EPTOn September 05 2014 08:30 batsnacks wrote:
This post reeks of tmi. Kush, how do you know I'm mafia unless you're mafia?
This post reeks of tmi. Kush, how do you know I'm mafia unless you're mafia?
Not sure if serious
Mission Mini Mafia - Page 5
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
Not sure if serious | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
On September 05 2014 08:46 kitaman27 wrote: lol I've never seen "it looks like he's putting a tremendous amount of effort" as a reason to call someone scummy. If you think I'm mafia, come out and say it with a legitimate case, because you're not going to discredit my posts by calling them artificial without providing examples. @bats, just an fyi, that Doctor Who game that you looked at, I started out as town and was converted to mafia later on in the game. Will probably post about bunnies next. What I mean is: You seem very focused on delivering very thought out explanations for your own behaviour in some aspects. It's like you're writing an alibi on how every time a certain specific event pushes your thoughts into a certain direction, which seems artificial. You are more focused on explaining yourself and why your thought process develops in a certain way rather than explaining why somebody else is scum. | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
On September 05 2014 08:54 kitaman27 wrote: meh, what do you think of bunnies before I give my opinion? Currently null | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
Nah | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
![[image loading]](http://static.giantbomb.com/uploads/original/0/6228/2231879-my_mind_is_full_of_fuck.png) | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
##Vote: Kushm4sta Kita, your take on kush please. Same for Oats or anyone else for that matter. | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
The thing is: What kita said about quote chain hitting 10 legitimately scared me, and then bats suddenly going nuts. I was really tempted to vote for him at that point if my scumreads didn't look like they wanted to lynch him. | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
On September 05 2014 09:58 Oatsmaster wrote: Yeah I could maybe talk myself into doing it. It's like he has occasionally posted good stuff but not with any consistency, like he only comments on stuff he can make a good post on. What did you find good so far? | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
On September 05 2014 10:03 ObiWanShinobi wrote: I really can't get over how weird the Templar kill was. Who shoots Templar? What does scum get out of it? The dude basically claimed not blue earlier in the game, so rolefishing is out. They either expect people to consider me as scum or they had the feeling that he was looking too townie. He had the biggest filter in the game. If I look at his reads those were me, batsnacks, 3d. No way of knowing if he got shot for his reads or for his townieness though. | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
On September 03 2014 11:38 Damdred wrote: I'll answer the second question first. Currently, I am nervous about Micchan. He made his initial post (which i pointed out also), that complains about the thread atmosphere which honestly was not bad at the time of his post. I think we were still in setup talk and were startin to move towards actual talk. He did not stay in the thread and help improve the conversation or even say what the mess was. On his return his posts were an excuse and throwing more suspicion onto 3d with no follow up. He has since lurked obviously. This is worrisome to me, but it is not enough for a scum read currently I think. We still have a good many hours left to search for scum and their is just not much to go on in his filter, theres no real meta case to be made as he is a newb or a smurf. And well I really do not like going for low hanging fruit. The people who I would like to see more out of right now are: -snip- On September 04 2014 03:04 Damdred wrote: ##Vote:Micchan Theres a few things that have led me to this vote. The first being in the way that his posts have gone about. He casually threw more accusations at 3d when pressure on him was the highest. He complained about the thread but never tried to fix it, gave excuses why he did not post yesterday and never posted again. All he has done is lurk, and while lurking is not scummy his play and posts look and feel scummy to me. A couple games ago I got into a situation that was similar in arnie and I let GB slide doing somewhat the same things and I don't want to make that mistake again by letting someone go whos to scummy to be scum. | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
On September 05 2014 11:57 Damdred wrote: Your correct Viv that at the point in the first post I did not want to vote on mix. You are also leaving out the context of the first post where poof demanded to know why I was not sleeping his case on mic. However a good bit of time passed and I thought he was the best option especially since a lot of people went afk with votes on him. So yea context helps that The context doesn't really help me here cause you expressed much doubt in the first post and how you didn't like going after low hanging fruit. Not much happened in between but you came back with more confidence to vote for him, confidence coming from...?? | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
On September 05 2014 12:09 Damdred wrote: At the first post it was shortly after his last post in the thread, so I was expecting him to come back and fight. But as the day was coming to an end, he hadn't done anything at all past that time. So it was his own lack of trying that gave me confidence. You said you found his posts scummy and that lurking wasn't inherently scummy. Lurking you now call lack of trying. No way, man. This smells like an excuse. ##Unvote ##Vote Damdred | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
On September 05 2014 12:27 Damdred wrote: Ok mr. I'll just stick my vote here and go to sleep plynch is cool. His posts were/are scummy, he lurked said scummy things which isn't inherrintly scummy then he left never came back. Yea ok whatever. Except low fruit who are actually town don't fuck off and not fucking fight. But with this you're using another argument than what you actually used previously: That his posts were scummy. That's cause I found a gap you had to fill in. | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
1. Damdred dislikes mix posts but doesn't see his lurking as scummy, decides to not go after him at this point for being low hanging fruit and to look for other options. 2. Damdred decides to vote Mix for his posts and again emphasizes that it doesn't have to do with his lurking. 3. I ask where the sudden boost of confidence came from. 4. Now in retrospective it's cause Mix didn't want to fight back, which is just another way of saying that he didn't post, which is another way of saying that he lurked, which previously wasn't a concern in his vote, so it couldn't have given that confidence to Damdred. Your vote on Damdred is a vote on scum. | ||
|
Vivax
22079 Posts
| ||
| ||
