|
On September 06 2014 09:54 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 09:53 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:52 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote:
I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Here is the plan that we should take. batsnacks is going with the idea that "the host lost interest after he broke his game", the only reason to think that is that if batsnack actually has a role related to voting that could actually involve the host being concerned about the votes. I propose that batsnacks role claims. If he fails, we should lynch him because he is trolling about the idea that 3d put out there. There is zero reason to assume that the host is concerned about breaking the game as vanilla town. That is really, really optimistic of you. So what are you saying?
That that is really, really optimistic of you.
|
On September 06 2014 09:55 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 09:55 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:54 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:53 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:52 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote:
I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Here is the plan that we should take. batsnacks is going with the idea that "the host lost interest after he broke his game", the only reason to think that is that if batsnack actually has a role related to voting that could actually involve the host being concerned about the votes. I propose that batsnacks role claims. If he fails, we should lynch him because he is trolling about the idea that 3d put out there. There is zero reason to assume that the host is concerned about breaking the game as vanilla town. That is really, really optimistic of you. So what are you saying? That that is really, really optimistic of you. Can we be serious for just 60 seconds, that's all I ask. Do you honestly believe that the host was upset with you about your votes for role related reasons?
I'm disappointed.
On September 06 2014 00:28 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 00:28 3d12 wrote:On September 06 2014 00:23 kitaman27 wrote:
I think you're leading down the wrong path there 3d. This is probably the strangest post I've seen from you yet, kita. Many potential missions have been pointed out by you and you've been really good at pointing out/heading off potential mission-like behavior. What makes you say this couldn't be true? Honestly, from the way your viewpoint changed without any clarification, it sounds like you're trying to pull me off of bat's trail. I'm townreading you so far, so give me a reason to keep doing so. Why is this mod warning irrelevant? You don't make reads off of mod warnings, ever.
|
On September 06 2014 09:59 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 09:57 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:55 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:55 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:54 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:53 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:52 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote:
I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Here is the plan that we should take. batsnacks is going with the idea that "the host lost interest after he broke his game", the only reason to think that is that if batsnack actually has a role related to voting that could actually involve the host being concerned about the votes. I propose that batsnacks role claims. If he fails, we should lynch him because he is trolling about the idea that 3d put out there. There is zero reason to assume that the host is concerned about breaking the game as vanilla town. That is really, really optimistic of you. So what are you saying? That that is really, really optimistic of you. Can we be serious for just 60 seconds, that's all I ask. Do you honestly believe that the host was upset with you about your votes for role related reasons? I'm disappointed. On September 06 2014 00:28 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 00:28 3d12 wrote:On September 06 2014 00:23 kitaman27 wrote:
I think you're leading down the wrong path there 3d. This is probably the strangest post I've seen from you yet, kita. Many potential missions have been pointed out by you and you've been really good at pointing out/heading off potential mission-like behavior. What makes you say this couldn't be true? Honestly, from the way your viewpoint changed without any clarification, it sounds like you're trying to pull me off of bat's trail. I'm townreading you so far, so give me a reason to keep doing so. Why is this mod warning irrelevant? You don't make reads off of mod warnings, ever. Nope, I'm not making a read off the mod warning. I'm asking you if you were stated "because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something" as something that you actually believe to be true or you stated it to poke fun at 3d.
If you're not making a read off of it then I don't understand why you want me to answer.
3d12 isn't scum. I have expressed this previously. You already had that information before this dialog.
|
On September 06 2014 10:03 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 10:01 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:59 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:57 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:55 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:55 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:54 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:53 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 09:52 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 09:23 batsnacks wrote:
I don't even know who I'm voting for because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something. Just in case I'm still voting for kush, which I shouldn't be right now. Here is the plan that we should take. batsnacks is going with the idea that "the host lost interest after he broke his game", the only reason to think that is that if batsnack actually has a role related to voting that could actually involve the host being concerned about the votes. I propose that batsnacks role claims. If he fails, we should lynch him because he is trolling about the idea that 3d put out there. There is zero reason to assume that the host is concerned about breaking the game as vanilla town. That is really, really optimistic of you. So what are you saying? That that is really, really optimistic of you. Can we be serious for just 60 seconds, that's all I ask. Do you honestly believe that the host was upset with you about your votes for role related reasons? I'm disappointed. On September 06 2014 00:28 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 00:28 3d12 wrote:On September 06 2014 00:23 kitaman27 wrote:
I think you're leading down the wrong path there 3d. This is probably the strangest post I've seen from you yet, kita. Many potential missions have been pointed out by you and you've been really good at pointing out/heading off potential mission-like behavior. What makes you say this couldn't be true? Honestly, from the way your viewpoint changed without any clarification, it sounds like you're trying to pull me off of bat's trail. I'm townreading you so far, so give me a reason to keep doing so. Why is this mod warning irrelevant? You don't make reads off of mod warnings, ever. Nope, I'm not making a read off the mod warning. I'm asking you if you were stated "because the host lost interest after I broke his game or something" as something that you actually believe to be true or you stated it to poke fun at 3d. If you're not making a read off of it then I don't understand why you want me to answer. 3d12 isn't scum. I have expressed this previously. You already had that information before this dialog. I'm not asking about 3d. I'm asking, do honestly think that it's possible that the host is worried that you broke his game or were you saying it as a joke?
What do you think?
|
On September 06 2014 10:07 kitaman27 wrote:I'm asking you. This doesn't need to be so difficult. Show nested quote +On September 04 2014 07:42 batsnacks wrote:
Given that, my vote was in an excellent spot I stand by the decisions I made day 1 Show nested quote +On September 05 2014 08:17 batsnacks wrote:On September 05 2014 08:17 Vivax wrote:
Anyone here who thinks kita is scum? duh Show nested quote +On September 04 2014 07:05 batsnacks wrote:
Do you think I was right about kitaman27? Show nested quote +On September 04 2014 06:50 batsnacks wrote:
there is at least 1 scum between the two of you. Show nested quote +On September 05 2014 07:34 batsnacks wrote:
I think I will vote obiwan or kitaman today. Considering you were so completely confident that I am mafia, why does it take a random 1 liner from kush and a joke vote from Obi for you to finally vote me. Weren't you in an "excellent spot" yesterday and you stand by you're decision? Now you're voting me in passing, saying that you'll probably end up on kush.
Quote where I said I will probably end up on kush today and I will unvote you.
|
On September 06 2014 10:11 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 10:08 batsnacks wrote:On September 06 2014 10:07 kitaman27 wrote:I'm asking you. This doesn't need to be so difficult. On September 04 2014 07:42 batsnacks wrote:
Given that, my vote was in an excellent spot I stand by the decisions I made day 1 On September 05 2014 08:17 batsnacks wrote:On September 05 2014 08:17 Vivax wrote:
Anyone here who thinks kita is scum? duh On September 04 2014 03:56 batsnacks wrote:
That's two down. On September 04 2014 07:05 batsnacks wrote:
Do you think I was right about kitaman27? On September 04 2014 06:50 batsnacks wrote:
there is at least 1 scum between the two of you. On September 05 2014 07:34 batsnacks wrote:
I think I will vote obiwan or kitaman today. Considering you were so completely confident that I am mafia, why does it take a random 1 liner from kush and a joke vote from Obi for you to finally vote me. Weren't you in an "excellent spot" yesterday and you stand by you're decision? Now you're voting me in passing, saying that you'll probably end up on kush. Quote where I said I will probably end up on kush today and I will unvote you. Misread that. The point still stands, why have you completely ignored your number one scumread. Is your case still that you think I had to be on the majority day one or are there any posts today that lead you to your conclusion?
Everyone else was townreading you. I thought I was wrong for a quick minute; which, I'm wrong sometimes. I actually had a massive campaign planned against you but I dropped it at the very last minute. If you want to see it post game remind me, it's still in my notepad. I have since remembered how right I was though, and you're doing a terrible job convincing me otherwise.
Let me give you some hoops to jump through. Tell me about Vivax and bunnies.
|
On September 06 2014 10:18 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 10:10 kitaman27 wrote:On September 06 2014 10:04 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
"Posting a case" isn't going to make me town or not, and you know it, so why would you make such an asinine request? Giving a read on essentially anyone is an "asinine" request? You said that you were going to sheep Vivax and don't care to do anything at the time. It's not like I posted this right after you made your post. You went 24 hours with NOTHING. You state that making a case isn't going to make you town. Well how exactly do you expect us to make a read if you post NOTHING for more than the first half of the cycle. If you're looking for specifics, what is your read on Kush, Damdred, Bunnies and batsnacks and why? tl;dr No.
My vote is in a good spot.
|
damn it I quoted the wrong person, sorry jedi master pls forgive me
|
On September 06 2014 10:20 Tehpoofter wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 09:45 batsnacks wrote:
poofter 3d12 isn't mafia. Just trust me, will you? Vote someone else. Twice I've tried to pressure him this game and twice been denied before he even has a chance to respond(thats just this day if you ignore day 1). I think you can understand I am not just going to trust you off your word. I'd like to see from 3d12 where his heads at. If he convinces me then I'm okay moving off but if not I'm going to pressure someone I think is scummy.
I'm ok with this response. You do what you do you have my full support.
Just fyi though 3d12 said "batwagon" and that's hilarious so he's probably not mafia.
|
On September 06 2014 10:23 kitaman27 wrote:
poofter, do you agree that batsnacks should post his "case in notepad" against me as proof that he is not lying?
If he continues to wait, that just gives him time to make one up,
Dude you should do motivational speaking. Your optimism is off the charts.
|
kitaman27 doesn't know me very well. Look at my posts this game. If I think something was too inappropriate to post... then god dog it, it is too damn inappropriate to post. I've already been warned once.
|
##unvote
##vote: ObiWanShinobi
|
On September 06 2014 10:31 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 10:29 batsnacks wrote:
kitaman27 doesn't know me very well. Look at my posts this game. If I think something was too inappropriate to post... then god dog it, it is too damn inappropriate to post. I've already been warned once. So to be clear, you're not posting your case hidden away in notepad?
Like I said, mention it post game. It is pure bat-gold.
|
WHERE'S DAMDRED? I REQUIRE DAMDRED IMMEDIATELY.
|
Obiwan lets talk about bunnies and vivax. If you say something about them I promise I will.
|
On September 06 2014 10:43 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 10:40 batsnacks wrote:
Obiwan lets talk about bunnies and vivax. If you say something about them I promise I will. Both of those people are town. Do you disagree?
I think Vivax is town. Bunnies I'm null on... her activity is the same now as when she was playing two games (cell and this one). I don't think bunnies is playing her scum game though. I wouldn't vote her this cycle, not seriously at least, since technically I have already voted every person in the game this cycle.
|
On September 06 2014 10:43 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2014 10:34 batsnacks wrote:
WHERE'S DAMDRED? I REQUIRE DAMDRED IMMEDIATELY. Where have you been all my life batsnacks?
Damdred you're a very logical person. Is kitaman27 mafia or am I crazy? Or both?
|
This is why you're the man Damdred.
|
On September 06 2014 11:15 Damdred wrote:
I mean why do you think town and null atm in more detail ive never seen a bunnies scum before
Vivax I think is town because I mostly agree with him and I like everything he's said about me. It is a semi-selfish read but I believe I am right. Also we had a conversation at the beginning of the day that I liked.
Bunnies I have only played one game with when she was scum (I think)... and it was cell mafia, so it was a completely different kind of game altogether. In that game I scum read her correctly very early on. This game I am neutral on her. This is not similar to the game I played where she was scum.
|
On September 07 2014 00:34 3d12 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 07 2014 00:26 Damdred wrote:
##Vote: 3d12
I think your scummy vivax, but 3d ignoring a ton of posts from poof and other people calling him scummy. Hes been doing it all game, with nb, with poof and with me. He has not interacted with the claims that hes scum hes just let people fight for his towniness without actually fighting himself. Well, good morning to you too! I haven't been ignoring the posts. I actually think poofter is pretty scummy too, but I don't have my notes with me to type up my case. I could maybe reconstruct the case from his posts, but I would need coffee first. As for right now, I'm still catching up. Might take a break to get coffee, ease the process along. If you have any opinions/answers you want, post. I'll respond to whatever relevant ones I find, but idk if you're looking for a particular repsonse over others.
I'm always super suspicious when people say they've made hand written notes about the game. Why would anyone do that? You need a computer to play, why not use a word processor so you can copy paste?
So my reason for posting right now is I don't believe your lame "don't have my notes can't post what I want" excuse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
