EPTNoir Mini Mafia: Chapter 2 - Page 46
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25552 Posts
| ||
|
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On July 22 2014 01:20 Hapahauli wrote: Post-Game Moderation Notes: Important Posts: + Show Spoiler + Alignments: + Show Spoiler + iamrobik kushm4sta Snickers MysteryMeat1 ObiWanShinobi Damdred Blazinghand (Veteran) Syencia Gobbledydook Warnings/Bans: (All bans are open to discussion/debate.) I’ll be requesting a 1-game ban for IAmRobik. He was not playing to his win-condition, and pretty much threw the game because he was frustrated about the game. While I understand the game atmosphere was pretty negative, that is no excuse for ruining the game for other players trying their best to win. He was both self-conscious of his desire to end the game without regards to his win-condition, and he did it on back-to-back lynches. I'd normally request more than a 1-game ban for this, but this game was a clusterfuck all around. ^The hammer vote of the day, made 4-hours after the day start. ^A vote placed in lylo in an IML game. Speaks for itself. I will be contesting the ban, even though I don't plan on playing for a month unless some really juicy game opens up | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
I will also request a ban for kush for knowing better and still voting bh because it's fun. I am 100% claiming to have just been following BH's directions -- he was our blue after all With regards to my mylo vote. Snickers left me no options when he took a hard stance on lynching me. He basically voted me without actually voting. All that shows is that I'm not a bitch | ||
|
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
|
iamperfection
United States9643 Posts
On July 22 2014 01:28 marvellosity wrote: I don't really agree with that ban tbh. | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
Given his stuff on Day 2, I thought I was being pretty lenient with 1-game only. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25552 Posts
That being said Robik did do things like post 20 messages in a row and honestly I'd be fine if you warned him for that, but Robik's voting was acceptable this game. He wasn't the one who threw. He was aggressive and caustic and spammy and I don't like that, and his attitude after my lynch was poop tier. Supreme poop tier. The actual votes on MM1 and Snickers were not against wincon though, since honestly MM1 and Snickers could have easily been the scumteam. | ||
|
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On July 22 2014 01:36 Hapahauli wrote: It's fine if you don't agree, but atleast tell me why =/ Given his stuff on Day 2, I thought I was being pretty lenient with 1-game only. As VT, I have no additional information, so I can't possibly be playing against my wincon unless I lynch myself. I had a strong town read on some girl named Cake in a game on VS. I ended up voting her at the end of d1 anyway cause marv told me to and she was mafia. Now don't get me wrong, BH is definitely not marv, but you get the point. There are few and far between times when I'm wrong. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
his vote on Snickers in LYLO shouldn't even be up for consideration, zero wrong with that at all. The whole town threw this game, and banning Robik for essentially being less retarded than the rest of the game (by being right about MM) doesn't seem that fair. Maybe the rest of town were trying to win, but they were still voting MM too. robik is right, kush flat out said BH was town on day 1 and hammered him anyway. tldr; shit happens, don't ban someone because shit happened in a stupid shitty game. | ||
|
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On July 22 2014 01:39 Blazinghand wrote: Honestly Robik was an annoyance to play with this game, but several times he did what was right rather than what was easy (ie, not hammering me when I was nya nyaaaing at him). IMO he should not be banned for playing against wincon, I don't percieve him as having done that this game. His vote on snickers actually wasn't too bad, and honestly someone has to vote first in LYLO or else we get games like A Fire Upon the Deep Mini Mafia (Read it if you dare, it's super short and super awful) where no townie wants to vote any other townie in LYLO, so nobody votes. Ever. That being said Robik did do things like post 20 messages in a row and honestly I'd be fine if you warned him for that, but Robik's voting was acceptable this game. He wasn't the one who threw. He was aggressive and caustic and spammy and I don't like that, and his attitude after my lynch was poop tier. Supreme poop tier. The actual votes on MM1 and Snickers were not against wincon though, since honestly MM1 and Snickers could have easily been the scumteam. I wanted to hammer you so fucking badly | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25552 Posts
| ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25552 Posts
I know, right!? I was having so much fun because you couldn't hammer me because you were trying to win the game. FWIW It really is a sign of respect that I was taunting you, I trusted you to be smart enough not to hammer. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
Happens in every game. true story. I don't agree. | ||
|
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
On July 22 2014 01:41 Blazinghand wrote: Actually, now that I think about it, his attitude BEFORE my lynch was also poop tier, but that's not the point. I had 4 votes on me, as town, in an IML lynch game where the votes on me were there because you RNG'd it. Are you serious? How is my attitude supposed to be good there? If I don't fight it, I'm mafia. If I do fight it I'm mafia. | ||
|
IAmRobik
United States5878 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
 | ||
|
iamperfection
United States9643 Posts
On July 22 2014 01:43 IAmRobik wrote: Good thing the best case I made all game was after the game was over. Lol | ||
| ||
