EPTOn December 24 2014 01:18 rsoultin wrote:
lol, GB, your initial case was bad, probably because your initial read was based on a gut read and you were trying to articulate it in a way to present as evidence. Read good, case bad, execution worse.
Between that and the screaming I turned off to everything else you said for too long. My bias, most definitely, and I need to learn that a bad case (Vivax had a couple) =/= scum or wrong. But you did kind of dig yourself a hole there, at least with me. SL has that effect on me, too. All the present talk made me inclined to ignore the good point you guys brought up about the present and HF later. I'm a bullheaded dingbat, but thinking things out before you present them will help you guys, I'm pretty sure.
lol, GB, your initial case was bad, probably because your initial read was based on a gut read and you were trying to articulate it in a way to present as evidence. Read good, case bad, execution worse.
Between that and the screaming I turned off to everything else you said for too long. My bias, most definitely, and I need to learn that a bad case (Vivax had a couple) =/= scum or wrong. But you did kind of dig yourself a hole there, at least with me. SL has that effect on me, too. All the present talk made me inclined to ignore the good point you guys brought up about the present and HF later. I'm a bullheaded dingbat, but thinking things out before you present them will help you guys, I'm pretty sure.
I actually know that I talk too much garbage. The problem is that I can't keep myself from participating.
I still think that what sold me on HF being scum was the part he says people voting outside the main wagon looked terrible, but didn't make anything with it. Also, saying I'm awfully wrong as town and reading me as scum for being awfully wrong is so inconsistent that I couldn't believe he was town.
Anyway, HF played a VERY good scum, as always. If it was anybody else, I would immediately town read him. I didn't because it was holyflare.
