EPTOn April 04 2014 22:20 marvellosity wrote:
Read any Dandel mafia game and then just shut up.
Read any Dandel mafia game and then just shut up.
i have, hence why i'm still following up on it, i do not care what you say because you can be wrong ty
Catastrophe Mafia - Page 7
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
i have, hence why i'm still following up on it, i do not care what you say because you can be wrong ty | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
no i've read your games, your database goes to les mafia where you talk in longer posts than this but was may last year and british empire which was march last year, it does not contain any games more recent than that both games show you are capable of 2 very different scum styles and after so many town games since then it is very easy to slip into a more towny style of posting as mafia which is what you are displaying here | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 04 2014 22:27 Dandel Ion wrote: I find holyflare to be 5000% confirmed mafia so I'm inclined to disagree. but that means you have to lynch kita because you don't lynch confirmed scum | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 04 2014 22:28 Dandel Ion wrote: hi you talk a lot but have no scumreads, how come? well it's seemingly obvious you are a scum read right now? i also have ve who made a va scum read based off something he took as a joke in the qt and switched his button pushing stance because his scum read told him to, also paperscraps the guy that doesn't have any reads that make sense | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 04 2014 22:30 Dandel Ion wrote: then why don't you have the balls to say so i fail how to see how that was not evident in the past few pages unless you admit to not reading | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 04 2014 22:50 Dandel Ion wrote: topic changes to something relevant to the game holyflare stops posting so he doesn't have to take a stance why do i care about taking stances on anyone? got facts to back stuff up there buddy? i liked what you said and subsequently took my scummy read on you and threw it away because you know... you're actually doing something with your read now gumshoe defended austin really weirdly after people had already done it so added nothing and then after doing that started questioning austin about why he was doing scummy looking stuff which is definitely weird and scummy people attack lsb | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 04 2014 22:55 Dandel Ion wrote: Dunno after the years you spent crawling into my butthole for basically not doing that in your opinion you sure aren't in a hurry to do it yourself. no it was that you called people scum and then did jack shit about it, you said gumshoe was scum but then didn't even bother posting this shit (which you could have done a long long time ago) until not long left into day 2 and you just prove that you haven't read anything about me by saying i go away when game talk happens because that's all i was doing with marv for the past 5-10 pages | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
that guy that i mentioned earlier about sheeping his scum read into pushing a button that he didn't want to push pre-game, the one that made a case on va based on something he took as a joke in qt the one who has only scum read lsb the policy button talker and va the afker ve if that wasn't clear | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 04 2014 22:58 Dandel Ion wrote: because it was so obvious it didn't need to be pointed out writing the post was a waste of time. well i have plenty of time to spare so not like i'm bothered here | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 04 2014 23:04 justanothertownie wrote: If it comes to this I will but I don't see that many votes on him. So you're going to neglect reading me because....? There's votes one me. You just stated that my argument with dandel is useless so you have no idea what I've done but you don't want to bother looking into me...? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 05 2014 00:42 marvellosity wrote: That is a good question. I'm tempted to say no, but hmm. I quite like the idea of lynching Djodref after he posted that he would lay low as mafia. But that's just one post. Amiko has a certain fluffy quality to him that I don't mind that makes me a little nervous. Maybe I'd vote him. Maybe gumshoe. Maybe sand could reconvince me on Holy but that one's making me feel a little queasy. despite me pointing out the obvious flaws in that sandro case ~_~ | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 04 2014 23:54 kitaman27 wrote: How is he my third scummiest dude? These players are higher up on the chopping block for me: iamp Amiko Hope killing syllo Keirathi and maybe Koshi (VE?) did you catch up to the thread? why is gumshoe not in this list? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 05 2014 00:45 marvellosity wrote: I know, but however much you handwave it away using previous games, antagonising Robik was truly terrible, and I still think all your reads have been pretty misplaced. On the other hand I kinda fancy your reads would be less weird as mafia. Hence queasiness. so you're saying the guy that follows his scum read to change his stance on button pressing is a good guy? | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On April 05 2014 00:50 LSB wrote: ##unvote ##vote: Paperscraps Reasoning here http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/447045-catastrophe-mafia?page=67#1323 so your reasoning isn't marv's reasoning? | ||
| ||
