EPT[M][N] "SMB" Mini Mafia - Page 19
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On January 17 2014 00:37 Hopeless1der wrote: hey rayn did you see when i asked about your thoughts on grack? or are you too busy with toad right now? Yeah sorry. If he does not stop trolling he is mafia. I liked his post where he said everything happened so far is dumb.  | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 17 2014 00:35 Hopeless1der wrote: Toad, comment on why skanjab's case is bullshit as per rayn's discussion. One of you is wrong. Explain why. he basicly said this: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=440800¤tpage=18#344 I don't think the bolded part counters anything about the careful posts that were mentioned at all. That post is something anyone could do. Besides you look for uncertainties, they're not going to show up in every post just like a mafia who slips won't slip in every post bust just one. I still like that part of the case and think rayn is talking bullshit. Furthermore we got rayn talking about how the list post was supposed to be stupid (it was) and noone seems to have a problem with the fact that rayn's the only one who felt the need to answer it: On January 16 2014 21:01 raynpelikoneet wrote: (1) town (2) stupid question (3) depends on the pressure and my alignment (4) emo Why does he answer that shit if he thinks it's shit, knowing that his answer is going to be shit as well? Just ignore it | ||
|
Sn0_Man
Tebellong44238 Posts
On January 17 2014 00:35 Hopeless1der wrote: Toad, comment on why skanjab's case is bullshit as per rayn's discussion. One of you is wrong. Explain why. Hopeless, stop 1-liner sniping from the sidelines and do some legwork yourself. Image macro's are worse than 1-liners. You work hard enough to find/generate an image macro but are too fucking lazy to do anything that could be construed as hunting scum. That doesn't make a ton of sense. Unless theres a good reason you don't want to take a stance on anything in-game? Oh yeah, cuz ur scum. | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 17 2014 00:35 raynpelikoneet wrote: Yet you agree with Skanjab's case. ##Unvote: ##Vote: Toadsstern Difference being: I am talking about his phrasing and how it's showing weakness. You basicly accused me of not having put up a case 1 hour into the game. The former can happen no matter if there is something in a post or not, your phrasing can always show your alignment. The conent 1 hour of the game can not and you should be smarter than this... | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 17 2014 00:28 raynpelikoneet wrote: But you were, because you said all of his contributions.... Why are you changing your story? I don't have a read on Hopeless yet. All of his contributions that I quoted. My story isn't changing at all. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On January 17 2014 00:43 Skanjab1s wrote: All of his contributions that I quoted. My story isn't changing at all. So if i take one or two posts of yours where you don't say much can i say "Skanjabs has not contributed anything at all". Does that sound like i would not be twisting what has actually happened? | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On January 17 2014 00:41 Sn0_Man wrote: Hopeless, stop 1-liner sniping from the sidelines and do some legwork yourself. Image macro's are worse than 1-liners. You work hard enough to find/generate an image macro but are too fucking lazy to do anything that could be construed as hunting scum. That doesn't make a ton of sense. Unless theres a good reason you don't want to take a stance on anything in-game? Oh yeah, cuz ur scum. Listen, Toad is avoiding rayn's discussion and is promoting something that I find scummy. I don't know if Toad is scum or town. Asking him to do stuff is a way to discern his alignment. Finding an image macro is a more suitable representation of my attitude towards skanjabs questionnaire and rayn telling me I should answer it. I have taken stances. See my vote. See how Grack hasnt done a thing this game and no one gives a rats ass yet because "oh its soo super early its meaningless" bullshit. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
On January 17 2014 00:40 Toadesstern wrote: + Show Spoiler +he basicly said this: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=440800¤tpage=18#344 I don't think the bolded part counters anything about the careful posts that were mentioned at all. That post is something anyone could do. Besides you look for uncertainties, they're not going to show up in every post just like a mafia who slips won't slip in every post bust just one. I still like that part of the case and think rayn is talking bullshit. Furthermore we got rayn talking about how the list post was supposed to be stupid (it was) and noone seems to have a problem with the fact that rayn's the only one who felt the need to answer it: Why does he answer that shit if he thinks it's shit, knowing that his answer is going to be shit as well? Just ignore it On January 16 2014 16:57 thrawn2112 wrote: oats i have no fucking clue if grack is scum or not. i never once said he's town, never, not once. I have in my notes: "grack - null, my+hopeless+kush+sn0 actions make it hard to judge" my reasons for unvoting were simply because i downgraded him from scummy to null because I REREAD and THOUGHT about my reasons and realized they were stupid. that does not fucking mean i'm suddenly town reading oats, take a reading comprehension class. that reason COMBINED with me not wanting to demotivate a potential townie is why I unvoted. town, murdering Oats IRL, depends on my mood, depends on my mood. On January 16 2014 18:02 Koshi wrote: Koshi is back alive. town. Being Batman. I am never pressured, maybe sometimes omgus. I only make well calculated decisions, and completely thought out posts. ↑ 1 thing is a lie. On January 16 2014 21:01 raynpelikoneet wrote: (1) town (2) stupid question (3) depends on the pressure and my alignment (4) emo On January 17 2014 00:28 Sn0_Man wrote: 1) I generally enjoyed my town games more than my singular replacement into a maf game 2) dafuq would I know? 3) Depends is a horrible cop-out answer everybody puts forth. I usually just OMGUS cuz omgus. Or whine a lot. 4) Tears, tears everywhere Aaaaand in other news I certainly hope you aren't counting on this or your romp through my filter as "contributions". | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On January 17 2014 00:40 Toadesstern wrote: Why does he answer that shit if he thinks it's shit, knowing that his answer is going to be shit as well? Just ignore it Are you even reading the thread? I am answering it because Skanjabs promised results when everyone has answered it. If everyone answers it he must keep his promise and tell those results. I wanna see what he actually does with the answers and how he considers them to be useful. Because i can't see it, and i won't know it if people do not answer because of his bullshit "i won't tell you bitch". | ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 17 2014 00:45 raynpelikoneet wrote: So if i take one or two posts of yours where you don't say much can i say "Skanjabs has not contributed anything at all". Does that sound like i would not be twisting what has actually happened? That's a different scenario, because I was referring to the quotes I posted, whereas you would be referring to everything. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
On January 17 2014 00:50 Skanjab1s wrote: That's a different scenario, because I was referring to the quotes I posted, whereas you would be referring to everything. You literally fucking said "His contributions are all incredibly tentative, careful comments that make sure to not outright accuse anyone.". How am i supposed to read that? That's like quoting posts where someone defends themself and saying "this guy is not scumhunting". That's fucking twisting the facts. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
| ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On January 17 2014 00:46 Hopeless1der wrote: Listen, Toad is avoiding rayn's discussion and is promoting something that I find scummy. I don't know if Toad is scum or town. Asking him to do stuff is a way to discern his alignment. Finding an image macro is a more suitable representation of my attitude towards skanjabs questionnaire and rayn telling me I should answer it. I have taken stances. See my vote. See how Grack hasnt done a thing this game and no one gives a rats ass yet because "oh its soo super early its meaningless" bullshit. I'll just quote this but it's about this and the next one. I wasn't ignoring anything... it takes time to look up the quotes. Oh yeah and messed up about the quotes. Just got home, saw it, looked who answered it and only found rayn because I was looking for that pattern. My bad. Anyways will be gone now until later the evening. On January 17 2014 00:50 raynpelikoneet wrote: Are you even reading the thread? I am answering it because Skanjabs promised results when everyone has answered it. If everyone answers it he must keep his promise and tell those results. I wanna see what he actually does with the answers and how he considers them to be useful. Because i can't see it, and i won't know it if people do not answer because of his bullshit "i won't tell you bitch". I skimmed it real quick because in a hurry. apparently too quick, my bad. | ||
|
raynpelikoneet
Finland43268 Posts
That's what it is, not scumhunting and figuring out one's alignment. Now i am going to see if you were this stupid in Hogwarts game and if you were not you die. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
|
Skanjab1s
748 Posts
On January 17 2014 00:52 raynpelikoneet wrote: You literally fucking said "His contributions are all incredibly tentative, careful comments that make sure to not outright accuse anyone.". How am i supposed to read that? That's like quoting posts where someone defends themself and saying "this guy is not scumhunting". That's fucking twisting the facts. That's not the same thing, rayn. His contributions were tentative and careful. I'm not twisting anything. The fact that there is one accusatory post does not mean that all the careful posts suddenly cease to exist. I should have added "His contributions *here* are all incredibly tentative, careful comments" but I didn't predict the confusion. I can see where you're getting caught up, but this really shouldn't be that hard to understand. | ||
|
Hopeless1der
United States5836 Posts
| ||
| ||
