|
People who are making excuses real or otherwise and I know are better than that!
[donkey]Glowingbear[/donkey] - No offense but your case on Jenny/Seeya pair was pretty much reaching and showed you're not focused. I'm going to give you the pass of not being here today but like you need to step it up day 2... If GB doesn't step it up just lynch him. His cases should be better than that as town. Making associative reads that early as the main part of your first case is just not something you should be doing.
[pink]Lord Tolkien[/pink] - I think you're town and just not getting to put a bunch of time into the game but you can't ride that the whole way through until lylo you're going ot be a question even if you are town and we might lose from it. So get it together. You would make an excellent cop check just saying I might check you.
These two need to do a lot better than they are. I read what they're saying as town I just feel like they're not playing to their potential. They're currently not getting any action and if you want me to bang you step it up please.
|
On July 31 2014 11:58 JennyHell wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 11:46 Tehpoofter wrote:On July 31 2014 11:29 JennyHell wrote:
Oh nvm, looks like he's on it. Work was busy today so had to be not as active as I would like. Going to do a reads rundown of what I find important next. Jenny - Clearly town honestly if I was medic which I most likely am I'd save the shit out of her. She has inquisitive posts is clearly taking the time to read everything and reread it. Her investment in the game is very clear. She has the new player scum hunting tactic of waiting awhile to vote all townie attributes. Every time she posts I get a town boner. I would literally never vote her. Teemu - His overnight stuff while looking crazy that he was talking to himself didn't feel like his last game where he was more set on his reads and just wanted things to progress day by day. Here he seems to be looking into things. He accused me and called me good /swoon. Also posting pictures of the wolf pack made me lawl. I'd hit that! Lilwade - I have come around on him slightly hes my sketchiest bang but I feel like he might have some good insight later in the game and shouldn't be the kill for the day as lots of other people are playing scummier. I feel like if I'm wrong on a town this is it. However hes still done enough for me today to not feel too worried about banging him. Fudgecake, why do you make me doubt my gut feeling on lilwade.. I have to sadly agree though that he picked it up a little and is looking less scummy than for instance meatpudding. Shit.. What to do.. Okay, until I hear more from meatpudding and can reassess the situation fully, this is what I'll do. ##UnvoteYou're not completely off the hook, lilwade, I still want to see you being townier than you are. Meatpudding, I know you're in school right now but there's been some serious inactivity and huge lack of reads on your part. ##Vote Meatpudding
Vote RomanNumeralGuy with me to make the wagons close.
We need a vote count but 2 big wagons > 1 super big wagon > 3 small wagons.
|
On July 31 2014 11:54 Tehpoofter wrote:Mafia Scumbags RomanNumeralGuy should be the competing wagon with Meatpudding right now. His reads reek of mafia. He comes in and gives long cases on one person that show hes not really paying attention to the thread. He does quote posts but they are disconjointed and seem to me like he just searched someones filter found something that looked scummy and took it out of context to make it seem worse. He has done nothing to redeem himself and isn't pushing someone too be lynched in my opinion. LYNCH WITH FIRE VOTE THIS DUDE MeatPudding: If I was giving a textbook read on what a Mafia's reads list looked like I'd just quote this post. + Show Spoiler +On July 30 2014 19:33 meatpudding wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2014 19:22 Teemursu wrote:On July 30 2014 19:09 meatpudding wrote:
Hey guys. Anyone still here? I'm going to look through the thread. You were the first one to post after four hours (not including me), great job. Now who do you think is mafia and why? Hi Teemu. meat - top town or tt for short
banks - town lover
jen - the devil is a woman but she's not evil
666 - definitely evil
wade - using some pressure
cya - too cautioustea - first to post first to kill (we're no strangers to love)
gb - logic infallible therefore must have perfect info
It is everyone's named listed neatly with a small quote on what he feels town sentiment is leaving even his bottom town to be lynched next or possibly his scumbuddies. GB and teemu probably town if this dude is mafia. He doesn't even read the whole thread to give the reads my bet is he skimmed it and made this list. I'd lynch this dude and not shed a tear. Seeyalater - My weakest scumread. He has been playing the good guy coaster. Not ruffling feathers making jokes at people being mafia but not really pushing his reads. If he is town he needs to take a stance and really just step it up! He also has tried I think to buddy up with Jenny who I feel to be town. This read is a weak one and doesn't have a lot of substance but is important. His comments like "off the table today" or "not going to look at now despite being scummy lets lynch the lurker" give me pause that maybe meat is some donkey town this guy wants to get misslynched.
I don't know how "stance"-y my post is above this, but hopefully you can see where I stand right now. And I'm voting for meat because he is my top scum for being a lurker/afk, when he has shown multiple teams he has been reading the thread. Specially when a few hours ago he talked about giving his reads after gym or something, when that was probably like, 6 hours ago or so? It really would not hurt him to just say a couple reads or so on who at least he thinks is town. Him waiting so long almost makes me feel like, either he is disinterested because he rolled mafia, or he has no clue where town is right now and is trying too hard to formulate a post to both appear townie and sling some shit around. So its almost like a 2 for 1, you lynch a mafia and a lurker at once!
|
Also it's less than 12 hours to go, so its now or never for you lurkers, since at least a couple of us won't be around for the deadline. We really need to hear from you guys soon.
|
Jenny on lilwade I think that he needs to be looked at but he is doing things that good players do as town to hes getting his ideas out there and reviewing them and coming to decently townie conclusions. I feel like he is someone that is town today and it was hard for me to reconsider but I had the same gut feeling. If we were right we can get him tomorrow.
+ Show Spoiler +On July 31 2014 11:58 JennyHell wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 11:46 Tehpoofter wrote:On July 31 2014 11:29 JennyHell wrote:
Oh nvm, looks like he's on it. Work was busy today so had to be not as active as I would like. Going to do a reads rundown of what I find important next. Jenny - Clearly town honestly if I was medic which I most likely am I'd save the shit out of her. She has inquisitive posts is clearly taking the time to read everything and reread it. Her investment in the game is very clear. She has the new player scum hunting tactic of waiting awhile to vote all townie attributes. Every time she posts I get a town boner. I would literally never vote her. Teemu - His overnight stuff while looking crazy that he was talking to himself didn't feel like his last game where he was more set on his reads and just wanted things to progress day by day. Here he seems to be looking into things. He accused me and called me good /swoon. Also posting pictures of the wolf pack made me lawl. I'd hit that! Lilwade - I have come around on him slightly hes my sketchiest bang but I feel like he might have some good insight later in the game and shouldn't be the kill for the day as lots of other people are playing scummier. I feel like if I'm wrong on a town this is it. However hes still done enough for me today to not feel too worried about banging him. Fudgecake, why do you make me doubt my gut feeling on lilwade.. I have to sadly agree though that he picked it up a little and is looking less scummy than for instance meatpudding. Shit.. What to do.. Okay, until I hear more from meatpudding and can re ASSess the situation fully, this is what I'll do. ##UnvoteYou're not completely off the hook, lilwade, I still want to see you being townier than you are. Meatpudding, I know you're in school right now but there's been some serious inactivity and huge lack of reads on your part. ##Vote Meatpudding
|
On July 31 2014 12:00 Tehpoofter wrote:People who are making excuses real or otherwise and I know are better than that! [donkey]Glowingbear[/donkey] - No offense but your case on Jenny/Seeya pair was pretty much reaching and showed you're not focused. I'm going to give you the pass of not being here today but like you need to step it up day 2... If GB doesn't step it up just lynch him. His cases should be better than that as town. Making associative reads that early as the main part of your first case is just not something you should be doing. [pink]Lord Tolkien[/pink] - I think you're town and just not getting to put a bunch of time into the game but you can't ride that the whole way through until lylo you're going ot be a question even if you are town and we might lose from it. So get it together. You would make an excellent cop check just saying I might check you. These two need to do a lot better than they are. I read what they're saying as town I just feel like they're not playing to their potential. They're currently not getting any action and if you want me to bang you step it up please.
I'm still really on the fence about GB. My stance on him has also definitely softened after sleeping on his case, because would mafia really go to such lengths and come up with a pretty bad case study? Or was it made so to seem more donkey townie? Or to just hope we get caught up in the shit-slinging? Also I do like him wanting pressure town into pressuring others and using their votes.
Lord Tolkien I still get a decent vibe off of. Although I surely do wish he would post more often, the few posts that he has made have been really concise, he brings up a whole bunch of reads, and just gives off a good townie vibe, and he seems to legit try to make time to read the game and put an effort into his posts.
|
On July 31 2014 12:00 Tehpoofter wrote:People who are making excuses real or otherwise and I know are better than that! [donkey]Glowingbear[/donkey] - No offense but your case on Jenny/Seeya pair was pretty much reaching and showed you're not focused. I'm going to give you the pass of not being here today but like you need to step it up day 2... If GB doesn't step it up just lynch him. His cases should be better than that as town. Making associative reads that early as the main part of your first case is just not something you should be doing. [pink]Lord Tolkien[/pink] - I think you're town and just not getting to put a bunch of time into the game but you can't ride that the whole way through until lylo you're going ot be a question even if you are town and we might lose from it. So get it together. You would make an excellent cop check just saying I might check you. These two need to do a lot better than they are. I read what they're saying as town I just feel like they're not playing to their potential. They're currently not getting any action and if you want me to bang you step it up please.
On July 31 2014 07:01 GlowingBear wrote:
Tolkien, on the case I brought I specifically said they were distancing from each other and then I said that how unnatural was Jenny trying to "defend" someone who looked scummy.
I WASN'T saying that they were scummy together based on a single interaction. I said both were scummy AND that it would make sense if they were partners. They have specific reasons.
1) I called Seeyalater scum because of a post he says someone is scum but not mafia. Sounded like he wasn't too much involved and felt very mafia motivated.
2) I called Jenny scum because it felt completely unnatural they say she jumped trying to justify Seeyalater's attitude instead of scum hunting.
These are separate reasons that could be solely used by their on. Interactions that I've brought we're only to support this vision.
Btw, don't bother posting, you two guys, we've already got your reasonings. I'm just explaining my case since its primary argument is not based on associations.
If you think that this case is not paying attention to the thread at that moment, I don't know what is to pay attention anymore.
Anyway, tomorrow will be an easier day.
|
On July 31 2014 12:15 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 12:00 Tehpoofter wrote:People who are making excuses real or otherwise and I know are better than that! [donkey]Glowingbear[/donkey] - No offense but your case on Jenny/Seeya pair was pretty much reaching and showed you're not focused. I'm going to give you the pass of not being here today but like you need to step it up day 2... If GB doesn't step it up just lynch him. His cases should be better than that as town. Making associative reads that early as the main part of your first case is just not something you should be doing. [pink]Lord Tolkien[/pink] - I think you're town and just not getting to put a bunch of time into the game but you can't ride that the whole way through until lylo you're going ot be a question even if you are town and we might lose from it. So get it together. You would make an excellent cop check just saying I might check you. These two need to do a lot better than they are. I read what they're saying as town I just feel like they're not playing to their potential. They're currently not getting any action and if you want me to bang you step it up please. Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 07:01 GlowingBear wrote:
Tolkien, on the case I brought I specifically said they were distancing from each other and then I said that how unnatural was Jenny trying to "defend" someone who looked scummy.
I WASN'T saying that they were scummy together based on a single interaction. I said both were scummy AND that it would make sense if they were partners. They have specific reasons.
1) I called Seeyalater scum because of a post he says someone is scum but not mafia. Sounded like he wasn't too much involved and felt very mafia motivated.
2) I called Jenny scum because it felt completely unnatural they say she jumped trying to justify Seeyalater's attitude instead of scum hunting.
These are separate reasons that could be solely used by their on. Interactions that I've brought we're only to support this vision.
Btw, don't bother posting, you two guys, we've already got your reasonings. I'm just explaining my case since its primary argument is not based on associations. If you think that this case is not paying attention to the thread at that moment, I don't know what is to pay attention anymore. Anyway, tomorrow will be an easier day.
Do you think you're making the best cases/playing the best town you can?
|
On July 31 2014 12:13 Seeyalater wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 12:00 Tehpoofter wrote:People who are making excuses real or otherwise and I know are better than that! [donkey]Glowingbear[/donkey] - No offense but your case on Jenny/Seeya pair was pretty much reaching and showed you're not focused. I'm going to give you the pass of not being here today but like you need to step it up day 2... If GB doesn't step it up just lynch him. His cases should be better than that as town. Making associative reads that early as the main part of your first case is just not something you should be doing. [pink]Lord Tolkien[/pink] - I think you're town and just not getting to put a bunch of time into the game but you can't ride that the whole way through until lylo you're going ot be a question even if you are town and we might lose from it. So get it together. You would make an excellent cop check just saying I might check you. These two need to do a lot better than they are. I read what they're saying as town I just feel like they're not playing to their potential. They're currently not getting any action and if you want me to bang you step it up please. I'm still really on the fence about GB. My stance on him has also definitely softened after sleeping on his case, because would mafia really go to such lengths and come up with a pretty bad case study? Or was it made so to seem more donkey townie? Or to just hope we get caught up in the shit-slinging? Also I do like him wanting pressure town into pressuring others and using their votes. Lord Tolkien I still get a decent vibe off of. Although I surely do wish he would post more often, the few posts that he has made have been really concise, he brings up a whole bunch of reads, and just gives off a good townie vibe, and he seems to legit try to make time to read the game and put an effort into his posts.
I'm not going to bang GB anytime soon he could be mafia but I think hes just doing a bunch of RL stuff atm at least thats what I'm believing same on Lord Tolkien.
|
On July 31 2014 12:01 Tehpoofter wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 11:58 JennyHell wrote:On July 31 2014 11:46 Tehpoofter wrote:On July 31 2014 11:29 JennyHell wrote:
Oh nvm, looks like he's on it. Work was busy today so had to be not as active as I would like. Going to do a reads rundown of what I find important next. Jenny - Clearly town honestly if I was medic which I most likely am I'd save the shit out of her. She has inquisitive posts is clearly taking the time to read everything and reread it. Her investment in the game is very clear. She has the new player scum hunting tactic of waiting awhile to vote all townie attributes. Every time she posts I get a town boner. I would literally never vote her. Teemu - His overnight stuff while looking crazy that he was talking to himself didn't feel like his last game where he was more set on his reads and just wanted things to progress day by day. Here he seems to be looking into things. He accused me and called me good /swoon. Also posting pictures of the wolf pack made me lawl. I'd hit that! Lilwade - I have come around on him slightly hes my sketchiest bang but I feel like he might have some good insight later in the game and shouldn't be the kill for the day as lots of other people are playing scummier. I feel like if I'm wrong on a town this is it. However hes still done enough for me today to not feel too worried about banging him. Fudgecake, why do you make me doubt my gut feeling on lilwade.. I have to sadly agree though that he picked it up a little and is looking less scummy than for instance meatpudding. Shit.. What to do.. Okay, until I hear more from meatpudding and can reassess the situation fully, this is what I'll do. ##UnvoteYou're not completely off the hook, lilwade, I still want to see you being townier than you are. Meatpudding, I know you're in school right now but there's been some serious inactivity and huge lack of reads on your part. ##Vote Meatpudding Vote RomanNumeralGuy with me to make the wagons close. We need a vote count but 2 big wagons > 1 super big wagon > 3 small wagons.
It was 2-2 before I changed my vote, making it 3-2. If I change my vote again it'll only make it 2-3, so it will not be that much of a difference, and although DC is super scummy right now and his filter is shorter than a midget with no legs, I still feel that meatpudding is contributing less. He listed names and didn't give any reads.
What DC has done though that I don't agree with, nor like, is saying that Teemu is more likely to be mafia than meatpudding. I don't know how he comes to that conclusion, and then his answer to GB doesn't seem to make sense, saying he can see why we would vote meatpudding when GB was questioning why we weren't..
On July 31 2014 07:26 GlowingBear wrote: Why aren't you voting meatpudding? Why aren't people voting meatpudding? Show nested quote +Mainly because I think teemursu is more likely to be mafia. Meatpuddings posts have been sparce and subpar, but that could be attributed to an uninterested vanilla as well as a lurking mafia. Teemursu I have a strong feeling of scum. That being said, Teemursu is at least talking and giving some information whereas Meatpudding is completely useless to the town, I can see why people would rather see him go.
I'll keep this in mind and might change from meat to DC later on. I just need to have a serious think about it.
|
On July 31 2014 12:22 JennyHell wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 12:01 Tehpoofter wrote:On July 31 2014 11:58 JennyHell wrote:On July 31 2014 11:46 Tehpoofter wrote:On July 31 2014 11:29 JennyHell wrote:
Oh nvm, looks like he's on it. Work was busy today so had to be not as active as I would like. Going to do a reads rundown of what I find important next. Jenny - Clearly town honestly if I was medic which I most likely am I'd save the shit out of her. She has inquisitive posts is clearly taking the time to read everything and reread it. Her investment in the game is very clear. She has the new player scum hunting tactic of waiting awhile to vote all townie attributes. Every time she posts I get a town boner. I would literally never vote her. Teemu - His overnight stuff while looking crazy that he was talking to himself didn't feel like his last game where he was more set on his reads and just wanted things to progress day by day. Here he seems to be looking into things. He accused me and called me good /swoon. Also posting pictures of the wolf pack made me lawl. I'd hit that! Lilwade - I have come around on him slightly hes my sketchiest bang but I feel like he might have some good insight later in the game and shouldn't be the kill for the day as lots of other people are playing scummier. I feel like if I'm wrong on a town this is it. However hes still done enough for me today to not feel too worried about banging him. Fudgecake, why do you make me doubt my gut feeling on lilwade.. I have to sadly agree though that he picked it up a little and is looking less scummy than for instance meatpudding. Shit.. What to do.. Okay, until I hear more from meatpudding and can reassess the situation fully, this is what I'll do. ##UnvoteYou're not completely off the hook, lilwade, I still want to see you being townier than you are. Meatpudding, I know you're in school right now but there's been some serious inactivity and huge lack of reads on your part. ##Vote Meatpudding Vote RomanNumeralGuy with me to make the wagons close. We need a vote count but 2 big wagons > 1 super big wagon > 3 small wagons. It was 2-2 before I changed my vote, making it 3-2. If I change my vote again it'll only make it 2-3, so it will not be that much of a difference, and although DC is super scummy right now and his filter is shorter than a midget with no legs, I still feel that meatpudding is contributing less. He listed names and didn't give any reads. What DC has done though that I don't agree with, nor like, is saying that Teemu is more likely to be mafia than meatpudding. I don't know how he comes to that conclusion, and then his answer to GB doesn't seem to make sense, saying he can see why we would vote meatpudding when GB was questioning why we weren't.. Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 07:26 GlowingBear wrote: Why aren't you voting meatpudding? Why aren't people voting meatpudding? Mainly because I think teemursu is more likely to be mafia. Meatpuddings posts have been sparce and subpar, but that could be attributed to an uninterested vanilla as well as a lurking mafia. Teemursu I have a strong feeling of scum. That being said, Teemursu is at least talking and giving some information whereas Meatpudding is completely useless to the town, I can see why people would rather see him go. I'll keep this in mind and might change from meat to DC later on. I just need to have a serious think about it.
hahahahahaahha at the bolded.
I thought it was like 4-2 Meat... if only we had fancy vote counts! If its 3-2 meat then thats fine. I'm not going to cry if meat dies today. I think RomanNumeralGuy is more mafia though but these two being hte wagons is I think pretty pro twon.
|
On July 31 2014 10:18 JennyHell wrote:
Lilwade, glad you're showing yourself a bit more after being voted on.
You mentioned how you feel about Seeya and the things he did.
How do you feel about Meatpudding, Poofter and GB?
Do not think I read this and ignored it, just got back from dinner.
I will answer now to the best of my ability, but I am gonna make another post backing my words with quotes.
meatpudding is really scummy atm and not very active so if he did have a role he would be more of a danger to town than anything.
Poofter- well I like the guy and he gets good reads so I think prematurely lynching him day 1 is a bad idea since w/e role he gets he can pass as townie.
As for glowing bear I have not put as much thought and criticism in his post as I am about to do, but from what I read about him he is leaning town.
|
On July 31 2014 12:18 Tehpoofter wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 12:15 GlowingBear wrote:On July 31 2014 12:00 Tehpoofter wrote:People who are making excuses real or otherwise and I know are better than that! [donkey]Glowingbear[/donkey] - No offense but your case on Jenny/Seeya pair was pretty much reaching and showed you're not focused. I'm going to give you the pass of not being here today but like you need to step it up day 2... If GB doesn't step it up just lynch him. His cases should be better than that as town. Making associative reads that early as the main part of your first case is just not something you should be doing. [pink]Lord Tolkien[/pink] - I think you're town and just not getting to put a bunch of time into the game but you can't ride that the whole way through until lylo you're going ot be a question even if you are town and we might lose from it. So get it together. You would make an excellent cop check just saying I might check you. These two need to do a lot better than they are. I read what they're saying as town I just feel like they're not playing to their potential. They're currently not getting any action and if you want me to bang you step it up please. On July 31 2014 07:01 GlowingBear wrote:
Tolkien, on the case I brought I specifically said they were distancing from each other and then I said that how unnatural was Jenny trying to "defend" someone who looked scummy.
I WASN'T saying that they were scummy together based on a single interaction. I said both were scummy AND that it would make sense if they were partners. They have specific reasons.
1) I called Seeyalater scum because of a post he says someone is scum but not mafia. Sounded like he wasn't too much involved and felt very mafia motivated.
2) I called Jenny scum because it felt completely unnatural they say she jumped trying to justify Seeyalater's attitude instead of scum hunting.
These are separate reasons that could be solely used by their on. Interactions that I've brought we're only to support this vision.
Btw, don't bother posting, you two guys, we've already got your reasonings. I'm just explaining my case since its primary argument is not based on associations. If you think that this case is not paying attention to the thread at that moment, I don't know what is to pay attention anymore. Anyway, tomorrow will be an easier day. Do you think you're making the best cases/playing the best town you can?
I would almost lynch you for this question.
Anyways, Banks stepped it up a bit, and I like him a little more, but until he successfully lynches mafia, I will have doubts about him in the back of my mind.
##Unvote
##Vote MeatPudding
|
Okay, now that Teemu is going at meatpudding I'll change my vote to DC.
The wagons will be equal.
##Unvote
##Vote DCLXVI
|
On July 31 2014 12:28 Teemursu wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 12:18 Tehpoofter wrote:On July 31 2014 12:15 GlowingBear wrote:On July 31 2014 12:00 Tehpoofter wrote:People who are making excuses real or otherwise and I know are better than that! [donkey]Glowingbear[/donkey] - No offense but your case on Jenny/Seeya pair was pretty much reaching and showed you're not focused. I'm going to give you the pass of not being here today but like you need to step it up day 2... If GB doesn't step it up just lynch him. His cases should be better than that as town. Making associative reads that early as the main part of your first case is just not something you should be doing. [pink]Lord Tolkien[/pink] - I think you're town and just not getting to put a bunch of time into the game but you can't ride that the whole way through until lylo you're going ot be a question even if you are town and we might lose from it. So get it together. You would make an excellent cop check just saying I might check you. These two need to do a lot better than they are. I read what they're saying as town I just feel like they're not playing to their potential. They're currently not getting any action and if you want me to bang you step it up please. On July 31 2014 07:01 GlowingBear wrote:
Tolkien, on the case I brought I specifically said they were distancing from each other and then I said that how unnatural was Jenny trying to "defend" someone who looked scummy.
I WASN'T saying that they were scummy together based on a single interaction. I said both were scummy AND that it would make sense if they were partners. They have specific reasons.
1) I called Seeyalater scum because of a post he says someone is scum but not mafia. Sounded like he wasn't too much involved and felt very mafia motivated.
2) I called Jenny scum because it felt completely unnatural they say she jumped trying to justify Seeyalater's attitude instead of scum hunting.
These are separate reasons that could be solely used by their on. Interactions that I've brought we're only to support this vision.
Btw, don't bother posting, you two guys, we've already got your reasonings. I'm just explaining my case since its primary argument is not based on associations. If you think that this case is not paying attention to the thread at that moment, I don't know what is to pay attention anymore. Anyway, tomorrow will be an easier day. Do you think you're making the best cases/playing the best town you can? I would almost lynch you for this question. Anyways, Banks stepped it up a bit, and I like him a little more, but until he successfully lynches mafia, I will have doubts about him in the back of my mind. ##Unvote ##Vote MeatPudding
I think anyone in their right state of mind will have doubts about little Pooftah.
|
On July 31 2014 12:18 Tehpoofter wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 12:15 GlowingBear wrote:On July 31 2014 12:00 Tehpoofter wrote:People who are making excuses real or otherwise and I know are better than that! [donkey]Glowingbear[/donkey] - No offense but your case on Jenny/Seeya pair was pretty much reaching and showed you're not focused. I'm going to give you the pass of not being here today but like you need to step it up day 2... If GB doesn't step it up just lynch him. His cases should be better than that as town. Making associative reads that early as the main part of your first case is just not something you should be doing. [pink]Lord Tolkien[/pink] - I think you're town and just not getting to put a bunch of time into the game but you can't ride that the whole way through until lylo you're going ot be a question even if you are town and we might lose from it. So get it together. You would make an excellent cop check just saying I might check you. These two need to do a lot better than they are. I read what they're saying as town I just feel like they're not playing to their potential. They're currently not getting any action and if you want me to bang you step it up please. On July 31 2014 07:01 GlowingBear wrote:
Tolkien, on the case I brought I specifically said they were distancing from each other and then I said that how unnatural was Jenny trying to "defend" someone who looked scummy.
I WASN'T saying that they were scummy together based on a single interaction. I said both were scummy AND that it would make sense if they were partners. They have specific reasons.
1) I called Seeyalater scum because of a post he says someone is scum but not mafia. Sounded like he wasn't too much involved and felt very mafia motivated.
2) I called Jenny scum because it felt completely unnatural they say she jumped trying to justify Seeyalater's attitude instead of scum hunting.
These are separate reasons that could be solely used by their on. Interactions that I've brought we're only to support this vision.
Btw, don't bother posting, you two guys, we've already got your reasonings. I'm just explaining my case since its primary argument is not based on associations. If you think that this case is not paying attention to the thread at that moment, I don't know what is to pay attention anymore. Anyway, tomorrow will be an easier day. Do you think you're making the best cases/playing the best town you can?
I believe that was the best case I could present at the moment it was presented. More than actually pointing out scums, it served the purpose of make people bring more information to the thread. I could read Jenny as town after that, and also could you. I still have to read seeyalater's filter after that, though.
It is impossible to make very good cases so early on day1. I thought that sharing this idea and gather information from the reactions was better than to stay quiet...
|
I read 666's case on me, but it wasn't good enough for me to address while I'm still naked and in bed. I'll get to it once I'm bored at work.
Also as much and as valid the accusations on Seeyalater have been, Idk if he is mafia. To me he just sounds really genuine about what he is saying. I might be overreading it (?) while I'm still half asleep, but Idk. Still needs to step up his game, though.
|
On July 31 2014 12:29 JennyHell wrote:
Okay, now that Teemu is going at meatpudding I'll change my vote to DC.
The wagons will be equal.
##Unvote
##Vote DCLXVI
Medic on Jenny shes insanely town.
Oh nvm I'm probably medic.
|
On July 31 2014 12:28 Teemursu wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 12:18 Tehpoofter wrote:On July 31 2014 12:15 GlowingBear wrote:On July 31 2014 12:00 Tehpoofter wrote:People who are making excuses real or otherwise and I know are better than that! [donkey]Glowingbear[/donkey] - No offense but your case on Jenny/Seeya pair was pretty much reaching and showed you're not focused. I'm going to give you the pass of not being here today but like you need to step it up day 2... If GB doesn't step it up just lynch him. His cases should be better than that as town. Making associative reads that early as the main part of your first case is just not something you should be doing. [pink]Lord Tolkien[/pink] - I think you're town and just not getting to put a bunch of time into the game but you can't ride that the whole way through until lylo you're going ot be a question even if you are town and we might lose from it. So get it together. You would make an excellent cop check just saying I might check you. These two need to do a lot better than they are. I read what they're saying as town I just feel like they're not playing to their potential. They're currently not getting any action and if you want me to bang you step it up please. On July 31 2014 07:01 GlowingBear wrote:
Tolkien, on the case I brought I specifically said they were distancing from each other and then I said that how unnatural was Jenny trying to "defend" someone who looked scummy.
I WASN'T saying that they were scummy together based on a single interaction. I said both were scummy AND that it would make sense if they were partners. They have specific reasons.
1) I called Seeyalater scum because of a post he says someone is scum but not mafia. Sounded like he wasn't too much involved and felt very mafia motivated.
2) I called Jenny scum because it felt completely unnatural they say she jumped trying to justify Seeyalater's attitude instead of scum hunting.
These are separate reasons that could be solely used by their on. Interactions that I've brought we're only to support this vision.
Btw, don't bother posting, you two guys, we've already got your reasonings. I'm just explaining my case since its primary argument is not based on associations. If you think that this case is not paying attention to the thread at that moment, I don't know what is to pay attention anymore. Anyway, tomorrow will be an easier day. Do you think you're making the best cases/playing the best town you can? I would almost lynch you for this question. Anyways, Banks stepped it up a bit, and I like him a little more, but until he successfully lynches mafia, I will have doubts about him in the back of my mind. ##Unvote
##Vote MeatPudding
What? That question is amazing. He needs to evaluate himself and based upon that I can read him better since hes so far playing in my opinion a sub par game for himself.
|
On July 31 2014 12:31 JennyHell wrote:Show nested quote +On July 31 2014 12:28 Teemursu wrote:On July 31 2014 12:18 Tehpoofter wrote:On July 31 2014 12:15 GlowingBear wrote:On July 31 2014 12:00 Tehpoofter wrote:People who are making excuses real or otherwise and I know are better than that! [donkey]Glowingbear[/donkey] - No offense but your case on Jenny/Seeya pair was pretty much reaching and showed you're not focused. I'm going to give you the pass of not being here today but like you need to step it up day 2... If GB doesn't step it up just lynch him. His cases should be better than that as town. Making associative reads that early as the main part of your first case is just not something you should be doing. [pink]Lord Tolkien[/pink] - I think you're town and just not getting to put a bunch of time into the game but you can't ride that the whole way through until lylo you're going ot be a question even if you are town and we might lose from it. So get it together. You would make an excellent cop check just saying I might check you. These two need to do a lot better than they are. I read what they're saying as town I just feel like they're not playing to their potential. They're currently not getting any action and if you want me to bang you step it up please. On July 31 2014 07:01 GlowingBear wrote:
Tolkien, on the case I brought I specifically said they were distancing from each other and then I said that how unnatural was Jenny trying to "defend" someone who looked scummy.
I WASN'T saying that they were scummy together based on a single interaction. I said both were scummy AND that it would make sense if they were partners. They have specific reasons.
1) I called Seeyalater scum because of a post he says someone is scum but not mafia. Sounded like he wasn't too much involved and felt very mafia motivated.
2) I called Jenny scum because it felt completely unnatural they say she jumped trying to justify Seeyalater's attitude instead of scum hunting.
These are separate reasons that could be solely used by their on. Interactions that I've brought we're only to support this vision.
Btw, don't bother posting, you two guys, we've already got your reasonings. I'm just explaining my case since its primary argument is not based on associations. If you think that this case is not paying attention to the thread at that moment, I don't know what is to pay attention anymore. Anyway, tomorrow will be an easier day. Do you think you're making the best cases/playing the best town you can? I would almost lynch you for this question. Anyways, Banks stepped it up a bit, and I like him a little more, but until he successfully lynches mafia, I will have doubts about him in the back of my mind. ##Unvote ##Vote MeatPudding I think anyone in their right state of mind will have doubts about little Pooftah.
::insert joke about things being bigger in texas here::
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
