You Only Shoot Once Mafia - Page 68

On April 30 2014 19:42 Foolishness wrote:
We must be playing a different game JAT. Because I could have sworn you said you wanted to kill Oats (probably a good idea) and yet are voting me for my correct analysis about what happened day 1 (clearly a bad idea).

On May 02 2014 11:28 Foolishness wrote:

"Foolishness is scum! He pushed a mislynch day 1 and is pushing a mislynch on day 2!"

*Oatsmaster flips mafia*

"Foolishness is scum! He clearly bussed his own teammate with his scumbuddy blazinghand!"

On May 06 2014 09:36 WaveofShadow wrote:
Alright let's see here.
Austin, I suppose if you were trying to trap those who have been tunneling Foolishness or something, alright, but what have you got to show for waiting and wasting my time? I don't really appreciate you not setting me straight. I mean I appreciate the QT info, but you really just had to say you were in there. (Now of course this could be one epic as fuck scumplay from you---if anybody could do it, it would be you but I think at this point I'd be willing to lose to you if you pulled something like this and essentially faked an entire QT or something.)

Can we talk a little plz? Who do you want lynched today, and why?

Now Foolishness I'd appreciate the answering of a few questions if possible.
1) Like JAT says, there are a few cruicial reads missing---where are your reads on me/RoL from that QT considering you were attempting to push us to some degree D1?
2) What from the information that Austin released was so absolutely crucial to your 'circle' that you couldn't release any of it?

Unrelated---I'm wondering now if one of the original shots wasn't on scum. If there has been a successful protect the past couple nights I can't imagine they had two shots (unless they had only 1 KP from the start I guess...).
I still want Poofter lynched right now, and until somebody offers me something better he is who I will be pushing.
3) This isn't a question but can you do something today so I can feel justified in not lynching you beyond the stuff Austin said?

On May 06 2014 09:36 WaveofShadow wrote:
Alright let's see here.
Austin, I suppose if you were trying to trap those who have been tunneling Foolishness or something, alright, but what have you got to show for waiting and wasting my time? I don't really appreciate you not setting me straight. I mean I appreciate the QT info, but you really just had to say you were in there. (Now of course this could be one epic as fuck scumplay from you---if anybody could do it, it would be you but I think at this point I'd be willing to lose to you if you pulled something like this and essentially faked an entire QT or something.)

Can we talk a little plz? Who do you want lynched today, and why?

Now Foolishness I'd appreciate the answering of a few questions if possible.
1) Like JAT says, there are a few cruicial reads missing---where are your reads on me/RoL from that QT considering you were attempting to push us to some degree D1?
2) What from the information that Austin released was so absolutely crucial to your 'circle' that you couldn't release any of it?

Unrelated---I'm wondering now if one of the original shots wasn't on scum. If there has been a successful protect the past couple nights I can't imagine they had two shots (unless they had only 1 KP from the start I guess...).
I still want Poofter lynched right now, and until somebody offers me something better he is who I will be pushing.
3) This isn't a question but can you do something today so I can feel justified in not lynching you beyond the stuff Austin said?

On May 06 2014 10:13 Ace wrote:
Lynch Palmar

On May 06 2014 04:38 Alakaslam wrote:
That is correct.

I think Ace or palmar are scum, but not both. So my vote is on one of them

As far as why, I restate:

Ace made a statement as if I had made a scumslip because I stated that my shot on Yamato was a mistake (does anyone doubt that? Really?) He even had an attitude that seems like he was laughing as he wrote it because it was all so convenient how I set myself up for mislynch. Immediately a few folks glomed onto it in a way I found scummy, but not as scummy as the initial pointing out because of blatant "Hey look, vet- let's sheep" mentality. But that is OMGUS I guess

On May 01 2014 17:42 Ace wrote:
Alakaslammo made a scumslip. Probably shot yamato by mistake, mwahahaha. #moustachetwirl

On May 06 2014 10:18 austinmcc wrote:
In addition to Foolishness?

As opposed to Foolishness?

On May 06 2014 10:10 austinmcc wrote:
What have I got for wasting your time? My whole thing is that no time was wasted, but I understand we feel differently there. I'd rather we be looking at non-QT crap, cuz the QT has jack all. And BH would have been pure claiming scum if he didn't invite me, because of the oats lynch + everyone calling me townie + protective roles SAYING they'd target me. You HAVE to add that person, imo. I honestly assumed that everyone would assume I was in there. Also, my recent scumplay has been a far cry from epic.

I want to lynch Foolishness. I do not want to lynch poofter today. Foolishness more likely scum, Foolishness more info/connections. Time to de-foo the scumteam. Nobody being particularly active means no trapping, there doesn't seem to be any desire from anyone to ever formulate other reads except to check in every 72 hours, say someone is mafia, and dip.

Why poofter over foolishness?

---

---

---

Cephiro,

I guess don't reveal who you checked last night, but I would personally <3 if you looked into the group of Ace/Caller/palmar/VA/Poofter. With probably a preference towards...ace/palmar/VA. All checks valid, no checks not accepted, and you may or may not die tonight, so ... maybe we get successful checks, maybe no.

On May 06 2014 10:20 Alakaslam wrote:

^^