Cell Mini Mafia II
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 27 2014 09:46 ObiWanShinobi wrote: start faster anxious to start, clear mafia tell. | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 27 2014 09:58 ObiWanShinobi wrote: damn you got me lynch plz always oblige someone who asks ##bote: obiwan | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
A VOTE FOR RITOKY IS A VOTE FOR [blue]FREEDOM[blue] - Do you want to feel murrica flowing through you in every facet of your life? - Do you want moderately acceptable health care at a ridiculously high price? - Do you want to bring the hammer of murrican justice down upon the scum of cell mafia? - Do you want to be able to call everyone who disagrees with you a dirty commie? - Do you want to crap excellence? If you answered yes to any of these questions, then I am the man for you. If you click my profile you will see that I am undefeated in mafia. I sport an incredible record of 2-0, with a 100% town rate. This is purely because of the fact that I am murrican, and those who are from murrica are born on the side of freedom. We will use the power of freedom to oust those dirty scum from our thread! Trust murrica and freedom; get on the side that has never lost, and we will conquer the scum together! In a recent survey of the entire planet: I may invade your country, I may step one your toes, I may yell at you and tell you you're doing it wrong in your own home; but know that it is all in the name of murrica, freedom, and victory. Because if there is one thing that murricans are about that isn't freedom, it is winning. A vote for me is a vote for winning. ##Vote: ritoky | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
| ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
Unlike shiaopi's claims of me being lazy and disappearing from the thread claim, I have no intentions of going quietly into the night. Those of us who fight for freedom day in and day out realize the hard work that it entails. We pull ourselves up by our boot straps, put on our pants one leg at a time, and work to rid the world of all that opposes the power of freedom. We know freedom isn't free. (please click for reference) Furthermore the founding father of freedom, George Washington, has reminded me of 2 things: always trust in the power of freedom and murricans always are first. So to further my case for mayor, I propose that Cell A goes first. It also contains the most obvious scum currently in the case of Thrawn, who clearly hates freedom. | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 28 2014 08:43 WaveofShadow wrote: 'Cause it's you, bbygrl. I did say I don't really care who else gets it for the most part, didn't I? Are you saying you don't care about freedom? | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
HF are you from the land of King George III (aka King Thrawn III) or the land of Winston Churchill? This is crucial in determining your fate. | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
Obviously not, one is a land of taxation without representation; the other is a land that recognizes the power of freedom and asks for murrica's power in a time of need. The fact that you cannot distinguish the two leads me to believe you have something to hide. | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
Bunnies has potential, being from Texas, but she is currently not utilizing it. Maybe she just needs a while to really organize and seize her rights and freedom. Outside of that, HF gave a damning case on himself: On May 28 2014 09:12 Holyflare wrote: In england women aren't even allowed to vote. This PROVES that he is from the land of King Thrawn III, because by the time that his nation began to recognize the power of freedom in the 1940s they already had women's suffrage. | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 28 2014 09:18 Meapak_Ziphh wrote: Mayor-Elect Ritoky could you dazzle me with some scum reads? In all seriousness, I am trying to think about this game slightly different than a normal mafia game. I am trying to think about it in terms of the cells and getting strong reads on players in the cells. Outside of the fact that freedom and murrica declare that Cell A should go first, I know I am town and I think you have posted and done enough in the thread for me to get a strong read on you. Thrawn has yet to post, so I can't speak with certainty, but I think there is a wealth of information in the thread about Cell A for people to make informed reads on two of us already. The next Cells I would consider after A are C or B. Probably C before B. In regards to Cell C, I think there is something off about ShiaoPi's post where he was critical of those who were joking. I didn't really find that it added much to the game beyond complaining about the state of the game. To me his complaints are anti-freedom. If he doesn't like the state of the game, why didn't he push hard for it to change to a more serious tone instead of just pointing it out and walking away? HF, unfortunately, has done more to push a town than Shiao but I also find his avoidance of certain questions and topics (such as my campaign against him) to be questionable. Batsnacks hasn't posted. We will see about him, but I think that after Cell A which will be very clear cut, how people vote in regards to cell C will be highly informative. Currently, I am about that Shiao kill in C (although I sways toward HF the more anti-freedom he spews). Cell B would probably be next, although I could be convinced that it should go before C. I think poofter has pitted himself against Palmar in a very strong way, and I think WoS's response to that direction opposition of two people in his cell will be very alignment indicative for him. I like poofter currently, as he is in my murrica huddle. I like his case as a baseline for starting an extensive inquiry into Palmar. I think he also needs to bit of time to really flesh it out with gameplay support or watch it fall through. Which is why I would have him go 3rd. Currently, I am about that Palmar kill in B. The last two would be probably E then D as of right now. Simply because I think we have the least information about those two at the moment and I can't say I have particularly strong feelings about any of the people outside of bunnies in those groups. I could be convinced to push D up after group A into the 2nd spot if someone convinces me of that sick tambo read, cuz his post was strange. I think it was him trying to make a joke about golden sun, but it fell flat and was awk. | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
Remember, that freedom must prevail. | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
I have some catching up to do. Thank you to those who expressed their condolences, Parker was only 9 years old and he was a rescued dog (we got him from an absuive household and he was blind) so the short lift was a bit expected; but sad nonetheless. | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
wow there's gonna be some spelling errors tonight, I am sorry in advance. | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
- Poofter's general murrican aggression. - HolyFlare's show of patriotism. For these actions you guys get a stamp: Things that I ended up on the fence about: - Batsnacks post. Now I didn't particularly agree with all of what his post concluded in terms of methodology. I mean, first and foremost because Cell A is not going first, and George Washington has already declared that Cell A must go first. But beyond that, I think it misses the mark a bit. I think he gets a little hung up on going after low post count Cells, whereas I think the target area of choice should be easy to read cells and cells that are polarizing. Easy to read cells for obvious reasons, and polarizing ones where people are pitted directly against each other because I feel those will give the most alignment indicative information for future cells. I also like how batsnacks demands that people interact with his post, its a nice murrican kind of aggression. That said, his post doesn't actively interact with anyone nor does it really get him involved in the thread, so he ends up on the fence in the end. Things I didn't like: - HolyFlare's patriotism being about the UK. - Poofter getting hung up a bit too long on "rereading" without directly calling it alignment indicative. - How ObiWanShinobi has entered the thread yet not made any direct commentary on the 3 major people who have proposed themselves for mayor nor their methodology. He seems to simply be skirting around the edges, which is not the murrican way. You gotta dive in all the way. Freedom takes commitment. For these actions you get this: | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 28 2014 14:15 ObiWanShinobi wrote: this ritoky guy has spunk. ##vote: ritoky I appreciate your vote and compliment good sir, but could I ask you for a little more input on the matter? Do you like my methodology? Do you like my reads? Do you love freedom? Do you think I am 100% town? | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 28 2014 14:32 WaveofShadow wrote: ##vote: ritoky I can't honestly say I trust you completely, but I trust MZ, and I don't know when I'll be around tomorrow to play. Would still be nice to know what you intend to do with cells though. I see a potential problem here where if my cell (or any other) is the easiest but also the most active we lose good scumhunting so I'm curious as to how to get around that. As of my previous post the order I want is A, C, B, E/D. E and D are currently interchangeable in my mind, E currently leads D, but the margin is negligible. Not much has occurred in my mind to change that very drastically. What would be your order as of now? (anyone can answer this as well) | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 28 2014 15:01 WaveofShadow wrote: Only issue I see with leaving D and E last is we also don't have any what their play will be like at LYLO (hell we dont' even know much of what their play is like right now.) I honestly can't tell if there's a lot of risk/reward involved with these mayor choices or if it doesn't matter at all either way because you're either eliminating the coinflippy/worse players early and saving the most active for later, or removing the active ones early and saving the worse/harder lynches for later in the game. I guess you have a point, but my thought process as of now is that if you leave the less active players until late in the game it will result in 2 things: 1) they will have more time in the game so thus they will have more total posts and more to read them off of. For example, Person A is a lurker who posts...idk 2x per day. If we leave their cell until 6 days into the game, at least we will have 12 posts from that person. As opposed to putting them first and having 2 posts to read them off of. 2) It forces lurky people to have extensive voting histories. If someone lurks and is a coinflip, the best way in my mind to combat that is to get solid reads on other people in the game as town or mafia and force them to develop a voting history. There's no requirement in the game that they have to give us exorbitant amounts of information in the form of posts, so why not force them to give us as much information as they are required to give us before we have to make judgments. You do agree that Cell A is the obvious first choice in all cases though right? Or do you hate George Washington? | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 28 2014 15:19 WaveofShadow wrote: I'm going to bed rl soon so it'll have to wait. I mostly want to hear more from people in your cell tbh. Can I get a cell order as of now from you before you go to bed? Don't really need reasons if you don't have the time. | ||
ritoky
United States6851 Posts
On May 28 2014 15:17 Holyflare wrote: How can you even decide groups before everyone has spoken. Much confusion. Very pushy! Let's move away from this policy nono stuff and talk about the peeps! You start because I'm lazy and watching some cookery stuff Who would you like me to talk about? I think I have spoken about everyone and where I stand on them at this point. As for deciding things before everyone has spoken. HAH OBVIOUSLY you have never been to murrica. | ||
| ||