EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/e8vG026.jpg)
Please make sure you fill it out accordingly
Fantasy Football (FFL) Mini - Page 37
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
Please make sure you fill it out accordingly | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13921 Posts
| ||
|
liancourt
1563 Posts
On October 08 2014 05:44 StorrZerg wrote: I see your pressure against BH as meaningless, since it could be done regardless of your alignment since you have made it apparent that you don't like to lynch via RNG. Hence you could push bh, regardless of your alignment, since its policy form your standpoint. Also your stance to vote OO is why? "na nanna boo boo see i can vote ?" I mean OO is afk. big woop? Thought as much you just think my discussion was null because you think its null when it wasn't for me. So we let afkers off scott free? Is that your policy of disregarding everything but tunneling on one person and everything he does? Like I said I'm suspicious of low lyers and OO is one of them. And after reading BH's post which I have said were townie and his arguement against OO i agree with him so I voted OO. Let me ask you this. Are you going to give me your opinion on others or are you going to scrutinize me for everything I do and having an opposite stance on everything? It'd be nice if you gave opinions on others rather than just me. It doesn't give much info on you except for the fact that you are just tunneling me. And after I'm gone town is left with nothing but your filter full of you attacking me. So, your thoughts on others if you will or I might change your stamp to scum. | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13921 Posts
why? how he town read me, how he followed up with the read. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
This means we can all safely just ignore batsnacks for the rest of the game, as it's unlikely anything he says is actually of any value. | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13921 Posts
On October 08 2014 06:04 liancourt wrote: Thought as much you just think my discussion was null because you think its null when it wasn't for me. So we let afkers off scott free? Is that your policy of disregarding everything but tunneling on one person and everything he does? Like I said I'm suspicious of low lyers and OO is one of them. And after reading BH's post which I have said were townie and his arguement against OO i agree with him so I voted OO. Let me ask you this. Are you going to give me your opinion on others or are you going to scrutinize me for everything I do and having an opposite stance on everything? It'd be nice if you gave opinions on others rather than just me. It doesn't give much info on you except for the fact that you are just tunneling me. And after I'm gone town is left with nothing but your filter full of you attacking me. So, your thoughts on others if you will or I might change your stamp to scum. im sorry you all ready town read me you can't change your mind right now. | ||
|
KelsierSC
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On October 08 2014 05:58 Palmar wrote: The one where he spent plenty of time talking about how some case was really good and he'd be totally down with it tomorrow, only to default to what is essentially a lurker lynch on OO, without actually explaining why the OO lynch is better. Like there's literally no reason he shouldn't be tunneling me just as much as OO, maybe he just knows I'm more of a pita to lynch and I might actually turn around and do shit. If he's so on board with the lynch based on reasons, why is he still trying to do this semi-policy lynch. Like the one thing that makes me not want to lynch BH is that the scumslip thing was so monumentally stupid (it's 200% reasonable to assume 3 scum in a game of this size) that I just don't want to lynch him to spite the idiots who thought it was relevant. Even if BH is mafia, that was not a scumslip. So OO got RNG'd and laughed it off and drew a train, which initially felt town to me. But as it became clear BH was serious, rather than get pissed off or fight he self voted and vanished. You haven't been here the whole game so it is a bit different in your case. I am really surprised that there is only that one thing stopping you from lynching BH | ||
|
StorrZerg
United States13921 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On October 08 2014 06:06 KelsierSC wrote: So OO got RNG'd and laughed it off and drew a train, which initially felt town to me. But as it became clear BH was serious, rather than get pissed off or fight he self voted and vanished. You haven't been here the whole game so it is a bit different in your case. I am really surprised that there is only that one thing stopping you from lynching BH BH didn't say that though (and I wasn't aware that OO self voted). I read this post: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=23075621 and was under the impression BH mostly wanted to lynch OO for basically being uninterested. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On October 07 2014 18:00 liancourt wrote: Although I hate to admit it OO does seem strange the way he was reacting. It'd mean I'd have to vote for a random vote which I'm reluctant in doing so because it'd go against my principles. This is strange too. If he's acting like what you think mafia would act, why do you hate to admit it? I always like it when people act like mafia. | ||
|
KelsierSC
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On October 08 2014 06:04 StorrZerg wrote: I feel palmars activity level could be higher along with his insight to the game, leaning town on him. why? how he town read me, how he followed up with the read. I liked him when he first posted saying lian was mafia, even though I think other people had given the reason he gave. Since then he has really fallen off. I don't like the way he got his read on you, doesn't seem genuine I didn't like how as soon as i questioned him about it he made some dumb post. I don't like how he thinks BH is scummy still I don't like how he hasn't bothered to read an important part of the thread. Or give reads on those people. On October 08 2014 04:57 Palmar wrote: I'm a slam fan. I'm not really a batsnacks fan because he's a bit of a dick. On October 08 2014 06:05 Palmar wrote: Also batsnacks is probably town for being the one to point out the scumslip. Mafia doesn't have the balls to do something this stupid. This means we can all safely just ignore batsnacks for the rest of the game, as it's unlikely anything he says is actually of any value. What the fuck bat is pretty clearly town and because he pressured BH that makes him stupid and of no value. yeh really don't like palmar, probably scum | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On October 08 2014 06:14 Hopeless1der wrote: palmar why do you need to have BH's stance on RNG lynches explained to you? Have you not encountered his antics like 50 bajillion other times by now? Say what? | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
Grackaroni (0): Oatsmaster (0): Obvious One (6): Blazinghand, Alakaslam, Palmer (1): batsnacks Obiwanshinobi (1): Holyflare (1): ObiWanShinobi KelsierSC (0): liancourt (1): StorrZerg Not Voting (4): Damdred, Palmer, KelsierSC, ObviousOne Currently Obvious One is set to be lynched. Day 1 ends at Wednesday, Oct 08 4:00am GMT (GMT+00:00) (in ) | ||
|
KelsierSC
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On October 08 2014 06:15 Palmar wrote: You understand the "fan" post has nothing to do with the game at hand, I just like slam's posting in general, and I don't like how batsnacks plays the game. Go read the last game if you need any explanation as to why batsnacks is a dick and shouldn't be listened to. so you made a post of no value that shouldn't be listened to | ||
|
liancourt
1563 Posts
On October 08 2014 05:44 Blazinghand wrote: IMO, liancourt, I don't really care about liancourt's null or town reads, just who the scumreads are. if you could focus on, say, who you think is most likely to be scum (Besides OO of course) that would be awesome Well damd scum. Half his filter is filled with questions and only a select few really address some form of issue. It's like he's acting to try and seem active but when really he is on nobody's radar and is low lying. There isn't anything worth mentioning where he put out a genuine case to someone. He just pokes and pokes around. He doesn't follow on anything. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On October 08 2014 06:17 KelsierSC wrote: so you made a post of no value that shouldn't be listened to Of no value, yes. shouldn't be listened to, no. | ||
|
liancourt
1563 Posts
when exactly are you going to post anything so I can analyze you? | ||
| ||
