|
On April 01 2014 06:07 Crossfire99 wrote:
Vote Count
raynpelikoneet (6) - kitaman27, thrawn2112, Alakaslam, Toadesstern, kushm4sta, Alakaslam, Tehpoofter, raynpelikoneet, Hopeless1der, kitaman27, Amiko, raynpelikoneet
Alakaslam (3) - Toadesstern, kushm4sta, Tehpoofter, thrawn2112, kitaman27, raynpelikoneet, Djodref, Amiko, Hopeless1der, JarJarDrinks, Djodref, Vivax, thrawn2112
Hopeless1der (0) - Toadesstern, raynpelikoneet, Toadesstern, thrawn2112
kitaman27 (0) - raynpelikoneet, raynpelikoneet, raynpelikoneet
gumshoe (3) - thrawn2112, Alakaslam, Tehpoofter, thrawn2112
Tehpoofter (1) - austinmcc
JarJarDrinks (0) - Djodref
thrawn2112 (0) - kitaman27
Toadesstern (0) - raynpelikoneet
Not Voting (1) - gumshoe
raynpelikoneet is lynched! Let me know if I made a mistake or anything.
Current vote count on me: Hopeless, kita, kush, TehPoofter
Oh look they were also on the rayn wagon yesterday.
|
|
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On April 04 2014 01:58 Vivax wrote:
Now I'm kinda sure you're scum cause you don't reply to my defense, but pop out once you spot something that could be construed as scummy. You don't question hopeless about anything but call him scum and the information I got from him useless.
lol, so you tell me not to reply to your defense until I'm done looking at hopeless and then when I'm in the process of doing so, you attack me for not responding, saying it makes me scum?
You even assume that I've chosen you over hope when I haven't indicated one way or the other. What gives?
|
kitaman27
United States9244 Posts
On April 04 2014 01:58 Hopeless1der wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 01:55 kitaman27 wrote:
Hope, what led you to this vote compared to when I asked last night? Opportunistic posturing. I'm not trying to avoid responsibility for my vote but I am not all that confident that I am able to read Vivax, I'm mostly sheeping thread sentiment. People seem less inclined to vote Toad which means its between me/Vivax. My choice would be to lynch Toad if I get the chance.
There are 2 votes on toad and 2 votes on Vivax. If Toad is your preferred lynch, why are you going with thread sentiment to make your decision?
|
so that I can be bossed around and not look like I'm trying to push a scummy agenda by tunneling Toad to everyone else.
|
It's still morning so hard for me to post, will be back in thread before vote deadline. I'll try really hard to get back with time to talk because I don't feel Vivax is the best lynch.
I don't feel persuaded by the first part of kita's case (settling on slam). I know when I reread some of his d1 comments I felt like they were things I thought would be good to pursue. The nuke comment, I don't know. It seemed consistent to me (he still wants to kill slam).
I do agree his vote stealer comment doesn't make sense to me, though
Right now my vote preference is hopeless1der. I will read vivax's defense more when I get back.
If I still think hopeless is the best lynch I will try to convince when I get back
@hopeless1der If you are in thread please comment on kita's case so I have more of you to read
##vote: hopeless1der
|
sry didnt bold
##vote: hopeless1der
|
Wut
I don't know if I voted but
Jjd If I didn't
|
kita please keep posting. Hopeless thoughts, pancake recipes, whatever.
|
On April 04 2014 02:04 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 01:58 Vivax wrote:
Now I'm kinda sure you're scum cause you don't reply to my defense, but pop out once you spot something that could be construed as scummy. You don't question hopeless about anything but call him scum and the information I got from him useless. lol, so you tell me not to reply to your defense until I'm done looking at hopeless and then when I'm in the process of doing so, you attack me for not responding, saying it makes me scum? You even assume that I've chosen you over hope when I haven't indicated one way or the other. What gives?
I was waiting for you to comment on hopeless, but seeing you got immediately hung up on soemthing that could be construed as scummy, I felt like I had to jump in and finally let out what I was thinking about you instead of keeping back until I saw what you would write about hope.
That really gave me super bad vibes cause yo uhave 1 post where I respond to your points, one post where I ask for your stuff on hope, and 1 where I replied to kush saying I have to reevaluate you both cause I can't imagine you being so bad.
Of all three, you chose the most offensive path to reply to me, picking the latest post trying to further incriminate me while completely skipping comments on my defense. That reads as scum trying to push a mislynch, not figuring out what i'm up to.
Even if I asked you to comment on hopeless first you didn't have to give me that courtesy if you felt that my defense against your case was bad. Which brings us to that. Try to reevaluate things in light of what I've said in my defense and post your points on hopeless and then we can see what's left to say to the points you skipped (either cause you accepted my request out of courtesy or willingly).
|
|
|
|
|
I really hope that nuke isn't a dud -.-
|
|
|
Hey Kita...have you made a case on me recently that I havent seen?
|
On April 04 2014 02:17 Hopeless1der wrote:
Hey Kita...have you made a case on me recently that I havent seen?
No, he never asks you a question but thinks you are worthy of today's lynch.
|
Maybe if it isn't, I mutashapeshift into kaslamplanardragon SK turn up red to checks
|
slam could you please read amiko and ... your choice of vivax/kita?
If you're not mafia, would be nice to get your thoughts from you before end of day. If mafia, still nice to get your thoughts.
If you're super super super uninterested in that, could you just read amiko's response to my zoo questions and tell me what you think about that post and the other zoo posts?
|
On April 04 2014 02:18 austinmcc wrote:
slam could you please read amiko and ... your choice of vivax/kita?
If you're not mafia, would be nice to get your thoughts from you before end of day. If mafia, still nice to get your thoughts.
If you're super super super uninterested in that, could you just read amiko's response to my zoo questions and tell me what you think about that post and the other zoo posts?
Put a link to zoo posts not sure I I have long
|
On April 04 2014 02:17 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On April 04 2014 02:17 Hopeless1der wrote:
Hey Kita...have you made a case on me recently that I havent seen? No, he never asks you a question but thinks you are worthy of today's lynch.
Okay well...On April 04 2014 02:09 Amiko wrote:
Right now my vote preference is hopeless1der. I will read vivax's defense more when I get back.
If I still think hopeless is the best lynch I will try to convince when I get back
@hopeless1der If you are in thread please comment on kita's case so I have more of you to read
##vote: hopeless1der
something is amiss here
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
