GSL Open Mini Mafia IV - Page 81

On February 21 2014 08:15 Mordanis wrote:
So by my count, everyone has voted except for Matt and Vivax. Vivax, why have you not voted, it seems like you've had plenty of scumreads.

On February 21 2014 04:59 IAmRobik wrote:

Do you have a bot that pings you every time "JJD" is written in the thread?

On February 21 2014 06:56 IAmRobik wrote:
gumshoe...your absence bothered me as well as the fact that I still think mattchew is town...regardless of his activity. I'll reiterate that I can be wrong here...but that's just my intuition. I'm totally down with Vivax420's plan of waiting until everyone gets modkilled. If we end up losing, I won't feel bad. If we get mafia modkilled, that would be awesome and we can read him and figure stuff out and move onto another suspect. If it ends up with 1 town modkilled, well at least we have more info and we don't have to waste a lynch on him and again, can move onto another suspect.

On February 21 2014 06:47 gumshoe wrote:


I was rbed yes, but aside from that why do you want to lynch me? I think my arguments out before I post them, I dont get in insult wars with other townies, I go through filters thoroughly before I take a stance on someone and you can see all that in my history. I opt for quality over quantity and I've produced more with five posts than most people have with twenty. Which is pretty much how I've played as town in games past.

I have stuck my neck out and presented unpopular cases not because I'm yolo red, but because I genuinely want to lynch scum. I have also played entirely transparent and have given town plenty to work with, both on those I consider scummy and myself, which is saying something considering that I didnt even know I was playing this game for two days.

You've done just the same and then some, as a result I and several others have placed our faith in you. You dont have to listen to everything I say, but after I I've delivered to you Mattchews red razor mouse of doom, do have a little bit of that faith in me, given my existing contributions and upcoming accolades(matt slayer!) I dont deserve to have the whims of the trilaner be all that separates me from the noose.

On February 21 2014 09:29 roundabound wrote:
How the tables turn.
(Full Seriousness)
I am nominating this post for "Worst Plan" Mafia 2014.

I can not believe you are relying on gaming the host to win this game.
BH rules are clear that if you dont want to post, dont post. QP got away with 5 days of not posting.

You admit you are bored.

What you are advocating now, is a plan to ensure that the rest of the game will be equally bored. Ridiculous.

Pull ya finger out.

~moc

On February 20 2014 00:39 roundabound wrote:
robik

how many wanks are u planning to max out on b4 giving up on masttchew?

~moc

On February 20 2014 00:44 IAmRobik wrote:

I'm almost there actually.

*snip*

On February 21 2014 10:21 bumatlarge wrote:


This is absurd. "Sticking out your neck" for posting reads? And what the hell is an unpopular case? I've never heard of that before. In fact, I have not an inkling of what you are trying to say in that entire middle paragraph. Quality over quantity is content, not post length.

Can you reiterate why I'm scum again? I seem to have forgotten outside of "doesn't post" and "doesn't give reads".

Can you reiterate why I'm scum again? I seem to have forgotten outside of "doesn't post" and "doesn't give reads".

On February 21 2014 12:23 gumshoe wrote:


Im pretty much betting everything on this Matt lynch, if it fails, I am almost entirely to blame and I expect my head to roll shortly after his. Thats called sticking your neck out, fortunately its not no going to fail, I am almost entirely sure Matts scum. Also whats an unpopular case? A case that is not widely held in esteem, prior to my initial case against him, nobody was attacking him. I took a risk going after someone that was not considered scum by town before I made my case. Which was a much more difficult avenue to pursue rather than continuously flip flopping on side sprang... and one I pursued only because thats exactly what I need to do as town to ensure we lynch scum. Also if you dont understand what I'm saying, sorry? I try my best to be transparent, but I've had scum write "I dont know what this guy is saying" as an argument against me before, so forgive me if I dont find your ignorance entirely sincere, I have known you to play dumb before.

As for why your scum.



The bolded is just not true, you do post, it's just those posts are worthless, your only job as town is to find scum and it is through reads and subsequent red flips you prove your towniness. You dont do that, you just defend yourself and offer half assed reads and when people call you out on that you scream "im just the replacement guys!" . After Mattchew flips red, I'll go into detail against you, but for now just stand back and watch your buddy get roasted, cause I'm really getting tired of your terrible scum play.

On February 21 2014 13:23 bumatlarge wrote:


Who cares whats going to happen to you. You took a risk in scum hunting? You certainly are if you are scum. No one has defended mattchew, so everything you said is really unnecessary if you are intent on him being mafia. Thanks for telling us your motives though. I also like how you are making up a lot of non-sense about me flip-flopping on SS. Please continue to make up non-sense if that is your thing.



How about you go into detail now. You are prepared to insult my play, but I think that is ill-founded. I think my scum play is pretty adequate, and yours is transparent! And mattchew is probably scum by the nature of your case and how you hope it's going to make you look. For being scum you sure do shed light on all the wrong things.

mordanis is chill, other two not so much. What about the sprangside? I feel good about him being scum

Alright, I've determined that sidesprang is fairly transparent. I can explain why, but I'd rather have him post for me to analyze. I'm not the greatest at meta reads, but the 'nervous' post mattchew brought up was pretty typical of the [red]sidesprang/red] I have studied.

And mattchew is probably scum by the nature of your case and how you hope it's going to make you look

On February 21 2014 14:22 bumatlarge wrote:
Those two you quoted are both calling him scummy. You probably should read them again.

You can be transparent scum.

On February 21 2014 14:22 bumatlarge wrote:
Those two you quoted are both calling him scummy. You probably should read them again.

You can be transparent scum.

On February 21 2014 14:38 gumshoe wrote:
Yeah, I'm sorry Bum, that was pretty much the main reason I suspected you, I wont be voting for you this cycle period now. If you still wanna come after me, it's your call ( : I'm off to bed, gl all.