EPTFantasy Football (FFL) Mini - Page 39
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On October 08 2014 06:15 Palmar wrote: You understand the "fan" post has nothing to do with the game at hand, I just like slam's posting in general, and I don't like how batsnacks plays the game. Go read the last game if you need any explanation as to why batsnacks is a dick and shouldn't be listened to. I bet I can get you lynched again.  | ||
|
liancourt
1563 Posts
On October 08 2014 06:07 StorrZerg wrote: @liancourt care to update your stance on Damdred tell me what you think instead of grilling me continuously. And he's scum I put this in an earlier post. | ||
|
liancourt
1563 Posts
On October 08 2014 06:11 Palmar wrote: This is strange too. If he's acting like what you think mafia would act, why do you hate to admit it? I always like it when people act like mafia. you need to keep on reading the answers there after many many pages. | ||
|
liancourt
1563 Posts
On October 08 2014 06:13 KelsierSC wrote: I liked him when he first posted saying lian was mafia, even though I think other people had given the reason he gave. Since then he has really fallen off. I don't like the way he got his read on you, doesn't seem genuine I didn't like how as soon as i questioned him about it he made some dumb post. I don't like how he thinks BH is scummy still I don't like how he hasn't bothered to read an important part of the thread. Or give reads on those people. What the fuck bat is pretty clearly town and because he pressured BH that makes him stupid and of no value. yeh really don't like palmar, probably scum i concur with the reasons above town stamp for you | ||
|
liancourt
1563 Posts
On October 08 2014 06:15 Palmar wrote: You understand the "fan" post has nothing to do with the game at hand, I just like slam's posting in general, and I don't like how batsnacks plays the game. Go read the last game if you need any explanation as to why batsnacks is a dick and shouldn't be listened to. So give us your alignment for them. I am willing to give you time to keep reading the thread as you clearly have not read even half of it. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On October 08 2014 06:49 liancourt wrote: So give us your alignment for them. I am willing to give you time to keep reading the thread as you clearly have not read even half of it. no u On October 08 2014 06:05 Palmar wrote: Also batsnacks is probably town for being the one to point out the scumslip. Mafia doesn't have the balls to do something this stupid. This means we can all safely just ignore batsnacks for the rest of the game, as it's unlikely anything he says is actually of any value. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
He "pressures" keiser with a vote: On October 07 2014 16:30 Oatsmaster wrote: clearly you arent reading hard enough. HF gave a fine explanation and even explained why he said "filter" in the first place. And you dont understand the reasoning behind HF's case. HF is saying that Obi keeps complaining about there not being content but Obi isnt doing anything to create content. No analysis. No reread then some new insight. Just chitchatting with Damdred. Obi doesnt even use the defense that you proposed which means its clearly not what Obi was doing. Therefore you're townread on him is bad and that means you are scum. ##vote KelsierSC Then he's satisfied very easily with I'm not sure what for I'm not sure what reasons: On October 07 2014 19:50 Oatsmaster wrote: Yeah cool you changed my mind. Great job kelsier. ##unvote Liancourt and oo might be scum. Liancourt cause he has no scum reads other than "they did nothing" Then he picks the easy target that isn't his mafia buddy: On October 08 2014 02:07 Oatsmaster wrote: ##vote oo I tshink this is the pretty clear choice for today. The only time he's mentioned OO previously was here, in the same post he scum reads keiser: On October 07 2014 15:53 Oatsmaster wrote: The obi stuff is interesting. He doesn't defend himself in any meaningful, rational way. Just gets irrationally angry and hf and starts a fight. I would expect scum to not be so foolish and actually defend themself with better stuff. Too bad to be scum is my current read. Keilsar or whatever his name is is scummy for reasons. So is oo. I think there's definitely scum in the lurkers so lynching into there is fine. Liencourt never responded to my question  And he's scum reading them both for literally "reasons [sic]" His vote on keiser seems fake. | ||
|
liancourt
1563 Posts
if there were details I think I'd post it for evidence, but the fact that "there isn't anything worth mentioning" ring a bell. He's a balnk piece of paper. You go read his filter and tell me your opinion. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
yeah, this. And slam, I'm not even going to try. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
#proscumhunter | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On October 08 2014 06:55 Palmar wrote: batsnacks with the associative reads #proscumhunter It's not an associative read. I think his vote is fake even if they're not both scum, which I think they both are. Why are you posting when you haven't read the thread? | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On October 08 2014 06:52 batsnacks wrote: I think I'm changing my scum reads to keiser and Oats. Where is oats? + Show Spoiler + He "pressures" keiser with a vote: On October 07 2014 16:30 Oatsmaster wrote: clearly you arent reading hard enough. HF gave a fine explanation and even explained why he said "filter" in the first place. And you dont understand the reasoning behind HF's case. HF is saying that Obi keeps complaining about there not being content but Obi isnt doing anything to create content. No analysis. No reread then some new insight. Just chitchatting with Damdred. Obi doesnt even use the defense that you proposed which means its clearly not what Obi was doing. Therefore you're townread on him is bad and that means you are scum. ##vote KelsierSC Then he's satisfied very easily with I'm not sure what for I'm not sure what reasons: On October 07 2014 19:50 Oatsmaster wrote: Yeah cool you changed my mind. Great job kelsier. ##unvote Liancourt and oo might be scum. Liancourt cause he has no scum reads other than "they did nothing" Then he picks the easy target that isn't his mafia buddy: On October 08 2014 02:07 Oatsmaster wrote: ##vote oo I tshink this is the pretty clear choice for today. The only time he's mentioned OO previously was here, in the same post he scum reads keiser: On October 07 2014 15:53 Oatsmaster wrote: The obi stuff is interesting. He doesn't defend himself in any meaningful, rational way. Just gets irrationally angry and hf and starts a fight. I would expect scum to not be so foolish and actually defend themself with better stuff. Too bad to be scum is my current read. Keilsar or whatever his name is is scummy for reasons. So is oo. I think there's definitely scum in the lurkers so lynching into there is fine. Liencourt never responded to my question And he's scum reading them both for literally "reasons [sic]" His vote on keiser seems fake. + Show Spoiler + ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/wuLyhcI.jpg) | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On October 08 2014 06:57 batsnacks wrote: It's not an associative read. I think his vote is fake even if they're not both scum, which I think they both are. Why are you posting when you haven't read the thread? Because interactive reads are usually far more valuable than reading after the fact, because you can more accurately process the emotional state of the player involved. This is one of the main reasons that by far the largest contributor to success in mafia is simply spending as much time as you can in front of the thread. | ||
|
liancourt
1563 Posts
bats town I think his trap was genuine although I didnt think this at first but looking back yea it seems legit. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On October 08 2014 07:00 Palmar wrote: Because interactive reads are usually far more valuable than reading after the fact, because you can more accurately process the emotional state of the player involved. This is one of the main reasons that by far the largest contributor to success in mafia is simply spending as much time as you can in front of the thread. You're can't interact with the thread if you haven't read the thread. What you're doing is interacting with yourself. We're all watching you "interact" with yourself. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On October 08 2014 07:03 batsnacks wrote: You're can't interact with the thread if you haven't read the thread. What you're doing is interacting with yourself. We're all watching you "interact" with yourself. you just interacted with palmar. sadly its useless, but you've already proven yourself wrong. grats | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On October 08 2014 07:04 Hopeless1der wrote: you just interacted with palmar. sadly its useless, but you've already proven yourself wrong. grats Don't be upset. On a scale of 1 to 10 how strongly do you think Oats felt about keiser being mafia? | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On October 08 2014 07:07 Hopeless1der wrote: 7ish So, about where on the scale is strong enough to actually give reasons other than him just saying he scum reads keiser for "reasons"? 8? 9? | ||
| ||
