Classroom Mafia (New / Newish Players Welcome) - Page 14

On May 27 2014 07:57 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
Did that make sense?

On May 27 2014 06:33 Epishade wrote:
I think I'm the only one who thinks Sqrt right now is town. Chromatically probably too.

Here are my thoughts.

Chromatically is saying Sqrt is likely town for asking about the coaches. Though it's not something that I particularly like doing either, I also think Sqrt wouldn't likely be asking about coaches if he were scum. It'd be a good move by Sqrt if he were actually really mafia and was planning on asking that to appear town, but I don't really think that's what happened here. In my interpretation, Sqrt then jokes about his being confirmed town because of his asking about coaches. Chromatically thinks it's a bit less townie of him to joke about being confirmed town, but I can't see a mafia making a joke about it like that.

Sqrt's probably town for me right now.

Chromatically is also probably town, maybe. Idk that he would go out of his way to claim Sqrt as probable town if he (Chromatically) were Mafia. I would think mafia would just care to give a neutral read on Sqrt if anything.

Bunny, you don't want to clear Sqrt. That's understandable I guess. You think a mafia could have just as easily asked about coaches, but I feel a bit differently about it, and feel that it's more likely that a townie asked about coaches then a mafia. No read on you so far.

Alakaslam seems to be pushing a bit on Chromatically and Sqrt for backtracking, but I believe he's making a big case over a joke. I also am unsure of how what Chromatically said implies inherent guilt. Maybe I misunderstood what Alakaslam was saying. @Alakaslam, can you explain your thought behind that again.

Fuba - I put you kind of in the same boat as Alakaslam. I find it hard to understand what you're trying to push Chromatically on. Your phrasing, to me, is a bit poor in this line, "Are you saying that the phrase itself was an exaggeration, or you meant to exaggerate?" As, to me, they both mean the same thing. You say the difference is intent and I don't really follow much of what you said in the rest of your post, "According to him, he didn't mean what he was saying from the start. I find this weird because he followed up that first statement with more evidence to support it, along with the assertion that finding sqrt to be town is "what must be done". He doesn't think sqtr is confirmed town, but says he's confirmed town, gives evidence that he is confirmed town, then switches to saying he's not confirmed town for the only reason that would have made sqtr not confirmed town in the first place."

Don't really have a read on anybody else as of yet.

On May 27 2014 08:13 mderg wrote:
I don´t really like how sqrt is asking random people about other random people. I don´t see what to get out of these questions.

On May 27 2014 07:15 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
Chromatically, what do you think of mderg so far?

On May 27 2014 07:55 sqrtofneg1 wrote:
It's like this. He town read me kind of, and then somewhat changes his mind on it. Now, in this post, he's explaining his thought process to come off as not insane. He's soft defending himself by explaining himself.

On May 27 2014 07:44 Alakaslam wrote:

Sure.

I explained who I liked and disliked in reply to a query, stating that I don't hold that to be a heuristic. Sloosh wants the game moving and so do I so I answered.

I have no absolute scum read at this point, and that is not sufficient heuristic to launch a ghost-OMGUS FoS from.

But for chromatically to take me so extremely, surprised me enough to wonder if maybe I actually should scumread him.

I think this isn't the situation.

As far as my scum play under this meta, I simply act far more classic TL townie. Ask Kush.

Also I would hard bus, we were savagely accusing each other for the bus and rofling in the qt in extractor trick.

On May 27 2014 08:13 mderg wrote:
I don´t really like how sqrt is asking random people about other random people. I don´t see what to get out of these questions.

On May 27 2014 08:18 HaruRH wrote:


I would like to deviate and think that any of them can still be mafia. Just a few lines won't cut it for analysis. Reading last minute vote changes and 'extraordinary' claims might be my reads for alignment.

On May 27 2014 08:45 Epishade wrote:


Well, of course any of them could be mafia. It's not exactly the greatest thing to clear someone on the first day or so when there's so little information to go on. I just mean that, given the information that I've been able to pick out so far, these are my reads. I'm sure they'll probably change as the game goes on.

On May 27 2014 08:39 Epishade wrote:
EBWOP:

Or rather, instead of how else should he have reacted, what made you think it was extreme of him to defend himself.

On May 27 2014 09:16 jabberwockzerg wrote:

can't really put a finger on it, but his tone was probably more defensive than it needs to be. Not making a call one way or the other just stuck out in my mind.