|
On September 05 2014 12:51 Damdred wrote:
Except there's a difference in lurking, low hanging fruit, and someone who decides not to fight back.
Marv or yamatto is good example of the last in showdown. Viv is a good example of lurking in storm 2, and mm1 is good example of low hanging fruit in a few of his games.
Your conclusion is flawed
It's a difference that is only visible in the eye of the observer.
If someone is busy, actively avoiding to post, or gave up on reading the thread, is entirely up to you.
But you categorized what Mix did based on the version that would be most useful to you at a certain point.
Earlier it was lurking, but you already said that it wasn't an argument for you, so you had to keep calling it lurking.
Now that you needed a reason for your confidence when voting for him, you made the lurking a giving up.
|
If that were the case, you would have said that in your vote post.
But you still called it lurking, and you still said that it wasn't relevant to you.
|
Besides, quoting me as an example is funny cause it shows how I, as scum, actually fought back when under pressure.
But your argument for getting confidence on mix being scum is that he didn't.
|
Damdred, opinion on kita's case?
Kita, opinion on my case?
please
|
On September 05 2014 13:31 27ninjabunnies wrote:
Kush, either explain how BS is confirmed scum or I'm voting you.
I've been waiting for some big bomb to drop, and it hasn't yet and I'm really fucking disappointed.
That being said.
Kita/Poof you are wrong on me. If you can't see this is my town game, then you can't read me at all.
##Vote:Batsnacks
Americans :>
Jokes aside, you're free to do something of your own. You're not sitting behind a big fat desk waiting for your catering service to serve you scum on a silver plate.
|
On September 05 2014 13:56 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2014 13:46 Vivax wrote:On September 05 2014 13:31 27ninjabunnies wrote:
Kush, either explain how BS is confirmed scum or I'm voting you.
I've been waiting for some big bomb to drop, and it hasn't yet and I'm really fucking disappointed.
That being said.
Kita/Poof you are wrong on me. If you can't see this is my town game, then you can't read me at all.
##Vote:Batsnacks Americans :> Jokes aside, you're free to do something of your own. You're not sitting behind a big fat desk waiting for your catering service to serve you scum on a silver plate. Well I am. Is that not how this game works?
Only for those who pledge loyalty to me.
On September 05 2014 13:56 kushm4sta wrote:
oh batsnacks isn't confirmed scum i just said that because i really think he's scum
##vote batsnacks
Cool, can you elaborate or do that other stuff you do when you're town?
|
Vote Damdred pls.
I am like 90 % sure he's scum.
|
What I also want to point out is how he defended bats against plynches initially, then later on when posting his rundown of possible scummers he mentioned how bats' entrance was weird...which he didn't address at the point where he defended him against the plynches, which tells me he made that up.
|
Would also lynch kush cause he has damdred among the possible scummers but didn't give a shit about the stuff I wrote on him so far.
Very authentic scumread.
|
Not gonna bold stuff but it's information from these posts.
On September 02 2014 12:16 Damdred wrote:@3d when you return could you talk more about why you think bat is doing that (as in him being provocative etc) and why town bats would just do that and run out of the thread? Feels like you are giving him a pass on it to easily at this point, though I do not think it is beyond town bats to do it either. Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 09:32 Micchan wrote:
Its only the start of the phase #mess Why complain and run out of the thread, give us some thoughts about whats going on in the thread.
On September 02 2014 21:58 Damdred wrote:I do not think that Plynching bats is a good idea, he has not posted enough for me to get a real read on him yet, and i'm not going to think that his post is mission oriented as it would be counter productive. I have played a lot with bats and normally if hes mafia he formulates his posts a lot more, when hes town he just says random stuff or does random things. Obviously cannot tell, if you want to lynch him do not waste a plynch on him, wait for him to post more and actually do something scummy rather than something to mess with your head. But I also think 3d is a bit premature in giving him a town pass until he posts more. Show nested quote +On September 02 2014 21:48 Oatsmaster wrote:
I prefer not to guess what batsnacks is doing. Safe to say, whatever it is, it isn't very useful.
##vote: obiwan
Oats, is your vote on obi for his random votings and lurking? Or some other reason?
On September 03 2014 00:32 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On September 03 2014 00:08 27ninjabunnies wrote:
Oh and by shoot him, I mean shoot batsnacks, not 3d12. Though I might be willing to get him out of the game too. Why are you so willing to shoot batsnacks? You even say that this is fool batsnacks in your post, it seems kinda weird you would want to shoot bats when you think hes possibly trying to get lynched..... And why would you be willing to get 3d12 out of the game? He seems awkward its true, and his read on bats is faulty (his initial reasons anyway) but does not getting him out of the game for those reasons seem a bit flimsy to you?
On September 03 2014 11:38 Damdred wrote:
Batsnacks: His entrance to the thread was weird. On his re-entrance he ignored a lot of things that were posted against him, he never even showed interest in answering anything. His posts are really formulaic, right now they are reminding me of Neat and Tidy mafia instead of crazy bats in Cell or Titanic. Also usually hes really spammy, but his postings have been really hit and miss and even though he spared a lot of thoughts to 3d, his only reaction is that an apologetic tone is not scummy. But their are other things in 3ds posts that he could talk about and he does not really draw conclusions from that.
|
Let that be a secondary concern. What's visible so far is that 2 of his reads ooze fakeness.
|
Unless your intention with that post was to get me to vote for bats.
In that case, you will have to convince me why he's a better option than Damdred at this point.
|
I see room for bats being town, I don't see that room for Damdred right now.
There's just too much incongruence in his D1 actions.
|
On September 05 2014 14:19 kushm4sta wrote:
batsnacks
kitaman27
Tehpoofter
mderg
Damdred
-revised list of possible scummers
On September 05 2014 23:25 kushm4sta wrote:
Read through dsmdred filter on and I'm finding it pretty townie with lots of content
|
|
|
Kita why didn't you answer to what Damdred wrote about you?
|
On September 06 2014 13:12 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 13:05 Vivax wrote:
Kita why didn't you answer to what Damdred wrote about you? Read the case Kita made on me. Tell me I'm not going insane because he changed his case mid interaction. I swore he did.
Yeah I don't like how he's so hung up on your inactivity, he might as well have started bitching about mderg.
|
On September 06 2014 13:53 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 13:27 Vivax wrote:On September 06 2014 13:12 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On September 06 2014 13:05 Vivax wrote:
Kita why didn't you answer to what Damdred wrote about you? Read the case Kita made on me. Tell me I'm not going insane because he changed his case mid interaction. I swore he did. Yeah I don't like how he's so hung up on your inactivity, he might as well have started bitching about mderg. When you state that I'm so hung up on his inactivity, what are you inferring? I voted him hoping that he would be motivated to post and he never showed up so I moved on. He is probably 4th or 5th in line for the players I find the worst, so the fact that you make that bullying comment upsets me. As for answering Damdred, there is nothing to answer there. He mentions that all 5 of the individuals that I brought up at different points today as "easy targets", which is nonsense. Out of all the players in this game, I've taken the most stances, so saying I haven't is also nonsense. The only thing I'm struggling with is that there are so many people that look scummy that I haven't decided which should die first. Can't win the game by lynching all 3 in one cycle. I do admit that haven't pushed bunnies a ton, mostly due to people rubbing me the wrong way even worse and her absence from the thread when I've been around lately. I'll revisit her tomorrow, but I'm at batsnacks > damdred > bunnies currently. Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 13:31 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
That's not even my main issue with him.
He's holding it against me that I don't have an ironclad case yet, votes me for it, has no interest in my response, and then changes his mind in that he only wants reads from me.
Then I don't give him those reads and he votes someone else. You have your order of events mixed up. I was on Damdred when you showed up. So how could I vote someone else when you didn't give me the reads, when I wasn't on you to begin with? You state that I have no interest in your response, yet I asked for those four reads 3 times and then you said you would deliver eventually. Why are we still going in circles? When I unvoted you prior to you showing up, I stated that I was hoping you would show up with some content and that I never intended to vote for you at the end of the cycle. Since you've returned, your use of time has been really inefficient :/
I'm inferring that your motives for starting to talk about Obi over talking to your current scumread when it posts arguments against you aren't comprehensible.
I don't like the focus you displayed there.
|
|
|
There's way too many people I found questionable during the course of the game trying to move the attention towards batsnacks. It makes me reluctant to opt for his lynch today.
Kush/Damdred/bunnies/kita are today's best options
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
