|
On October 20 2014 11:00 Oatsmaster wrote:
Yeah. Well after this mission vote I will explain the benefits and drawbacks of a hidden vote.
On October 20 2014 11:01 Blazinghand wrote:
pretty sure votes will be revealed, they're just hidden during the tallying process, like in resistance.
On October 20 2014 11:04 Oatsmaster wrote:
Yeah what bh said.
On October 20 2014 12:24 Blazinghand wrote:
oh, i get it now. welp, oats is definitely town
What happened here?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On October 21 2014 03:04 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On October 20 2014 11:00 Oatsmaster wrote:
Yeah. Well after this mission vote I will explain the benefits and drawbacks of a hidden vote. Show nested quote +On October 20 2014 11:01 Blazinghand wrote:
pretty sure votes will be revealed, they're just hidden during the tallying process, like in resistance. Show nested quote +On October 20 2014 12:24 Blazinghand wrote:
oh, i get it now. welp, oats is definitely town What happened here?
Well, I didn't want to explain exactly why since it makes me look bad, but Oats was trying to fool scum into thinking the vote was permanently hidden. Basically, this would cause scum to not try to hide how they were voting. If he had been successful, scum would have voted without trying to WIFOM for this vote. Unfortunately, I derped and mentioned that votes will be revealed during the tallying process. Later, I realized what Oats was going for.
Basically, Oats wouldn't have tried to do this as scum. Scum would... well, scum would say what I said. Trying to hide this info from scum and trap them is an unbelievably townie move. Oats is absolutely town.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
|
|
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
what, you don't get the reasoning? Oats was trying to trick/trap scum. Even if it was laughably ineffective, it was a legitimate attempt
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
how do you know this? or are you extrapolating one conclusion from a whole variety of possibilities, which seems to be the case?
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On October 21 2014 03:13 marvellosity wrote:
how do you know this? or are you extrapolating one conclusion from a whole variety of possibilities, which seems to be the case?
Oh, come on. He was trying to hide the fact that yay/nay votes are revealed at day end. Why would anyone try to hide that? The answer is obvious. If scum think their voting is hidden, they'll vote honestly and we'll get a lot of info. It's the only possibility that makes sense, and the fact that you're doubting it honestly makes me very suspicious of you (After all, Oats is traditionally "lynchbait" and would have been a good person to blame a mission failure on)...
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
you're making claims that aren't backed up by what was put in the thread.
It's incredibly suspicious.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
And if you're suspicious of me that just makes you stupid.
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
Dude, Oats literally tried to hide info from scum. He's obviously town. Get over yourself.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
which would normally make Oats town by default, but i'm not sure if mafia would confidently declare other spies as townies in this game.
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
You've pointed out no holes in my logic. Oats will come into the thread and tell you that's what he was planning. The fact that you lack the intense skill, experience, mental fortitude, and general sexiness that I have doesn't make me wrong. You just have to recognize when someone's play is so far above your level you can't comprehend it.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
he'd come into the thread as either alignment and say that dumbass
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
On October 21 2014 03:21 marvellosity wrote:
he'd come into the thread as either alignment and say that dumbass
You think he'd lie to his teammates as scum, faking an attempt to trick them? I don't think so.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
BH must never be taken on a mission
|
Trying to trap someone in some way is towny right?
Though i'm not sure how I feel about BH going out of his way to explain the trap to nullify it I guess
|
On October 21 2014 03:19 marvellosity wrote:
which would normally make Oats town by default, but i'm not sure if mafia would confidently declare other spies as townies in this game.
This doesn't make sense to me.
Oats town by default -- not sure if mafia would declare another spy is town? Are you talking about scum!BH calling scum!oats town or...?
Are you talking about two spies? Or are you talking about 1 spy and 1 town?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On October 21 2014 03:27 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On October 21 2014 03:19 marvellosity wrote:
which would normally make Oats town by default, but i'm not sure if mafia would confidently declare other spies as townies in this game. This doesn't make sense to me. Oats town by default -- not sure if mafia would declare another spy is town? Are you talking about scum!BH calling scum!oats town or...? Are you talking about two spies? Or are you talking about 1 spy and 1 town?
What I'm saying is that in a normal game of mafia, it's highly unusual for a mafia to confidently declare another mafia town.
But this is different, so I'm not sure the same applies
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
