHUPAZI from him. will try to look over his filters again tomorrow (which is today). ##Vote Alakaslam | ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
Snickers' reads seem to be made without original thought On March 02 2015 09:27 Snickers wrote: A policy lynch of the worst kind. It's not a pressure lynch in the slightest (at the time there was no replacement), it's right at the start of Day 1, and it avoids making any kind of actual read. Mafia wants to sit back and lynch inactives without providing actual reads, town wants to solve the game. Snickers also stood by this read (after the replacement), while continuously refusing to explain why he made this statement in the first place.Why are we not lynching kelsier. Also ff knows about this. On March 03 2015 05:59 Snickers wrote: This list post provides no explanation at all. His reads seem to scumread those who scumread him, townread those with larger thread presences, and mirror other players' reads. He has a "Post more" category, but people with terribly few posts (such as myself and Superbia) weren't in it. I don't get the impression that Snickers is providing original thought. I also note that he requests a full filter review from Damdred while not providing any explanation for his own reads. Hm.Town: Robik Rsoultin Superbia Slam Ritoky Post More: Onegu Oats Scum: Snickers Damdred prplhz Trefel Palmar: Palmar MM: Lynch him Snickers<chupazi<reason On March 03 2015 08:31 Snickers wrote: These posts show that Snickers just scumreads everyone who is suspicious of him. There is no explanation or thought to these comments.I was talking about the second part Snickers seems to be drawing attention to himself to compensate for not providing reads, and is concerned about how towny he appears On March 02 2015 12:48 Snickers wrote: Snickers said this after only providing the comment about lynching KelsierSC. He tried to draw attention to himself, as if his attempt to policy lynch an inactive was any more than that. I find it ironic that since then, when people have talked about this push, he has refused to answer the questions. I am being ignored.On March 03 2015 12:12 Snickers wrote: Because Snickers has been providing so much intense scum hunting.umm if you guys want a well deserved break/laugh from this intense scum hunting by all of us except three. Look at purple's filter and find what is really off with it. Snickers has also accused people of not reading the thread multiple times, and his argument with prphlz and me feels somewhat condescending. I get the impression that Snickers is trying to make himself seem superior to us and look better than us, while there is no town motivation to do so. On March 03 2015 14:03 Snickers wrote: So, Snickers isn't going to answer questions because that's a scum thing to do, and townies don't answer questions. Not for any reason other than trying to look townie.On March 03 2015 04:57 Snickers wrote: Resoltin make a list of every player, reads, and who you would lynch Scum answer questions all the time. Rsoultin tells me to take a hike which is the right townie response. I wasnt answer your question cause a.its shit b.towns dont answer every question So you guys can leave me alone now right. And stop pesting me. Calling me bm and shit. I showed you proof. And I answered the question lol after you guys shit a brick over it lol. Step yo game up. In conclusion, I feel that while much of Snickers' filter is not alignment indicative, he has avoided providing reads while doing his best to make it seem like he has. As a result, I find him very suspicious. Any thoughts are appreciated. | ||
| ||
it's a gut read but I'm fine with it
