#bestlogic2014
Hearthstone Mafia - Page 5
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
#bestlogic2014 | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
I don't like day1 lurkers and this guy just came to the thread to say WOAH and gave nothing else to us. ##Unvote ##Vote: risk.nuke | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On November 01 2014 08:58 risk.nuke wrote: Don't have any reads for you mate. This game started a bit to soon for my convenience, I'm packing to move on sunday and spending a lot of the time seeing my friends before I go. I've been following the thread whenever I had time. I was planning to go to bed but I'm here if anyone want to ask me stuff. Who's mafia? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On November 01 2014 09:01 ritoky wrote: oh god, i am at an impasse. policy tells me to never lynch the person who is the most active on d1 and policy tells me to lynch the first person who suggests lynching someone for being a lurker.....GB WHY ARE YOU BOTH? Because I rock. No, really, after Avogadro, I'm never letting total lurkers to live past day1 | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On November 01 2014 09:03 Lord Tolkien wrote: BUT MOOOOOM, I got TLLOLOTGDTGN tonite, can't I wait till LATER to contribute? NO. GODDAMN, TOLKIEN! | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On November 01 2014 09:04 risk.nuke wrote: The people who got their role pm in red. Next question. Why shouldn't you get lynched day1? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
Unless we RNG a selected list of players. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On November 01 2014 09:09 Blazinghand wrote: heh, GB, of course you disagree with RNG, you are scum-- RNG has proven it. now DIE. I'm scum with the largest filter day1. Try again BH lol | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On November 01 2014 09:12 jrkirby wrote: I don't even know how you find the post count of a post. As far as I can tell, you're pullig numbers out of your ass. Trust me, he isn't. It doesn't make RNG less horrible. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
BH IF YOU ARE TOWN YOU'RE MESSING THE THREAD. DISCUSSING RNG WON'T GET US ANYWHERE AND IT WON'T GENERATE CONVERSATION MORE THAN BRINGING READS TO THE THREAD. COME ON! | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On November 01 2014 09:20 Blazinghand wrote: mmhmm, "rng is disrupting scumhunting", a historically common scum response to rng. Like, I know i've been kinda joking a bit, but literally the most common scum response to rng is to claim that rng is disrupting the thread somehow (rather than just calling it bad or ignoring it) This is WIFOM, BH. If we are heading away from productive discussion, it's town's duty to get it back on track. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On November 01 2014 09:35 jrkirby wrote: I guess this is fair enough to me. I have a slight town-lean read on GB, but I think RNG can be very powerful day 1. If anyone trys RNG after day one, I will want to lynch you though. So I'm going to drop my slight town read on GB and my vote on the unproductive LT in favor of the power of RNG. This is a hearthstone flavored game here. Just so everyone knows, this is a vote for RNG, not for GB in particular. BY FIRE BE PURGED. + Show Spoiler + Cause Ragnaros has a random target, yeah? ##Unvote: Lord Tolkein ##Vote: GlowingBear This guy is scum. Props to me for pointing him out so early in the game. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On November 01 2014 09:42 Circumstance wrote: So, we have GB as a call for the D1 backup, and some people seem to be jumping onboard for risk.nuke. I've read the case for lynching risk.nuke, and I'm not yet completely sold. I don't have a solid read on him yet, so can anyone give me a reason we should lynch someone else INSTEAD of risk.nuke? You can start by telling who you think is scum. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On November 01 2014 10:10 ritoky wrote: what statistics are you using for this? can we lynch this guy? like srsly. he doesn't give reads, he talked incessantly about the cat, does more nothing, now he wants rng because d1 reads suck? you haven't even tried to develop strong reads or push for information in any way. you're just looking for easy shit to talk about to appear active and involved, and when it doesn't work out you have an excuse. welcome to my scum list. Of course we can and I'm certain he is scum. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On November 01 2014 09:42 Circumstance wrote: So, we have GB as a call for the D1 backup, and some people seem to be jumping onboard for risk.nuke. I've read the case for lynching risk.nuke, and I'm not yet completely sold. I don't have a solid read on him yet, so can anyone give me a reason we should lynch someone else INSTEAD of risk.nuke? This post is also bad. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On November 01 2014 10:16 Damdred wrote: analyze jrkirby OH HERE YOU ARE! Geev reeds. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
Now he thinks I'm town mean but he is okay with RNGing me? When did I get townie to his eyes? But this is unflipped association. Not good yet. I just don't think he would instantly call his scum partner town that early. But his is WIFOM. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
Gn. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On November 01 2014 10:47 Circumstance wrote: Do you want me to explain my schedule to you? I will if you want. As for GB's question, my current reads aren't strong enough to lay out on the table right now, and frankly, I don't know how much it matters at this stage. We've got some clear targets that are slowly beginning to get multiple votes placed on them. If we don't consolidate, we run the risk of a no-lynch, which doesn't benefit anyone. I don't WANT to lynch you right now, GB, because I'm not a fan of RNG and you keep discussions going. But before I place my vote on risk.nuke, I want to hear the argument against it, assuming there is one, to see if it holds water. It's plurality lynch. The player with most votes dies. There is no "no-lynch" | ||
| ||