|
Throughout this whole game, I havent felt like Rayn really wanted to solve the game and thats one of my biggest problems with him. Also contradictory.
On March 05 2014 13:26 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 05 2014 13:01 Alakaslam wrote:On March 05 2014 12:56 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 05 2014 04:38 boonetown wrote:On March 05 2014 04:34 justanothertownie wrote:On March 05 2014 04:33 boonetown wrote:On March 05 2014 04:32 justanothertownie wrote:On March 05 2014 04:28 boonetown wrote: Boone, why is austin scum, and why is GGtemp voting badly, and has the other people you play video mafia with match their meta there so far? Austin is leaning town more and more, which is unfortunate because I was pretty happy thinking I found a mafia in the QT. GGtemp, if you have ever seen him play, is the most paranoid town player in the history of mafia, ever. He would rather sleep every single day of the game in order to not mislynch someone. He only votes if he's mafia, or if he knows the vote won't go through, as a trolly way to make it look like he made a choice. Either templar isn't even trying, or he's mafia. That's where I'm currently at with his allignment. Is austin leaning town because of qt or thread activity? Both, but more so what has been recently posted in the QT. Could be a show, but seems very genuine. Has rayn posted in there? What is your opinion on him? Rayn has posted very little, but I really liked that he asked if we should bring the QT to the thread and let people know about it. Rayn. I think based on early gut reads and reactions Rayn is town. I had stated earlier that if there were mafia between the two I thought it was Austin, now that my read on him is changing I'm going to have to reread Rayn in the thread and see if my read on Rayn adapts as well. For now, They could both potentially be town, which would be great for the purpose of the QT. Not true. I asked austin if he thinks using the QT is a good idea or not. Pay attention, this was not a good idea. On March 05 2014 06:51 Grackaroni wrote: It's kind of strange to me that Rayn wanted to policy lynch me this game when he hasn't really tried to do it in other games, but maybe he's just really sick of my play.
Other than that nothing besides the Austin attack sticks out to me. Not true. I voted you for pure policy in SMB and i will do it every game you play like that. A question, am i supposed to read Palmar as mafia in your opinion? If not, why the fuck am i scum for it? Didn't GGTeMpLar just call Slam town and mafia? I think? I'm not really sure even. Look at the vote thread rayn, does not that stuff look suspicious to you? I don't knowwhat do you mean? Elaborate please. Top 2 vote leaders are bad votes and i don't even know why there are votes on them. Also: ##Vote: GGTeMpLaR He doesnt try and convince anyone to vote for GGTemp here but just a while ago, he asked us to make a case/convince people on Grack if we wanted to move votes. Actions dont match his words.
and
On March 06 2014 04:38 raynpelikoneet wrote: I kinda wanna lycnh VE for his bad post about boone's claim. Also ggtemplar so vote stands. he totally drops this read in favor of lynching GGtemp, never really talks to Grack about lynch VE, the top propnent towards his lynch. Basically it doesnt look like he wants to find scum, just push people who look bad.
|
|
On March 09 2014 00:50 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2014 00:46 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 09 2014 00:44 Grackaroni wrote:On March 09 2014 00:41 Oatsmaster wrote:are you talking about this Grack? On March 06 2014 03:24 Oatsmaster wrote: I would lynch VE and I wouldnt lynch GGtemp, the burst of activity he had felt like he was trying to make up for his earlier ploys and it didnt really feel like he was making up stuff about his reaction tests. I dont remember your post about that reason I called bad as the reason I said I would lynch VE. I think I was thinking about the so little impact that VE had on the game. yes. When you ask me for a reason I assume that you have some reason for doing so. If you thought that reason was shit I would expect you as town to go out and say that it is shit. I really dont remember that post. I try to keep myself as unbiased as possible but I don't see how I can ever think of you as townie then. You ask me for reasoning to lynch VE, ignore my answer, and then come back the next day and argue that I'm scum for pushing faulty reasoning. By ignore you mean never see then ok.
|
Also, people keep referring to my slip. Please point this nonsense out to me since I couldn't have slipped since I'm town.
|
On March 09 2014 00:59 raynpelikoneet wrote: trololol oats yay i have support!
|
FWIW, Rayn's d2 is:
Robert is mafia Robert is mafia Robert is mafia Robert is mafia The case on him is so strong Robert is mafia Robert is mafia Robert is mafia Robert is mafia
He is not doing ANY scumhunting. He is pushing a lynch against a townie. He is 100% pushing a mafia agenda by pushing a mislynch and if you guys end up lynching me, I IMPLORE YOU to lynch him tomorrow. I know you won't because I mean...why would anyone listen to a dead vanilla townie...but like LYNCH RAYN CAUSE HE'LL NEVER GET NIGHT KILLED CAUSE HE'S MAFIA.
|
I really wonder why DM players like to noob claim.
|
Robik's d2:
EWRGIHQWEROFUIH"§$OIFHAWOEIRHQ§$=OG)HQEPOILKWEF OMGUS OMGUS OMGUS QWEROIUFH§O%$ITHER)HGWQLK$FLKJF!"OI§JRP"OP§$IHRGI
He's not doing any scumhunting. His vote is on a person he doesn't even call scum anymore because he can't come up with reasons for it.
|
On March 09 2014 01:05 Oatsmaster wrote: I really wonder why DM players like to noob claim. I'm not claiming noob. I'm claiming that TL players don't give a fuck about anyone's opinion but their own and when someone flips town, they don't even bother analyzing the posts of dead players to see how their reads are and if they're congruent with their own.
I was the only one who even started to do a reread of Austin. No one even cares to figure out why he was night killed.
Like, he and VE are the only two confirmed towns in my eyes, and we know that Austin was NK'd...but no one is willing to try to figure out why?
From the first couple pages of his filter that I read, Palmar should be getting a lot of heat. I didn't finish reading Austin's filter because of the bullshit that went down with Dandelion, but like, no one even bothers to do that in TL games and that's bad.
|
On March 09 2014 00:59 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2014 00:50 Grackaroni wrote:On March 09 2014 00:46 Oatsmaster wrote:On March 09 2014 00:44 Grackaroni wrote:On March 09 2014 00:41 Oatsmaster wrote:are you talking about this Grack? On March 06 2014 03:24 Oatsmaster wrote: I would lynch VE and I wouldnt lynch GGtemp, the burst of activity he had felt like he was trying to make up for his earlier ploys and it didnt really feel like he was making up stuff about his reaction tests. I dont remember your post about that reason I called bad as the reason I said I would lynch VE. I think I was thinking about the so little impact that VE had on the game. yes. When you ask me for a reason I assume that you have some reason for doing so. If you thought that reason was shit I would expect you as town to go out and say that it is shit. I really dont remember that post. I try to keep myself as unbiased as possible but I don't see how I can ever think of you as townie then. You ask me for reasoning to lynch VE, ignore my answer, and then come back the next day and argue that I'm scum for pushing faulty reasoning. By ignore you mean never see then ok. no that's total bullshit. I went back to the context of those quotes. I gave my reasoning on VE. You asked me to explain the reasoning. I clarified it again and then that clarification post was quoted on the next page by JAT who said it made me townie, and then you said you would lynch VE.
You just didn't want to argue against it at the time and now you are coming back to say all of my reasoning is incompatible once VE has flipped town and I am afk.
|
Oh I wouldn't have a problem lynching palmar right now. Pressuring him is hard thoug cause he isn't here.
|
This is just getting better, now it's my fault he hasn't read austin's filter.
How old are you dude?
|
On March 09 2014 01:08 Dandel Ion wrote: Robik's d2:
EWRGIHQWEROFUIH"§$OIFHAWOEIRHQ§$=OG)HQEPOILKWEF OMGUS OMGUS OMGUS QWEROIUFH§O%$ITHER)HGWQLK$FLKJF!"OI§JRP"OP§$IHRGI
He's not doing any scumhunting. His vote is on a person he doesn't even call scum anymore because he can't come up with reasons for it. The reason I'm voting you right now is strictly a placeholder. The 3 people I'm most suspicious of are Rayn, Joey and Palmar. Besides my interactions with you, I made a case against Joey and explained why he's a really good lynch for today. I also reread Slam's filter and it swong me 180 degrees from thinking that he's just trolly scum to thinking that he's town. I also started reading Austin's filter and came to the conclusion that Palmar looks bad from it. I may have done other stuff, but I'm not quite sure. I was absolutely enraged yesterday when I was having a battle with you and now that I have a bit of a clearer head, I'm trying to be calmer and more productive.
If you'd like me to address any of the points you made against me, I'd be more than happy to go over them again and refute them.
If you're town, I beg that you reevaluate your stance on me because I am town.
|
On March 09 2014 01:11 Dandel Ion wrote: This is just getting better, now it's my fault he hasn't read austin's filter.
How old are you dude? Enough dandel. Robik if you rage at this again I will lynch you. Just ignore the mocking and answer actual points if they are brought up.
|
On March 09 2014 01:13 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2014 01:11 Dandel Ion wrote: This is just getting better, now it's my fault he hasn't read austin's filter.
How old are you dude? Enough dandel. Robik if you rage at this again I will lynch you. Just ignore the mocking and answer actual points if they are brought up. That was 100% my plan.
|
Nightkills speculation is really only speculation and generally there are multiple reasons why someone dies and we never know what it actually is. Who else is scum Robik?
|
On March 09 2014 01:15 Oatsmaster wrote: Nightkills speculation is really only speculation and generally there are multiple reasons why someone dies and we never know what it actually is. Who else is scum Robik?
I just listed my top 3 people. I suppose all 3 are not together based off of interactions that they had in the game (though this is from my memory of events and not a reread, so it could be a bit fuzzy), but those are the people that have been fairly scummy in the game and I think would either flip mafia or provide us with some good insight (in the case of Joey, I think both)
|
On March 09 2014 01:08 IAmRobik wrote: From the first couple pages of his filter that I read, Palmar should be getting a lot of heat. why?
|
On March 09 2014 01:18 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2014 01:08 IAmRobik wrote: From the first couple pages of his filter that I read, Palmar should be getting a lot of heat. why? Because the Austin death incriminates you
|
On March 09 2014 01:18 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2014 01:08 IAmRobik wrote: From the first couple pages of his filter that I read, Palmar should be getting a lot of heat. why? Any new insights? What lynch will you be pushing today?
|
|
|
|