• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:32
CEST 07:32
KST 14:32
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)10Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy4Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic7Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 9-15): herO doubles on GSL week0Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer12Classic & herO RO8 Interviews: "I think it’s time to teach [Rogue] a lesson."2Rogue & GuMiho RO8 interviews: "Lifting that trophy would be a testament to all I’ve had to overcome over the years and how far I’ve come on this journey.8Code S RO8 Results + RO4 Bracket (2025 Season 2)14
StarCraft 2
General
Nexon wins bid to develop StarCraft IP content, distribute Overwatch mobile game Rogue EWC 2025 Hype Video! Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025) Rain's Behind the Scenes Storytime Firefly suspended by EWC, replaced by Lancer
Tourneys
$5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 SOOP Starcraft Global #22 $3,500 WardiTV European League 2025
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] Darkgrid Layout
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 478 Instant Karma Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target
Brood War
General
ASL20 Preliminary Maps BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Recent recommended BW games FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu
Tourneys
[BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - WB Finals & LBR3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile Beyond All Reason What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
Vanilla Mini Mafia TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
UK Politics Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Echoes of Revolution and Separation
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
NHL Playoffs 2024 2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 31762 users

Resistance 3

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Normal
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-12-24 03:39:48
December 24 2013 03:38 GMT
#32
/in <3

This game is fucking awesome!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 24 2013 03:43 GMT
#33
This rule:
If the 4th suggested team is rejected, the 5th team suggested team will automatically be vetted and we will immediately move into night phase.

Isn't it supposed to be: "In case the proposed team gets rejected 5 times in a row spies automatically win the mission"?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-12-24 03:55:04
December 24 2013 03:50 GMT
#37
On December 24 2013 11:50 VisceraEyes wrote:
Because that would be too heavily spy favored imo on this medium. Forum is a little different from the standard face to face game. Ray was saying he plays it regularly IRL I'd like his opinion on the fifth day I guess.

Mission members: 3,4,4,5,5
Sabotages needed: 1,1,1,2,1

Also as someone said the idea is to raise the bar in every mission barring 2->3. Usually the game is REALLY close even if one team ends up winning 3-0.

You can't put 2 sabotages to the last mission because in case town wins missions 1 and 2, spies win 3 and 4 - town then knows 2 spies amongst the 5, they pick the rest 4 and strongest town read and easy win.

It has to be the setup i just said (for 9players). Anything else is unfair to one of the sides.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 26 2013 22:54 GMT
#60
oh yeah! I love this game <3

I'm off for ~2h, then let's play!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 26 2013 23:32 GMT
#69
Is the voting really non-anonymous? That's not how it usually is in resistance so just to clarify.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 00:07 GMT
#72
Resistance 2 had afaik the same mission details than this game but nvm. Just wanted a clarification.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 00:47 GMT
#74
Why would you ask that?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 00:48 GMT
#76
Hmm..i disagree with rayn about voting usually being anonymous. I guess my friends play with weird rules. I'm used to IRL voting where a choice is selected with a hidden tile and then revealed all at once, then votes are tallied and you know who voted for what and have that as information to analyze.

Yes this is exactly what i mean. Now the voting is different, like you would lay your choice on the table face up but you are allowed to change that. Usually the voting is done via PM's and then revealed when the phase is finished.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 01:13 GMT
#79
hmm.. okay.

Anyways Hopeless, you seem to have played Resistance. Why would you not have an opinion of if the leader should not pick themselves in any situation? I find it hard to believe tbh.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 01:23 GMT
#81
I don't want to go into specifics but i do not agree Hopeless. There are specific scenarios where not picking yourself is more beneficial than picking yourself.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 01:25 GMT
#82
Picking a team that will get 100% downvoted (if that includes yourself) does not serve any purpose.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 04:19 GMT
#97
So everybody is basically saying the same thing over and over again. There are 6 townies. If you exclude yourself there are 5 townies. Even the last missions require only max 5 people. You can select an all town team even if you exclude yourself. Therefore, in case you are considered not necessarily town and your team would be refused if you are in it, it's better to select other people. If you select a team which gets 8 nay votes, it tells us nothing. Voting patterns are the most important thing (obviously besides mission results) in this game because there are no flips.

Anyone who refuses to cooperate in mission selection as a leader and pushes through a selection that is doomed to get a fuckton of nay votes should not go a mission. That's what i think.

On December 27 2013 12:08 Chairman Ray wrote:
There are definitely situations where the leader would not put himself in. It would probably be best to analyse this case by case when these kinds of situations arise, because I always find that people suggesting sub-optimal teams, getting rejected, and letting the next good team pass gives more information than people doing the right play in the first place. We get information for why they chose the team, who approved the team, and who rejected it.

Anyways, other than Koshi who wants to be in, are there any other suggestions on who should be sent on the first mission? Since it's the first one, I'm alright with any team that goes in.

I think you are scum because of this. In 5 pl setup this works because it's actually better to pass the first mission as scum, in 9 pl setup this is different and not necessarily true. Seems to me like an attempt to stop the conversation before it even started.

CR - Does Koshi seem town to you? Why?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 04:58 GMT
#98
Corazon if you were a leader now would you send a team that does not include yourself?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 05:06 GMT
#100
Because you job as a leader is to send 3 townies on a mission. You knowing your alignment why would you not send yourself?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 05:16 GMT
#102
Why would we talk only about those people's alignment who are sent in the mission?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 05:25 GMT
#104
Oh god, i hope you drop that line of thinking if you are town. We are supposed to discuss everyone's alignment regardless of what the team leader is going to send. Strongest townreads should go, on D1 that means you should send yourself, because you are your strongest townread, and there is no concrete information of anyone's scumminess/towniness (i mean voting patterns & mission results to analyze).

Even if you have a weak townread on someone who is being put on the mission that does not mean you should automatically pass that without discussion, you need to suggest your strongest townreads. After D1 that somewhat changes but the first mission.. There is no reason to not nominate yourself if you are town, absolutely none.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 05:41 GMT
#106
Basically yes.
After D1 that somewhat changes.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 05:59 GMT
#109
On December 27 2013 14:48 Corazon wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2013 14:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Basically yes.
After D1 that somewhat changes.

Ok, I can compromise with you there. Of course I'm not picking first so I don't know what you mean by "I hope you stop thinking like this if you are town". No need to attack me for hypotheticals

I don't know if you have played Resistance before. What i do know is you are (were?) working on wrong mindset. I don't care if you continue that if you're scum, i do care if you continue doing that if you are town because it makes you scummy to me.

Make your own decisions and have your own opinions, disagree if you disagree. But if you do so i want you to reason yourself.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 06:02 GMT
#110
On December 27 2013 14:44 Chairman Ray wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2013 13:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:
So everybody is basically saying the same thing over and over again. There are 6 townies. If you exclude yourself there are 5 townies. Even the last missions require only max 5 people. You can select an all town team even if you exclude yourself. Therefore, in case you are considered not necessarily town and your team would be refused if you are in it, it's better to select other people. If you select a team which gets 8 nay votes, it tells us nothing. Voting patterns are the most important thing (obviously besides mission results) in this game because there are no flips.

Anyone who refuses to cooperate in mission selection as a leader and pushes through a selection that is doomed to get a fuckton of nay votes should not go a mission. That's what i think.

On December 27 2013 12:08 Chairman Ray wrote:
There are definitely situations where the leader would not put himself in. It would probably be best to analyse this case by case when these kinds of situations arise, because I always find that people suggesting sub-optimal teams, getting rejected, and letting the next good team pass gives more information than people doing the right play in the first place. We get information for why they chose the team, who approved the team, and who rejected it.

Anyways, other than Koshi who wants to be in, are there any other suggestions on who should be sent on the first mission? Since it's the first one, I'm alright with any team that goes in.

I think you are scum because of this. In 5 pl setup this works because it's actually better to pass the first mission as scum, in 9 pl setup this is different and not necessarily true. Seems to me like an attempt to stop the conversation before it even started.

CR - Does Koshi seem town to you? Why?


Why does not asserting for myself or a specific person to go on the first mission mean I'm scum? Is the logic that since scum will want to fail the first mission, then if I am town, I need to get into the mission to reduce the chances that there will be scum in there?

You are supposed to suggest an all town team, for every mission.
You don't seem to be giving any shits who goes onto a mission 1 and who doesn't. It's not only results and voting that wins the game, it's the discussion behind picks and people's responses on top of that.

What you said was basically "just pick some people who want to go on a mission and let's get over with it".
That's scummy.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 06:04 GMT
#111
Adam if you needed to decide the team now who'd you pick?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 06:44 GMT
#113
Exactly what do you not agree with?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 14:46 GMT
#133
Koshi could you elaborate more on the Hopeless/Grack/Adam thing? You seem to be thinking Adam and Grack are scum correct and they are trying to frame(?) Hopeless?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 15:03 GMT
#135
Grack why'd you be okay with me/Adam/Hopeless?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 18:10 GMT
#150
You send the most townie people on Day 1. But because I doubt that anybody can prove himself 100% town I suggest that the most active people/most respected people go on the first mission. Reasons have been stated.

And here you are clearly contradicting yourself. Koshi what the hell? Get your shit together if you are town. Most towniest people go, doesn't matter who they are.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 18:12 GMT
#151
I am very very puzzled why people are unwilling to send Hopeless. Atm there is nothing that for me implies he is scum, people use some bullshit reasoning for dismissing him from the team without even trying to figure out his alignment and i find that very very fishy.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 18:24 GMT
#153
On December 28 2013 03:18 Koshi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2013 03:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
You send the most townie people on Day 1. But because I doubt that anybody can prove himself 100% town I suggest that the most active people/most respected people go on the first mission. Reasons have been stated.

And here you are clearly contradicting yourself. Koshi what the hell? Get your shit together if you are town. Most towniest people go, doesn't matter who they are.

How?

Yoi say you want to send the most towniest people but you have already decided some people in the game can't possibly prove their towniness nor are you trying to figure out their alignment.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 20:11 GMT
#158
CR could you answer my question i asked you last night?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 21:16 GMT
#160
omfg what?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 21:25 GMT
#162
So what if everyone just stops talking and vote yes fo Adam's team (whatever it is)?
What can you tell us if there is 1 sabotage?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 21:27 GMT
#163
On December 27 2013 15:22 Chairman Ray wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 27 2013 15:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 27 2013 14:44 Chairman Ray wrote:
On December 27 2013 13:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:
So everybody is basically saying the same thing over and over again. There are 6 townies. If you exclude yourself there are 5 townies. Even the last missions require only max 5 people. You can select an all town team even if you exclude yourself. Therefore, in case you are considered not necessarily town and your team would be refused if you are in it, it's better to select other people. If you select a team which gets 8 nay votes, it tells us nothing. Voting patterns are the most important thing (obviously besides mission results) in this game because there are no flips.

Anyone who refuses to cooperate in mission selection as a leader and pushes through a selection that is doomed to get a fuckton of nay votes should not go a mission. That's what i think.

On December 27 2013 12:08 Chairman Ray wrote:
There are definitely situations where the leader would not put himself in. It would probably be best to analyse this case by case when these kinds of situations arise, because I always find that people suggesting sub-optimal teams, getting rejected, and letting the next good team pass gives more information than people doing the right play in the first place. We get information for why they chose the team, who approved the team, and who rejected it.

Anyways, other than Koshi who wants to be in, are there any other suggestions on who should be sent on the first mission? Since it's the first one, I'm alright with any team that goes in.

I think you are scum because of this. In 5 pl setup this works because it's actually better to pass the first mission as scum, in 9 pl setup this is different and not necessarily true. Seems to me like an attempt to stop the conversation before it even started.

CR - Does Koshi seem town to you? Why?


Why does not asserting for myself or a specific person to go on the first mission mean I'm scum? Is the logic that since scum will want to fail the first mission, then if I am town, I need to get into the mission to reduce the chances that there will be scum in there?

You are supposed to suggest an all town team, for every mission.
You don't seem to be giving any shits who goes onto a mission 1 and who doesn't. It's not only results and voting that wins the game, it's the discussion behind picks and people's responses on top of that.

What you said was basically "just pick some people who want to go on a mission and let's get over with it".
That's scummy.


I don't agree with that, but we can revisit this subject on day 2 if you want.

Anyway, we need to get some picks on the table. If Adam doesn't have any solid picks right now, we can throw some names on the table to discuss, and if Adam agrees, then he can put them up for a vote.



On December 27 2013 15:44 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Exactly what do you not agree with?

Please answer this. I just want to know what you disagree with, not why.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 22:59 GMT
#166
Yeah CR is scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 27 2013 23:07 GMT
#167
I think that's a good team Adam.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2013 00:14 GMT
#172
Corazon what's your read on CR?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2013 00:14 GMT
#173
also Adam are you here?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2013 00:43 GMT
#175
Corazon i think CR is giving out half-arsed opinions and not explaining them. I do not like that. I also do not like he is not willing to put any effort into figuring people's alignments on D1.

I would swap Adam with you, that would be my top team atm. I think VE is town too, but it's not a strong read. Adam is null for me. Koshi does not look too fancy, Grack & Sentinel are quite meh, haven't seen any strong opinions from them, and i think CR is scum for what i said.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2013 06:26 GMT
#182
So Adam why have you not yay voted your team?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2013 19:40 GMT
#196
I am voting Nay because of Adam's refusal to vote yay and to talk in general.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2013 19:56 GMT
#198
CR, why are you talking about spy strategies?
There are some people who have not played resistance and in case there are spies amongst them they are more likely to slip. No need to tell people how to play if they are spies.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2013 20:14 GMT
#200
What, it's not sure the mission will go, there are not 5 yay's.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2013 23:52 GMT
#214
Why didn't you tell that in the first place then? There is no reason to not answer when someone asks you something.
Who would you pick as the fourth member right now if you were to send in a 4 man team?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 28 2013 23:53 GMT
#216
I've consulted with a few people and I'm going to make everyone vote, regardless of their status of mission leader. As I have changed this rule on the fly, it will not take effect until after Day 1 ends. However, in the interest of documentation, I would like to request Adam to formally vote on the team thread.

You have already "voted yes" so why the sudden hesitation?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2013 01:28 GMT
#236
On December 29 2013 09:39 Adam4167 wrote:
Sentinel, if you could change your vote, would you switch it?

Rayn, same question to you

No i wouldn't. I don't trust you, especially after your comment on the top of the current page.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2013 01:30 GMT
#237
On December 29 2013 09:08 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2013 09:03 Adam4167 wrote:
On December 29 2013 08:53 Grackaroni wrote:
On December 29 2013 08:46 Adam4167 wrote:
Rayn, don't be thick. I asked the host if my submission of the team counted as a yay from me, he said yes, so there was no reason for me to vote.

When I went to bed there were 3 yes votes and no one was contesting my team, so what was I to discuss? I'm not going to bark at the people that have voted yes, their votes are in, and they've already done their bit. For everyone else, I was waiting for them to bring their objections to the thread to discuss with them. If they had no objections, there was nothing to discuss and they'd vote yes.

The level of resistance this team is facing is what I'd expect from an all town team. I'll almost certainly vote yes, but we've got 4 hours still, may as well use it to discuss.

Level of resistance? The team has already passed lol.


Only just by the looks of it. 5-4 is all i'd expect from a town team. If it had gone over in a landslide, then I'd know i'd fucked up.

well, Rayn is on the team. so that vote isn't indicative of scum wanting to down vote an all town team. I'd guess VE is probably more interested in making his own team.

Basically this. This is a good post.
Me nay-voting is definitely not a "+" for saying "i think this is an all-town team".
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2013 18:20 GMT
#282
VE don't pick a team yet. I'm having a dinner and after that i'll give my thoughts on everything so far.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2013 18:22 GMT
#283
Oh shit you aready did that... Anyways, you'll hear me more in an hour.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2013 20:48 GMT
#289
[UoN]Sentinel - Had a clear stance on the question "should the leader always pick themselves". Didn't leave any room for himself to change his mind later on regarding that. Points towards town. I do not know why he liked Koshi / Adam early on, i certainly did not share the feeling. I do not like this post:
On December 28 2013 12:13 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
Hopeless is talking with more sense and clarity that I can conjure up, and his posts do seem a lot more complete than what I saw in my quick browse of his LXIII filter.

I like Adam calling out Koshi as well instead of just hopping on board with everyone else (including me). In some way this makes me think he carefully thought out his team. I trust him and I trust his view on Hopeless. Rayn's been stepping up as our chief discussion leader so I trust him too. I'm okay with this mission.

Voting yay

I like what Sentinel says about Hopeless, and i like what he says about Adam calling out Koshi. The problem is earlier on Koshi was a strong candidate for Sentinel's pick if was to pick a team. Why did you change your mind on Koshi? Another problem with the post is what Sentinel did - he yay-voted amongst the first people for Adam's team. Now he is "holding judgement" on VE's team, when in fact it should be easier to vote in a way or another, as he is one of the teammembers, he has to judge only 2 people, not 3. Explain that Sentinel. Also again, here he says Koshi and VE are shaky, why?

VisceraEyes - VE seems to be thinking i am town but at some point i am not any more of his top picks, and somehow me + Hopeless are swapped with Sentinel + Cora. Why? I also get the feeling VE is laid back and playing more with a reactionary playstyle rather than being pro-active. Is there any reason for that VE? You yourself said this game is more about town hunting than scum hunting, which is true, i don't get the feeling you are trying to find out if people are town or not, and it bothers me. On the other hand his posts are clear and the point comes across easily for me, nothing too suspicious about VE besides his lack of pro-activiness and him picking the team almost immediately when he had 24h.

Adam4167 - I really do not like the fact Adam down-voted his own team, which in his opinion should be all town as he picked it. I would like him to fully explain the thoguht process behind doing so. To me it makes no sense he first says "ofc ima vote yay", then argues that the team is all town when it meets resistance and proceeds on down-voting it.

Corazon - He looks fairly town to me. I do not think he has played Resistance before and still he was fearless giving his opinions on how people should act in certain situations. While i think his opinions were wrong i think it strongly points towards him being town. He is also being pro-active in sharing his reads and asking people's opinions on things. I still would love to hear more on his reasoning behind his reads.


Chairman Ray - I really really did not like him discussing spy strategies. Like he told "there is something need to talk about after missions", then when people asked him why, it seemed to me he went defensive and gave people what they wanted. While the information he gave out was correct, it was something that should not be given out imo. Spies can't communicate outside the thread and if CR is a spy he just told his scummates how to play. That's fishy. He's been more talking about strategy than actual reads, does anyone know who CR thinks is town/scum? Because i don't. I also did not like his "it doesn't matter who we send on the first mission so let's just get over with it". That's entirely incorrect.

Grackaroni - Grack has had some good points on things, mainly on the nay-votes on Adam's team proposal. I can't really tell his alignment in a way or another as he has only commented on things i find to be quite small and i can't figure out what agenda he is trying to push. Need to hear more from him.

Koshi - I don't like Koshi's heuristics. At all. To me it seems like he wants to sit behind some principles like "let's send the most active players" to not having to contribute on people's alignments with real arguments. That's definitely a wrong way to play this game. Especially D1 in Resistance is not much different from Mafia, besides that town-hunting is more beneficial than scumhunting. Not doing either of them is really bad. I would like to hear his reasoning for his reads, not like he does it now ("if these people are town then good - we should send them to find out"), but rather like ("i think these people are town for XYZ, that's why we should send them"). Right now Koshi seems to be working backwards and that's really worrying.

Hopeless1der - Hopeless seems really pro-active in comparsion to other games i have played with him. I like Hopeless' posts, he seems to be thinking alike me. Hopeless one question, why did you yay-vote Adam's team as he was null for you?



That's pretty much all i have to say atm. I would like people to answer my concerns so i can tell you how we win this game after that.

I am not voting yet and i advice others to do so aswell, we have time, there is no need to rush as it costs as valuable discussion time.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2013 20:50 GMT
#291
Since you ninja'd me Hopeless, i see you disagree with me on Cora, so, what exactly is your read on Cora and why?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2013 21:19 GMT
#297
On December 30 2013 06:05 Koshi wrote:
Koshi has already commented on people their alignments with real arguments. Why do you suggest I am trying to play without doing that? I clearly am giving reads and probably am within the top 3 of people giving reads on everything.

VisceraEyes/Corazon is my scumteam atm. Can't shake the feeling and I had it for a long time now. I said why already. + now there is a scumslip.

Show nested quote +
On December 30 2013 05:41 Hopeless1der wrote:
Koshi who do you plan to send for your team?

Koshi, Not VE, Not Cora

No Koshi, you havn't given any reads.
Only things that could be considered as reads are in this post of yours:
+ Show Spoiler +
On December 29 2013 07:19 Koshi wrote:
Cora going after me so soon was cute, but now he is too invested in it for no reason. I was not getting elected or was elected and Cora is already making plans to not let me go on mission 2 & 3. There is no townie reason for that. He kept blackening my name with his joke "pulling a Koshi".

VE was playing it cool. Staying in the back, I thought he was gathering reads and not letting the scummers feel his presence at first. VE even made the comment "even when I am not elected I can still give good reads", but after adam made his team. VE came into the picture and instantly undermined Adam without touching the team, no townie reason for that. The follow up reads VE gave was null on adam. Nothing at all on rayn and Hopeless. Town on Cora and Sentinel. Which doesnt make sense, if Adam is nullish and the biggest problem in that team. Then VE has already townreads on rayn, Hopeless, Cora and Sentinel. Pretty strong stuff. But VE is not that confident at all in his post, he should be pushing a nay vote from everybody and be captain himself, pick his reads and own this game for town. But he isn't, he is still unsure about what to do when his team gets through and he will have to pick sabotage or not. VE is scum. Pretty sure about him.

CR is town for spilling all the information. I am a guy that hasnt played resistance yet and I feel CR his information is helping me. Unless CR is teamed with 2 noobies there is no reason for him to be noobfriendly. Sadly people are thinking I am scum so this is looking like exactly the thing CR as scum would do to help me but nope. I am not scum.
CR is being neutral atm. Neutral is good. VE pretended to be neutral at start but wasnt after first team got out. Cora is pushing me (town) out of mission 1-3.

Read on VE is somewhat understandable, reads on Cora and CR are not.
Cora trying to figure out your alignment is a scumtell? Why?
Read on CR is crap for what i have stated already. "Spilling the beans" is a scumtell in Resistance because of no out thread comm for spies. Does it make CR scum? Not necessarily, but it definitely does not make him town.

All other reads you have given are some arbitary teams you suggest and then you tell what me might learn if the mission with those people will fail/succeed. That's not giving reads, that's working backwards. I can point out ~10 exmples from your filter if you want to argue about this.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2013 21:26 GMT
#299
Okay i am pretty sure Hopeless is town. That answer was what i was looking for.

However i disagree with you on Koshi, the way he is working is not correct and does not make him town. He constantly uses reasoning like "if these people are town then good", "if the mission fails then.." when discussing teams. That's not how you should play. You give reads, pick townies, and then re-evaluate if the mission fails. Picking someone / not picking someone because "if the mission fails then what?" is a wrong way to work, that's not reasoning that makes someone town/scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2013 21:37 GMT
#301
On December 30 2013 06:26 Hopeless1der wrote:
I didn't actually state my read of Cora: I'd call him a spy at the moment.
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2013 08:38 Corazon wrote:
After looking at Hopeless again, I really do like his posts. His contributions have been very excellent and I don't mind his nomination at all.

I'm also okay with Rayn and Adam as nominations. I want to hear some more questioning and activity from everyone b/c the only scum/spy read I have right now is Koshi.

This felt way too easy of a +1 without any critical thought behind it. I didn't like this post. Combined with associative I think Koshi is town -> Therefore Cora scum.

And then you make this terrible post.. Ugh..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 29 2013 21:43 GMT
#303
That sounds like a reasonable explanation VE.
So you think me, Hopeless, Cora and Sent are town right?
What abbout the rest of the people, who are scum and who would you say is the last townie?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 30 2013 18:55 GMT
#323
VE elaborate more on your last statement about Adam. Was Adam your scumread at that time and if he was/wasn't how does that change your read on him now or does it?

Please other people, come in and play as well. D1 is a crucial part of this game and i really do want an all town team to go. This is dumb atm because noone is playing ffs.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 30 2013 19:47 GMT
#325
Sent what do you think of Adam's statement about VE?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 30 2013 19:59 GMT
#327
I meant more like what does it say about Adam?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 30 2013 20:07 GMT
#329
I think it's really likely that Adam is town based on that. This line...
If your scum team is correct, then why did both Koshi and Chairman Ray vote yay yesterday?

...is exactly the kind of behavior you should bee looking & questioning in Resistance games if you are town. That's probably one of the best posts in thread.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 30 2013 20:10 GMT
#332
I mean, In VE's reads the team Adam suggested is all town (or rather - all non-scum, since Adam was null to VE). It makes very little sense for VE's scumreads to yay-vote an all town team and i think VE should have realized this and changed his reads based on votes. He only brings up Adam MAYBE being mafia instead of Grack after Adam asks him about it.

If he was town he should have made conclusions right after the team got nay-voted. Also if Adam is scum, and VE's reads are otherwise correct, why would Adam nay-vote his own team, there would be scum in it?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 30 2013 20:15 GMT
#334
So does him nay-voting his own team change your opinion on him in any way?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 30 2013 20:21 GMT
#336
Okay, so you think it's WIFOM? I understand that's a possibility but i just wanna know what you think and why.

About the discussion point. I think that's the most WIFOM'y thing discussed on D1 and all the people who discussed it should be under scrutiny. Nay-voting a team especially on D1 because "you want more discussion" is an easy way for scum to hide behind if the proposed team is all town. If the team is all town and you think so, you should be yay-voting it because the point is to pass teams that are all town. If people nay-vote because they "want more discussion" that actually kills the discussion because the votes are not because of reads but something else, you can't tell the real motivation or mkae conclusions about people's reasons.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 30 2013 20:26 GMT
#338
Yeah that's true and i would like to hear more from Adam. Like really hear about why he downvoted the team (as i said in my big post).
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 30 2013 20:29 GMT
#340
Yes this post from him:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=439135&currentpage=16#311

Doesn't really answer my question. He's doing what Koshi is doing, working backwards. At least based on this.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 30 2013 20:30 GMT
#341
Exactly VE. Just what you said in your last post.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 30 2013 20:31 GMT
#342
God i would really hope Adam would come here and talk so i could make something out of this mess. I have really mixed feelings on him atm..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 30 2013 20:36 GMT
#344
On December 31 2013 05:32 VisceraEyes wrote:
What do you think about Hopeless's problem with me rayn? I have a hard time remaining objective looking at it for obvious reasons.

I understand his point about you proposing a team almost immediately when you had 24 hours. I think it's a legit concern, i had the exact same feeling when i saw you just proposed a team without any discussion.

Is there something else you want me to answer about him? That's pretty much all i can remember him talking about you.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 30 2013 20:46 GMT
#346
On December 31 2013 05:40 VisceraEyes wrote:
Well for starters, I selected my team 12 hours into the day after the first 12 hours had been a black hole of inactivity. So no, I didn't almost immediately pick a team, I was just one of the first to post after the day was started. Why am I suspicious because the entire game is absent from the thread?

You could have waited the other 12h before picking your team and asked people to te talk. Like say "i am thinking of picking a team with X, Y and Z. I am gonna submit the team in X hours if people do not give opinions about it so i want everyone to elaborate".

Can you see it from my perspective. I am the last leader. That does not bother me so much as i don't really care if i get to pick a team or not. But if i don't i want everyone to elaborate on their POSSIBLE teampicks and other people to give their thoguhts about the teams. That's how you FORCE people to give out reads and imo it's more beneficial to get info from all the players regarding a team that's not proposed yet. After that the leader can act accordingly based on answers and we get more info on them too.

Now, all we got is that you think Sentinel and Cora are town. Hell you could have even lied about your reads on me and Hopeless, who is to say you were really truthful in those reads as you did not nominate us while saying so?

Do you get my point? It's about clarity and making desicions based on actual information and not the other way around - making desicions and then seeing what it brings you. This is a team game after all.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 30 2013 20:52 GMT
#347
For example:

At the start of the game this would be a comparsion to a normal mafia game:
Koshi: "Let's randomly assume good players like rayn and VE are town and if they lynch wrong people then lynch them"
CR: "Let's random lynch someone and then see who voted what and make conclusions about it".

That's not ho it works. As i said, especially D1 is like normal mafia, you are just more town hunting than scumhunting. But the main point stands, you discuss things with people and make conclusions about the discussions and THEN you make desicions in proposing teams and what to vote on proposed teams.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 30 2013 22:46 GMT
#350
So seriously, where the fuck is everyone?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 31 2013 04:11 GMT
#386
well fuck.. i would have voted nay either way.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 31 2013 04:13 GMT
#387
sorry hosts.. :/
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 31 2013 19:29 GMT
#426
Koshi i think your case on VE is pretty good barring some things i don't think are alignment indicative.
I also think your list of possible picks is pretty good, although i am still on the fence with Adam and Grack. I would not send either of them. I can go with you + Hopeless + me.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 31 2013 19:29 GMT
#427
Koshi do you want ot 100% send yourself?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 31 2013 19:55 GMT
#430
I think what you said about CR is quite accurate in a way that it does not make sense you both are scum. I don't think CR's absence points towards him being town, because as i said it's a way of denying information.

If you wanna send me + you + Hopeless i am okay with it. But please, do not pick the team yet if you are able to do it later, i want to hear what other people have to say about it aswell.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 31 2013 20:07 GMT
#432
On January 01 2014 05:05 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
How would town CR be able to steer town to victory if he's viewed as a suspicious person? All of his stuff about spy strats was construed as him trying to give the team some pointers. If he's town, real scummers would have an easy time twisting his words while they control the majority of town sentiment.

Scum CR, if Mission 1 fails, could adopt the same i-told-you-so reasoning as town CR. I think an experienced player would have no problem shifting the game... he was even talking about how spies would use WIFOM in their voting to scare town into picking new teams.

I'll probably bump him up to null-scum until I see his D2 play in earnest though.

That's the point. Did you read Koshi's post? Either way, if CR is scum at the moment he is helping the town with his attitude as he can't oppose all town team. If he is town he is helping scum by looking like non-town as he is not helping.

Funny but that's how i see it.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 31 2013 20:08 GMT
#433
It's a bold play if he is scum but on the other hand it's quite stupid if he is town as more information = always better for the town and right now he isn't giving us anything.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
December 31 2013 20:24 GMT
#441
Koshi you should listen to Snetinel's piano song when scumhunting.
I tried it in Titanic II and found many scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 02 2014 10:24 GMT
#519
I have a fucking bad feeling about this. There are no nay-votes..
Either scum are intentionally letting an all-town team to go for some reason, or there is scum in the team.

Not that the votes at this point matter any more, everything after the first 5 votes tell us nothing (and that's why the voting system is usually by PM's/anonymous until results)..

Koshi, what's this talk about PMing the hosts?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 02 2014 10:40 GMT
#521
We'll talk more about this after the results.
What do you think about the votes?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 02 2014 10:48 GMT
#523
Yes it is.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 02 2014 11:19 GMT
#526
I really have no idea what's going on in this game atm. Just about everyone had a scum read on you Koshi and when i say i am okay with you in the team everyone suddenly yay-votes the team.

I hope i am wrong and scum were just terrified or wtf ever and too sacred to vote nay, but we'll see about that.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 02 2014 13:13 GMT
#528
And why exactly is that scummy?
Do you think scum just let the mission with 3 townies just pass without a single piece of resistance?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 02 2014 14:56 GMT
#533
The thing that scummers could/should have done (wanted to see if rayn would figure it out because it is strange he didn't) is to suggest a team without attracting too much attention.

Elaborate on this please. I have no idea what you mean by this.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 02 2014 20:25 GMT
#538
Koshi. This post:
On January 01 2014 05:15 Koshi wrote:
Hmm. Looks like rayn/Hopeless/Koshi has already passed with 5 votes if we got Sentinel vote of approval.

Who are the 5 people who will pass the mission and why at this point?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 02 2014 21:05 GMT
#541
VE what do you think of what i talked with Koshi earlier? Also who would you send right now if you were the leader?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 02 2014 21:11 GMT
#544
Hey Coag, if you're town we'd need 3 more townies for town victory. Who'd they be?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 02 2014 21:20 GMT
#547
Oh shit i totally forgot CR. I could not ffs find the fifth person that you were talking about and thought it could be scum communication.

I was trying to find something that makes sense from the thread after you made the case on VE and we talked about it and other stuff. I still can't understand why the hell suddenly after that, everyone just yay-votes the team with zero discussion. Even VE, who had you as a scumread and really the only thing you talked about was your case on him.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 02 2014 22:51 GMT
#564
Interesting. Please elaborate Grack.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 02 2014 23:01 GMT
#567
No that's not how the game works. If town passes mission 1 they have to only find 1 more townie in the next 2 missions to win, that's a pain in the ass for scum. Spies do not want to let the first mission go through at any cost if the have a slightest clue what they are doing.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 02 2014 23:15 GMT
#569
I honestly see no reason for CR to be town. The guy promised somehintg i thought was mindblowing on D2 based on his posts and all he came up with is "I am working on Cora & Hopeless scumteam".
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 02 2014 23:45 GMT
#575
I have absolutely no idea how you come to that conclusion Grack.
Because Koshi voted yay on the first mission one of me/Hopeless is scum? What the fuck?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 00:46 GMT
#580
On January 03 2014 09:06 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 03 2014 08:45 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I have absolutely no idea how you come to that conclusion Grack.
Because Koshi voted yay on the first mission one of me/Hopeless is scum? What the fuck?

No what I am saying is that the first mission would have been sabotaged. There could easily be an Adam/Koshi scum team as well.

Basically one of you/hopeless/koshi has to be scum, and if it's not one of you/hopeless then Koshi is scum and he reversed his read on hopeless to upvote a team. Koshi wouldn't go out of his way as scum to help an all town team pass because, as you have previously stated, that is not how this game works.

Ahh okay, i get it now. Yes, i think it's a fair assumption. So what does that tell you?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 09:21 GMT
#590
Right now i have a feeling that at least Hopeless is scum from the 1st mission. Here's my reasoning:

Hopeless' read on Koshi and Corazon and it's evolvement:
On December 30 2013 06:19 Hopeless1der wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 30 2013 05:59 Corazon wrote:
Hopeless, do you think Koshi is town and why

Yes, and I don't remember exactly why. Something about how he's trying to convert mafia knowledge to resistance knowledge and his appealing to veterans to guide the way for us made me think he had an idea of a plan that would push town in the right direction, even if he had nothing to do with finding that right direction.

Show nested quote +
On December 30 2013 05:50 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Since you ninja'd me Hopeless, i see you disagree with me on Cora, so, what exactly is your read on Cora and why?

There were points against koshi about how he wasnt trying to discern alignments. Cora is doing the same thing with Koshi, but worse, he's actively discrediting him. Koshi was assuming I just wouldnt post much and that sending me on a mission was a losing endeavor because even if we succeed you get little benefit from having me "confirmed" since I wouldn't do much with it. Cora is telling people to ignore Koshi because he's trolling too much and wont allow him a word in edgewise.

Show nested quote +
On December 30 2013 06:10 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
On December 30 2013 06:05 Koshi wrote:
I said why already. + now there is a scumslip.

I for one remain unconvinced there was any scumslip there.

I think koshi is more likely to be town for thinking its a scumslip though, regardless of if there really is one.





@Rayn's question from list post
Show nested quote +
Hopeless one question, why did you yay-vote Adam's team as he was null for you?
Probably a similar reason that Koshi was willing to consider Yay'ing VE's team if he commited to a townread on you: It was worth risking a failed mission to "confirm" a spy.

In my case, Adam was a statistical tossup as first leader. I looked at his suggesting-a-team post and thought it was more likely he was town than scum, but in the same breath second guessed myself into calling him null. I think I have a good read on you. If we failed our mission, I'd be convinced Adam was the spy. That information is worth the failed early mission to me.

This is when VE proposes his team. Hopeless reads Koshi as town for "some reason he does not remember". He also says Corazon is playing quite similarly to Koshi but that Cora is trying to discredit Koshi. This in itself is not alignment indicative (at least on scummy side) but watch on what happens next:
On December 30 2013 06:26 Hopeless1der wrote:
I didn't actually state my read of Cora: I'd call him a spy at the moment.
Show nested quote +
On December 28 2013 08:38 Corazon wrote:
After looking at Hopeless again, I really do like his posts. His contributions have been very excellent and I don't mind his nomination at all.

I'm also okay with Rayn and Adam as nominations. I want to hear some more questioning and activity from everyone b/c the only scum/spy read I have right now is Koshi.

This felt way too easy of a +1 without any critical thought behind it. I didn't like this post. Combined with associative I think Koshi is town -> Therefore Cora scum.

Associative read that makes no sense this way. You can make associative reads (and in Resistance you have to) but they work another way around, if someone is scum you can deduce someone else must be town (is some cases). You however can't say someone is town - therefore someone is scum, as townies accuse each other all the time.

This is also a clarification on Hopeless' read on Koshi/Cora, and it gives him a reason to nay-vote VE's team.

Later on Hopeless calls VE scum (that's something i don't find relevant in this case though, but worth mentioning) and again says he found Cora scummy for other reasons than association with Koshi. He never explains those reasons fully.

Then there is some back and forth with Hopeless/Corazon where they call each other scum for stupid reasons. Nothing alignment indicative there imo.

Team VE fails, and Koshi becomes a leader and starts discussing his team. Now here is an important post:
On January 01 2014 07:00 Hopeless1der wrote:
So guys...rayn/cora/hopeless

Who needs convincing?

This is BEFORE Koshi has chosen his team. Hopeless has already taken a stance where Cora is town and Koshi is (apparently?) not. Or both Koshi and Cora are town? I really don't know what to think. The important piece of information to be drawn is Hopeless already knows where this is going (most likely to a team him/rayn/Koshi), it's quite evident he is already playing the next phase in case the team goes through, and when a sabotage happens.

Think about it. On D3 (in case Koshi's educatedly guessed team Koshi/Hopeless/rayn goes on a mission) Hopeless needs someone to be scum. That someone needs to be rayn/Koshi. I think it's obvious he is pre-emptively trying to cover all bases and his future thought process, otherwise this sudden change of mind on Koshi<->Cora read makes no sense as Cora's posting hasn't changed one bit from what it has been all game. Cora's reads have not changed, Cora's posting style has not chaged, there is no reason Hopeless should consider him any townier than before at this point.
On January 01 2014 07:39 Hopeless1der wrote:
Cora's brain can't seem to handle the possibility that someone considers him scum. But he's probably town. And a self-centered drama queen.

And again, before the mission. Why?

This is during the voting phase:
On January 02 2014 08:47 Hopeless1der wrote:
add cora for flawless victory grack

Both Koshi and Corazon are town. I can only ask why? Hopeless has never explained this change of heart in his reads on these fellas and in the first place the read was moslty based on association. When this association no longer benefits him ti's completely dropped.

After the mission fails Hopeless posts (as assumed) this:
On January 03 2014 06:21 Hopeless1der wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 03 2014 06:20 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Oh shit i totally forgot CR. I could not ffs find the fifth person that you were talking about and thought it could be scum communication.

I was trying to find something that makes sense from the thread after you made the case on VE and we talked about it and other stuff. I still can't understand why the hell suddenly after that, everyone just yay-votes the team with zero discussion. Even VE, who had you as a scumread and really the only thing you talked about was your case on him.

I conclude Koshi is the spy.

He has concluded Koshi is spy. Why? There is no explanation, just a quote of my post. Does he have a stronger town read on me? If so, why?


TLDR;
Why i think Hopeless is a spy:
  • Throughout the game he has a lot of unexplained reads (mainly Koshi and Corazon)
  • His reasoning for his read on Corazon changes without real reasoning and pre-emptively in a manner that can only be explained from spy perspective
  • Him townreading me over Koshi is weird and does not really make sense as it seems like he hasn't never really given any thought on those reads. Before Koshi's mission Hopeless was pretty sure about Koshi being town and he just said "rayn needs to go on 1st mission" without really having a read on me at all, or explaining it. It seems like he's just having me as a strong townie to buddy with and therefore blame the sabotage on Koshi.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 09:31 GMT
#591
Holy fucking shit.
This just struck me:

Team 2
Current Leader: VisceraEyes

Current Vote Count:
Koshi: Nay
Hopeless1der: Nay
Corazon: Yay
[UoN]Sentinel: Yay
Chairman Ray: Yay
Adam4167: Nay
VisceraEyes: Yay
Grackaroni: Nay
raynpelikoneet: Not voting *said he would nay*

Team: VisceraEyes, [UoN]Sentinel, Corazon

Can it be this easy?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 09:33 GMT
#592
This would make perfect sense given Grackaroni is attacking me after Koshi's mission based on "gut feeling". After fail mission it's better for scum to attack different people, as you don't even care if one of your teammates get bussed as you wanna have eggs in every basket.

I have no idea why Grackaroni would attack me after Koshi's mission with literally no reasoning unless he is spy.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 09:41 GMT
#594
Well why don't you tell then what makes more sense, preferrably with something to back that up..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 09:51 GMT
#596
On January 03 2014 18:45 Grackaroni wrote:
I don't really get what you are saying in the first place. Sentinel is trying to get me off the mission and it makes sense for scum to spread their targets so he must be scum. Doesn't that make perfect sense?

For one thing you assume that the majority of townies are derps and upvoted the first mission which would have been a sabotage. You also assume that I forced Adam to down vote a passing mission for the fuck of it.

Having 2 scum on 1st mission has it's advantages and disadvantages. Having 1 scum however is easier to play off in case you do not know how to play it after that. I don't think up/down-voting the first (Adam's) mission has a lot to do with alignments in a sense that i don't think all scum were on the same side (as in voting yay or nay).

Or what exactly are you trying to say?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 10:01 GMT
#598
There is a difference because i don't think Koshi's mission had 2 scum and Adam's had.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 10:01 GMT
#599
Adam was basically forced to pick the team he picked in case he wanted to pick himself. That's quite obvious if you look at the thread at that time.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 10:09 GMT
#601
On January 03 2014 19:05 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 03 2014 19:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:
There is a difference because i don't think Koshi's mission had 2 scum and Adam's had.

And I would have picked Hopeless/Koshi if Koshi's mission got passed over.

You mean rejected? It's irrelevant what you say you would have picked because it didn't happen. Anyone can say anything they "would do" if something that didn't happen would have happened. That's not really good reasoning.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 10:18 GMT
#604
Well Mr.Grackaroni, explain this:
On December 27 2013 21:48 Grackaroni wrote:
Adam/Hopeless/Rayn sounds pretty good.

Nothing here suggests a change in your reads.
Grackaroni: Nay
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 10:22 GMT
#605
Because let's be honest here. I was easily the towniest person in thread when Adam chose his team. I pressured him to tell me what team he would pick in case he had to pick it instantly (before he picked the team). Nobody made good posts after that and at that moment he had a strong(?) townread on Hopeless.

What exactly were his chances of changing his mind after giving me his team proposition of him/me/Hopeless as noone posts townie stuff unless he wants to out himself in case he is scum?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 10:29 GMT
#608
On January 03 2014 19:26 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 03 2014 19:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Because let's be honest here. I was easily the towniest person in thread when Adam chose his team. I pressured him to tell me what team he would pick in case he had to pick it instantly (before he picked the team). Nobody made good posts after that and at that moment he had a strong(?) townread on Hopeless.

What exactly were his chances of changing his mind after giving me his team proposition of him/me/Hopeless as noone posts townie stuff unless he wants to out himself in case he is scum?

Why was he giving a town read on hopeless in the first place if he is so strongly against putting 2 scum on the mission?

Because i pressured him to tell me who would he pick now in case he had to. Jesus, are you not reading at all?
Hopeless' posting was also really good during the time it was Adam's mission pick.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 10:31 GMT
#609
On January 03 2014 19:24 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 03 2014 19:18 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Well Mr.Grackaroni, explain this:
On December 27 2013 21:48 Grackaroni wrote:
Adam/Hopeless/Rayn sounds pretty good.

Nothing here suggests a change in your reads.
Grackaroni: Nay

I don't think looking for filter consistency is the right way to go about scum hunting in general. If I want my filter to be consistent I can make it consistent. I liked both you/hopeless but not enough to yay vote the first mission. I was going to nay vote any mission the first few days regardless of the team because there was only like 20 pages of thread.

Filter consistency is the only way to scumhunt because if your filter is not consistent then you are scum as you change your mind based on nothing - something you don't do as town.

What do you suggest is how to scumhunt then?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 10:39 GMT
#610
On December 31 2013 20:49 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 31 2013 20:34 Koshi wrote:
On December 31 2013 20:18 Grackaroni wrote:
hmmmm. I'm not sure. I do seem to have dug some sort of a whole for myself by not posting. You too see to be making some enemies. Perhaps we should team up. Team Grackoshi Go GRACKOSHHI!

Sounds epic. I am planning to pick up my game now, so let's be a well respected Grackoshi team. I thought this game would move way faster and that we would have a team ready to go in 48 hours. Therefore I went a bit chicken without head & fingers crossed and just spammed to take me on the first mission. Sillyness :D.

Concern I now have:

1) Corazon never talking directly to me. He mentions Koshi a shitton in his filter, but never redirect his questions to me personally. It's all "Koshi needs to pick up his game" "If Koshi is going to troll" "I will not be considering Koshi his team at all"

Which is just strange. I have been reading BttB mafia, Titanic 1 & 2 and he doesn't do that there at all. This game he mentions my playstyle so many times and I don't think there is 1 message directed at me. But because there is no meta to compare it to it is just simply strange and not alignment indicative I guess.

I do have some posts that make Cora town though. Those are for later when I make my teams and give overall reads.


2) What do you think of Adam nay voting his own team + his reasoning behind it. I could see a VE or Cora say that because CR and I instantly voted "yay" that they get extra hesitant about adam, hopeless or rayn. But Adam (and rayn as well tbh) should not have this problem that much because they know from themselves that they are town. So then they only need to verify 2 more townies. It speaks in both Adam, rayn their favor that they blame each other for the nayvote though.

rayn says he nayvoted because Koshi&CR yayvoted and he became unsure about Adamn.
Adam says he nayvoted because Koshi&CR yayvoted and he became unsure about rayn.

I think I need to reread it again but atm I am thinking Adam might have been thinking that if he yayvotes with Hopeless and rayn being very townie that he will be seen as the spy in the mission if he decide to fail it. Or he is forced to succeed it but then he might confirm both Hopeless and rayn as very likely town and he might fall out of the boat.


Hmm. I don't know yet.

Ah yes. the nay vote of Adam. A peculiar event it was. He just seemed oh so confident of his team before people started wondering why the vote was so easily passed. If that vote failed he was definitely taking the blaiM! Hehe. I'm really not sure though. Mafia is hard. If he was town though I think he made the right call. Good play by ADAM!

Who you putting on your team this time Koshi/

Also Grack, this does not sound like a policy nay-vote as you earlier on said it was.
You are giving different reasons for your voting behavior.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 10:47 GMT
#613
On January 03 2014 19:44 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 03 2014 19:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On January 03 2014 19:24 Grackaroni wrote:
On January 03 2014 19:18 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Well Mr.Grackaroni, explain this:
On December 27 2013 21:48 Grackaroni wrote:
Adam/Hopeless/Rayn sounds pretty good.

Nothing here suggests a change in your reads.
Grackaroni: Nay

I don't think looking for filter consistency is the right way to go about scum hunting in general. If I want my filter to be consistent I can make it consistent. I liked both you/hopeless but not enough to yay vote the first mission. I was going to nay vote any mission the first few days regardless of the team because there was only like 20 pages of thread.

Filter consistency is the only way to scumhunt because if your filter is not consistent then you are scum as you change your mind based on nothing - something you don't do as town.

What do you suggest is how to scumhunt then?

I won't tell you how to scumhunt. There are definitely times when you can catch scum for a weird inconsistency. From my own experience I believe that scum are more concerned with making their filter consistent and that they will always give a reason to explain their actions. I don't think down voting a team that is good for scum after saying a team is good is indicative of scum play; on the contrary, it's a pretty damn good indicator of town.

You are arguing that Adam and I are scum with Hopeless and that Adam/I were both against the idea of having 2 scum on our team, yet we both came out pro-hopeless. It's not even that I disagree with your theory because I know that it's wrong. I don't think that it's a sensible belief disregarding my own alignment.

I am saying i am leaning on you and Adam(Coag) being scum because your reasoning for voting behavior and reads do not match what's been happening in thread and what you have said before.

I'll make a more detailed post about this for all the people to see tonight, i gotta go after a while for couple of hours so i don't have time to do it now.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 11:51 GMT
#618
Actually regarding Adam and Hopeless connection we came to the same conclusion for pretty much the same reasons. It's just that i started with analysing the second mission while you started from the beginning. Easier for me to start from the mission where i actually know from 2 people at least one has to be scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 12:02 GMT
#620
That's not the basis of my read if you have read my posts.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 12:04 GMT
#621
That is just one point;
If VE's team is all town all scum voted nay, it's pretty clear. Chairman Ray do you agree with this hypothesis?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 12:18 GMT
#626
On January 03 2014 21:08 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 03 2014 21:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
That's not the basis of my read if you have read my posts.

Well why don't you tell me what is the basis of your read. You found me saying I liked you and hopeless and nay voting later on. The only reasoning I can see besides that is because you think scum would want to spread the blame, which I don't think is even true. I over bus in non-resistance games lol. If I was scum I would just attack my teammates, get myself on the mission and if people accuse me of sabotaging the mission my teammates would have a better chance of getting on the next mission.

Your train of thought regarding the first mission and voting does not make sense. Your thought process does not match your actions. I am making a big post about this when i get back home but i gotta go in ~10min so i really have no time now.


These are my general assumptions regarding the voting:

1) I assume there was at least one scum in Adam's team:
- If one scum -> nay-voters look much better than yay-voters
- If two scum -> scum most likely split their votes on yay/nay

2) VE's team:
- If there is scum in VE's team nay-voters look better
- If VE's team was all town all scum voted nay

3) I assume there is only 1 scum in Koshi's team:
- Either way the yay-votes piled up too easily and noone looks better than anyone else besides Cora.

If someone disagrees with these (1-3) please tell why.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 12:19 GMT
#628
On January 03 2014 21:14 Grackaroni wrote:
Honestly I am starting to picture a Rayn/hopeless/Adam team right now just from how strange this accusation is from Rayn.

If that was the scumteam that team would have 100% passed when Adam suggested it. That scenario is so interesting i would have pushed it through. lol Grack, that's like the shittiest post in thread.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 13:07 GMT
#631
Okay i just got back. Lemme put my thoughts on Adam/Coag slot in thread and then we talk Grack. Just gimme a minute.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 13:37 GMT
#632
Okay so. First of all this is a bit BS towards Coagulation regardless of his alignment because he can't possibly answer this as he can't tell Adam's thought process (and that's why replacements in general are shit in Resistance as the game is not as straightforward as mafia). Anyways, this is why i think Adam/Coag slot is spy:

Whenever you are a leader, regardless of your position in the leader queue the fact is you are supposed to submit an all town team if you are town. Adam suggest a team of himself, me and Hopeless. Therefore he must think me and Hopeless (at the time of suggestion) are town.

Before Adam's own vote he says multiple times he thinks the team is all town because of resistance towards the team and because it seems like the team is going to either pass/fail by small margin.

Ultimately this is why Adam downvotes his own team. My downvote and this is what he gives as reasoning:
On December 29 2013 10:35 Adam4167 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2013 10:23 Hopeless1der wrote:
welll i'll say this in favor of you being town adam: you didnt just lock in your yay vote when there was no substantial reason not to. After all, you proposed your team. If you are having reservations about me or rayn, what might they be?


Well, your activity was a little lower than I was hoping. But I guess I shouldn't throw stones in a glass house.

Rayns down vote was for a shit reason, but why would he downvote the team if he was scum? That doesn't really make sense.

Then there's Koshi, coming back, doing a backflip on his reads and yay voting my team through, when I thought he was scum. Why would he do that if he were scum and this was an all town team like I think? If i'm wrong about him, then I have to be wrong about a few others because things aren't making sense.

Chairman Ray gives me pause in that he voted yes, yet has given zero reads on anyone on the team and I don't even see a post saying why he went yes over no.

Grack saying my team looked good earlier in the day, then no voting it and declaring he was going to vote no to any team proposed today makes me question anything coming out of him.

He gives the implication about his hesitation about my vote. However my vote can't possibly be alignment indicative because as scum (assuming Adam is town - remember he thinks Hopeless is town) i would have absolutely no reason to downvote the team. The only reason i would downvote the team is what i said, i am town and i think Adam is scum. However from Adam's perspective (if he is town) this does not mean his team is less town.
On December 29 2013 10:47 Adam4167 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2013 10:41 Corazon wrote:
On December 29 2013 10:39 Adam4167 wrote:
On December 29 2013 10:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On December 29 2013 09:39 Adam4167 wrote:
Sentinel, if you could change your vote, would you switch it?

Rayn, same question to you

No i wouldn't. I don't trust you, especially after your comment on the top of the current page.


You don't like the fact that I want to take extra time to make sure I don't fuck this up?

Why

This ultimately rests in my hands, as I have the swing vote and I want to make sure i'm making the right decision.

Why are you only being cautious now as opposed to being cautious when you picked a team?


Because I picked my two strongest town reads at the time when I made my team..? Why would I need to be cautious about that? Things have happened since then, and with that new information, I am less sure, as the people voting with me are not the people I expected to be doing so when I made this team.

The bolded part. This does not mean shit. Adam is hesitant because of what other people vote. He does not trust his own reads, while earlier on he said people voting against his team is a tell that the team is all town!! It makes zero sense that he backpedals from yay-voting the team for the same reasons he thoguht the team was town for. It does not matter who votes what at this stage, the thing that should matter is that Adam has a town read on me and Hopeless, we are town, he is town, and therefore the team is all town.
On December 29 2013 10:53 Adam4167 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 29 2013 10:46 Grackaroni wrote:
What do you think is going on with Koshi Rayn?


It all made sense for Koshi-scum and Rayn-town, right up until they both voted the complete opposite I expected them to. Now I have no fucking clue.


I don't feel confident enough in this to send this team right now. We have 4 more chances after this one, so lets err on the side of caution and use them.

Balls in your court, VE.

This is really bad. Look at the argument.
- My vote, as i stated earlier on, is not a scumtell. It makes zero sense for me to downvote the team as scum because i would want a team where there is scum, and i could have easily accomplished it by yay-voting!!
- Koshi's vote can't be alignment indicative because Adam said he does not have a clear read on Koshi. If Adam's null-read votes yay that's not a reason to backpedal from yay-voting his own team, a team he has picked, a team that are his townreads!


TLDR;
Adam's reasoning for nay-voting his own team that consists of his top town reads does not make sense. By his logic there would be no information gathered from voting, because everyone could just say "yeah well let's have more info and more leader before passing a team". That's not how it works, you propose a full town team and that's it, you push it through. If everyone uses this bullshit reasoning on yay/nay-voting teams votes are meaningless and tell nothing about anything. His is using BS reasoning for downvoting his own team, it's that simple.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 13:40 GMT
#634
Grackaroni, i have a few questions to you:
1) What do you think of my case on Hopeless?
2) What do you think of my case on Adam/Coag?
3) If there was a team suggested that consists of VE's earlier team + Koshi, what would you vote? If "nay", why?
4) Do you think i am scum? If yes, why?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 13:41 GMT
#635
On January 03 2014 22:38 Hopeless1der wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 03 2014 21:17 Koshi wrote:
meh. Don't think rayn would go after Hopeless so hard so fast.

Bussing me is an almost guaranteed win for rayn, he looks so town. Good thing you're a spy Koshi <3

You just scumslipped but i am not scum because i am not bussing you. I just figured you out.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 13:43 GMT
#638
Koshi:
1) What do you think of my case on Adam/Coag?
2) If there was a team suggested that consists of VE's earlier team + rayn, what would you vote? If "nay", why?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 13:44 GMT
#640
On January 03 2014 22:42 Hopeless1der wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 03 2014 22:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:
On January 03 2014 22:38 Hopeless1der wrote:
On January 03 2014 21:17 Koshi wrote:
meh. Don't think rayn would go after Hopeless so hard so fast.

Bussing me is an almost guaranteed win for rayn, he looks so town. Good thing you're a spy Koshi <3

You just scumslipped but i am not scum because i am not bussing you. I just figured you out.

I assure you I am not a spy, I'm just blowing holes in poor logic for funsies. Adam/Koshi/CR spyteam

If you are town could you answer my case where i point out what i find to be your poor logic?
Also could you tell why exactly do you think Adam + CR are scum and why Koshi is scum over me?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 14:08 GMT
#643
On January 03 2014 23:00 Hopeless1der wrote:
I legitimately thought koshi was town. He was on the back foot because people (correctly) called him scum, and was hesitant about sending himself. *note my previous concept of leader-always-goes

This:
Show nested quote +
On January 01 2014 07:00 Hopeless1der wrote:
So guys...rayn/cora/hopeless

Who needs convincing?


Was largely in response to this (btw dat red stuff doe):
Show nested quote +
On January 01 2014 05:11 Koshi wrote:
Well if you feel confident about CR scum. I feel confident about Adam/VE

then a Cora/rayn/Hopeless party looks pretty cool.

I think it is better than me in case one rayn/Hopeless is scum. better for me at least.

Grack townish but didn't do enough to also take on a Mission tbh. The things I like are his early town read for Hopeless and his posts concerning the first team. Like saying he would nayvote regardless the first team was and saying that the team already passed while a couple people still had to vote. Kinda makes him look like he is in the dark.


I had not changed my mind, I was feeling out whether people would approve a team of you-me-cora since the existing team was on the cusp of being passed, and we needed to find another townie.
Show nested quote +
On January 01 2014 05:15 Koshi wrote:
Hmm. Looks like rayn/Hopeless/Koshi has already passed with 5 votes if we got Sentinel vote of approval.




On your reasoning for Cora, the fact that his behavior, posting etc, especially in regards to him banging the Hopeless=scum drum make me read him as town. Explaining this read is insulting to Cora and I don't want to incite any further flaming, so here's hoping that would suffice as an explanation.


I concluded koshi is the spy because you are not the spy, I am not the spy and the mission failed. Lets suppose I am the spy, there's no chance I can paint you red. I HAVE to go for Koshi here as either alignment.

This does not exactly prove you are town as like you said you "had to go against Koshi" as either alignment. Also the first part, i don't understand the reasoning behind your quote you brought up. Koshi was the leader, he decided the team, why are you trying to convince other people about some other team (me/you/Cora)? You were supposed to convince Koshi to suggest a team, not everyone else.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 14:09 GMT
#644
You also thought Koshi was town, so what the fuck?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 14:12 GMT
#645
Like you say you thought Koshi is town and you thought i was town, yet you tried to convince people into picking another team than me/you/Koshi. How does that make sense?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 03 2014 20:55 GMT
#683
Ughhh.. I really don't like this post by Koshi:
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=439135&currentpage=33#649
I really really don't.

Still waiting for Grack to come back.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 04 2014 01:01 GMT
#696
Grackaroni why did you pick me into your team? I thought you think i am mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 04 2014 01:10 GMT
#698
On January 04 2014 10:09 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 04 2014 10:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Grackaroni why did you pick me into your team? I thought you think i am mafia.

I was really annoyed with your accusation at the time, but you were persistent with it. I feel better about sending you than sending Koshi.

Hmm.. Why does it have to be me or Koshi over other people?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 04 2014 21:07 GMT
#730
Coagulation your vote did not count for some reason.
Are you still going to vote yay on the team and could you elaborate on your reasoning behind your vote?
Koshi why did you say you'll yay-vote and then do the opposite? There is nothing in your filter between saying you'll yay and your vote that suggest you change your mine.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 05 2014 03:51 GMT
#764
I am naying the team because of Grack in it, i don't think it matters though.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 05 2014 13:58 GMT
#767
Whoever is not on the team and voted yay could you explain your thought process?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 05 2014 13:59 GMT
#768
More interested in Sentinel's reasoning than Coag's atm.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 05 2014 14:57 GMT
#769
Actually Sentinel has to be a spy.

This is the team proposed:
Grackaroni, Corazon, VisceraEyes, raynpelikoneet.

In order for Sentinel to yay-vote the team the team has to be all town. But before Sentinel yay-votes the team there is a yay-vote from Coagulation and Hopeless.

This means Sentinel must think those people are town too, why would they yay-vote an all-town team otherwise?
If we combine this we have the following scenario:
Sentinel thinks Grackaroni, Corazon, VisceraEyes, raynpelikoneet, Caogulation and Hopeless are town.
That can't possibly be true because that would be 6 players and unless Sentinel wants to call himself scum he can't possibly think all of those people are town.

So Sentinel is scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 05 2014 15:09 GMT
#771
Tell me Hopeless, would you as scum yay-vote an all town team?
If you would, why?

If this team is all town and it goes through town wins the game.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 05 2014 16:30 GMT
#774
yes.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 06 2014 03:58 GMT
#825
On January 06 2014 07:50 VisceraEyes wrote:
Rayn on two failed missions. Rayn doesn't get to go on missions anymore.

This is stupid thinking because i have been nay-voting the both missions i was in in the first place.
How does that make ma scum? I can decide what other people vote and propose as teams?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 06 2014 05:43 GMT
#828
Hopeless you are calling me, Koshi and CR the scumteam right?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 06 2014 18:51 GMT
#831
On January 06 2014 14:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Hopeless you are calling me, Koshi and CR the scumteam right?

table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 06 2014 19:02 GMT
#833
That's pretty funny because me and CR are the most pro-town players in this game and Sentinel is confirmed scum..
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 06 2014 19:11 GMT
#835
Because we are the only people who are saying stuff that actually analyses things happening. Both of us figured out Sentinel has to be scum because of his vote on the last mission.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 06 2014 19:12 GMT
#836
I mean anyone who puts any fucking thought in the game would see that. I suggest the other townies take their heads out off their asses and start playing this game because right now this isn't going really well.

Hopeless and Sentinel are scum - that makes Koshi most likely town. In a couple of hours i am going to figure out who the last scum is.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 07 2014 02:33 GMT
#843
Corazon Koshi can't basically be mafia, unless you believe he decided to put both himself and Hopeless - 2 mafia people + me on the first mission. When they fail the mission there would be kinda no way people would think i am scum anyways, so he puts 2 of his scumteam unders suspicion. That's not wise and i don't think Koshi would do that as mafia.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 07 2014 03:11 GMT
#845
On January 07 2014 12:04 VisceraEyes wrote:
Like, I have been absent, but that doesn't make me scum. I will get to this game soon.

Explain your statement on how me being on 2 failed missions make me mafia - as i could not possibly do anything to (1) even choose if i was on those missions or not, and (2) voted nay on both teams.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 07 2014 03:21 GMT
#848
Well then, please, follow up with your argument and tell me who am i scum with.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 07 2014 04:40 GMT
#858
Maybe you should also yay-vote the mission VE so we can lose this game.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 07 2014 04:49 GMT
#860
Hopeless is scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 07 2014 05:01 GMT
#862
On January 05 2014 23:57 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Actually Sentinel has to be a spy.

This is the team proposed:
Grackaroni, Corazon, VisceraEyes, raynpelikoneet.

In order for Sentinel to yay-vote the team the team has to be all town. But before Sentinel yay-votes the team there is a yay-vote from Coagulation and Hopeless.

This means Sentinel must think those people are town too, why would they yay-vote an all-town team otherwise?
If we combine this we have the following scenario:
Sentinel thinks Grackaroni, Corazon, VisceraEyes, raynpelikoneet, Caogulation and Hopeless are town.
That can't possibly be true because that would be 6 players and unless Sentinel wants to call himself scum he can't possibly think all of those people are town.


So Sentinel is scum.

On January 06 2014 14:43 raynpelikoneet wrote:
Hopeless you are calling me, Koshi and CR the scumteam right?

On January 07 2014 03:54 Hopeless1der wrote:
yes

On January 07 2014 04:02 raynpelikoneet wrote:
That's pretty funny because me and CR are the most pro-town players in this game and Sentinel is confirmed scum..

table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 07 2014 05:01 GMT
#863
And that's why Hopeless is scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 07 2014 05:05 GMT
#864
Also Coagulation has to be town so the team that will pass for sure is Coagulation/raynpelikoneet/Koshi/Chairman Ray.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 07 2014 05:14 GMT
#865
Like Chairman Ray and Coagulation are both confirmed town regardless of what you think about anyone else in the game.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 07 2014 05:20 GMT
#867
Sentinel claimed scum. Hopeless is scum for what i said.
That leaves 1 mafia in the pool of me/you/Grack/Cora (whe were on the second mission that failed).

There is no room for Coagulation + Chairman Ray and in fact Koshi to be mafia.
They all all town, even regardless of what you think of me.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 07 2014 05:28 GMT
#868
THIS ALSO MEANS NO TOWNIE SHOULD BE VOTING YAY TO THE MISSION, OTHERWISE WE LOSE!!!
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 07 2014 06:16 GMT
#870
It does not mean anything because regardless of what he votes does not matter as there are 5 yay's already.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 07 2014 06:44 GMT
#874
I am not on the team Hopeless proposed.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 07 2014 06:46 GMT
#875
Hopeless is suggesting that i am scum because it gives him the most leeway in his team proposal as that would mean i sabotaged missions 1 and 2 and instead of calling 2 people scum he only has to call 1 person scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 07 2014 06:56 GMT
#879
On January 07 2014 15:52 VisceraEyes wrote:
I just don't see him calling you scum anywhere rayn, except for where you ask him. Isn't that strange?

That's why i asked him about it. I don't mind him calling me scum because i would expect him to do so as it's the only thing he can do as he is scum. I asked about CR and Koshi from him because his answer gave away his alignment as Sentinel is confirmed scum - all of us 3 can't be scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 07 2014 08:27 GMT
#883
That's not really true Koshi.
Not that it matters because i know you are town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 07 2014 08:28 GMT
#885
<3
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 07 2014 14:33 GMT
#890
! ?! !?!?!?! ?! ?!?? !?
u srs?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 07 2014 15:38 GMT
#899
rofl.

can we just move onto next leader, the team is nay-voted already?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 08 2014 04:29 GMT
#941
Corazon if you think i am town that means i am right about Hopeless so why did you not take Koshi?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 08 2014 04:43 GMT
#943
It does not matter if he cares or not.
If you think i am town and Hopeless is scum Koshi is confirmed town and you should take townies to the mission. VisceraEyes/Grack are not confirmed town, so why did you take VE/Grack over Koshi?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 08 2014 04:57 GMT
#945
Yeah but you don't take people "you want to see post more". You take people who are town. If you think i am town, Koshi, Coagulation and Chairman Ray are confirmed town.

Therefore your suggestion by default should be yourself, Koshi, CR and Coag. That's not what you did so i am nay-voting.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 08 2014 05:11 GMT
#947
It does not matter if he talks or not if he is confirmed town for fucks sake. This game is about finding townies, not so much about finding scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 08 2014 05:26 GMT
#949
On January 08 2014 14:17 Grackaroni wrote:
he's not confirmed town lol.

and why is that?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 08 2014 06:08 GMT
#952
On January 08 2014 14:38 Grackaroni wrote:
it's all based off of you being town. What do you think is a possible scum team without me on it?

From the people left (you/Cora/VE) based on what's happened on the last few pages Cora is scum.
I'm focused on another game atm and when this team gets rejected - because it should - i am looking more closely into those people.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 09 2014 07:59 GMT
#970
Btw this is the team that should be discussed THE MOST and EVERYONE needs to join the discussion because we have a confirmed town proposing the team. That makes it most likely to get an all town team on the mission.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 09 2014 08:13 GMT
#973
Me neither because Sentinel is confirmed scum Hopeless/Corazon/Coag cannot possibly be the scumteam.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 09 2014 08:18 GMT
#975
Not really, no. But that's enough. You can't possibly think there are 7 town in this game.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 09 2014 08:19 GMT
#976
Like that's literally how you find scum in Resistance at least if you don't want to play like you play mafia on mission 1 which people refused to play.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 09 2014 08:33 GMT
#978
Actually the last post you quoted from Sentinel heavily suggests Corazon is scum, unless he is WIFOMing and did "suggest" an all town team because noone would listen to him anyways. Corazon's last day actions however point towards him being scum. He refused to take in confrimed townies on the team "because they do not post". That's a bad reason.

Like if you compre to a normal mafia game it's like saying "i copped the confirmed town over the scummy people" because i don't like him being inactive.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 09 2014 08:36 GMT
#979
The thing is whatever you think of me you should pick CR/Koshi/Coag because they areconfirmed town. Use your judgement and pick one of me/VE/Grack/Cora. I am obviously town but if you don't trust me that's fine.

I would pick me -> VE -> Grack ->Cora in order from most likely town -> most likely scum.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 09 2014 08:40 GMT
#982
Regardless of what happens propose the team as close to the deadline you are able to.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 09 2014 08:41 GMT
#983
We just lost a game where townies speed lynched in a instant majority lynch game and it was really stupid.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 09 2014 18:46 GMT
#991
4th mission is irrelevant.
Waiting for the rest of the game to do something.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 10 2014 06:18 GMT
#1012
On January 10 2014 04:03 Hopeless1der wrote:
so you're also in the koshi is confirmed town boat?

Basically yes.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 10 2014 11:01 GMT
#1015
Why VE over Grack/Coag/Cora?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 10 2014 15:02 GMT
#1027
Grackaroni:
Cora/VE, Who's scum and who's town? Or do you have some other theory of scummers?
We need 5 townies in the end anyways.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 10 2014 15:16 GMT
#1030
I think you should start thinking about it if you are town.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 10 2014 15:20 GMT
#1033
No Grack it does matter. There is at least 1 town in you, VE, Cora.
4th mission needs +1 dude. So it does matter.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 10 2014 15:29 GMT
#1038
Why?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 10 2014 15:32 GMT
#1039
I mean Koshi.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 10 2014 15:32 GMT
#1040
Fucking shit. I mean why Koshi 0 care?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 10 2014 15:39 GMT
#1042
And why the hell is that? If you are town we have 3 confirmed townies. Why would you say game is impossible to win? You need to find one townie now, then one townie more after this mission and gg.

Why don't people play this game for fucks sake?
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 10 2014 15:57 GMT
#1045
No Koshi, you don't need luck to win Resistance as town. There are no-flip setups in mafia which are balanced. This game would not exist if it was not balanced enough. I agree scum need to fuck up to lose. They have fucked up.

Sentinel thought there is 7 town. Noone makes that kinda logical mistake as town. If someone does then it's their fault.
Hopeless did - after that - call three other people scum. That is the next closest thing to a scumclaim. If he does that as fucking town then it's his fault.

This is the information we have and this is the information we need to work with. Because there are no flips. If even one of those guys is town then fuck it, but townies should not fuck up like that because this game is literally based on those kinda analysis!! It's that simple, they are scum, and now we have 7 people where we need to find 1 scum, or rather find 2 people where there is 1 scum so we can have 5 townies on mission 4 and 5.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 10 2014 16:06 GMT
#1047
On January 11 2014 00:59 Koshi wrote:
Normal mafia is balanced around the fact a team plays better than guys who are solo. I think this game counters that by the voting mechanism, but this voting mechanism is not the normal voting mechanism. The slowness of 24h picks and 24h votes also work in scum favor imo, making it fast paced like irl helps town because you need to take stances. VE didn't take a single stance on any player in the first 240 hours of this game. Still gets town read. rofl.

And that's why i want Grack to do shit, i don't trust VE. At some point i thought he was town but after rereading it's a big nono. The problem is Grack hasn't done much either and Cora was really fucking scummy last phase. But at least one, probably 2 are town. And we need 1 town from there.

Scum disadvantage is no off thread comm. They need to play together in thread only, and that makes them fuck up. They can't coordinate.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 10 2014 16:40 GMT
#1053
I don't fucking know what to think. Maybe we should swap Koshi and Hopeless.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 10 2014 16:51 GMT
#1055
I gotta take a close look at this later on tonight. I have sauna soon so i don't have time to think another scenario through from the beginning.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 10 2014 18:13 GMT
#1064
Nonono.. What Koshi did there is not scummy at all.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 10 2014 18:21 GMT
#1066
No it's a null-tell.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 10 2014 19:02 GMT
#1068
Because Sentinel claimed scum and you proposed a scumteam that did not include him and now i have to think if you were just being dumb because now Koshi is being dumb. Why the hell do you guys need to make this game so fucking hard for me?!!?""?! 5'
#t
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 10 2014 19:08 GMT
#1071
Moderate chance that Sentinel is scum, but I'm calling that the scumteam.

Ughhh...
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 11 2014 02:20 GMT
#1127
The voting should absolutely be anonymous and the votes only revealed at the deadline. That's the point of Resistance.
In this particular case where it was not you should always push a policy that the people who are not on the mission vote first. That's a must. Otherwise you can't do shit if spies get a dude on the first mission and the game becomes pretty random.
table for two on a tv tray
raynpelikoneet
Profile Joined April 2007
Finland43268 Posts
January 11 2014 02:22 GMT
#1128
On January 11 2014 11:14 Chairman Ray wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 11 2014 10:54 Koshi wrote:
Also big shout out to CR. I love his play. I just do. Lovely style. Low amounts of post but really a lot of effort in them. I would never be able to do that. Pretty unique player.


Thanks! I'll try to keep it up. However I still have many areas to improve upon though, for example, I wasn't open minded enough to consider the scenario where both Hopeless and Sentinel were town. There were definitely moments in their filter where they did seem town and I chose to ignore it.

tbh there is pretty much nothing you can do. You can't possibly outargue a scenario where they are scum if they have majorly fucked up, because that should not happen.

I am surprised why you did not play more on D1, that's like the backbone of town winning, a good D1.
table for two on a tv tray
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Online Event
00:00
LATAM SC2 League: FINALS
Liquipedia
Replay Cast
00:00
2025 GSL S2 - Playoffs
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 280
Zeus 195
Light 138
JulyZerg 81
PianO 61
Noble 15
ajuk12(nOOB) 6
Dota 2
monkeys_forever557
League of Legends
JimRising 694
Cuddl3bear4
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1042
PGG 87
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor128
Trikslyr34
Other Games
summit1g5129
C9.Mang01094
shahzam813
Mew2King220
Hui .75
RuFF_SC256
NeuroSwarm43
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick825
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH309
• practicex 72
• Migwel
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• ZZZeroYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota2685
League of Legends
• Doublelift5361
• Lourlo1078
• Stunt354
• HappyZerGling71
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
4h 28m
RSL Revival
4h 28m
Harstem vs SHIN
Solar vs Cham
WardiTV Invitational
6h 28m
ByuN vs Reynor
Clem vs MaxPax
OSC
6h 58m
Replay Cast
18h 28m
RSL Revival
1d 4h
Reynor vs Scarlett
ShoWTimE vs Classic
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 9h
SOOP
2 days
Cure vs Zoun
SC Evo League
2 days
Road to EWC
2 days
[ Show More ]
SOOP Global
2 days
Future vs MaNa
Harstem vs Cham
BSL: ProLeague
2 days
Sziky vs JDConan
Cross vs MadiNho
Hawk vs Bonyth
Circuito Brasileiro de…
2 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Road to EWC
3 days
BSL: ProLeague
3 days
UltrA vs TBD
Dewalt vs TBD
Replay Cast
5 days
Online Event
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #3 - GSC
2025 GSL S2
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
BLAST Open Fall 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.