EPT????
[I] [S] Shadow Mini Mafia - Page 113
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
???? | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
HF played weakly and his scum play is strong. Therefore his weak play is more likely to be town. I imagine he was somewhat intimidated by the playerlist. Lord knows I was. Why is it idiotic to call out both your scum buddies the same way as likely town for shit posting? Because jesus, once one of those guys flips we look back and go "oh hey look X said Y and Z were town for the same shitty reason. I bet X was full of shit, lets lynch Y and Z" | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On January 28 2014 23:45 marvellosity wrote: your reasoning is atrocious though nope. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 28 2014 23:46 Promethelax wrote: Why if HF's play likelier town? HF played weakly and his scum play is strong. Therefore his weak play is more likely to be town. I imagine he was somewhat intimidated by the playerlist. Lord knows I was. Why is it idiotic to call out both your scum buddies the same way as likely town for shit posting? Because jesus, once one of those guys flips we look back and go "oh hey look X said Y and Z were town for the same shitty reason. I bet X was full of shit, lets lynch Y and Z" Townies never say this. Because of the reasons you're bitching about. They think "oh we got the mafia from that part of the list" wifomwifomwifom | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On January 28 2014 23:42 marvellosity wrote: Lol. O.o Are you actually cancelling your whole case on that small bit of wifom? Is the rest of the case valid to the point where you like it more than the case against toad? | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On January 28 2014 23:52 austinmcc wrote: prome, what was the conspiracy theory you wanted to chat about? Any reason why you don't have a post this cycle? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 28 2014 23:48 kitaman27 wrote: Is the rest of the case valid to the point where you like it more than the case against toad? I don't think so. Although I've been a little bit tunnelvisioned on toad, which is part of the reason maybe. The post that Prome points out of austin waffling about Fool is kinda nasty. Mostly it's that i think prome is being dumb with that particular bit of reasoning. Tell me what you think, kita. Any issues I have with austin are of a more recent nature, regarding his activity/pushes. He was late to deciding on anything on day 1, which is fine, because he's right,he does always play like that. But he was late committing anything on day 2 as well (VE when VE was basically dead already) and he's late doing anything today. I swear he had the same length of filter as me at some point. | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On January 28 2014 23:52 austinmcc wrote: prome, what was the conspiracy theory you wanted to chat about? If fool and Sand are scum together who and why is the third scum and how does he work to look good from day one? This will lead into the theory. Play along. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On January 28 2014 23:54 kitaman27 wrote: Not a good one. I've been reading, but not posting.Any reason why you don't have a post this cycle? | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On January 28 2014 23:57 Promethelax wrote: If fool and sand are scum together and you're me and you throw out Toad as possible mafia, then the likeliest scum candidate is kita. Which you know, because you just read my filter.If fool and Sand are scum together who and why is the third scum and how does he work to look good from day one? This will lead into the theory. Play along. In that scenario, I don't think he has to work to make himself look good. He's got to look BETTER than other lynch alternatives, but it's LIKELY that in a sand/fool/+1 team, the +1 is the guy you're setting up for endgame. Foolishness almost got lynched on D1, has had relatively consistent pressure/votes/suspicion on him throughout the game, so I think all the +1 has to do is look better than the non-foolishness lynch candidates. I don't think he tries and distances or buddies Foolishness, because he doesn't really need to. He just has to not sink to the bottom of the questionable group, can lynch Foolishness if need be, and hope to ride things out til late-ish. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
| ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On January 28 2014 23:57 austinmcc wrote: Not a good one. I've been reading, but not posting. so why reply to my post from 18 hours ago now? | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On January 29 2014 00:01 austinmcc wrote: If fool and sand are scum together and you're me and you throw out Toad as possible mafia, then the likeliest scum candidate is kita. Which you know, because you just read my filter. In that scenario, I don't think he has to work to make himself look good. He's got to look BETTER than other lynch alternatives, but it's LIKELY that in a sand/fool/+1 team, the +1 is the guy you're setting up for endgame. Foolishness almost got lynched on D1, has had relatively consistent pressure/votes/suspicion on him throughout the game, so I think all the +1 has to do is look better than the non-foolishness lynch candidates. I don't think he tries and distances or buddies Foolishness, because he doesn't really need to. He just has to not sink to the bottom of the questionable group, can lynch Foolishness if need be, and hope to ride things out til late-ish. what if I'm not you and don't throw out toad? | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On January 29 2014 00:02 austinmcc wrote: marv, how do you connect prome's ego with the non-committal/committal stuff in foolishness's case? Just feeling like player caliber is high makes him less sure of things? yeah. Like Fool posts 3 posts of Promes with red stuff highlighted. First one is Prome's opinion, and the 2nd two look like Prome just weighing up gonzaw's read heavily because he trusts (+ respects) him. Prome might as well answer that thought process himself to be fair. | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
| ||
