TL Mafia LXIV: The Restart - Page 24

On January 27 2014 03:25 Oatsmaster wrote:

oh right you were 3p.
Thats a technicality.
3p = not scum aligned

Vote for Oats!

On January 27 2014 03:27 kushm4sta wrote:
hmm nvm i get what bc is saying

On January 27 2014 03:27 VisceraEyes wrote:

3p = not town aligned too.

I won't be voting for you friend. You never reread the thread, and only comment on things that are current. If you're town, I can't trust you to make the best lynch.

But feel free to convince me you're town though! I always love getting a townread on people I otherwise love to lynch.

On January 27 2014 02:26 QuantumPope wrote:


Grack: I appreciate his confidence in his Day 1 reads. While he is on my good list he isn't particularly high on it I appreciated his campaign motto of lynching his reads. He is leaning towards the ugly with his trolling but he does make the list.

Alaka: He's essentially baiting out comments. I like that to get the town talking on Day 1 but if it continues into the following days he'll probably land in my ugly list.

On January 27 2014 03:34 GGTeMpLaR wrote:
Oats/Kush/Skans can you guys form a Triumvirate and one of you run for mayor?

Or just vote me mayor?

On January 27 2014 03:35 kushm4sta wrote:
@oats
but qp had decent reasons for these two townreads

On January 27 2014 02:36 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
active blue hunting while not posting a ton of contributions. His support of kush early is just wtf in my opinion as well and no sensible person would do.

Also pope your post was clearly crafted as you said

have all contributed quite a bit as well but something about these people’s early reasoning does not sit well with me. Maybe they’re scum hunting with their comments but the interactions just don’t scream town for me. I am just not particularly excited about what these people have to say.



At the time of your post I had one post, made less than an hour before your post. Skanj had like 2 posts, and storr has like 4-5.

None of us have contributed quite a bit. Its clearly a post made in retardation and it was crafted with next to no real thought behind it.

On January 27 2014 02:36 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
His support of kush early is just wtf in my opinion as well and no sensible person would do.

On January 27 2014 02:36 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
Its clearly a post made in retardation and it was crafted with next to no real thought behind it.

On January 27 2014 03:41 QuantumPope wrote:


I don't see the problem with supporting kush? I happen to be a very sensible person but if you could happen to enlighten me as to why this is a bad read it would be greatly appreciated.

On January 27 2014 03:41 QuantumPope wrote:


I generalized to be concise. Long posts that doesn't seem to say anything, for instance the one I am quoting, doesn't really do anything for town. I could write a 2000 word post going into specifics of various individuals in the thread but I find it posts like that only hinder town. Your personal attacks on my character also seem to be unsubstantiated so I'd love for you could please elaborate on the following:


I don't see the problem with supporting kush? I happen to be a very sensible person but if you could happen to enlighten me as to why this is a bad read it would be greatly appreciated.


You try to discredit my reads...with no counter argument and by calling me retarded. Want to elaborate?