|
On March 09 2014 00:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2014 00:37 Oatsmaster wrote:Why did you say this then rayn? On March 08 2014 02:24 raynpelikoneet wrote: Why don't you want to policy lynch the shit out of this Palmar? You know that's not going to stop. If you think robik is scum? Because that was before he made some posts that were not only "RAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGE". wtf, read the thread. The case you are talking about above is Dandel's case right?
|
On March 09 2014 00:42 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2014 00:38 raynpelikoneet wrote:On March 09 2014 00:37 Oatsmaster wrote:Why did you say this then rayn? On March 08 2014 02:24 raynpelikoneet wrote: Why don't you want to policy lynch the shit out of this Palmar? You know that's not going to stop. If you think robik is scum? Because that was before he made some posts that were not only "RAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGERAGE". wtf, read the thread. The case you are talking about above is Dandel's case right? Yes.
|
On March 09 2014 00:41 Oatsmaster wrote:are you talking about this Grack? Show nested quote +On March 06 2014 03:24 Oatsmaster wrote: I would lynch VE and I wouldnt lynch GGtemp, the burst of activity he had felt like he was trying to make up for his earlier ploys and it didnt really feel like he was making up stuff about his reaction tests. I dont remember your post about that reason I called bad as the reason I said I would lynch VE. I think I was thinking about the so little impact that VE had on the game. yes. When you ask me for a reason I assume that you have some reason for doing so. If you thought that reason was shit I would expect you as town to go out and say that it is shit.
|
On March 09 2014 00:30 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2014 00:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: I have my vote on the person i want to lynch in case you have not noticed. And you really think scumrobik would put himself in the spotlight like that? He could never have thought that he would win if the lynch is between him and dandel. On top of that he attacked you for some very weak reasons (yeah, the act in itself is scummy but who does that when he knows that you will tear it to shreds later on?). This is suicidal scumplay. Which makes it WIFOM which makes it a smart move.
|
Rayn I think you should walk away for a bit.
|
|
On March 09 2014 00:44 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2014 00:30 justanothertownie wrote:On March 09 2014 00:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: I have my vote on the person i want to lynch in case you have not noticed. And you really think scumrobik would put himself in the spotlight like that? He could never have thought that he would win if the lynch is between him and dandel. On top of that he attacked you for some very weak reasons (yeah, the act in itself is scummy but who does that when he knows that you will tear it to shreds later on?). This is suicidal scumplay. Which makes it WIFOM which makes it a smart move. Not if he could just avoid the whole thing altogether. Good that you are here slam - you think we should lynch robik today? Why?
|
On March 09 2014 00:45 Oatsmaster wrote: Meh never mind.
what does that mean?
|
On March 09 2014 00:44 Grackaroni wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2014 00:41 Oatsmaster wrote:are you talking about this Grack? On March 06 2014 03:24 Oatsmaster wrote: I would lynch VE and I wouldnt lynch GGtemp, the burst of activity he had felt like he was trying to make up for his earlier ploys and it didnt really feel like he was making up stuff about his reaction tests. I dont remember your post about that reason I called bad as the reason I said I would lynch VE. I think I was thinking about the so little impact that VE had on the game. yes. When you ask me for a reason I assume that you have some reason for doing so. If you thought that reason was shit I would expect you as town to go out and say that it is shit. I really dont remember that post.
|
On March 09 2014 00:46 Grackaroni wrote:what does that mean? I was referring to the question at the top of the page.
|
On March 09 2014 00:45 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2014 00:44 Alakaslam wrote:On March 09 2014 00:30 justanothertownie wrote:On March 09 2014 00:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: I have my vote on the person i want to lynch in case you have not noticed. And you really think scumrobik would put himself in the spotlight like that? He could never have thought that he would win if the lynch is between him and dandel. On top of that he attacked you for some very weak reasons (yeah, the act in itself is scummy but who does that when he knows that you will tear it to shreds later on?). This is suicidal scumplay. Which makes it WIFOM which makes it a smart move. Not if he could just avoid the whole thing altogether. Good that you are here slam - you think we should lynch robik today? Why? Yes probably, because of RAYNPELIKONEET's CASE!!!
You all seem to forget he caught robik in a slip up that he still hasn't answered shortly before HIJOLE CHINGA LE SEMANA RAAAAA
|
On March 09 2014 00:45 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2014 00:44 Alakaslam wrote:On March 09 2014 00:30 justanothertownie wrote:On March 09 2014 00:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: I have my vote on the person i want to lynch in case you have not noticed. And you really think scumrobik would put himself in the spotlight like that? He could never have thought that he would win if the lynch is between him and dandel. On top of that he attacked you for some very weak reasons (yeah, the act in itself is scummy but who does that when he knows that you will tear it to shreds later on?). This is suicidal scumplay. Which makes it WIFOM which makes it a smart move. Not if he could just avoid the whole thing altogether. Good that you are here slam - you think we should lynch robik today? Why? The point is he can't if he is mafia and can't reasonably answer the case.
|
On March 09 2014 00:46 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2014 00:44 Grackaroni wrote:On March 09 2014 00:41 Oatsmaster wrote:are you talking about this Grack? On March 06 2014 03:24 Oatsmaster wrote: I would lynch VE and I wouldnt lynch GGtemp, the burst of activity he had felt like he was trying to make up for his earlier ploys and it didnt really feel like he was making up stuff about his reaction tests. I dont remember your post about that reason I called bad as the reason I said I would lynch VE. I think I was thinking about the so little impact that VE had on the game. yes. When you ask me for a reason I assume that you have some reason for doing so. If you thought that reason was shit I would expect you as town to go out and say that it is shit. I really dont remember that post. I try to keep myself as unbiased as possible but I don't see how I can ever think of you as townie then. You ask me for reasoning to lynch VE, ignore my answer, and then come back the next day and argue that I'm scum for pushing faulty reasoning.
|
On March 09 2014 00:48 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2014 00:45 justanothertownie wrote:On March 09 2014 00:44 Alakaslam wrote:On March 09 2014 00:30 justanothertownie wrote:On March 09 2014 00:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: I have my vote on the person i want to lynch in case you have not noticed. And you really think scumrobik would put himself in the spotlight like that? He could never have thought that he would win if the lynch is between him and dandel. On top of that he attacked you for some very weak reasons (yeah, the act in itself is scummy but who does that when he knows that you will tear it to shreds later on?). This is suicidal scumplay. Which makes it WIFOM which makes it a smart move. Not if he could just avoid the whole thing altogether. Good that you are here slam - you think we should lynch robik today? Why? Yes probably, because of RAYNPELIKONEET's CASE!!! You all seem to forget he caught robik in a slip up that he still hasn't answered shortly before HIJOLE CHINGA LE SEMANA RAAAAA No, I know he did. But it is also in dandels case. Do you think this "slip" alone is enough to lynch him?
|
You said it yourself at some point. If the case is so bad why could robik just debunk it? Why start a flamewar?
|
|
On March 09 2014 00:50 raynpelikoneet wrote: You said it yourself at some point. If the case is so bad why could robik just debunk it? Why start a flamewar? I know I said that and I still think the case itself is really good. Sorry, that I am trying to gather more information and am willing to consider different explanations than "he is mafia, gg".
|
On March 09 2014 00:53 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2014 00:50 raynpelikoneet wrote: You said it yourself at some point. If the case is so bad why could robik just debunk it? Why start a flamewar? I know I said that and I still think the case itself is really good. Sorry, that I am trying to gather more information and am willing to consider different explanations than "he is mafia, gg". Fair enough. That's reasonable.
I just happen to know from personal experience that's a perfectly valid mafia strategy when you get caught. I use it all the time against marv, when i am caught i just distract the town leaders for the rest of my time in the game because i can't answer the case. I've done it many times, and to me his behavior looks more likely to come from mafia and i can't find any reasoning why he would do that as town.
|
On March 09 2014 00:32 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On March 09 2014 00:30 justanothertownie wrote:On March 09 2014 00:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: I have my vote on the person i want to lynch in case you have not noticed. And you really think scumrobik would put himself in the spotlight like that? He could never have thought that he would win if the lynch is between him and dandel. On top of that he attacked you for some very weak reasons (yeah, the act in itself is scummy but who does that when he knows that you will tear it to shreds later on?). This is suicidal scumplay. There is a reasonable case on him. His defence does not answer the accusation. His reads are based on nothing. He gets unreasonably mad. Those all are things i don't see a townie do. Rayn
I think you're scum this game, but I'll entertain you for a bit. Please make a case on me and I will do my best to refute all the points against me because I'm town and I want the people in this game who are actually town to see that. Thanks.
Please don't say things like "his emotional outburst was not something a town does" because if that's your case on me then you have no idea what a town does. I am emotionally invested in this game and I care about the game, so my emotions reflect my emotions in real life.
Additionally, you say that I didn't answer the accusations. Please explain which of Dandelion's accusations I didn't refute and I would be happy to go into more detail about why they're wrong and why I'm town.
Also, there should be two other scum by your estimation in this game, but you are completely unwilling to give your opinions on anyone else besides me. This is scummy from my perspective since I know I'm town and all your'e doing all game is pushing a mislynch, even though you claim that you and Dandelion are the only ones who are "doing anything on d2 to try to get mafia lynch".
|
Like maybe he is mafia but the only thing in the case that could not be explained by a ridiculous bias towards dandel is how he shat on the VE lynch after saying he would lynch into VE/Joey. Going for easy targets is not defensible and could be brought up against almost anyone here.
|
|
|
|