|
On January 27 2014 02:29 VisceraEyes wrote:
BC I may agree with you with regard to GGTemplar, but I want to hear your reasoning for thinking he's scum.
I also think that BH is scum for a specific, PM related reason that I'm not willing to share with the group, but I will say that he's not floating my boat in the thread either.
active blue hunting while not posting a ton of contributions. His support of kush early is just wtf in my opinion as well and no sensible person would do.
Also pope your post was clearly crafted as you said
have all contributed quite a bit as well but something about these people’s early reasoning does not sit well with me. Maybe they’re scum hunting with their comments but the interactions just don’t scream town for me. I am just not particularly excited about what these people have to say.
At the time of your post I had one post, made less than an hour before your post. Skanj had like 2 posts, and storr has like 4-5.
None of us have contributed quite a bit. Its clearly a post made in retardation and it was crafted with next to no real thought behind it.
|
On January 27 2014 02:26 QuantumPope wrote:Show nested quote +On January 27 2014 02:06 kushm4sta wrote:
what's grack and alaka done that you consider good?
Grack: I appreciate his confidence in his Day 1 reads. While he is on my good list he isn't particularly high on it I appreciated his campaign motto of lynching his reads. He is leaning towards the ugly with his trolling but he does make the list. Alaka: He's essentially baiting out comments. I like that to get the town talking on Day 1 but if it continues into the following days he'll probably land in my ugly list.
um he clearly put thought into it. I like both of these reasons actually.
|
On January 27 2014 02:36 BloodyC0bbler wrote:Show nested quote +On January 27 2014 02:29 VisceraEyes wrote:
BC I may agree with you with regard to GGTemplar, but I want to hear your reasoning for thinking he's scum.
I also think that BH is scum for a specific, PM related reason that I'm not willing to share with the group, but I will say that he's not floating my boat in the thread either. active blue hunting while not posting a ton of contributions. His support of kush early is just wtf in my opinion as well and no sensible person would do.
How many games have you played with him? This is my first and I thought my reasoning was pretty good.
Elaborate why it wasn't aside from being "wtf"
|
I like you BC, lets be friends.
But, ohwait, why did you make that lovely campaign post but then not vote for yourself?
Why would you do that to me BC
Why
|
oh god why are there so many pages full of incomprehensible scribblings??? ? ?
BC are you scum?
You seem like scum.
|
On January 27 2014 02:41 Oatsmaster wrote:
oh god why are there so many pages full of incomprehensible scribblings??? ? ?
BC are you scum?
You seem like scum.
scum? No, I found the fuckup in your giant post. There is no way that in one post from two players you can claim we both posted quite a lot. Simple straight up fact.
You clearly had a list of people that you divided into different categories with bullshit justifications.
|
bah, oats i thought that was pope i was responding to, just replace "you" with pope" in that post.
|
i like how quantumpope explained his townreads on grack and alaka. his reasons are based on true things and i can see how someone would get townreads from that.
~~~
bh seems to be attacking easy targets, and there's very little to back it up
His case against qp i think it really scummy.
He says qp's post seems "constructed".. very generic and meaningless scumtell.
On January 27 2014 02:36 BloodyC0bbler wrote:
At the time of your post I had one post, made less than an hour before your post. Skanj had like 2 posts, and storr has like 4-5.
None of us have contributed quite a bit. Its clearly a post made in retardation and it was crafted with next to no real thought behind it.
Here he is nitpicking so hard. He just finds a minor contradiction and turns it into a scumtell which doesn't even make sense. His post is "retarded with next to no real thought behind it" yet it feels "constructed".
okay,,,
|
ok, that was slightly scary for a moment. I thought I might have sleep typed or something.
|
I'm still waiting for a follow-up on his case against me which smells like a load of horse shit.
|
On January 27 2014 02:41 Skanjab1s wrote:
I like you BC, lets be friends.
But, ohwait, why did you make that lovely campaign post but then not vote for yourself?
Why would you do that to me BC
Why
Why would I need to auto vote myself? If the thread wants me as mayor they should vote me in, plain and simple.
|
Do you not want yourself to be mayor?
If you want yourself to be mayor you should vote yourself in, plain and simple.
|
obviously he is trying to exude an air of confidence so that he looks super townie.
u don't like my minicase on him, tweak?
|
I love everything you say, kushybear. Your points on him make sense and I enjoyed/agreed them
|
BC exudes an air of confidence no matter what alignment he is. That's a null tell.
I don't necessarily like him picking QP out of the crowd for lynch, but again, he may see something I don't and I might be biased because dude said I'm town...but not agreeing with someone's read says nothing about the person's alignment. I DO agree that QP's post looks a little constructed (the way it's separated out, formatted and everything could be construed as contrived), but that doesn't necessarily mean scum. He could just like his posts to be pretty. I used to, once upon a time.
|
THERE ARE MAYORS???? ?? ?
CAN I BE MAYOR PLS GUYS!!
|
Hey VE, why do you want mayorship when you are horrible at it?
|
On January 27 2014 03:21 Oatsmaster wrote:
Hey VE, why do you want mayorship when you are horrible at it?
I'm not horrible at it? I have a 100% scum lynch rate as town-aligned mayor. Sup Oats?
|
On January 27 2014 03:21 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On January 27 2014 03:21 Oatsmaster wrote:
Hey VE, why do you want mayorship when you are horrible at it?
I'm not horrible at it? I have a 100% scum lynch rate as town-aligned mayor. Sup Oats?
oh right you were 3p.
Thats a technicality.
3p = not scum aligned
Vote for Oats!
|
On January 27 2014 02:02 QuantumPope wrote:
The Good: Right now VE, Thrawn, Balla, Grack, and Alakaslam
have been contributing to furthering the conversation. In some cases it has been extremely elaborate with reasoning, information and solid reasoning. In the other cases it’s legit trolling trying to get people to talk. I’m okay with all these people tentatively.
Can you give any concrete examples of this?
On January 27 2014 02:02 QuantumPope wrote:
The Ugly: Coagulation, BlazingHand, Wile E. Coyote, Oatsmaster, bumatlarge, and Mocasta.
These people have either not posted or have not given me enough to read on. I have a hard time reading into trolls. These people, in my opinion, have added very little information of substance or attempting to drive the conversation in a direction that seems town oriented.
What differentiates say Alakazam's trolling that makes it not hard for you to read into?
On January 27 2014 02:26 QuantumPope wrote:Show nested quote +On January 27 2014 02:06 kushm4sta wrote:
what's grack and alaka done that you consider good?
Grack: I appreciate his confidence in his Day 1 reads. While he is on my good list he isn't particularly high on it I appreciated his campaign motto of lynching his reads. He is leaning towards the ugly with his trolling but he does make the list. Alaka: He's essentially baiting out comments. I like that to get the town talking on Day 1 but if it continues into the following days he'll probably land in my ugly list.
-Like regarding these, half the town has come out confidently in this game, what is different about Grack's confidence versus the confidence of others?
-And Alaka's trolling is directed at baiting out comments to what ends? Have you gotten any reads off someone who fell for Alaka's "bait" that you find useful?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
