|
On February 13 2014 20:46 roundabound wrote:
I am also interested in why they say stuff like this, and then nothing. No follow up.
That's my impression of every question they've asked so far. None of the questions seem particularly helpful.
On February 13 2014 06:48 VIVAX420 wrote:
Thrawn, why didn't you want to ask things from a potential scumread when you weren't sure yet?
I see what he's getting at with this question but I think it's just barely helpful enough to be considered a contribution towards scumhunting. I'm not sure how to describe this point other than by saying that I am not impressed by anything V420's posted.
|
theyve all been vivax basically. Im not caught up yet. I will say though that lynching us d1 is objectively a terrible idea. We have the potential to catch scum and we will probably get nk very early.
As of like 10 pages ago I had rayn/grack/jarjar as possible scummers.
|
ebwop
On February 13 2014 20:54 thrawn2112 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 13 2014 20:46 roundabound wrote:
I am also interested in why they say stuff like this, and then nothing. No follow up. That's my impression of every question they've asked so far. None of the questions seem particularly helpful. Show nested quote +On February 13 2014 06:48 VIVAX420 wrote:
Thrawn, why didn't you want to ask things from a potential scumread when you weren't sure yet? I see what he's getting at with this question but I think it's just barely helpful enough to be considered a contribution towards scumhunting. I'm not sure how to describe this point other than by saying that I am not impressed by anything V420's posted and my expectation of their town play doesn't align with what they've done so far.
|
Also this doesn't have to do with scumhunting, but I would really like robik to stfu saying stuff that's totally not relevant. It's harsh but I am in skipallhisposts mode,. This isn't a turbo.
|
@thrawn you are wrong. I thought vivax was pretty much kicking ass with his questions.
|
also here is the key to differentiating our posts. vivax uses capitalization
|
I don't see how that sidesprang post comes off as "most mafia nervous post"?? It's a clear answer to a stupid question, discussing setup is a waste of time and anyone could figure that out by themselves. I on't get how do you come to that conclusion thrawn, it does not really line up with sidesprang's posting as town or as mafia either.
~rayn
|
It doesn't have anything to do with the topic of conversation or the conclusion ss reached. The "nervous-mafia" bit applies to how he talks. Here it is for reference.
On February 13 2014 04:18 sidesprang wrote:
ATM we can't figure it out, even if we knew the amount of boxers, I think atleast. So I see no reason in starting that debate atm. Just wait untill we get some flips, and then it might be usefull.
Just waste of time atm.
All the things I'm about to list are trivial and probably not alignment indicative but when added together they create the vibe of "nervous-mafia"
-atm's
-awkward use of commas
-"i think, at least"
The post doesn't feel right for a reason that is hard to explain but I think can be pretty accurately described as an awkward scum post.
|
I am +1'ing sidesprang's question; Why would mafia be nervous talking about setup?
~rayn
|
Mafia could be nervous about posting anything simply because they are mafia, especially during the early game when everyone is paying close attention to every post and people are willing to jump on anything even slightly weird.
Take it or leave it, I don't want to continue debating the tone of a single post. It wasn't something I felt strongly enough about to mention when it happened and the only reason I'm talking about it right now is because it relates to what I think about mattchew.
|
k i read everything and read some filters. I couldn't find anyone that looks a lot like mafia.
mordanis: his arguements are just so ridiculously wrong he must be a noob. townread i suppose, but goddamn someone needs to teach this guy how to play mafia
if I were going to lynch someone RIGHT NAO it would be Grack. He said he was going to try hard this game. He hasn't been trying hard.
On February 13 2014 02:44 Grackaroni wrote:
Yes! I am totally going to play seriously and stuff.
Votes for me for no reason, calls it "solid" for no reason.
His only read is to call rob "probably town."
|
So kush what's wrong in Mordanis' posting?
~rayn
|
On February 13 2014 06:28 Mordanis wrote:
On a side note, I think its looking a bit sketchy that it seems like we already have a vote on thrawn (for "hmm") and vivax building a meta case on him for lurking a few hours into the game, it feels like teamwork or opportunistic scum play...
wut
|
Yes that's a bad conclusion, is there anything else?
~rayn
|
that might be the wrongest thing ive ever seen anyone say ever. but yeah this is all pointless and mean because he's probably town.
|
he's assuming we have a "hell of a scumread" on everyone we ask a question of. Also that question that he said didn't belond was actually my question, and everyone else was vivax.
On February 13 2014 09:06 Mordanis wrote:On vivax I really don't like the way that vivax posted fluff, gave someone else evidence to start a case, and then left it all alone for everyone else to take care of, and then disappeared right afterwards. And then there's this post: Show nested quote +On February 13 2014 06:17 VIVAX420 wrote:On February 13 2014 06:16 IAmRobik wrote:
People try to shush me when I play live games cause I talk to much...but in these games I'm free to provide all the content that I want! do you talk a lot as scum too? vivax goes from one hell of a scum read on thrawn (without really pushing anything) to one hell of a town read on Robik (without telling us why). In short, vivax seems incredibly confident about being right but hasn't really done anything useful aside from helping another player make a case. That seems like as much of a scum mindset as you can get.
|
like how does asking "do you talk a lot as scum too?" consistute "one hell of a scumread"?
it's the kind of thing where if i saw you making these arguments, rayn, i would be suspicious but since it's coming from a noob, i think it pretty heavily leans town.
|
On February 13 2014 22:02 VIVAX420 wrote:he's assuming we have a "hell of a scumread" on everyone we ask a question of. Also that question that he said didn't belond was actually my question, and everyone else was vivax. Show nested quote +On February 13 2014 09:06 Mordanis wrote:On vivax I really don't like the way that vivax posted fluff, gave someone else evidence to start a case, and then left it all alone for everyone else to take care of, and then disappeared right afterwards. And then there's this post: On February 13 2014 06:17 VIVAX420 wrote:On February 13 2014 06:16 IAmRobik wrote:
People try to shush me when I play live games cause I talk to much...but in these games I'm free to provide all the content that I want! do you talk a lot as scum too? vivax goes from one hell of a scum read on thrawn (without really pushing anything) to one hell of a town read on Robik (without telling us why). In short, vivax seems incredibly confident about being right but hasn't really done anything useful aside from helping another player make a case. That seems like as much of a scum mindset as you can get.
Ehh, where does he say you have a hell of a scumread on everyone you question?
Saying you have a hell of a scumread on thrawn at that time is not that wrong imo, because Vivax said he had found mafia in thrawn, made a case and voted for him. What is it if not a scumread?
I am curious, you call Mordanis noob town because his posts are "so wrong". Me and thrawn are not noobs and we have come to quite similar conclusion about your posting (that there is not much substance behind your posts). Why don't you have a scumread on us? What's different?
~rayn
|
Nevermind you never voted for thrawn..
~rayn
|
i misread actually. I thought he was saying i had a hell of a scumread on rob because i asked him a question. actually he said hell of a townread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
