|
On July 17 2014 04:37 Snickers wrote:
Yea it's time for you guys to stop voting robik.
Atleast two players have proven they are bad. Sebastian brought up percentages. The percentage of newbie games first lynch mafia is a lot lower than ring.
Anyway gobble is scum, so obvious.
Explain? Or should I respond with "Anyway snickers is scum, so obvious"? Because your accusation is worse than BH's RNG.
|
cool 4 people have now asked snickers the same question.
|
lol kush why the hell do you ask me the same question twice when I never even came back to the thread. Your forcing questions out.
Time for me to join the party.
##Vote: kushmasta
I will actually contribute tomorrow when I am not so tired. But here is the case on kushmasta. Who the hell asks the same question to somebody twice without them popping into the thread. He is just making his filter look good while also making me looking scummy. He has not done anything productive except or ask questions. Also he votes me then makes the comment of cool four people have now asked snickers the same question. Just a sly way to make me look like shit.
I SHALL EXPLAIN MY MYSTERIOUS SELF TOMORROW WHEN I AM NOT SO TIRED. Advice for all of you would be for everyone to stop looking so scummy. TOODLES
|
##unvote snickers
i just looked at some of his last scum game, fire into the deep or something.
yeah he was way more tryhard.
|
Vote Count – Day 1
Gobbledygook (0): ObiWanShinobi
Damdred (1): ObiWanShinobi, Sylencia
ObiWanShinobi (0): gobbledydook, IAmRobik
Kushm4sta (1): ObiWanShinobi, Snickers
IAmRobik (3): ObiWanShinobi, Blazinghand, ObiWanShinobi, gobbledydook, Kushm4sta, ObiWanShinobi
Sylencia (0): ObiWanShinobi
Snickers (0): ObiWanShinobi, Kushm4sta
Blazinghand (1):: ObiWanShinobi, IAmRobik
MysteryMeat1 (0): ObiWanShinobi
Not Voting (3): MysteryMeat1, Damdred, Kushm4sta
Five votes are required to lynch.
Please contact the mods if the vote count is incorrect. Thank you!
It is currently Day 1. The day will end in , or when five votes on one person are reached.
|
If you want to see try hard look at my mini mafia (roman number) game hosted by kurami. (not 100% if that is his correctly spelled name, he is from Poland).
That point only makes sense if I am also not try hard when playing town. THIS IS WHERE YOU HAVE SLIPPED. I am tryhard, I double checked your count of four people. You have enough suspicion to vote me but are too lazy to actually do a real check. You retract your vote for terrible reason because you are afraid of what my close reading can do. One scum has been found.
Also clarification. The reason why his filter being entirely questions is bad, is because he completely forced one question. Aka his filter is all forced, nothing genuine.
|
On July 17 2014 11:39 gobbledydook wrote:Show nested quote +On July 17 2014 04:37 Snickers wrote:
Yea it's time for you guys to stop voting robik.
Atleast two players have proven they are bad. Sebastian brought up percentages. The percentage of newbie games first lynch mafia is a lot lower than ring.
Anyway gobble is scum, so obvious. Explain? Or should I respond with "Anyway snickers is scum, so obvious"? Because your accusation is worse than BH's RNG.
why do you have robik as scum?
|
On July 17 2014 12:18 Snickers wrote:
If you want to see try hard look at my mini mafia (roman number) game hosted by kurami. (not 100% if that is his correctly spelled name, he is from Poland).
That point only makes sense if I am also not try hard when playing town. THIS IS WHERE YOU HAVE SLIPPED. I am tryhard, I double checked your count of four people. You have enough suspicion to vote me but are too lazy to actually do a real check. You retract your vote for terrible reason because you are afraid of what my close reading can do. One scum has been found.
Also clarification. The reason why his filter being entirely questions is bad, is because he completely forced one question. Aka his filter is all forced, nothing genuine.
whats wrong with a filter full of questions?
you know, besides nothing.
|
|
|
snickers, the post in which I asked you the same question twice, i also asked you a new question. I was just consolidating my questions.
And no I didn't read a lot of your filter, nor have I read any of your town filters. I actually have to read one of your town filters to get a good meta read of you, you are right.
But the reason why I unvoted you was because your posts looked less tryhard than your scumgame. So I'm not going to vote someone for shitposting, if they don't shitpost as scum.
ANYWAY something doesn't sit right about you still. You are too tired to explain thoughts you already had, like why things you said were scummy were scummy, yet you had plenty of energy to concoct this shitcase against me for "asking questions." Seems like explaining your old suspicions would be quicker than coming up with new ones.
Add to that the fact that your suspicion is very omgusy.
##vote snickers
still wanna read one of your towngames before I feel confident in the vote though.
|
|
|
Why has everyone ignored the best case in the thread. it's been almost a page since i posted it
|
On July 17 2014 13:12 IAmRobik wrote:
Why has everyone ignored the best case in the thread. it's been almost a page since i posted it
I agree with you, and I asked bh two questions I would like him to answer. While we are waiting for that, I'm pursuing other avenues.
The truth is BH has very little content, and he does the random vote shit every single game. So I feel like although he leans scummy, it's too late to form a good read on him.
|
*too early to form a good read on him.
btw robik, care to weigh in about snickers?
you haven't said anything about him. plus you probably have the most experience with him?
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
bwahahaha it is FAR too late, foolish kush! You shall never form a read on me now!
Seriously though robik is like an amazing lynch just for rng reasons, but also other reasons that i'll get into soon ish
|
On July 17 2014 12:51 kushm4sta wrote:
snickers, the post in which I asked you the same question twice, i also asked you a new question. I was just consolidating my questions.
And no I didn't read a lot of your filter, nor have I read any of your town filters. I actually have to read one of your town filters to get a good meta read of you, you are right.
But the reason why I unvoted you was because your posts looked less tryhard than your scumgame. So I'm not going to vote someone for shitposting, if they don't shitpost as scum.
ANYWAY something doesn't sit right about you still. You are too tired to explain thoughts you already had, like why things you said were scummy were scummy, yet you had plenty of energy to concoct this shitcase against me for "asking questions." Seems like explaining your old suspicions would be quicker than coming up with new ones.
Add to that the fact that your suspicion is very omgusy.
##vote snickers
still wanna read one of your towngames before I feel confident in the vote though.
numbers refer to paragraphs.
1. This smells of the shittiest bullshit I have ever heard.
2. Your first post towards me was you seriously asking me about my posts. Next post... BAM VOTE. You did not vote me for shit posts and if you thought they were shit you would not seriously ask me about them. I did nothing in between the time interval for you to think ...good posts...shit posts..
3.If it is a shitcase, why are you acting like I put alot of effort into it. I do not understand the sentence that starts with seems.
Summy is that you are not making anysense and just back peddling yourself.
Any more bad defense posts that I can use for my case against you tomorrow?
|
fyi bh has the most expierence with me and I will weigh in on BH tomorrow for now I am too busy with other matters.
|
that last snickers post was awful and it reminded me of what i posted in wc.
|
i guess i need to ask you a third time because you aren't answering:
why you say gg was obv scum?
and what was scummy about obi's unvote?
|
I dont see how that helps the thread at all. Also I love how kush reads my meta---> I am town. Reads my meta again ----->I am scum. Stop reading me with an alignment in mind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
