|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On April 30 2014 05:38 prplhz wrote: Like Foolishness has done exactly what he said his scum meta is: he completely disappeared d2 after making a bad case on d1. Today we just do what sandroba said, 100% scum lynch on Foolishness. we're not going with some Caller/Ace/Blazinghand bullshit. Today we listen to probably the best town player (no no, not me, sandroba) saying that he's 100% sure on someone else and we lynch Foolishness. Get on with it. Except it wasn't a bad case because 12 people voted on it? Oops.
If someone wants to post an actual case against me I'll gladly respond to it (or quote it for me in case I missed it). I haven't seen any real arguments about how I'm mafia. Most of them are silly because they boil down to:
1) sandroba said so. Of which I have to say:
a) He also said that Palmar is mafia (and Palmar said he was mafia let's not forget that) and Palmar is a much more questionable character than I am for obvious reasons. b) Like you have never nightkilled someone to incriminate another town? c) I already refuted what sandroba had to say about me. If you need clarification bring up an argument and I'll respond.
2) I pushed a "bad" case on day 1. Of which I have to say:
a) It wasn't bad because a bunch of people (including townies) voted on it. b) A bunch of people independently came up with reasons why it was a good lynch. c) It's not my mafia meta like some people claim. According to the past 4 forum mafia games I've played I have either 1) done jack shit while I was alive or 2) make a case but never follow through.
On that subject, I return to what I said in an earlier post. Some of you seem to have this idea that yesterday's lynch was a mafia controlled lynch. I find this hard to believe and it's probably not true. The main reason being is because of point 2b) above: a bunch of people all had given reasons why strongandbig was a good lynch, all of which came independently. These people include Koshi, geript (confirmed town), Blazinghand and myself. If this was a mafia controlled lynch than a lot of people who started the wagon on him would have to be mafia (which is not true. Of the 4 people I listed there I'm sure we're all town. At most one is mafia if you want to hedge I guess). Not to mention there was opposition to the lynch in the form of good opposition from people like Odin and prphlz (by this I mean actual reasons behind why he's town and not just "this lynch sucks like some people did").
Furthermore, how many people are there that sat and watched that lynch happen? There's a lot, and I'll come back to those people below and I've already said who in my previous posts. For every person in this game that is making constructive posts and pushing reads it feels like there's 2 people who are sheeping (though 2 is an exaggeration in reality). What do you think is the most likely scenario for what has happened this game:
1) mafia pushed the strongandbig lynch really hard. Of the voters for strongandbig there's ~4 mafia voting, and half the town is sitting derping while this happened.
2) Town pushed a lynch onto a town. Mafia have all their votes spread out and just sat and watched it happened (which means sheeping reads, not pushing whoever they are voting for and letting town self-destruct).
It should be clear what happened yesterday unless you're in conspiracy theory land. I'm not really sure what this says about Oatsmaster (if anything) given that he was second in line to be lynched. What I do know is that mafia were very content with how things played out yesterday and did not fear one of their own getting killed. This means that the vast majority (if not all) of the mafia team were sitting back and sheeping along, because why would you put yourself out there to get townie's lynched when you can just let the town do it for you?
The people noteworthy here are:
RebirthOfLegend Who is guilty of:
1) Sheeping the vote read here: + Show Spoiler +On April 28 2014 04:33 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: As my tunnel buddy, I'm required to agree with everything foolishness says.
##Vote StrongAndBig And then claiming a whopping 7 hours later that he came to the same conclusion himself... + Show Spoiler +On April 28 2014 11:01 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: Before reading both foolishness and blazinghands cases on SNB I took a look through his filter just so I could get my own read beforehand. I'd be inclined to see it the same as they did. It felt like SNB was trying a bit too hard to be non committal on everything. It just struck me as effort into making sure he wasn't saying anything anyone could take issue with. Foolishness went a bit more indepth and compared it to other games, however I'd say it seemed clear enough that the only real incentive to put effort into being as neutral as humanly possible is to hide the fact you are scum and be able to point fingers at those who were more influential on the D1 lynch.
Sorry about my low activity, I will try to be more consistent with my posting going forward.
Also, ##donate 2 posts to SNB. You seem to be low on posts, I suppose its only fair to give you a bit more to work with in the few hours before your demise. I will be around until deadline if I don't accidentally fall asleep while watching dreamhack. And then 2) in his most recent post here:
On April 29 2014 07:26 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:Show nested quote +On April 28 2014 14:58 gumshoe wrote: Haro, its late but I owe town a few thoughts. I wont make anymore excuses, suffice to say been a spectacularly busy couple days.
havent had enough to read things too in depth. but heres a few things that stand out, geript is town as far as I can tell, or hes playing hard into his own meta.
I dont think palmer is scum because a) i am all too familiar with the if im going down towns coming with me mentality, (not specifically in mafia but other traitor games like bsg) its a shit scum strat because threatening people in a game with virtually no stakes is a bad idea, you cant cowe a town with this many great players and I dont think scum plam would try it. seems like a rage play. As scum Hes better off using his time to influence town, because he will never flip thanks to callers nuke.
b) pardoner seems like a shit role for scum, seeing as if you use to save your buddy, you instantly become a target and he just gets lynched tommorow.
I have a few preliminary scum reads but I need to get completely intimate with das thread first : P not going to throw myself into another retarded tunnel again if I can help it.
2 am here T_T night all, gl.
Scum can't pardon other scum unless Bill Murry is hosting. The ability usually used in order to put the town a few steps back when there is a scum pardoner and generally to cause chaos. But yes, it usually does need to be used in such a way to where the person giving the pardon can escape the ire of the town the following day. But yeah, it's not the best role for scum, but's it's more useful then a vanilla scum role because it can situationally be used to fuck with the town. IIRC we had a mafia pardoner in the last game I ran, although we kind of derp'd the implementation a bit. Personally I could see the point being made that if Palmar thought he was going to die, he might as well use the power. He can be town and have had such a huge town read on prplhz which I don't think is too likely on D1, or he could be a scum pardoner who figured he'd take the chance to just fuck with the town a bit while he can (assuming the nuke was real). IMO I think scenario 2 makes more sense because no read should be that strong day 1 to the point where you would remove the towns option to kill a person.
Also, let's not forget he said he was going to try to fuck us, whether or not it was an act or genuine rage it seems quite scummy to me. He says that what Palmar did is quite scummy. Yet he said nothing about Palmar on day 1 (or Caller for that matter). He also promised that he would give the town something by the end of night 1 and he did not deliver.
So let's get this straight. He says that Palmar is scummy for trying to mess with the town on day 1 (true statement, yes). Yet he did not feel the need to say anything about it on day 1 and just go along with the strongandbig read? What townie thinks that someone is likely scum and then not vote him, not say anything about it, and not push him?
Yes, he is noteworthy for being an inactive player. When he's town he's much more aggressive with his reads and actually pushes his targets. Check out his post here from a game where he's town. Note that he actually makes a case using his own thoughts and follows through (he talks about cheesecake in later posts as well). When he's mafia he never makes a constructive case like this and only provides backhanded reasoning. In purgatory and storm mafia (where he's mafia) he comments on a lot of things to make it seem like he cares but he doesn't have the vested interest in hunting mafia or figuring out the game.
##Vote: RebirthOfLegend
WaveOfShadow Who is guilty of:
1) Not doing anything day 1 in a broad sense. He's always a big presence in the thread but most people seem to have forgotten he was even in this game (I know I did on multiple occasions).
2) Flailing his vote around on day 1. First voting for sandroba here + Show Spoiler +On April 28 2014 09:03 WaveofShadow wrote: I was actually going to suggest more people shoot so we can use the coroner and veal a whole bunch of stuff at once ( I'm assuming its a one shot that only reveals one set of no flips ) Also ##Vote:sandroba
And then unvoting an hour and a half later (to his credit that was when sandroba came back to the thread and voted a bunch). Then voting for Oats even though he doesn't like the case here: + Show Spoiler +On April 28 2014 10:48 WaveofShadow wrote: Dunno man, looks like Oats bein' Oats to me. I'd lynch him over SnB though for sure.
3) Says Palmar is suspicious and should probably be lynched but never doing anything about it:
On April 28 2014 06:29 WaveofShadow wrote: Also Ace hasn't mentioned NBA or posted gifs Lynch dat guy
I think question today honestly comes down to which of the older vets cares the least and we lunch them S ndroba/ace/palmar/caller gogogogo
On April 28 2014 10:36 WaveofShadow wrote: Catastrophe was the first time I've ever seen SnB play that hard. Start to this game feels like that. I've already explained Foolishness's meta read as not being great, what are the other cases against him?
I dunno this is one of those things I feel ok about, not Shadow-game VE-read amazing. I personally think we should be lynching into one of the useless vets today, because ultimately they are the ones who seem to get the most demotivated and lurky when they roll scum.
Not sure what that means for Palmar specifically---I could totally see him being a jerk like that as town but I'd be perfectly fine to lynch him for his weird spitefulness.
I can donate some posts maybe so we can continue this convo if necessary. What do you make of Slam's shot and random-ass addendum that he was going to shoot me? That post he made is probably the most sense I have ever seen him make, and it was BAD. Like...scum-bad. Who knows how to read that guy?
4) Follows some weird train of thought that ends up with him voting Blazinghand? I can't even follow his logic through this one. He keeps saying he wants to sheep someone but doesn't seem to quite know where to go with that.
He's either bored townie or mafia. I don't think I've ever seen him bored.
Palmar Who is guilty of a lot of things.
To be clear I will maintain my position that Palmar is town but I am still listing him here because he fits the bill and I would still vote for him should the rest of us decide he needs to die. My vote is staying on the better case for now.
Oastmaster Who is guilty of:
1) Voting for strongandbig without any reasoning here: + Show Spoiler +On April 28 2014 01:11 Oatsmaster wrote: man wtf yamato why are you derailing a lynch and not proposing anything else you useless bastard. For the record, I am totes fine with SnB lynch and I now think that geript is not scum because he dropped his policy lynch. Which he had arguably more reason to continue with ##unvote ##vote SnB Im going to sleep, kill scum guyys pls.
2) General absence on day 1. He was next in line to get lynched and hardly seemed to care.
--- I have to stop here for now but I know I'm on the cusp of having this figured out.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On April 30 2014 08:04 austinmcc wrote:Foolishness, that says a LOT about not-oats, when yesterday you were looking over him and snb at one point, and proceeded to just say nothing at all about oats ever. Including more or less up until now, because all this other stuff is real work and the oats bit is just him having a weak vote and being absent. This bit Show nested quote +I'm not really sure what this says about Oatsmaster (if anything) given that he was second in line to be lynched. What I do know is that mafia were very content with how things played out yesterday and did not fear one of their own getting killed. This means that the vast majority (if not all) of the mafia team were sitting back and sheeping along, because why would you put yourself out there to get townie's lynched when you can just let the town do it for you? also doesn't quite jive with this bit [sic] You don't have to draw conclusions, you can be not really sure, but ... a red oats means mafia probably was NOT content with how things played out yesterday. Talk to me about oats and why he's mafia for doing scummy stuff and not for doing things that 2/3 the game is doing. You misunderstand. That paragraph means I don't know if that in itself says anything about Oats. I read that particularly thing as neutral. If you think that if Oats was mafia then more drama would have happened yesterday I can respect that.
Also weren't you the one saying Oats was mafia post after post?
On April 30 2014 08:34 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: Suck it phil. Your argument collapsed on top of itself. You talk about how I am lazy and apathetic and then say that after I sheeped you I pretended to draw the same conclusion. The real reason was because I just went WOOOO VOTE SNB, then went and did other things, then eventually came back and read it when I stopped being lazy. I love you too <3
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On April 30 2014 08:40 Tehpoofter wrote:@ Foolishness, Did you read my case on Koshi? At first I thought it was one of the two of you just from reading and after filter diving Koshi I feel like what he did was get a snowball rolling and instead of pushing it let you get behind it and do the leg work and slightly cheer on the sidelines "go team" knowing SNB was town and defending his potential buddy in Oats more than pushing his lynch. I really liked your post you bring up RoL sheeping you and I read his filter after your post and he really hasn't done much at all and not coming through with his promise is scummy. My question is him sheeping you is odd what do you think of Koshi's post here: Show nested quote +On April 27 2014 06:46 Koshi wrote: I am sorry but if Foolishness says you are scum. You are scum. No need to second guess it.
##Vote: prphlz Especially when Koshi follows it up saying he thinks prphlz might be town/doesn't know why hes scummy but basically hes voting because you said so??? + Show Spoiler +On April 27 2014 07:13 Koshi wrote:Show nested quote +On April 27 2014 07:05 justanothertownie wrote:On April 27 2014 06:56 Koshi wrote: GREAT ANALYSIS JAT. REALLY NICE. VERY THOUGHTFUL.
Above message is sarcastic.
The reason to why it is sarcastic is because you don't give any input at all about prplhz his alignment. You use meta I think. But the only thing I remember in Foolishness his meta is pure gold and awesomeness.
But even if there is something. Are you saying because foolishness once said that a guy was scum while he was town it now counts for all future games?
Your blind worshipping is just getting on my nerves tbh. Foolishness did exactly this to WoS in the shadow game. As long as almighty Foolishness doesn't explain to me why prplhz is scummy I will just ignore him and you should too. At least if you have no scumread on that guy on your own. I literally do this in every game marv is in and you never have a problem with it. You are even pushing me away to have marv his penis for you alone. Now suddenly it is a problem I follow the great Foolishness? I don't know what it is that makes prplhz scummy. I see: 1) trying to help town atmosphere saying stuff that is good for town atmosphere in theory. Then also votes Caller and gives reasoning. Asks a question to VE that probably has nothing to do with scumhunting. Asks the guys who think Caller is town why they think Caller is town. 2) Helping people who can't read the OP. Asking some questions to Ace that might not have anything to do with scumhunting. 3) Tell Oats he is wrong and Caller is scum. 4) Telling Caller he is scum. 5) Telling the thread Caller is scum. So I am going on blind trust here.
Foolishness town hero. Can you go into a bit further detail on what you think of Palmer? like basically you're saying "I think he's town but I'd vote he's also not the best case" Ill look through your filter for a case you have on Palmer after this but I don't recall it. @town I Think Koshi is most definitely the scum between Foolish and Koshi.... look at the way they've played the game Koshi brings up a case on SNB but doesn't ever really push it he also defends the other lynch candidate Oats who if you read Austin's case looks scummy as well. I feel like he also REALLY wanted the Geript kill to be meaningful and brought it up very very quickly after the day start something I think mafia does because they know who is going to die. I am most likely shooting Koshi before days end unless some people I find townie can convince me otherwise (I'm looking at you austin, odin, ace, palmer, foolish). I think the lynch needs to be between Oats/WoS/BH/RoL I am going to read filters on them and decide where to place my vote. Koshi you have about 12 hours or so to convince me you're town or you'll be the proud owner of a bullet! Koshi was one of the few posting things of substance yesterday so I thought he was town. I agree with you that his flip-flop-ness is questionable. I haven't looked at any of his past games (yet) so I'm not sure how normal this is for him. I do think you bring up some good points though, not sure if I'd shoot him yet.
I'm just going to change my Palmar read status to: "I don't know". Thought he was town, but maybe not cause he had that bad post where he gave a bunch of reads day 1. Thought he was town again, but him dying would answer a lot of questions I think. I don't know. Would not bat an eye if he died.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
Also I would lynch gumshoe without hesitation.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
Austin I'm not sure what you're asking me about Oats. I think Oats is mafia for not doing anything this game and tossing around his vote. I think it's a debatable subject on whether or not there would have been more drama on day 1 if Oats is mafia. Personally, I don't think it's true, but I understand why you might think so.
Also I think Yamato is town.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
We must be playing a different game JAT. Because I could have sworn you said you wanted to kill Oats (probably a good idea) and yet are voting me for my correct analysis about what happened day 1 (clearly a bad idea).
Also the four people who pushed the strongandbig lynch were the first five people to vote for him (blazinghand was doing things with his vote because he has difficulties reading the clock sometime). So essentially what happened is that a bunch of people posted cases on strongandbig, voted for him, and then a large chunk of people went "hey this sounds good! vote strongandbig" and another large chunk of people went "hey this doesn't sound good! toss vote on *insert random person here*".
I mean, okay Oatsmaster had a lot of votes yesterday too. But when votes were getting moved it hardly felt like mafia doing something there. If you think otherwise then you need to
1) Provide a case on why Oatsmaster is mafia (which you haven't done). 2) Show players who moved their vote around at crucial times in regards to Oatsmaster collecting votes (which you haven't done). 3) Show that the players in number 2 are mafia for reasons outside of that, like they aren't contributing, pushing an agenda, etc. (which you haven't done).
Now I just took the liberty of looking through your filter this game and noticed a quite unusual turn of mindset.
On April 29 2014 22:06 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On April 29 2014 06:34 Foolishness wrote: Gonna go out on a limb here and say that sandroba and Palmar are both town.
And by limb I mean I'd find it difficult to believe if you thought otherwise.
I'll just summarize main sandroba points:
1) in Bureaucracy mafia I made a bullshit case on day 1 and was afk for the rest of the game. I hardly even pushed it iirc. This game I got a town lynched.
2) I'm not soft defending Palmar, I'm hard defending him. I think he's town. Make a case if you think otherwise cause I haven't seen one other than he did something anti-town by pardoning prphlz. Even so, would not be upset if he died. Almost like a wildcard.
3) Cases weren't bullshit cause I didn't make them up. Legit thought prphlz was mafia (I've caught him before as mafia in the past). Don't think he's mafia anymore and would not lynch tomorrow.
So maybe this game is difficult and I or blazinghand or Koshi or 2 or all of us are mafia, and we all pushed a lynched yesterday that we knew was on a town.
Or maybe what really happened is that a bunch of townies pushed a lynch onto another townie and the mafia sat back and watched it all happened. This is even more likely given that there wasn't ever that hard of a push against anyone else (the Oatsmaster case never got the traction, though to be honest I would probably lynch him). And it's even more likely cause there's a big handful of people that can be best summarized as:
1) Didn't really contribute much yesterday in terms of pushing a read.
2) Voted without much consideration or without following it up.
And that handful of people includes, Ace, Palmar, Alakaslam, Caller, RoL, WaveOfShadow, Cephiro and then VA and JAT to an extent.
Which boat you riding sandroba? You're "Foolishness is so awful as mafia this is him leading the town to a mislynch with his scumbuddy Palmar" or the "town lynched a town and mafia just sat back and enjoyed the show"? I know what boat I'm in and it doesn't involve any conspiracy theories about mafia buddies purposely ignoring each other.
Yes prphlz, I did look at would lynch Cephiro in a heartbeat. So, to clarify: Did you actually mean to say Palmar/Sandroba are town or is that a typo? Because the rest of your posts does not suggest that as far as sandroba is concerned. You basically call everything he said wrong. Also I think it is quite ridiculous that you group me in the list of people who "voted without much consideration". That is absolutely not true. I made it very clear that I thought oats was the better lynch and I even spoke to you about why your case does not make SnB mafia. You claim oatsmaster never got traction which is a blatant lie. If that was the case how come it was tied (8:8 or something like that) at some point? If you are town you can do better and you will have to because if you don't provide some magic today I am very inclined to sheep sandroba and lynch you. Show nested quote +On April 29 2014 16:53 Koshi wrote: ##vote Foolishness Because I am not impressed. Also Sandroba is ded.
imo people should shoot Foolishness. Also Palmar.
PEOPLE PLS SHOOT FOOLISHNESS AND PALMAR.
Thank you. I don't think we should be shooting Foolishness. If he doesn't start shitting towny rainbows we lynch him today. We learn nothing by shooting him.Could you please explain your Foolishness read in more detail now like you promised earlier? I still think your change from "mouth already full" to totes scum makes no sense the way you presented it. The same goes for you Koshi, so BANKS I would recommend not shooting Koshi. Koshi said it himself but I think it is kinda true that he would not lead a lynch that way as scum. I mean he could be scum but he will be readable in the future. We need to get rid of the question marks who will remain question marks all game and we sadly have plenty of them this game. Examples: slam, RoL, gumshoe... if you have some kind of scumread on one of those people they make a better shot than the vocal guys. Then a whopping two and a half hours later you say that I'm a good lynch (before proceeding to vote me hours after):
On April 30 2014 00:50 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On April 30 2014 00:41 Koshi wrote:On April 30 2014 00:27 Caller wrote:we're ignoring all the other crap you guys are spouting, half of you are chasing your own tails and the other half of you are mafia. we're focusing on this now. On April 30 2014 00:14 Caller wrote:On April 29 2014 12:17 VayneAuthority wrote: didnt even know there was vanilla town in this game, what a scrub lol are you guys fucking kidding me the guy just softed a blue claim, and there isnt a bomb or meth dealer or w/e role. There's only two reasons why you would do this: either you're a fucking retard that wants to get killed by mafia, or you're actually mafia. i tend to think better of humanity than to assume everybody is a fucking retard, so VA claim, it's out in the open anyways. ##vote: VayneAuthority I am waiting on VA to come back and shoot Cephiro. I read the claim and was planning to talk to him about it. Pretty sure he typed that because he wants to shoot somebody today. If he doesn't do it or shoots somebody strange we have a problem. Voting him makes it sure he can't shoot. We want him to shoot a target town is ok with. So I suggest you give him a scummer instead of voting him. IN THE MEANTIME: Alakaslam and JAT think it is better to not let VA shoot obvious great scumtargets. Which means I can add another paragraph to my response to JAT ↓. On April 30 2014 00:17 justanothertownie wrote:On April 29 2014 23:16 WaveofShadow wrote:On April 29 2014 22:36 justanothertownie wrote:On April 29 2014 22:30 Koshi wrote: So I can brag endgame? If you think you can brag with those reads endgame you have to have some reasons for them, correct? Believe it or not I want to hear them. Normally you are an easy townread at this point and I really need townreads because very few people are really towny this game and asshole scummers shot 2 of them last night. I have the nagging feeling that you are town but your play doesn't suggest that at all. My eyes have been opened. This looks like 'Oh balls, they's catching on, no reasoning though---hmm I can discredit here.' Also probably thought Cephiro was town until that traitor shit was pointed out to me which seems really damn obvious, including his recent attempts to defend himself. I dunno I think I just have to find someone to sheep all game. Maybe I'll make like Koshi and listen to dead geript for once? I don't think I can play this kind of format again it's killing my activity and motivation. It's funny I yelled at Slam/called him scum for saying I don't care about the game but this may be the game I've cared about the least in like, ever. Someone give me something to do. Austin you're good at that. Because asking for reasoning is totally scummy after all... I understand that you think this game sucks WoS. I share that feeling mainly because of the post restriction and because half of the people aren't even playing but why should other people put effort in if you don't? Koshi promised explanation and didn't deliver. His scumteam makes 0 sense since I wouldn't mind seeing all of the other 3 people he called scum dead. The difference is though that I would rather see foolishness lynched than shot. Cephiro and slam are both decent shots because the chance of them being traitor/scum is quite high and they are lynchbait anyways should they be town. My scumteams makes 0 sense even though you agree with 3 out of 4 guys in it? That's pretty much descrediting my entire scumteam while you only want to discuss your name in it. But wait. Do you really want those 3 shot? You were defending Foolishness with meta reasoning D1 right? You did give 3 names that needed to be shot right? It was RoL, Alakaslam and gumshoe. I do not see Cephiro in there. Wait let me see what is in your filter JAT: On April 29 2014 21:39 justanothertownie wrote:On April 29 2014 21:13 Palmar wrote: Like does no one but me care that Ceph is literally claiming traitor?
I noticed that too. The problem here is that I would not put it past Cephiro to do this as town for some weird ass play. He totally claimed traitor with the recruiting stuff and the "don't shoot me it's not worth it" etc. Do you think he would be this obvious as scum? I mean he is a decent shot don't get me wrong, but I am not sure about his alignment. IS IT MORE META DEFENSE OF PEOPLE IN MY LIST? It sure looks like it. EXTRA: So we have 4 people JAT wants shot: RoL, Cephiro, Alakaslam, Gumshoe. And then Foolishness lynched. But when VA claims dayvig (most likely) JAT wants to lynch VA instead of directing his shot on a scummer. Sounds legit! Koshi when did you lose the ability to read? I did not defend Foolishness day1 I just stated that what he did (provide a read without reasoning) is not necessarily indicative of scum foolishness which is proven true. And yes, your scumteam as a whole makes 0 sense as long as I am included in it. I am not defending anyone else on it. Foolishness is a good lynch, the others are good shots. I literally say Cephiro is a decent shot in the fucking post you quoted. Also VA did not claim dayvig anywhere. He softclaimed not VT that is all and I wanted to lynch that guy since day1. I realize that time is relative, but it is awfully convenient for you to change that read as soon as I started getting heat in the thread. You even said you liked quite a few of my posts on day 1. Furthermore, your whole basis against me is this deal about mafia-controlling the lynch. A point I could almost agree to disagree about.
Now if you want to be helpful to the town you're going to need to:
1) Give more than just one argument about why I'm mafia (which you haven't done). 2) Explain how my play this game coincides with my mafia play in other games or is vastly different from my town play (which you haven't done). 3) Explain why your other top mafia Oats (who you haven't pushed or made a case on) is mafia with me even though I want to kill him and was okay killing him yesterday (which you haven't done).
Because I certainly have given the town all of my reads and where they are coming from, even if some are a bit haphazard. With that said, you can do the same (ya know on Oats and all his mafia scumbuddies you're so sure of) and I and everyone else would gladly love to contribute to that. But currently you are only doing the following:
1) Tunneling on one of the few players making cases and trying to steer down in the right direction (bad for the town). 2) Voting on someone on the basis that you disagree with 1-2 things they said (bad for the town). 3) Nothing (bad for the town).
I also took the liberty of reading through all your past games so be on your best behavior! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt=""
tl;dr Nobody cares.
Ace, I'm very content where my vote is (it's on a mafia).
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
I'll consolidate my vote onto any of the four austin proposed (with the exception being myself of course).
Also Cephiro promised us something good by half-way into day 2 and has not delivered yet.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On May 01 2014 04:43 Cephiro wrote:Alright. Read through all the filters and have enhanced my opinions and thoughts. This will only be a list post of my thoughts, I am going to elaborate further on a few people during the next few hours. Why I'm posting the list first is because I want to ask from all of you, is there any specific read of mine you'd like me to elaborate on. Depending on who asks and on what read, I may or may not comply. Confirmed Town Club: Cephiro, geript (DEAD), strongandbig (DEAD) Greenish Grasses (Most to least town): austinmcc, justanothertownie, Ace, yamato (DEAD), tehpoofter, WaveOfShadow Neutral Waters (Townier to scummier): VisceraEyes, prplhz, Alakaslam, gumshoe, RebirthOfLegend, VayneOfAuthority Fiery Furnace (Least scummy to scummiest): Caller, Foolishness, Palmar, Koshi, Oatsmaster Joker Category: OdinOfPergo (Slight townread, but I also suspect him to be traitor), Blazinghand (Has traits that make me lean both slightly town as well as slightly scum, however I don't think both he and foolishness would be on the same scumteam) Players I am planning to elaborate on: Blazinghand, Koshi, Foolishness, Caller. On request: Palmar, Oatsmaster (I think most of the things I want to point about these players have been told enough times.) So yeah, there you have it. If you simply agree with some, then nice, but I'd prefer to hear why. If you disagree with some, I won't give a shit about your opinion if you don't give reasoning towards why you disagree. If you want to hear my thoughts about a certain player, explain why, and point out any certain points of importance you're especially interested in knowing my thought process on. Show nested quote +On April 28 2014 13:01 Hapahauli wrote:Vote Count! Palmar (1) - Acestrongandbig (13) - Foolishness, Alakaslam, Geript, Palmar, Koshi, VisceraEyes, RebirthofLegend, BlazingHand, Caller, OdinofPergo, WaveofShadow, VayneAuthority, prplhzOatsmaster (5) - Austinmcc, Yamato77 dead, Strongandbig, justanothertownie, Cephiro, SandrobaAlakaslam (1) - OatsmasterNot Voting (2) - tehpoofter, gumshoe until lynch. With 22 alive, 12 votes are needed to lynch. Above is how I think the lynch went down. I may very well be wrong on something (and most likely am, calling it perfectly would be quite insane), but I'm not interesting in hearing you bash my opinion for "obviously being wrong." If you think something definitely can't be the case, then do tell. My current belief is that there are 5 members in the scumteam + 1 traitor that may or may not have been recruited yet. My assumption is: Koshi, Palmar, Caller, Oatsmaster, Foolishness + OdinOfPergo My main concern about this assumption is including both Palmar and Caller in the team. I like the theory pointed out by WoS early on, and had initial thoughts along the same lines. However I'm not so sure if these two would have the balls to pull it off or not. Palmar's panic reaction seemed genuine, and I can picture it easily in (Caller/Palmar respectively) Scum/Town, Town/Town, Town/Scum situations, but a genuine in panic reaction in a Scum/Scum reaction is something that doesn't add up. With this, I'll be around writing my cases and responding to questions (occasionally and briefly, as I may be needing my available posts today.). I would like to lynch Koshi today. I'm having trouble understanding this world where 3 active town members on day 1 (plus one confirmed town who died at night) who each posted their own cases about why strongandbig should be lynched are mafia and not say the ~8 people who have yet to post a case, contribute to the town or post their own thoughts.
I'm also having trouble believing that it's in the best interest to the town to kill the people who are posting cases and contributing and just letting those ~8 people get away with doing nothing.
So I would be honored if someone can explain to me why the people who sat around on day 1 are all likely town. And ya know, you can do this by responding to the cases already made or by posting your own.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
Really I'm just baffled by this all. Is the logic as follows?
"oh, 75% of the players in the game are just writing sheep posts and not posting their own thoughts. Meanwhile 25% of the players are posting reads/cases, trying to steer town in the right direction, and analyze what the mafia has been doing this whole game.
Well, I know that there are more town than mafia in the game because that's how the game of mafia is set up. That must mean all the town players are doing the same thing and are in the 75%, and it must be the mafia who are the 25%."
I'm legit trying to figure out the mindset behind this. Cause hot damn so many people are on board with this I'm questioning my own stupidity.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
Yes Austin, I think that it speaks a lot about Cephiro. I brought it up because VE posted that he thinks he's mafia and until Cephiro delivers I don't have any reason to think otherwise.
On May 01 2014 05:31 WaveofShadow wrote: Foolishness can I ask how I fit in to all this exactly? Am I 25 or 75? And I am pretty curious as to how Bh's gumshoe lynch fits into your mason QT exactly.
Honestly it wouldn't surprise me if RoL and Oats are town in this game----for me to be as apathetic as I've been to think that people who normally lurk (like RoL) are similar isn't a stretch. Except of course that apparently this kind of game is the ideal for RoL who hates spam. And I dunno oats is just oats. I'm still pretty damn certain this game is just over, hence the apathy. So much idgaf in this game from me and mostly everyone else, it sucks for the people who are fighting against a brick wall. Like Austin.
Also cephiro only pops up with large vomit posts when people remember he's around. Curious coincidence.
I'd lynch RoL or ceph or oats today I guess considering I don't have anything useful to add. The BH-foolishness thing seems legit and kinda difficult for even someone like BH to come up with if they were both scum. It's as you said, you're apathetic and just kinda sitting around watching this game happen. Do I think you're mafia over the other people proposed today? No. But you fit the bill and need to be held accountable. The only reason there's no heat on you is because a boatload of other people are just that much worse than you. I do give you points for actually posting in the thread more than 6 times a cycle (cough RoL, Oats, cough) even though every post your write looks like you had to climb out of a well full of acid to do so.
And what do you think about the people who are fighting against a brick wall? Desperate mafia or townies trying to win?
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On May 01 2014 06:13 Alakaslam wrote: K here is something.
IF foolishness is scum, so also is Koshi most likely even though that makes very little sense.
If foolishness is town Koshi could still be scum but most likely he is t. I'll reiterate that on day 1 I thought Koshi was town (just based off his posting and thread presence, I never did a hard analysis or anything). tehpoofter brings up some good points though that can't be ignored. I don't think Koshi should be lynched today (and probably not tomorrow either) because there's a handful of other people that need to be taken care of first (myself, Palmar, Oats, RoL, Caller, etc.).
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
##Unvote: RebirthOfLegend ##Vote: Oatsmaster
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On May 02 2014 09:53 Tehpoofter wrote:Show nested quote +On May 01 2014 12:56 VisceraEyes wrote: Oh nevermind, I thought the votes were at 9 when I voted LMAO
Nevermind the confirmed bit, but I'm still town.
Banks I'll get to you later. Is it later yet? @VE and Prphlz What did you guys learn from your vote count analysis? Prphlz I liked yours a lot I think its a bit townier that you went through all that trouble to right out all the votes. VE your thing for your own use was really weird to post in the thread. Like you're posting it just to be like "hey guys look at the work im doing man I'm town" Did you learn anything from those vote counts? @JaT explain to me what a scumFool/BH team gains from busing their partner with a shot left in his day gun? What is Fools role that makes him so much better than essentially a free kill?? @Austin What is your read on WoS? to me he seems disinterested and not caring which is different from his game in Catastrophe where he tried really hard and was very into it do you buy that the post restriction is bumming him out? @Slam I guess we are both shooters I think I hit a mafia do you think you did? IF you still had your shot who would you shoot? What I learned is that we should be killing RebirthOfLegend, Palmar, and Caller.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On May 02 2014 10:30 VayneAuthority wrote:Show nested quote +On May 02 2014 10:08 Foolishness wrote:On May 02 2014 09:53 Tehpoofter wrote:On May 01 2014 12:56 VisceraEyes wrote: Oh nevermind, I thought the votes were at 9 when I voted LMAO
Nevermind the confirmed bit, but I'm still town.
Banks I'll get to you later. Is it later yet? @VE and Prphlz What did you guys learn from your vote count analysis? Prphlz I liked yours a lot I think its a bit townier that you went through all that trouble to right out all the votes. VE your thing for your own use was really weird to post in the thread. Like you're posting it just to be like "hey guys look at the work im doing man I'm town" Did you learn anything from those vote counts? @JaT explain to me what a scumFool/BH team gains from busing their partner with a shot left in his day gun? What is Fools role that makes him so much better than essentially a free kill?? @Austin What is your read on WoS? to me he seems disinterested and not caring which is different from his game in Catastrophe where he tried really hard and was very into it do you buy that the post restriction is bumming him out? @Slam I guess we are both shooters I think I hit a mafia do you think you did? IF you still had your shot who would you shoot? What I learned is that we should be killing RebirthOfLegend, Palmar, and Caller. what exactly is your read on RoL or anyone else that has him as scum. I don't really have him down as anything.
On April 30 2014 07:45 Foolishness wrote:RebirthOfLegendWho is guilty of: 1) Sheeping the vote read here: + Show Spoiler +On April 28 2014 04:33 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: As my tunnel buddy, I'm required to agree with everything foolishness says.
##Vote StrongAndBig And then claiming a whopping 7 hours later that he came to the same conclusion himself... + Show Spoiler +On April 28 2014 11:01 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote: Before reading both foolishness and blazinghands cases on SNB I took a look through his filter just so I could get my own read beforehand. I'd be inclined to see it the same as they did. It felt like SNB was trying a bit too hard to be non committal on everything. It just struck me as effort into making sure he wasn't saying anything anyone could take issue with. Foolishness went a bit more indepth and compared it to other games, however I'd say it seemed clear enough that the only real incentive to put effort into being as neutral as humanly possible is to hide the fact you are scum and be able to point fingers at those who were more influential on the D1 lynch.
Sorry about my low activity, I will try to be more consistent with my posting going forward.
Also, ##donate 2 posts to SNB. You seem to be low on posts, I suppose its only fair to give you a bit more to work with in the few hours before your demise. I will be around until deadline if I don't accidentally fall asleep while watching dreamhack. And then 2) in his most recent post here: Show nested quote +On April 29 2014 07:26 RebirthOfLeGenD wrote:On April 28 2014 14:58 gumshoe wrote: Haro, its late but I owe town a few thoughts. I wont make anymore excuses, suffice to say been a spectacularly busy couple days.
havent had enough to read things too in depth. but heres a few things that stand out, geript is town as far as I can tell, or hes playing hard into his own meta.
I dont think palmer is scum because a) i am all too familiar with the if im going down towns coming with me mentality, (not specifically in mafia but other traitor games like bsg) its a shit scum strat because threatening people in a game with virtually no stakes is a bad idea, you cant cowe a town with this many great players and I dont think scum plam would try it. seems like a rage play. As scum Hes better off using his time to influence town, because he will never flip thanks to callers nuke.
b) pardoner seems like a shit role for scum, seeing as if you use to save your buddy, you instantly become a target and he just gets lynched tommorow.
I have a few preliminary scum reads but I need to get completely intimate with das thread first : P not going to throw myself into another retarded tunnel again if I can help it.
2 am here T_T night all, gl.
Scum can't pardon other scum unless Bill Murry is hosting. The ability usually used in order to put the town a few steps back when there is a scum pardoner and generally to cause chaos. But yes, it usually does need to be used in such a way to where the person giving the pardon can escape the ire of the town the following day. But yeah, it's not the best role for scum, but's it's more useful then a vanilla scum role because it can situationally be used to fuck with the town. IIRC we had a mafia pardoner in the last game I ran, although we kind of derp'd the implementation a bit. Personally I could see the point being made that if Palmar thought he was going to die, he might as well use the power. He can be town and have had such a huge town read on prplhz which I don't think is too likely on D1, or he could be a scum pardoner who figured he'd take the chance to just fuck with the town a bit while he can (assuming the nuke was real). IMO I think scenario 2 makes more sense because no read should be that strong day 1 to the point where you would remove the towns option to kill a person.
Also, let's not forget he said he was going to try to fuck us, whether or not it was an act or genuine rage it seems quite scummy to me. He says that what Palmar did is quite scummy. Yet he said nothing about Palmar on day 1 (or Caller for that matter). He also promised that he would give the town something by the end of night 1 and he did not deliver. So let's get this straight. He says that Palmar is scummy for trying to mess with the town on day 1 (true statement, yes). Yet he did not feel the need to say anything about it on day 1 and just go along with the strongandbig read? What townie thinks that someone is likely scum and then not vote him, not say anything about it, and not push him? Yes, he is noteworthy for being an inactive player. When he's town he's much more aggressive with his reads and actually pushes his targets. Check out his post here from a game where he's town. Note that he actually makes a case using his own thoughts and follows through (he talks about cheesecake in later posts as well). When he's mafia he never makes a constructive case like this and only provides backhanded reasoning. In purgatory and storm mafia (where he's mafia) he comments on a lot of things to make it seem like he cares but he doesn't have the vested interest in hunting mafia or figuring out the game. ##Vote: RebirthOfLegend And then combine it with his day 2 play (where he didn't do anything again...)
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On May 02 2014 11:10 OdinOfPergo wrote: Also in case I die tonight,
I thin Fool is still very questionable. His connection with BH isn't outstanding to me.
For all I know it is not a mason chat. Or it could be a mason chat. One started by a mason as scum.. Who invited his buddy N1 (since this only started D2 when BH/Fool were both questionable...) And then Bam suddenly there is a 3 way mason and w/e Fine recruit more people. I do hope you do that. Hopefully people will see.
Bh I'm pretty sure as scum. Foolish I only feel as bad about since Oats flip. I didn't like him day1 but Oats flip really makes me think he's scum.
I'm not going to claim I am correct. But you will know I am not coming from it as a mafia perspective. There are other people in the mason chat who can confirm the order of events here.
Also the people in the mason can confirm that I also wanted to kill Oats on day 1. I don't believe I ever said this in the thread (though blazinghand alluded to it once) but it's there.
Going to go back to what was said above.
"Foolishness is scum! He pushed a mislynch day 1 and is pushing a mislynch on day 2!"
*Oatsmaster flips mafia*
"Foolishness is scum! He clearly bussed his own teammate with his scumbuddy blazinghand!"
-_- -_- -_-
Tunnel Vision.
Tunnel Vision.
RebirthOfLegend is mafia.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
I just reposted the case JAT. What about is not substantiated?
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
Actually nevermind, I think you and I can just agree to disagree at this point cause it's not going anywhere.
That's a nice way of saying you're going on my ignore list btw. <3
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On May 02 2014 13:14 WaveofShadow wrote:Well if nobody else is going to talk then I will. First of all: Show nested quote +On May 01 2014 12:21 justanothertownie wrote:Oh shit I forgot about the most votes mechanic. Interesting. There could be information to be gained here. Sorry WoS! data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" This apology looks weird and forced, like you were caught at something and wanted to look good. You've been nothing but derisive and insulting towards me all game, and then this. In reality when I was talking about having a lot of people cleared I hadn't even really considered the voting mechanic (ie Oats not being ABLE to shoot at that point), I was simply talking about how I don't think scum would push him so that he'd be forced to use his shot and/or die but obviously with the voting mechanic this makes more sense. Even if the voting mechanic didn't exist,a 1 for 1 trade at this point in the game (just like in Catastrophe) is not good for scum, so bussing early makes zero sense. Now why did you feel the need to apologize to me? Other stuff: Foolishness, how about this. I will vote for RoL today. If he flips town, then you are scum. How does that sound? Because I can't honestly believe if you've been so active in this other QT that you haven't come down with a list of a few scum here beyond the megalurk that is RoL. It's like BH pointing out gumshoe as primary lynch. It's terrible and BH had zero basis on which to do it other than lurk. I'll give you that you have slightly more to go on w/RoL but it's not much, and it's low hanging fruit. (Not to mention the fact that you're playing a little differently from Shadow and Catastrophe, but that's just feels and not strong ones.) I've noticed your list for today is RoL/Caller/Palmar. This means that you've also given though to the first thing I said in this game? And yet you posted a big ol' case on me a little while ago? And still seem to think I'm scum 'but not above other people and I need to be held accountable.' How, exactly? Your thoughts really don't seem to add up in a good way this game, good buddeh. One final thing. Thoughts on Ace? Are we still waiting for him to show up and wow us? Is this one of those games where he just doesn't give a shit like so many others? As I pointed out RoL fits the bill. I posted a case. He was collecting some votes yesterday and still did nothing. Gumshoe is still a fine lynch but I still feel uneasy about it. Would not be upset and need more evidence that he's mafia. Caller and Palmar fit the bill and I would wager one is mafia.
Also the low-hanging fruit is not really an acceptable argument because nearly every lynch is low hanging fruit in this game.
Yes I'm fine with you cause you're here posting. I've considered the things you said. At the time when I posted my list you were definitely a questionable suspect. I said before, and you admitted it, that you are very bored this game and I can tell that in your posting. Doesn't indicate mafia though. Not going to worry about you.
##Vote: RebirthOfLegend
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
Oh also, about Ace. I anticipate he'll show his true colors after more mafia die. Cause at this rate if he's mafia he can't just sit back like this.
That's a very convoluted way of saying I think he's town but I really don't know.
|
Foolishness
United States3044 Posts
On May 03 2014 06:46 prplhz wrote: Scenarios:
Foolishness is scum and Blazinghand is scum: Lets lynch Foolishness for being scum. Foolishness is town and Blazinghand is scum: Blazinghand has been fooling Foolishness in PMs for two days in a row. 4 srs? Foolishness is scum and Blazinghand is town: Foolishness has been foolish Blazinghand in PMs for two days in a row. Lets lynch Foolishness. Foolishness is town and Blazinghand is town: Lets not lynch Blazinghand.
Foolishness is 100% scum and needs to die. Today. Tomorrow we can talk about other things but for now we need to kill Foolishness. JAT, I'm sorry I ever doubted your intelligence. I will buy you dinner should I ever get the opportunity to.
|
|
|
|