Office Mini Mafia - Page 17

On February 20 2015 07:48 Kurumi wrote:

We're going 88 miles per hour

Arkham Asylum was a great game. It really was dark and gritty, full of great plays, awesome with Palmar's Joker comics by the end of the game. Our game-wide IRC convos. Two threads at once both being very important to be a part of. There was a guy called notasmurf. Notasmurf has devised a great plan. Plan I have reused. Plan I believe has worked once again.

Say hello to Operation Honeypot.
I have set up five quicktopics before the game started. I would've used them differently as scum but it wasn't as sharp as the town version. Only one of them had four people including me, rest was three including me. Two quicktopics have been compromised. Those two are: VisceraEyes, LightiningStrike and geript, Oatsmaster. In both of them there is one person that should not get an access to the QT. Snickers never accessed his to my knowledge.

Showtime boys. Why were you sharing QTs with anyone? I don't care that there are three of you and I have only one too much. Maybe your partner is Onegu, who has not accessed my qt either.

On February 20 2015 07:58 Snickers wrote:
Umm I have ten minutes before I need to leave for class, but kurumis big post above looks very interesting.

Anyway I want to hear more about LS , liancourt, sicklucker and oatsmaster. People in that list have either posted nothing to telling or havent really been searching for things but rather going with the flow.

I would like to hear more from rayn because his play is just so interesting.

Obviously want to hear from Onegu. Has he pmed anyone?

Also in a perfect world, everyone would just verify if someone is quoting a pm that is true but that probably would not happen. I would like some type of verification but it probably will not happen.

On February 20 2015 08:01 Eden1892 wrote:
The compromising-QTs thing is pretty cool, but I have a feeling it's not going to lead anywhere. I won't say why until it doesn't though, because if you did catch someone, I don't want to give them an out.

On February 20 2015 08:03 Kurumi wrote:

Boy, believe me it is legit. I have two Internet connections at hand and four devices. Enough to test it again myself - and you can guess that I did so.

On February 20 2015 08:19 geript wrote:
@Kurumi. I actually don't believe any of that shit. I'm pretty sure it's BS too. Because I literally just created a QT and then sent myself access through my PM so I could easily access it on my phone. I didn't even post from my phone in that QT. Both register as separate unique views AND I haven't given that test QT to anyone. Like anyone could set this up and check it for themselves. I'm pretty sure that operation honeypot was a complete failure at best because I know that the Oats/me QT hasn't been compromised at all now. As for VE/LS, IDK but I'm pretty sure LS has played from phone in the past (could check but lazy) so it wouldn't surprise me that. It would depend on the number of unique views potentially, but I know for sure that since me/oats/you QT only has 4 unique views I don't see how that's comprimised. I know I've accessed and posted from my phone to that QT.

On February 20 2015 08:25 geript wrote:

Yes to both. I've been logged in on my phone since forever.

On February 20 2015 08:28 Koshi wrote:
It doesn't say you are an other user if you are logged in. Because I read the QT at work and at home. And ours wasn't infiltrated.

On February 20 2015 08:34 geript wrote:

idk. maybe I wasn't actually signed in it just let me post under my name without being signed in. All I know is that it took my phone and computer as 2 unique views in the qt I created. Like there are a million ways to test this. Even still, the important question has been unanswered as of yet.

Kurumi, why didn't you wait for more than +1 unique view?