| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
Vote Count! Palmar (2) - Caller (0) - Geript (0) - VisceraEyes (0) - prplhz (immune) (1) - strongandbig (7) - Foolishness, Alakaslam, Geript, Palmar, Koshi, Cephiro (0) - Foolishness (1) - Sandroba Oatsmaster (5) - Austinmcc, Blazinghand (1) - VisceraEyes Sandroba (2) - VayneAuthority, WaveofShadow Alakaslam (1) - Oatsmaster until lynch. With 22 alive, 12 votes are needed to lynch. | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
19 | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On April 28 2014 09:32 sandroba wrote: So far I got as possible scum foolishness oats slam and possibly koshi and bh. I'm fair game to kill any of these today. Lynch all the guys on snb! | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
~21 | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25562 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On April 28 2014 09:47 sandroba wrote: I disliked Foolishness's case on SnB, when I often find myself liking town foolishness's cases. It's been awhile since I played with mafia Foolishness, Bureacracy and Parallel Worlds. I don't fully agree with scum foolishness busting out D1 cases, iirc he didn't in Bureacracy until he was really getting hammered for NOT doing it, and I remember him not getting moving for a bit in Parallel. So, I'm not inclined to super sheep your foolishness meta there, specifically don't agree with how mafia foolishness acts. I'm not inclined to lynch him D1, and I'm certainly not inclined to try and start swapping votes to him at the tail end of a D1 where town hasn't gotten a majority all day and has a bunch of sneaky snakes. His SnB case worries me, but only because I'm reacting differently to that than to cases he's made in recent games we've played. Enough to watch him. Not enough to put him top on any list I'd make.I honestly could care less by post cap and giving away posts. I dont think it means shit. And yes I find them all scummy for different reasons, it's d1 and trying to put a team together or talking about what might be their strategy is a waste of time. Tell me if you agree with what I said about foolishness instead. It's difficult to tell whether you're associating people or find them all scummy in their own right when you don't write anything and there are ties between folks based on pushing one lynch/not pushing another. Just checking. On April 28 2014 09:57 geript wrote: I'd totally claim to be more oats-whispery than you. Or at the very least I can often identify town oats even when people are trying to lynch him. Regardless of who whispers best, I think you be wrong.To snooglewoogle I am the oats whisperer. I don't think any of your points actually make him scum. Normal people, maybe but not oats IMO. I'm really surprised slam shot without any provocation. That's pretty far out his character. Like really really far out of his character. Enough so that I'm considering him again. I don't get why Sandroba doesn't like the SnB stuf. ~16 ***NEW THINGS*** On April 28 2014 06:46 justanothertownie wrote: This was a legit point. I don't love the idea of lynching someone when they won't be around to defend themselves. BOO ME FOR MAKING MY POST LATE IN THE DAY. BOO ME. There, now we're done.The problem with going after oats now is that he won't be able to defend himself if he is town. His filter looks horrible though. HOWEVER Oatsmaster DID come back to thread. Now let's see what he came back to the thread and did, and how he defended himself. On April 28 2014 08:49 Oatsmaster wrote: Caller was TOWN for nuking palmar, because what scum would out themselves, so stupid it couldn't be scum. Slam is MAFIA (or voteworthy) for shooting someone without provocation. Why the difference? There isn't one given.well what the fuck. ##unvote ##vote Slam The reason I didnt talk about nuke+caller+palmar is that happened fucking long ago and it did have an impact on my read, ie geript town. Austin, you know when town does stupid shit it makes them look like scum but when they stop their stupid shit it doesnt make them look like scum? I dont know if you know how to play, but reads change based on new info. Meh i need more time to figure out why the fuck caller instantly shoots a fake nuke because its not for the lulz but I think that Palmar's actions are of angry town rather than angry scum. Angry scum will be angrier and less inclined to play the game than palmar was. Also, in his defense, his geript read changed BECAUSE of fakenuke/caller/palmar, even if he didn't mention any of that. GREAT GREAT, OATS IS HERE AND CAN DEFEND HIMSELF, HE'LL DO THAT, WE'LL SEE IF WE'RE STILL SCUMMY ON HIM. GOGO DIALOGUE AND DEFENDING SELF! When questioned further about how fakenuke/caller/palmar led oats to change his mind on Geript --> On April 28 2014 09:36 Oatsmaster wrote: Ah, gotcha. So geript changed his vote for fakenuke/caller/palmar reasons, and THAT is why those things play into Oats's shifted read on Geript.Geript save me!! Geript changed his vote because palmar didnt die. Not for anything else austin. You must be deluded to think that.Anyway pretty much all the nuke did was waste time and a pardoner. I cant believe you guys dont want to lynch alak for that horrific shot. Yamato was annoying but not scum or shotworthy. Look a the way he rationalizes it like shooting someone for the sake of shooting someone rather than shooting scum Except if you read Geript's filter, that is 10000000% NOT THE CASE. It was a problem that oats wouldn't be able to defend himself Oats came back and had a chance to defend himself Oats responded to a single thing, by misrepresentation/blatant lie When offered an opportunity to point out where the thing he said happened actually happened, he never responded If ANYONE would like to show where geript's mind changed because of fakenuke/caller/palmar, please be my guest and quote some posts and show me what oats is seeing. You really should do that. If you CANNOT, then you need to read Oats's return to thread, the point he tried to defend himself on, and go "well gee golly gosh, that right there is just not true" and then you need to ask yourself why someone defends themselves by making crap up. He didn't leave the thread, cuz he thinks Sandro is bad, but neither he nor anyone else is gonna be able to find Geript talking about fakenuke/caller/palmar leading him to change his vote from caller to SnB. Specifically, dudemen on SnB, please read Oats's return to the thread. EVEN IF YOU WANT TO VOTE SNB NO MATTER WHAT THE END, please tell me whether you think Oats is making up a defense by misrepresenting/lying, or whether you can actually find posts that say what he say was say-ed. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On April 28 2014 10:15 geript wrote: Here's the thing. I don't see any better wagon right now. Not having a lynch is 100% not acceptable. SnB is wagon of justice people. Do the right thing. Free smores to everyone who joins. ~21 Sorry luv muffin You're my bro and all, but I just don't think SnB is scum. I don't know what sandro's return to the thread makes me think, especially considering I was looking at Oats before he told me that's what I should be doing. Problem with Oats of course, being I can't read that guy worth a dick (was wrong about him for the first day or two in Catastrophe). If you had to lynch somebody who wasn't Oats (because apparently you don't think he's scum even though his filter admittedly looks real shit) and wasn't SnB, who would it be? ##Unvote | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
22? | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On April 28 2014 10:06 Koshi wrote: Also this post count thingie is only a guideline and not a hard rule. Read OP pls. ... Regarding post-limits, we will give a warning for a first offense. Multiple offenses, and/or outright flaunting the post restrictions will result in a modkill. That's how it was enforced in Sicilian (with identical OP text), and that's how it will be enforced here. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
Start to this game feels like that. I've already explained Foolishness's meta read as not being great, what are the other cases against him? I dunno this is one of those things I feel ok about, not Shadow-game VE-read amazing. I personally think we should be lynching into one of the useless vets today, because ultimately they are the ones who seem to get the most demotivated and lurky when they roll scum. Not sure what that means for Palmar specifically---I could totally see him being a jerk like that as town but I'd be perfectly fine to lynch him for his weird spitefulness. I can donate some posts maybe so we can continue this convo if necessary. What do you make of Slam's shot and random-ass addendum that he was going to shoot me? That post he made is probably the most sense I have ever seen him make, and it was BAD. Like...scum-bad. Who knows how to read that guy? | ||
|
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
##donate 5 posts to alakaslam | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On April 28 2014 01:11 Oatsmaster wrote: man wtf yamato why are you derailing a lynch and not proposing anything else you useless bastard. For the record, I am totes fine with SnB lynch and I now think that geript is not scum because he dropped his policy lynch. Which he had arguably more reason to continue with ##unvote ##vote SnB Im going to sleep, kill scum guyys pls. On April 28 2014 08:49 Oatsmaster wrote: well what the fuck. ##unvote ##vote Slam The reason I didnt talk about nuke+caller+palmar is that happened fucking long ago and it did have an impact on my read, ie geript town. Austin, you know when town does stupid shit it makes them look like scum but when they stop their stupid shit it doesnt make them look like scum? I dont know if you know how to play, but reads change based on new info. Meh i need more time to figure out why the fuck caller instantly shoots a fake nuke because its not for the lulz but I think that Palmar's actions are of angry town rather than angry scum. Angry scum will be angrier and less inclined to play the game than palmar was. On April 28 2014 09:36 Oatsmaster wrote: What townie returns to thread and unvotes a near-majority candidate to be the only person on slam?Geript save me!! Geript changed his vote because palmar didnt die. Not for anything else austin. You must be deluded to think that. Anyway pretty much all the nuke did was waste time and a pardoner. I cant believe you guys dont want to lynch alak for that horrific shot. Yamato was annoying but not scum or shotworthy. Look a the way he rationalizes it like shooting someone for the sake of shooting someone rather than shooting scum Also, please show me the posts that back up the bolded statement, the last bolded statement. Or you, geript, can explain why oats is correct that you unvoted geript because of fakenuke/caller/palmar, and not because you liked Koshi's SnB case and thought SnB was scummy. Cuz if you can't do that, then hi, here's a dude whose defense 100% consists of a single lie. When asked to explain that lie, he failed to do so (despite still being around, because he called sandro a baddie). (Oats I didn't love the bits where slam tried to make a lot of sense in his responses post-shot, but I don't think he's dying today, and we can watch him throughout the rest of the game and judge him based on his play/posting rather than the shot. I've had mixed success reading him, am not the slamwhisperer) | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On April 28 2014 10:42 austinmcc wrote: Geript, WoS, Koshi, Blazinghand What townie returns to thread and unvotes a near-majority candidate to be the only person on slam? Also, please show me the posts that back up the bolded statement, the last bolded statement. Or you, geript, can explain why oats is correct that you unvoted geript because of fakenuke/caller/palmar, and not because you liked Koshi's SnB case and thought SnB was scummy. Cuz if you can't do that, then hi, here's a dude whose defense 100% consists of a single lie. When asked to explain that lie, he failed to do so (despite still being around, because he called sandro a baddie). (Oats I didn't love the bits where slam tried to make a lot of sense in his responses post-shot, but I don't think he's dying today, and we can watch him throughout the rest of the game and judge him based on his play/posting rather than the shot. I've had mixed success reading him, am not the slamwhisperer) Dunno man, looks like Oats bein' Oats to me. I'd lynch him over SnB though for sure. | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
Sorry if you guys wanted to switch. see you tomorrow. | ||
|
RebirthOfLeGenD
USA5860 Posts
Sorry about my low activity, I will try to be more consistent with my posting going forward. Also, ##donate 2 posts to SNB. You seem to be low on posts, I suppose its only fair to give you a bit more to work with in the few hours before your demise. I will be around until deadline if I don't accidentally fall asleep while watching dreamhack. | ||
|
Hapahauli
United States9305 Posts
On April 28 2014 11:01 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: ... Also, ##donate 2 posts to SNB. Invalid. You cannot donate more than 10 total posts per cycle. | ||
|
sandroba
Canada4998 Posts
I don't understand how being as neutral as humanly possible helps you point fingers at those more influential on d1 lynch. Also I don't get this neutrality from snb's posts at all and he seems pretty clear headed and very similiar in the way he thought about stuff in the last game in which he was town. | ||
| ||
[ Submit Event ] |
|
|
|
GSL
IntoTheiNu
 32PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
Replay Cast
The PondCast
KCM Race Survival
Escore
IntoTheTV X SOOP
CranKy Ducklings
Sparkling Tuna Cup
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
