|
On November 27 2014 05:07 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2014 04:50 sicklucker wrote: Rsoutn make sure to change your vote if your push has no traction near the deadline I will do the same. I will policy lynch people who cast useless votes thats a mafia trait if Ive ever seen one. I am not afraid of you continuing to vote for me, SL, for this reason or any other reason that you can come up with. I am not going to be glued to the computer today. Celebrating the holidays with the fam. If I do get on and see the votes leaning a way that I don't think will benefit town, of course I will change my vote to lynch someone I believe is more likely scum...otherwise it doesn't even matter, now does it? Don't make me add you to my dropkick pile with bats.
Read my case rsoultin and comment on it.
Overall I disagree with SL just becuase you have your vote elsewhere doesn't make it antitown you could be pushing your lynch at the time or trying to do shenanigans or what not, but yea
|
On November 25 2014 09:43 Damdred wrote: Show nested quote +
Not really, i'm trying to figure out exactly why hes doing what hes doing hes answered me to the fullest of his abilities thres nothin else to gain from the conversation.
What are you doing though? You agree with Sick when he says its looking lik ei'm trying to do stuff just to do it but then you try to pressure him then switch to me. Looks like you are trying to do the same thing I was accused of
This one irght in my case and when you tried to pressure myself and SL
|
On November 27 2014 05:26 sicklucker wrote: Another thing if damdreds hard defending bats here. Its way too easy for us to get two mafia after this. I dont think thats whats happening.
unflipped association reads are never good....
|
On November 27 2014 05:32 rsoultin wrote: Okay, here's a question to Damdred and anyone else who cares to weigh in.
Isn't there a mod-kill policy for people who don't vote? So why are we pushing anyone who still hasn't voted?
Read and post on my case
It just depends on replacements and what not, BH could modkill everyone not voting or putting forth effort or could replace them. IMO they could show up last minut and vote as well.
|
Why will you look the worst out of everyone on dicksmash?
|
I'll try to be back for deadline driving atm,
bresh, tell me what you think of the case and tell me what you think of SL Right now
|
What in the world, why are you goin to let yourself get lynched like that without even claiming to save town, like WTF is that shit you don't even fucking defend yourself oh my god.
This just is really really frustrating
|
100% if you are about to get lynched and you have a PR you claim no matter what
|
On November 27 2014 07:16 rsoultin wrote: Eh, yeah. You'd think town with a role would kick up more of a fuss if he was being bussed. Oh well. Apologies LS...apparently with this group the potential of hitting power roles is way higher than you'd think.
What do you mean? (first bolded part)
Actually mafia lynch % day 1 is like in the 30% range I believe which is really good
|
On November 27 2014 07:21 sicklucker wrote: So If breskes mafia he has perfect information. He comes on late and knows a towns about to get lynched. Damdred gives a really good case and he even agrees but his vote ends up on bats. A mafia knows its a town getting lynched and wont put on a pointless vote because it makes him look bad. That is all its not gonna bury him but it is something.
In before wiymfo. Who cares hes not an advanced player I would do the same thing. (infact i did the opposite)
I was looking for his post where he did this, and this is a great point you beat me to it haha
|
On November 27 2014 07:24 Trfel wrote: Ok guys, see what I told you?
I presented a strong case against batsnacks and continually supported it. I expressed doubt over the Dicksmash McIroncock lynch. Yes, he hadn't been playing well, but that doesn't make him mafia. From here, can we PLEASE continue by lynching targets who seem to definitely be mafia, aka batsnacks?
WE were lynching someone who seemed to be mafia, he ha plenty of scummy things going for him...
I really hate teh bolded portion of this post to
|
On November 27 2014 07:48 Half the Sky wrote: Well let's look at the arguments used to defend bats - Day 1 reads being unreliable to awful (justifying his bad reads on people) and DSMI's gameplay being poor, the latter upon which we generally agree.
Damdred if I recall used a meta argument against DSMI.
Uh this is wrong.... do you know what a meta read is?
|
On November 27 2014 07:48 LightningStrike wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2014 07:42 Half the Sky wrote: That is frustrating, his voting also made no sense. We had no way of figuring he was the doctor, and I was convinced enough by kush. Now I'm having a really bad feeling about this. Who else seemed driven to vote DSMI? Oats and Damndred. Sorry the late reply for the night post but my fears had happened :|. rsoultin your apology is accepted. My reads had now changed because of this lynching. My scum team are the ones who pushed for DSMI Kush Oatsmaster Damndred. If we got a cop check one of those 3 out. If we got a Tracker go on to anyone since we got possible setups with a doctor revealed and we got no idea which setup is being used except for either Set up A or Set up C :|
What? Oats was on bats what are you on about? Are you reading? Why are the main pushes of DSMI (who didn't even fight his lynch btw) scum?
|
Why are people who pushed things scum? Who actually went through the trouble of making a case?
|
|
On November 27 2014 07:59 LightningStrike wrote:Show nested quote +On November 27 2014 07:55 Damdred wrote: Why are people who pushed things scum? Who actually went through the trouble of making a case? Kush was the one who went through the trouble of making a case for the lynching.
Was he the only one who made a case today?
|
I most actively pursued the lynch,
It was he said he had no time to read, but came away with a vote saying he read someones filters
He voted for said person even though he said someone else was scum and the person he voted he never said was scummy.
He asked questions with no follow up
Always took the middle ground
Dodged Questions posed by others
At time of his lynch he did not fight or claim he was medic or give any substantiated reads.
|
On November 27 2014 08:03 sicklucker wrote: Your reads are not completely horrible ls, but theirs no way their all right mafia is not so obvious to vote with each other on day 1. So when you say the scum team is the people who voted him out your just wrong. Some towns lead the charge. Some mafia might have joined in. I think its a bit likely one of kush or dand are mafia. Little chance they both are
This is wifom basically, sometimes mafia do vote and use this exxcuse later
|
Hold up a second here, if you were so sure that Bats is scum and I was wrong. Why did you say "OH HOLY CRAP DAMDRED HAS CONVINCED ME". And now blame me, you could of pushed bats and told dick to get on bats and it would of been 5 5 and you could of pushed bats off a cliff if you really wanted to, so why blame me now and throw dirt on me on a case that YOU said was good.
|
Then why didn't you push someone you thought was really scum?
|
|
|
|