EPT[S] Shadowed Mini Mafia - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
I would like Jonny to explain his arguments against me though. I am actually upset about the fact my early posting is "shitposting" tbh. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
1) LM said he was not going to vote for something just based on filter size but on filter content. This shows future commitment to the game. This is a town answer. But in 24 hours we can also use this to pressure him to give reads, or at least his town answer looks bad when he doesn't follow up. But I trust he will. 2) Balla same story. Instantly said yay let's do this and was worried about other people low content spam and not himself. Good + follow up ensured. 3) Jonny was angry and is still angry. There is no reason for that at all and I put him scummy. I also read his post better and found previously quoted post that does not make sense at all. ↨ 4) Hopeless said something and then fucked off. This is scummy and it is not my fault that he did this. If we lynch somebody we lynch Hopeless. 5) Suki her post was actually a wtf moment. The underlined part of previous sentence was my confusion. I think the rest of the people made similar comments but that's what my post generated. But nothing on it's own was scummy. Also I wasn't in let's solve this game right now mode yesterday right before bed. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
JayB is making sense this game. Voice of Reason. That's all. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
As in "guys let's be nice to each other and post a lot" But I called it a policy to get things going. At least Jonny and Oats aren't scum together. I can't believe 2 scummers pushing the most dumb argument ever. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
I prefer to lynch Jonny atm. Nothing he says connects to each other. He starts saying he wants to lynch all lurkers multiple times and that my "Policy" was a good conversation starter. On February 03 2014 10:10 JonnyLaw wrote: Three of them were lurkers in our games. We're lynching them d1 if they do nothing. On February 04 2014 07:54 JonnyLaw wrote: 40 posts is an arbitrary number that doesn't mean anything. It worked okay as a conversation starter but on Wednesday are you going to be sitting around counting people's posts since the game started? Somewhere Jonny must have read that I was actually serious about going to actually count the number of posts and then lynch somebody for it while I said that I wasn't going to do that. So normally Jonny shouldn't be going on about it then? On February 05 2014 00:38 JonnyLaw wrote: You posted something stupid that you admittedly don't want to follow through with in the end. If we take away everyone talking about your first post then maybe we'd have better content instead of discussion about post counts. This is his come back post in the thread many hours after he said my policy was all about the numbers. I have so many problems with every sentence in that post. You posted something stupid that you admittedly don't want to follow through with in the end. What is this? Am I scum for posting something stupid? Am I scum for not following up my stupid plans? I think it is pretty townie to not follow up stupid shit. Why is he trying to make me not following up stupid shit look scummy? If we take away everyone talking about your first post then maybe we'd have better content instead of discussion about post counts. Why is Jonny being frustrated with me about the fact that all the content is being shit content? I type in the start of the game "guys let's be nice and post a lot" and the guy replies with 'Fuck being nice because people are lazy and lynch all lurkers" but then keeps going on and on about "there is no content" . THERE IS ALWAYS CONTENT. Then there is Jonny and his talk about LM: On February 04 2014 07:54 JonnyLaw wrote: And what the fuck is that vote? Lonemeow's said the most sensible thing since this game started. On February 04 2014 10:20 JonnyLaw wrote: I agreed with his second post and dismissed the other one. That first one is an excuse for lurking. I dunno if that's scummy or not. Let's see how LM proceeds from here. Maybe I have a soft spot from him hosting one of our newbie games. [QUOTE]On February 04 2014 11:14 JonnyLaw wrote: LM hasn't given us quality or quantity yet. He says one thing then does another. It's early in the game for me to demand more quality of his posting. At least as far as considering lynching him. [QUOTE]On February 04 2014 11:48 JonnyLaw wrote: At this point LM's first post was shit but says nothing about his alignment until other actions take place in the game. Koshi on the other hand created two pages of shit posting. This allowed LM and other LM like people to pop in, say nothing and fuck off out of here acting as though they participated in the game.[/QUOTE] Just look at the progression: "How do you dare to vote LM, he said the most sensible thing in this thread" "LM his second post was really good, I didn't consider the other ones" "LM can be lynched" "LM posted like shit early game, but it really was Koshi his fault" It literally goes from this guy posted incredible pro town towards everything this guy posted was shit. And there is a post right after Jonny said "I can lynch LM" where Jonny give his scummy list and I am on top of the scummy list and not LM. This is the post that Jonny found protown at first but then said it was scummy btw: + Show Spoiler + On February 04 2014 07:40 LoneMeow wrote: Well, for starters I don't quite agree with your "minimum post count" thing. I'll support a lurker lynch if it's necessary, but based on amount of content, not number of posts. Which on itself is indeed a pro-town post. The problem just lied that LM right after this post said that he was going to do hardcore lurking and the posts didn't add up... Which Jonny still doesn't understand. And somebody needs to figure out what Jonny means with the "first post" and the "second post" etc, because I am pretty sure it doesn't add up as well. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
I prefer to lynch Jonny atm. Nothing he says connects to each other. He starts saying he wants to lynch all lurkers multiple times and that my "Policy" was a good conversation starter. On February 03 2014 10:10 JonnyLaw wrote: Three of them were lurkers in our games. We're lynching them d1 if they do nothing. On February 04 2014 07:54 JonnyLaw wrote: 40 posts is an arbitrary number that doesn't mean anything. It worked okay as a conversation starter but on Wednesday are you going to be sitting around counting people's posts since the game started? Somewhere Jonny must have read that I was actually serious about going to actually count the number of posts and then lynch somebody for it while I said that I wasn't going to do that. So normally Jonny shouldn't be going on about it then? On February 05 2014 00:38 JonnyLaw wrote: You posted something stupid that you admittedly don't want to follow through with in the end. If we take away everyone talking about your first post then maybe we'd have better content instead of discussion about post counts. This is his come back post in the thread many hours after he said my policy was all about the numbers. I have so many problems with every sentence in that post. You posted something stupid that you admittedly don't want to follow through with in the end. What is this? Am I scum for posting something stupid? Am I scum for not following up my stupid plans? I think it is pretty townie to not follow up stupid shit. Why is he trying to make me not following up stupid shit look scummy? If we take away everyone talking about your first post then maybe we'd have better content instead of discussion about post counts. Why is Jonny being frustrated with me about the fact that all the content is being shit content? I type in the start of the game "guys let's be nice and post a lot" and the guy replies with 'Fuck being nice because people are lazy and lynch all lurkers" but then keeps going on and on about "there is no content" . THERE IS ALWAYS CONTENT. Then there is Jonny and his talk about LM: On February 04 2014 07:54 JonnyLaw wrote: And what the fuck is that vote? Lonemeow's said the most sensible thing since this game started. On February 04 2014 10:20 JonnyLaw wrote: I agreed with his second post and dismissed the other one. That first one is an excuse for lurking. I dunno if that's scummy or not. Let's see how LM proceeds from here. Maybe I have a soft spot from him hosting one of our newbie games. On February 04 2014 11:14 JonnyLaw wrote: LM hasn't given us quality or quantity yet. He says one thing then does another. It's early in the game for me to demand more quality of his posting. At least as far as considering lynching him. On February 04 2014 11:48 JonnyLaw wrote: At this point LM's first post was shit but says nothing about his alignment until other actions take place in the game. Koshi on the other hand created two pages of shit posting. This allowed LM and other LM like people to pop in, say nothing and fuck off out of here acting as though they participated in the game. Just look at the progression: "How do you dare to vote LM, he said the most sensible thing in this thread" "LM his second post was really good, I didn't consider the other ones" "LM can be lynched" "LM posted like shit early game, but it really was Koshi his fault" It literally goes from this guy posted incredible pro town towards everything this guy posted was shit. And there is a post right after Jonny said "I can lynch LM" where Jonny give his scummy list and I am on top of the scummy list and not LM. This is the post that Jonny found protown at first but then said it was scummy btw: + Show Spoiler + On February 04 2014 07:40 LoneMeow wrote: Well, for starters I don't quite agree with your "minimum post count" thing. I'll support a lurker lynch if it's necessary, but based on amount of content, not number of posts. Which on itself is indeed a pro-town post. The problem just lied that LM right after this post said that he was going to do hardcore lurking and the posts didn't add up... Which Jonny still doesn't understand. And somebody needs to figure out what Jonny means with the "first post" and the "second post" etc, because I am pretty sure it doesn't add up as well. Some lone posts I find troubling: On February 04 2014 12:05 JonnyLaw wrote: I'd say it could feel like bussing scum buddy. This is about JayB and Sidesprang. Never to be mentioned again. On February 04 2014 12:41 JonnyLaw wrote: Anyway, I'm not waffling on anything. I'm trying to figure out the game. If you have firm convictions this early you're an idiot or a god. When people say "I am not waffling" they are waffling. Also, did people think he was waffling? I don't even see where he was waffling. That's what they call inherent guilt. He looks at his own posts and sees the flaws in them, or at least he thinks they are there. ##vote: JonnyLaw | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
On February 05 2014 04:39 Alakaslam wrote: Koshi! Lampshades everywhere! Explain plz. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
His stance on you. Did it feel natural to you? Or did he just followed thread sentiment. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
On February 05 2014 06:06 Alakaslam wrote: You are lampshading people's early efforts to say some kind of pro town thing and then call that same act scummy later. In fact so am I Indeed it is odd. Wait a minute! We all are somehow?!?! Is it possible? I am not following you. At all. I also don' know what Lampshading is. Jonny his read on me is too absolute. Agree? | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
On February 04 2014 09:33 Balla24 wrote: Because he opened by saying something super ambiguous and unclear as to what he meant for no reason instead of just saying what he thought. About which post was this and can you clarify this for me. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38797 Posts
This is the post that Jonny is going ham about. He likes post 2 and think that is a protown post. He still does. I think you (Balla) are talking about this post. On February 04 2014 07:40 LoneMeow wrote: Well, for starters I don't quite agree with your "minimum post count" thing. I'll support a lurker lynch if it's necessary, but based on amount of content, not number of posts. | ||
| ||
