Really Small Mafia - Page 2

On January 10 2014 09:13 Mocsta wrote:
ohh. clearly not.

Well it wasn't x-1 anyways.

On January 10 2014 09:09 Alakaslam wrote:
Artanis[Xp], GGTeMpLaR, Mocsta

With 7 alive, it takes 4 to lynch.

On January 10 2014 18:58 Holyflare wrote:


Artanis is a dog at the moment and his vote on Derrida was kinda shit too because he didn't justify it and it was a +1. Meh. They can't all be scum ~_~ I can switch artanis for giggle or mocsta to be honest. It's early and there isn't enough for me to go on properly until I can talk to them or they actually participate in finding scooby and velma T_T!

On January 10 2014 18:01 Holyflare wrote:







These all fall under the same category of what you attribute to Deridadadadada being scum. Yet this guy has significantly more trolly posts inbetween and a substantially larger filter. Why is he not your target instead?

On January 10 2014 18:14 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I actually don't think GGTeMpLaR would go against all odds as scum and continuosly attack Derrida if he was scum.
##unvote

But don't you dare to tunnel him zizyo. I can tell you it's quite clear the dude is town.

On January 10 2014 20:35 Derrida wrote:
As I told you guys before, I am town. Please do not waste your precious time on analyzing my posts. Derrida confirmed town.

I am assuming two scums to put significant distance between each other. I am putting Holyflare as my #1 scum candidate

because the town does not gain anything from the Scooby Doo scheme and we have lost about 12 hours from its trolly fluff. This would be a win-win situation for the Mafia goons because: (1) town loses time and discussion is dulled; (2) the other scum will position himself in opposition of the game making it hard for townies to provide a clear read.

On January 10 2014 18:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:
IML = instant majority lynch.

So, who was it that took the most critical position towards Holyflare and setup? GGTemplaR. Just look at his filter and his conversations with Holyflare, I bet they are laughing their asses off in the scum quicktopic like we did last game.

Any way, based on my first game as scum, I am extremely sure that one of the scums are pro scoobydoo, and the other is anti. I ask all townies to consider this insight and provide their insights as to who they think could be scums in such a scenario.

On January 10 2014 22:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Look i try to explain. Holyflare's mini game is not a scum tell. You guys are calling it a scum tell because it distracts the thread while in fact it has promoted the most useful discussion there is. It started the scumhunting discussion. I don't know what thread you are reading if that's not your conclusion.

Besides that Holyflare has been one of the most productive and sharing players in this game. I know what his read on every player is, pretty much. Same can't be said about Giggletummy, Mocsta and Artanis (and to some extent you, although i believe you think other people are town besided HF/ziziyo).

Your reasoning for the connection theory is bad, because the original assumption / analysis is incorrect. Holyflare's mini game is not alignment indicative. There is no town/scum motive over the other for it. The results in itself prove it. If Holyflare kept on with his game and did nothing else and didn't play the actual mafia game then you could call him scum for not scumhunting, but that's not the case. In addition to that he is right in saying mafia does not want to bus. It might not be 100% correct assumption but taking completely different sides and calling each other mafia as mafia is the worst way to play this setup, just because mafia wins the game if they lynch 2 townies and if they bus on D1 they give the town 2 mislynches + 6 irl-days of extra time to figure out the game. It's a big nono.

Mafia does not want to call other mafia scum, at least this early in the game. The town credit they could claim is not enough to cover the risk of losing a member and giving town more time to solve the game. If you accuse your scumbuddy you know they are scum and your accusation is most likely correct (unless you want to make yourself look bad by saying stupid stuff). You risk losing a member for nothing, when you can just "try to figure out the game" and attack some poor townie, like i assume at least one mafioso is doing right now by attacking you. Because what you are saying makes very little sense. That does not however mean you are mafia.

Mocsta and Artanis should know better, i have no clue who Giggletummy is.

On January 11 2014 01:25 raynpelikoneet wrote:
So are you going to give your reads on Giggletummy

and Mocsta

or continue with this crap Artanis?

On January 11 2014 01:33 raynpelikoneet wrote:
##unvote:
##Vote: Artanis
In either way 2/3 of Artanis/Giggle/Mocsta are scum so i don't really care. No playing is not playing and should warrant a lynch.

On January 12 2014 07:12 Giggletummy wrote:
Artanis, sir, you rhyme quite well
But much on mocsta you do dwell.
Why care you 'bout his reads of scum
When this game he has been a bum?

Turn your verse to other names
What think you bout the man called rayn?
A scum before, but much he's typed
Do you still wish him set alight?

Derrida plays a different game
Than when in red we saw his name.
But Holyflare has got a point
And from this game D seems disjoint.

You wait for mocsta but I fear
He's made his thoughts on this game clear.
You think his reads will help your thoughts,
When on this game he's cast a pox?

On January 12 2014 09:05 Derrida wrote:
sorry about this small derail, but how long does that take you to put together Artanis? God damn continental European education system, I can't even write a poem in my native language let alone a second language.

On January 12 2014 09:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:

yeah he voted for Mocsta at the start of the game. Cool story. When Mocsta was in serious danger of being lynched he in fact did not want to vote for Mocsta.

On January 12 2014 09:23 raynpelikoneet wrote:

How does my Serial Killer meta differentiate from my town meta? Because it does not.

On January 12 2014 09:37 Holyflare wrote:


The fact you put the vote to L-1 must have meant you had the intent to lynch so why after his hammer did not go through do you suddenly want to ask him for stances on his posts instead of before the lynch?

On January 12 2014 09:48 Holyflare wrote:
Stop talking in verse right now if you are town or I will actually lynch you tomorrow.