• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 08:41
CET 14:41
KST 22:41
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview5RSL Season 3 - Playoffs Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12
Community News
Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump1Weekly Cups (Nov 24-30): MaxPax, Clem, herO win2BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced15[BSL21] Ro.16 Group Stage (C->B->A->D)4Weekly Cups (Nov 17-23): Solar, MaxPax, Clem win3
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival - 2025 Season Finals Preview Weekly Cups (Dec 1-7): Clem doubles, Solar gets over the hump Chinese SC2 server to reopen; live all-star event in Hangzhou Maestros of the Game: Live Finals Preview (RO4) BGE Stara Zagora 2026 announced
Tourneys
RSL Offline Finals Info - Dec 13 and 14! Tenacious Turtle Tussle 2025 RSL Offline Finals Dates + Ticket Sales! Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament StarCraft2.fi 15th Anniversary Cup
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 503 Fowl Play Mutation # 502 Negative Reinforcement Mutation # 501 Price of Progress Mutation # 500 Fright night
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle [BSL21] RO8 Bracket & Prediction Contest BW General Discussion Let's talk about Metropolis
Tourneys
[ASL20] Grand Finals [BSL21] RO8 - Day 2 - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO8 - Day 1 - Saturday 21:00 CET Small VOD Thread 2.0
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates Current Meta Game Theory for Starcraft
Other Games
General Games
Dawn of War IV Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Awesome Games Done Quick 2026! Nintendo Switch Thread
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Mafia Game Mode Feedback/Ideas Survivor II: The Amazon Sengoku Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread YouTube Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion!
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2026 Football Thread
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TL+ Announced Where to ask questions and add stream?
Blogs
How Sleep Deprivation Affect…
TrAiDoS
I decided to write a webnov…
DjKniteX
James Bond movies ranking - pa…
Topin
Thanks for the RSL
Hildegard
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1095 users

Detention Mafia - Page 63

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 61 62 63 64 65 78 Next
Amiko
Profile Joined February 2014
United States1725 Posts
June 05 2014 17:28 GMT
#1241
Whether you are town or scum, you have an incentive to stay and respond.
If you want to go AFK go for it, but I don't think it'll help you.
Palmar
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Iceland22633 Posts
June 05 2014 17:29 GMT
#1242
On June 06 2014 02:28 Amiko wrote:
Whether you are town or scum, you have an incentive to stay and respond.
If you want to go AFK go for it, but I don't think it'll help you.

Well I'm not exactly sure what'll help me.

I'm doing my best but you've got your head so firmly up your ass nothing I say is getting through.
Computer says mafia
sqrtofneg1
Profile Blog Joined November 2013
Canada1159 Posts
June 05 2014 17:30 GMT
#1243
On June 06 2014 02:29 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2014 02:28 Amiko wrote:
Whether you are town or scum, you have an incentive to stay and respond.
If you want to go AFK go for it, but I don't think it'll help you.

Well I'm not exactly sure what'll help me.

I'm doing my best but you've got your head so firmly up your ass nothing I say is getting through.

I don't like this attitude.
Imaginary
sqrtofneg1
Profile Blog Joined November 2013
Canada1159 Posts
June 05 2014 17:30 GMT
#1244
This attitude isn't gonna help you.
Argue all you want, but insulting won't help.
Imaginary
Amiko
Profile Joined February 2014
United States1725 Posts
June 05 2014 17:32 GMT
#1245
On June 06 2014 02:26 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2014 02:05 Amiko wrote:
To me, the quotes posts are you attempting to squirm new reasons into a lynch (inactivity, rereading) that your posts at the time do not reflect.

From now on, assume every point I make could possibly be inspired by rethinking, rereading, observation, events, jesus or various other things I don't tell you about.

It's 100% super clear what my thought process was.

1. jabber did super scummy things.
2. MZ did some scummy things
3. MZ did super scummy things. he still might contribute later
4. jabber is so scummy he might not be scum
5. we need to lynch him anyway, in case he's just bad mafia
6. can only lynch 1 person today.
8. jabber dies
10. Mz is still not contributing
11. shit day coming up, better post thoughts


It's so clear you even skipped 7 and 9. (I don't care much about that but it is funny since it reflects you were reordering the 100% clear thoughts)

Why would I assume someone has good reasons for their actions if they don't tell me the reasons? That's basically contrary to the game. I'm certainly not going to give you that benefit.
Amiko
Profile Joined February 2014
United States1725 Posts
June 05 2014 17:33 GMT
#1246
If you want to focus on fuba or mderg go ahead and make your cases on them.
If are town and you get lynched today, there's a chance you'd see something in mderg or fuba that we didn't.
Amiko
Profile Joined February 2014
United States1725 Posts
June 05 2014 17:33 GMT
#1247
EBWOP: If you are town and you get lynched today
HaruRH
Profile Blog Joined August 2011
Singapore2780 Posts
June 05 2014 17:34 GMT
#1248
I think I might be crazy, but fuba should be the scum in the pond we are looking for. His activity and the way people are killed coincides.

Using the kills on d2 and 3 as proof, we have:
Bunnies - n2

Bunnies was active at n2 exactly after the lynch, where she said that she was catching up. Fuba was active at that time too. Mderg only came along 10 hours after all the fiasco. It could be right to assume that fuba sent in the name when bunnies was regarded as safe by amiko (amiko was asking bunnies about reads on others and never asked others on reads of her) and me and sqrt were suspected. This is a safe kill for fuba as it only causes trouble for everyone else to lose a 'confirmed' townie.

Alakaslam - n3
On n3, both palmar and mderg were pretty active, figuring out the lylo situation. As scum, it would be wise to kill off slam since he could have been blue and was quite a confirmed townie by you all. Slam did not die on n2 since killing off bunnies would have been more beneficial, to deny her time to make claims. Thus, slam the confirmed town was killed off n3 instead.

I'm still convinced its fuba. If Palmar is the scum, I'll. .. cry.
It is fucking D4 and you are still alive as a CONFIRMED FUCKING TOWN. This is how fucking terrible scum thinks you are - Koshi
Palmar
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Iceland22633 Posts
June 05 2014 17:35 GMT
#1249
On June 06 2014 02:32 Amiko wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2014 02:26 Palmar wrote:
On June 06 2014 02:05 Amiko wrote:
To me, the quotes posts are you attempting to squirm new reasons into a lynch (inactivity, rereading) that your posts at the time do not reflect.

From now on, assume every point I make could possibly be inspired by rethinking, rereading, observation, events, jesus or various other things I don't tell you about.

It's 100% super clear what my thought process was.

1. jabber did super scummy things.
2. MZ did some scummy things
3. MZ did super scummy things. he still might contribute later
4. jabber is so scummy he might not be scum
5. we need to lynch him anyway, in case he's just bad mafia
6. can only lynch 1 person today.
8. jabber dies
10. Mz is still not contributing
11. shit day coming up, better post thoughts


It's so clear you even skipped 7 and 9. (I don't care much about that but it is funny since it reflects you were reordering the 100% clear thoughts)

Why would I assume someone has good reasons for their actions if they don't tell me the reasons? That's basically contrary to the game. I'm certainly not going to give you that benefit.


lol, 7 was a copy of 10 but I didn't think it needed to be said twice. 9 was "rethinking/rereading/mushrooms/jesus" but again, that's unimportant.
Computer says mafia
Palmar
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Iceland22633 Posts
June 05 2014 17:36 GMT
#1250
On June 06 2014 02:30 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
This attitude isn't gonna help you.
Argue all you want, but insulting won't help.

I'm not insulting him. maybe his ass is a real nice place.
Computer says mafia
Palmar
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Iceland22633 Posts
June 05 2014 17:45 GMT
#1251
On June 06 2014 02:32 Amiko wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2014 02:26 Palmar wrote:
On June 06 2014 02:05 Amiko wrote:
To me, the quotes posts are you attempting to squirm new reasons into a lynch (inactivity, rereading) that your posts at the time do not reflect.

From now on, assume every point I make could possibly be inspired by rethinking, rereading, observation, events, jesus or various other things I don't tell you about.

It's 100% super clear what my thought process was.

1. jabber did super scummy things.
2. MZ did some scummy things
3. MZ did super scummy things. he still might contribute later
4. jabber is so scummy he might not be scum
5. we need to lynch him anyway, in case he's just bad mafia
6. can only lynch 1 person today.
8. jabber dies
10. Mz is still not contributing
11. shit day coming up, better post thoughts


It's so clear you even skipped 7 and 9. (I don't care much about that but it is funny since it reflects you were reordering the 100% clear thoughts)

Why would I assume someone has good reasons for their actions if they don't tell me the reasons? That's basically contrary to the game. I'm certainly not going to give you that benefit.


No, you're requesting more than reasons. You're requesting inspiration and timeline.

Like that has never been a thing in mafia anywhere. You're stuck in your confirmation bias where if I don't have an exact post MZ posted that made me think he's mafia and I responded immediately to that I must be mafia.

In that post I was explaining why I thought he was mafia. Yes I gradually became more convinced over time. I probably did some rereading and even more rethinking. I also noticed his activity wasn't keeping up and his content was very lackluster.

You're going to have to accept not everyone plays mafia the same way. If you cannot comprehend that I don't think exactly like you, this conversation is pointless.

Computer says mafia
Amiko
Profile Joined February 2014
United States1725 Posts
June 05 2014 17:48 GMT
#1252
On June 06 2014 02:34 HaruRH wrote:
I think I might be crazy, but fuba should be the scum in the pond we are looking for. His activity and the way people are killed coincides.

Using the kills on d2 and 3 as proof, we have:
Bunnies - n2

Bunnies was active at n2 exactly after the lynch, where she said that she was catching up. Fuba was active at that time too. Mderg only came along 10 hours after all the fiasco. It could be right to assume that fuba sent in the name when bunnies was regarded as safe by amiko (amiko was asking bunnies about reads on others and never asked others on reads of her) and me and sqrt were suspected. This is a safe kill for fuba as it only causes trouble for everyone else to lose a 'confirmed' townie.

Alakaslam - n3
On n3, both palmar and mderg were pretty active, figuring out the lylo situation. As scum, it would be wise to kill off slam since he could have been blue and was quite a confirmed townie by you all. Slam did not die on n2 since killing off bunnies would have been more beneficial, to deny her time to make claims. Thus, slam the confirmed town was killed off n3 instead.

I'm still convinced its fuba. If Palmar is the scum, I'll. .. cry.


Ok, but why does that make fuba more likely than Palmar?
Just to explain, you can change who you decide to kill / check as long as you do it a while before deadline.
Mafia can send in the check at the beginning of the night or toward the end of the night (usually about an hour beforehand is nice so hosts can prepare the day post).

It seems to me that either mafia-Fuba or mafia-Palmar would see bunnies and slam as relatively confirmed town. I think this would even apply to mafia-mderg.
Amiko
Profile Joined February 2014
United States1725 Posts
June 05 2014 17:52 GMT
#1253
On June 06 2014 02:45 Palmar wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2014 02:32 Amiko wrote:
On June 06 2014 02:26 Palmar wrote:
On June 06 2014 02:05 Amiko wrote:
To me, the quotes posts are you attempting to squirm new reasons into a lynch (inactivity, rereading) that your posts at the time do not reflect.

From now on, assume every point I make could possibly be inspired by rethinking, rereading, observation, events, jesus or various other things I don't tell you about.

It's 100% super clear what my thought process was.

1. jabber did super scummy things.
2. MZ did some scummy things
3. MZ did super scummy things. he still might contribute later
4. jabber is so scummy he might not be scum
5. we need to lynch him anyway, in case he's just bad mafia
6. can only lynch 1 person today.
8. jabber dies
10. Mz is still not contributing
11. shit day coming up, better post thoughts


It's so clear you even skipped 7 and 9. (I don't care much about that but it is funny since it reflects you were reordering the 100% clear thoughts)

Why would I assume someone has good reasons for their actions if they don't tell me the reasons? That's basically contrary to the game. I'm certainly not going to give you that benefit.


No, you're requesting more than reasons. You're requesting inspiration and timeline.

Like that has never been a thing in mafia anywhere. You're stuck in your confirmation bias where if I don't have an exact post MZ posted that made me think he's mafia and I responded immediately to that I must be mafia.

In that post I was explaining why I thought he was mafia. Yes I gradually became more convinced over time. I probably did some rereading and even more rethinking. I also noticed his activity wasn't keeping up and his content was very lackluster.

You're going to have to accept not everyone plays mafia the same way. If you cannot comprehend that I don't think exactly like you, this conversation is pointless.



You don't have to play mafia the same way as me.

If I see behavior that looks scummy, I want to see an explanation.
If the explanation doesn't seem to fit your play at the time, I'm more comfortable disregarding it.

Timeline is absolutely a thing in mafia. Haven't you seen MS Paint?
Palmar
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Iceland22633 Posts
June 05 2014 17:54 GMT
#1254
On June 06 2014 02:52 Amiko wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2014 02:45 Palmar wrote:
On June 06 2014 02:32 Amiko wrote:
On June 06 2014 02:26 Palmar wrote:
On June 06 2014 02:05 Amiko wrote:
To me, the quotes posts are you attempting to squirm new reasons into a lynch (inactivity, rereading) that your posts at the time do not reflect.

From now on, assume every point I make could possibly be inspired by rethinking, rereading, observation, events, jesus or various other things I don't tell you about.

It's 100% super clear what my thought process was.

1. jabber did super scummy things.
2. MZ did some scummy things
3. MZ did super scummy things. he still might contribute later
4. jabber is so scummy he might not be scum
5. we need to lynch him anyway, in case he's just bad mafia
6. can only lynch 1 person today.
8. jabber dies
10. Mz is still not contributing
11. shit day coming up, better post thoughts


It's so clear you even skipped 7 and 9. (I don't care much about that but it is funny since it reflects you were reordering the 100% clear thoughts)

Why would I assume someone has good reasons for their actions if they don't tell me the reasons? That's basically contrary to the game. I'm certainly not going to give you that benefit.


No, you're requesting more than reasons. You're requesting inspiration and timeline.

Like that has never been a thing in mafia anywhere. You're stuck in your confirmation bias where if I don't have an exact post MZ posted that made me think he's mafia and I responded immediately to that I must be mafia.

In that post I was explaining why I thought he was mafia. Yes I gradually became more convinced over time. I probably did some rereading and even more rethinking. I also noticed his activity wasn't keeping up and his content was very lackluster.

You're going to have to accept not everyone plays mafia the same way. If you cannot comprehend that I don't think exactly like you, this conversation is pointless.



You don't have to play mafia the same way as me.

If I see behavior that looks scummy, I want to see an explanation.
If the explanation doesn't seem to fit your play at the time, I'm more comfortable disregarding it.

Timeline is absolutely a thing in mafia. Haven't you seen MS Paint?


Timeline is totally a thing. But only when you timetravel.

I didn't timetravel.

You don't need to tell me, I've used timeline arguments, but only when they actually apply.

My play at the time fits everything I've said perfectly. You're wrong if you say it doesn't.

Also, I'm going afk 4srs now because I actually need to do rl stuff for a while.
Computer says mafia
Amiko
Profile Joined February 2014
United States1725 Posts
June 05 2014 17:56 GMT
#1255
I'll be out for a while too.
I do want to give fuba & mderg some love also.
fuba
Profile Joined April 2014
United States663 Posts
June 05 2014 18:09 GMT
#1256
On June 06 2014 02:02 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 06 2014 02:00 Palmar wrote:
On June 06 2014 01:54 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
Well, here's something that I don't get.
If you're not mafia, why aren't you pushing people who you think are mafia?
If I were you, I'd be trying to get everyone to vote for fuba.

I'm not convinced it's fuba.

So if you guys could all be dears and start trying to figure out. Just pretend for the next 24 hours that I'm confirmed town, and go scumhunt the other two. Use reasons and stuff.

Then you can come back to me and lynch me. But it's hard to scumhunt when people are constantly pushing me as mafia for awful reasons.

Here's the thing.
It's either you or fuba. I'm lynching both you and fuba. The only question remaining is who to lynch first.

I believe that you're a more competent player, and that if you were mafia, it'd be easier for you rather than fuba to wiggle your way out of a lynch.
So you're my target today.
If you're not mafia, it's fuba.

I agree that we lynch palmar over me, but if you disregard mderg when actual thread events explain how he could easily be scum, then you're throwing the game away.

- He hard-hard-hard defends jabber while not actually searching for scum.
- Chrom points this out and he's dead the next day
- he votes MZ early on D2, comes back about a day later (when the sloosh wagon appears nigh-untouchable) and jumps on strong
- At that point, if he's bussing his teammate, he can't possibly switch wagons or it'll look really suspicious for him
- He is "roleblocked", making him look even more townie after the lynch
- He spends the rest of the game basically agreeing with Amiko

I'm not so much doing this to accuse mderg as to make everyone see that it's absolutely possible for him to be scum. Don't ignore him just because he voted SlOosh. If he's scum, a sloosh lynch seemed unavoidable unless some gullible townie waltzed in and convinced half the town to switch to MZ. By the time that happened, he had committed to the bus. He could not have switched back without looking very suspicious. The only people who should actually be acting like this is a solved game are me, palmar, and mderg, because we're the only ones who actually know where the scum is, 100%.

Oh, and Haru's "case" on me has been responded to, and the response has been ignored. It isn't strong. It's based on the dying words of confirmed scum. There's no legitimacy to that argument whatsoever. I'll be around, but I dunno if I'll respond to a whole lot. I can't keep up with post speeds like Amiko and Palmar have been churning out, and the most anything I've posted this game has accomplished is almost diverting a lynch from scum to town, so I don't see anything I have to say actually changing anyone's opinion of my play. I'm certain the scum is between palmar and mderg, but am really uncertain which one it actually is. To me, it doesn't matter, because there are two days to lynch scum.

In my own defense: I'll suggest you look at my interactions with gobble and try to explain it as two scum interacting. Unfortunately, at the time, the only person I asked for a response directly was SlOosh, so I was discouraged from a scum lynch by scum. (this is the kind of thing I was referring to when I said I'm not used to my words having this much impact, because a completely legit case against scum was completely ignored by everyone in town) Do you think that was a ploy involving the entire scumteam?

##Unvote
##Vote: mderg


Because why not~
@theRealMkfuba07
Amiko
Profile Joined February 2014
United States1725 Posts
June 05 2014 18:17 GMT
#1257
I'll give your post more time a little later fuba, I am about to head out.

Do you think scum is likely to not use a roleblock on d2? Especially if scum used a roleblock on d1? When there is no watcher in the game, and there is a cop, it feels pretty unlikely.
I can't deny it is possible, but it just seems like a stretch to me so I'd like to hear your explanation of that.
fuba
Profile Joined April 2014
United States663 Posts
June 05 2014 18:52 GMT
#1258
I've considered it, and I'd say it's more likely that they used it, particularly without a watcher. But I wouldn't completely count it out that they'd hold it in order to put us in the exact situation we're in now, where most of town won't consider mderg to even possibly be scum.

I know that it's likely that after Palmar, I'm next. And since I know I'm town, that would mean us losing the game (this is in the situation that palmar flips town, otherwise we wouldn't be lynching me at all XD). Preserving myself is a somewhat scummy mindset, as I said when I was voting for jabber, but it's kinda the mindset that all three of us have found ourselves in. Of me, palmar, and mderg, the one who gets the other two lynched wins the game. So while I hope it's Palmar, since that's definitely the easiest hurdle at this point in the game, mderg is the only other option if it's not. And I've been tricked by a scum ploy a few times this game already, so I'd like to be prepared if this is another one.
@theRealMkfuba07
Palmar
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Iceland22633 Posts
June 05 2014 19:17 GMT
#1259
##vote mderg

@fuba: I don't see why not.
Computer says mafia
Palmar
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Iceland22633 Posts
June 05 2014 19:21 GMT
#1260
Actually no.

my day 1 reads tend to be solid

##unvote
##vote fuba
Computer says mafia
Prev 1 61 62 63 64 65 78 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
StarCraft2.fi
10:00
15V Cup / Offline Finals
starcraft2fi 370
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Lowko492
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 43649
Horang2 2022
Stork 741
Light 738
Jaedong 687
EffOrt 669
Mini 665
BeSt 424
firebathero 316
Killer 269
[ Show more ]
Hyun 206
Rush 189
hero 186
Last 168
Larva 158
Leta 86
Mind 78
Mong 46
sorry 40
ToSsGirL 34
Aegong 25
yabsab 24
soO 23
Noble 23
Bale 22
Sacsri 21
Movie 21
Terrorterran 17
Shine 13
ajuk12(nOOB) 8
Shinee 7
Dota 2
Gorgc6407
singsing4261
XcaliburYe275
canceldota72
League of Legends
C9.Mang0334
Counter-Strike
edward188
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor210
Other Games
Grubby2678
FrodaN2574
B2W.Neo1654
Hui .181
oskar117
KnowMe101
XaKoH 93
Mew2King57
Trikslyr14
MindelVK10
Organizations
StarCraft 2
ComeBackTV 830
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 12
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH195
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV320
League of Legends
• Jankos3475
Other Games
• Scarra953
Upcoming Events
IPSL
3h 20m
Sziky vs JDConan
OSC
3h 20m
Solar vs Percival
Gerald vs Nicoract
Creator vs ByuN
BSL 21
6h 20m
Sziky vs StRyKeR
Hawk vs Dewalt
RSL Revival
14h 50m
Classic vs Reynor
herO vs Zoun
WardiTV 2025
23h 20m
herO vs ShoWTimE
SHIN vs herO
Clem vs herO
SHIN vs Clem
SHIN vs ShoWTimE
Clem vs ShoWTimE
IPSL
1d 3h
Tarson vs DragOn
BSL 21
1d 6h
Tech vs Cross
Bonyth vs eOnzErG
Replay Cast
1d 19h
Wardi Open
1d 22h
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
Replay Cast
4 days
The PondCast
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
SC Evo League
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #4 - TS3
RSL Revival: Season 3
Kuram Kup

Ongoing

IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
Slon Tour Season 2
WardiTV 2025
RSL Offline Finals
META Madness #9
SL Budapest Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
Bellum Gens Elite Stara Zagora 2026
HSC XXVIII
Big Gabe Cup #3
PGL Cluj-Napoca 2026
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter Qual
eXTREMESLAND 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.